Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News & Views
  • Published:

DNA repair

Familiar ends with alternative endings

The faithful propagation of species requires a complex balance of DNA-repair pathways to maintain genome integrity. New work sheds light on one such poorly understood pathway and its role in certain cancers. See Letters p.254 & p.258

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Repair mechanisms for double-strand breaks in DNA.

Notes

  1. See all news & views

References

  1. Bryant, H. E. et al. Nature 434, 913–917 (2005).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Farmer, H. et al. Nature 434, 917–921 (2005).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Mateos-Gomez, P. A. et al. Nature 518, 254–257 (2015).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ceccaldi, R. et al. Nature 518, 258–262 (2015).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kent, T., Chandramouly, G., McDevitt, S. M., Ozdemir, A. Y. & Pomerantz, R. T. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.2961 (2015).

  6. Yan, C. T. et al. Nature 449, 478–482 (2007).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Corneo, B. et al. Nature 449, 483–486 (2007).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Boulton, S. J. & Jackson, S. P. EMBO J. 15, 5093–5103 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sfeir, A. & de Lange, T. Science 336, 593–597 (2012).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Yu, A. M. & McVey, M. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, 5706–5717 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Nik-Zainal, S. et al. Cell 149, 979–993 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roger A. Greenberg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cho, N., Greenberg, R. Familiar ends with alternative endings. Nature 518, 174–175 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14200

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14200

This article is cited by

Comments

Commenting on this article is now closed.

  1. Two papers in this issue of Nature (Mateos-Gomez et al. an Ceccaldi et al.) and another in Nature Structural and Molecular Biology (Kent et al.) report a role for PolQ in promoting DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair in eukaryotic cells by the so-called microhomology-mediated end-joining (MMEJ) pathway. However, it is important to appreciate that this form of end-joining also exists in the other domains of life and the molecular details of a prokaryotic MMEJ repair process have been described (Brissett et al, 2007; 2011; 2013).

    NHEJ is not a eukaryotic-specific repair pathway but, as identified over a decade ago, this break repair process first originated in prokaryotes and archaea (Weller et al., 2002; Della et al., 2004; Bartlett, et al., 2013). This DSB repair pathway subsequently became more complex by the acquisition of additional factors during its evolution in eukaryotes. Despite these differences, the basic mechanisms of DSB repair are likely to be similar and this is particularly true for MMEJ. The mycobacterial NHEJ repair apparatus has provided unexpected molecular insights into how break repair polymerases (PolDom/ LigD Pol) bind to the termini of DSBs, promote break synapsis via MMEJ and extend in trans from annealed 3 prime overhangs (Brissett et al, 2007, 2011, 2013). It appears that MMEJ first arose in prokaryotes, becoming the predominant break repair mechanism in stationary phase (Pitcher et al., 2007), with the polymerase playing a central role in promoting this process. Given that these enzymes (PolDom and PolQ) share a variety of atypical extension and end-synapsis activities (Hogg et al., 2012; Kent et al., 2015), the mechanistic studies on prokaryotic end-joining are likely to be also informative about PolQ's role in MMEJ.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing