Applying Adoption Models to Farmer's Decision-Making

Have you ever wondered why some farmers quickly embrace new farming methods while others prefer trying-and-true practices? When considering the adoption of new agricultural technologies, such as a novel seed variety or employing new soil practices, farmers must weigh a complex set of factors that influence their decision-making process. This decision is not driven solely by the perceived benefits of the innovation but is shaped by various behavioral, social, and economic considerations. Adoption models provide a framework for understanding the multifaceted nature of this decision-making.

When your neighbor farmer starts planting that new seed variety, the question is, what makes them take that leap while you might want to wait and see?

For most farmers, it's not a simple yes or no decision. You might be thinking:

• "Can I afford to take this risk?"
• "Has anyone I know tried this?"
• "Will it work with my current equipment?"
• "What if it doesn't perform as promised?"
• "Will it be better than my current practice?"

As research shows that all listed above concerns are valid for farmers. Below, we will discuss why.

The Role of Adoption Models

Adoption models are a collection of behavioral theories that collectively explain the underlying motivations and barriers that shape a farmer's decision to embrace or reject new agricultural technologies. These models recognize that the adoption process is influenced by an interplay of factors, including:

1. Perceived Attributes of Innovation: Farmers evaluate characteristics such as relative advantage, compatibility, complexity, trialability, and observability when assessing the desirability of a new technology (Rogers, 2003).
2. Socioeconomic Characteristics: Farm size, income, education level, and access to information and resources can impact a farmer's capacity and willingness to adopt (Feder et al., 1985).
3. Social Influences: Peer recommendations, market trends, and the adoption decisions of one's social network can influence an individual farmer's choices (Bandiera & Rasul, 2006; Ryan and Gross, 1943).
4. Perceived Risks and Uncertainties: Concerns over financial costs, compatibility with existing practices, and the potential for failed investments can create barriers to adoption (Montes de Oca Munguia et al., 2021).
5. Institutional and Policy Factors: Government incentives, extension services, and regulatory environments can either facilitate or hinder the adoption of new technologies (Feder & Umali, 1993).

Definitions of Adoption and Innovation

Adoption is embracing, implementing, or modifying a new technology or innovation (Kee, 2017; Rogers, 2003). Diffusion refers to how this innovation spreads through a community over time, with the adoption rate indicating its speed of acceptance. Individuals fall into adopter categories, from early innovators to later adopters like the majority and laggards. The adoption process involves awareness, interest, evaluation, trial, and adoption stages, marking deeper commitment levels (Rogers, 2003).

Innovation introduces new ideas or methods to create practical solutions, addressing specific challenges (Singh & Aggarwal, 2001). In agriculture, technology transfer brings research into practical use for farmers, enhancing practices (Suwanan et al., 2021; Wahab et al., 2011). Knowledge transfer supports this process by sharing expertise across groups to promote performance and further innovation (Estey et al., 2010; Hassan et al., 2017). Adoption relies on behavioral intentions shaped by social influences, perceived control, and attitude toward the technology, affecting the decision to adopt (Fishbein & Ajzen, 1975; Ajzen, 1991).

Did You Know? How Farmers Like You Have Helped Shape Innovation

In 1941, two researchers, Bryce Ryan and Neal Gross, explored how new ideas spread through farming communities, focusing on why Iowa farmers quickly adopted hybrid corn. They noticed that farmers took to this innovation due to three main factors: social support, clear benefits, and reliable information. Their work revealed that having a strong network, understanding the value of an innovation, and trusting the information about it are crucial for farmers deciding whether to try something new. Ryan and Gross’s findings, published in 1943, laid the groundwork for future research on how communities adopt innovations. This research directly inspired Everett Rogers’ well-known “Diffusion of Innovation” theory, which helps explain why some farmers adopt new methods early while others prefer to wait. By connecting with others, assessing the advantages, and accessing trusted information, you play a key role in shaping how innovations spread and succeed in agriculture.

Diffusion of Innovation Theory

In 1962, Everett M. Rogers published Diffusion of Innovations, a seminal work in which he compiled and expanded existing research about the spread of new ideas and technologies. In this book, Rogers introduced what is now known as the Diffusion of Innovation Theory, a framework that explains how and why new ideas and technologies are adopted. This theory has become one of the most widely applied models in adoption research, with over 163,900 citations, especially in studies on the adoption of innovation in agriculture. Rogers identified five key stages in the innovation-decision process:

1. Knowledge: The individual becomes aware of the innovation, initially understanding its characteristics and functionality.
2. Persuasion: The individual forms an attitude toward innovation, whether positive or negative. Five factors shape this perception:

• Relative Advantage: The degree to which the innovation is perceived as an improvement over the current option.
• Compatibility: The extent to which the innovation aligns with the individual’s needs, values, and experiences.
• Complexity: How simple or complex the innovation is to understand and use.
• Trialability: The possibility of experimenting with the innovation on a limited basis before full adoption.
• Observability: The visibility of the innovation’s benefits to others.

Additionally, Rogers categorized adopters into five types based on their willingness to adopt:

1. Innovators (2.5%): Risk-takers who are the first to adopt new ideas.
2. Early Adopters (13.5%): Opinion leaders who influence others and embrace innovations early.
3. Early Majority (34%): Thoughtful individuals who adopt just before the average person.
4. Late Majority (34%): Skeptical individuals who adopt after most others.
5. Laggards (16%): Conservative, often resistant to change, and adopting last.

In essence, Rogers' Diffusion of Innovation model suggests that farmers are more likely to adopt new technology if they perceive a clear advantage, find it compatible with their needs, see it as easy to use, have an opportunity to try it on a small scale, and observe its benefits in practice.

The Theory of Planned Behavior

The Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB), introduced by Icek Ajzen in 1985, builds on Fishbein’s Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA) by adding a key element: Perceived Behavioral Control, which reflects an individual’s confidence in their ability to perform a behavior despite potential obstacles. Ajzen first presented this theory in his paper From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior.

The TPB posits that three interrelated factors shape behavioral intentions and subsequent actions:

1. Attitude: The individual’s positive or negative evaluation of performing the behavior.
2. Subjective Norms: The perceived social pressure to engage in or avoid behavior.
3. Perceived Behavioral Control: The individual’s belief in their capability to perform the behavior, considering potential challenges.

The TPB is widely used in agriculture to understand and predict farmers' behaviors, particularly in adopting sustainable technologies and environmental practices. Researchers apply TPB principles to categorize farmers based on their attitudes, perceived social influences, and control beliefs, examining how these elements impact adopting new practices. According to the TPB, a farmer is more likely to adopt a technology if they believe it is beneficial (attitude), feel encouraged by others (subjective norms), and have confidence in their ability to implement it effectively (perceived behavioral control).

In conclusion, these two theories indicate that farmers are more likely to adopt new technologies when they perceive clear benefits, find the technology compatible with their values and routines, feel supported by their community, and have confidence in their ability to use it effectively. Successful adoption depends on seeing practical advantages, receiving social support, ease of use, and alignment with specific farming needs—drawing insights from Rogers’ Diffusion of Innovation and the Theory of Planned Behavior.

References

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

Bandiera, O., & Rasul, I. (2006). Social networks and technology adoption in Northern Mozambique. The Economic Journal, 116(514), 869–902. doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2006.01115.x

Estey, E., Kmetic, A., & Reading, J. L. (2010). Thinking about aboriginal KT: learning from the network environments for aboriginal health research in British Columbia (near BC). Canadian Journal of Public Health, 101(1), 83-86. doi.org/10.1007/bf03405569

Feder, G., Just, R. E., & Zilberman, D. (1985). Adoption of agricultural innovations in developing countries: A survey. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 33(2), 255–298. doi.org/10.1086/451467

Feder, G., & Umali, D. L. (1993). The adoption of agricultural innovations: A review. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 43(3–4), 215–239. doi.org/10.1016/0040-1625(93)90053-A

Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley.

Goodhue, D. L., & Thompson, R. L. (1995). Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 213–236. doi.org/10.2307/249689

Hassan, N. A. H. M., Noor, M. N. M., & Hussin, N. (2017). Knowledge transfer practice in organization. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(8). doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v7-i8/3291

James, J., & Bewell, D. (2021, September 14). What is the diffusion of innovations theory? - enablers of Change. Enablers of Change - Enablers of Change.

Kee, K. F. (2017). Adoption and diffusion. In C. Scott & L. Lewis (Eds.), International encyclopedia of organizational communication. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.

Montes de Oca Munguia, O., Pannell, D. J., & Llewellyn, R. (2021). Understanding the adoption of innovations in agriculture: A review of selected conceptual models. Agronomy, 11(1), 139. doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11010139

Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.

Ryan, B., & Gross, N. C. (1943). The Diffusion of Hybrid Seed Corn in Two Iowa Communities. Rural Sociology, 8(1), 15.

Singh, S., & Aggarwal, Y. (2021). In search of a consensus definition of innovation: A qualitative synthesis of 208 definitions using grounded theory approach. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 35(2), 177–195. doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2021.1925526

Spies, R., Grobbelaar, S., & Botha, A. (2020). A scoping review of the application of the task-technology fit theory. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 397–408. doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44999-5_33

Suwanan, A. F., Rori, A. M., & Kurniawan, D. T. (2021). The critical review of agriculture technological transfer in the era of decentralization. E3S Web of Conferences, 306, 03021. doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202130603021

Valente TW, Rogers EM. The origins and development of the diffusion of innovations paradigm as an example of scientific growth. Sci Commun. 1995 Mar;16(3):242-73. doi.org/10.1177/1075547095016003002

Vendramin, N., Nardelli, G., & Ipsen, C. (2021). Task-Technology Fit Theory. A Handbook of Theories on Designing Alignment between People and the Office Environment, 39–53. doi.org/10.1201/9781003128830-4

Wahab, S. A., Rose, R. C., Idayu, S., Osman, W., Global, F., & Holdings, V. (2011). Defining the concepts of technology and technology transfer: a literature analysis. International Business Research, 5(1). doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v5n1p61