Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Colossal cages in zeolitic imidazolate frameworks as selective carbon dioxide reservoirs

Abstract

Zeolitic imidazolate frameworks (ZIFs) are porous crystalline materials with tetrahedral networks that resemble those of zeolites: transition metals (Zn, Co) replace tetrahedrally coordinated atoms (for example, Si), and imidazolate links replace oxygen bridges1. A striking feature of these materials is that the structure adopted by a given ZIF is determined by link–link interactions, rather than by the structure directing agents used in zeolite synthesis2. As a result, systematic variations of linker substituents have yielded many different ZIFs that exhibit known or predicted zeolite topologies. The materials are chemically and thermally stable, yet have the long-sought-after design flexibility offered by functionalized organic links and a high density of transition metal ions1,2,3,4,5,6,7. Here we report the synthesis and characterization of two porous ZIFs—ZIF-95 and ZIF-100—with structures of a scale and complexity previously unknown in zeolites8,9,10. The materials have complex cages that contain up to 264 vertices, and are constructed from as many as 7,524 atoms. As expected from the adsorption selectivity recently documented for other members of this materials family3, both ZIFs selectively capture carbon dioxide from several different gas mixtures at room temperature, with ZIF-100 capable of storing 28 litres per litre of material at standard temperature and pressure. These characteristics, combined with their high thermal and chemical stability and ease of fabrication, make ZIFs promising candidate materials for strategies aimed at ameliorating increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide levels.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Bridging angles and girths in zeolites and IMs.
Figure 2: The cages in ZIF-95 and ZIF-100.
Figure 3: The frameworks of ZIF-95 and ZIF-100 shown as natural tilings27 .
Figure 4: Gas adsorption isotherms of ZIF-95 (left) and ZIF-100 (right).

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Park, K.-S. et al. Exceptional chemical and thermal stability of zeolitic imidazolate frameworks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 10186–10191 (2006)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hayashi, H., Côté, A. P., Furukawa, H., O’Keeffe, M. & Yaghi, O. M. Zeolite A imidazolate frameworks. Nature Mater. 6, 501–506 (2007)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Banerjee, R. et al. High-throughput synthesis of zeolitic imidazolate frameworks and application to CO2 capture. Science 319, 939–943 (2008)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Tian, Y.-Q. et al. Two polymorphs of cobalt(II) imidazolate polymers synthesized solvothermally by using one organic template N,N-dimethylacetamide. Inorg. Chem. 43, 4631–4635 (2004)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Tian, Y.-Q. et al. Design and generation of extended zeolitic metal-organic frameworks (ZMOFs): Synthesis and crystal structures of zinc(II) imidazolate polymers with zeolitic topologies. Chem. Eur. J. 13, 4146–4154 (2007)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Huang, X.-C., Lin, Y.-Y., Zhang, J.-P. & Chen, X.-M. Ligand-directed strategy for zeolite-type metal-organic frameworks: Zinc(II) imidazolates with unusual zeolitic topologies. Angew. Chem. Int. Edn 45, 1557–1559 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Liu, Y., Kravtsov, V. Ch., Larsena, R. & Eddaoudi, M. Molecular building blocks approach to the assembly of zeolite-like metal-organic frameworks (ZMOFs) with extra-large cavities. Chem. Commun. 14, 1488–1490 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Baerlocher, C. & McCusker, L. B. Database of Zeolite Structures 〈http://www.iza-structure.org/databases/〉 (accessed, 11 October 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Davis, M. E. Ordered porous materials for emerging applications. Nature 417, 813–821 (2002)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Thomas, J. M. Design, synthesis and in situ characterization of new solid catalysts. Angew. Chem. Int. Edn 38, 3588–3628 (1999)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ockwig, N. W., Delgado-Friedrichs, O., O’Keeffe, M. & Yaghi, O. M. Reticular chemistry: Occurrence and taxonomy of nets and grammar for the design of frameworks. Acc. Chem. Res. 38, 176–182 (2005)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Cerius2. Modeling Environment (Molecular Simulations, San Diego, California, 1999)

  13. Férey, G. et al. A chromium terephthalate-based solid with unusually large pore volumes and surface area. Science 309, 2040–2042 (2005)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Park, Y. K. et al. Crystal structure and guest uptake of a mesoporous metal-organic framework containing cages of 3.9 and 4.7 nm in diameter. Angew. Chem. Int. Edn 46, 8230–8233 (2007)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Weeks, C. M. & Miller, R. The design and implementation of SnB version 2.0. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 32, 120–124 (1999)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Walton, K. S. & Snurr, R. Q. Applicability of the BET method for determining surface areas of microporous metal-organic frameworks. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129, 8552–8556 (2007)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Houghton, J. T., Meira Filho, L. G., Griggs, D. J. & Noguer, M. Implications of Proposed CO2 Emissions Limitations (Technical Paper IV, IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, 1997)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Li, H., Eddaoudi, M., Groy, T. L. & Yaghi, O. M. Establishing microporosity in open metal-organic frameworks: Gas sorption isotherms for Zn(BDC) (BDC = 1,4-benzenedicarboxylate). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 120, 8571–8572 (1998)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Millward, A. R. & Yaghi, O. M. Metal-organic frameworks with exceptionally high capacity for storage of carbon dioxide at room temperature. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 17998–17999 (2005)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Surblé, S. et al. Synthesis of MIL-102, a chromium carboxylate metal-organic framework, with gas sorption analysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 14889–14896 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Maji, T. K., Mostafa, G., Changa, H.-C. & Kitagawa, S. Porous lanthanide-organic framework with zeolite-like topology. Chem. Commun. 19, 2436–2438 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Horike, S., Tanaka, D., Nakagawa, K. & Kitagawa, S. Selective guest sorption in an interdigitated porous framework with hydrophobic pore surfaces. Chem. Commun. 32, 3395–3397 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sircar, S. Basic research needs for design of adsorptive gas separation processes. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 45, 5435–5448 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Sasaki, A., Matsumoto, S., Fujitsuka, M., Shinoki, T. & Tanaka, T. CO2 recovery in molten carbonate fuel cell system by pressure swing adsorption. IEEE Trans. Energy Convers. 8, 26–32 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sircar, S., Golden, T. C. & Rao, M. B. Activated carbon for gas separation and storage. Carbon 34, 1–12 (1996)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Sircar, S. & Golden, T. C. Isothermal and isobaric desorption of carbon dioxide by purge. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 34, 2881–2888 (1995)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Blatov, V. A., Delgado-Friedrichs, O., O’Keeffe, M. & Proserpio, D. M. Three-periodic nets and tilings: natural tilings for nets. Acta Crystallogr. A 63, 418–423 (2007)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Malek, A. & Farooq, S. Comparison of isotherm models for hydrocarbon adsorption on activated carbon. Am. Inst. Chem. Eng. J. 42, 3191–3201 (1996)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Funding was provided by BASF Ludwigshafen-Germany (synthesis), US Department of Defense (DTRA, separation instruments) and US Department of Energy (BES-Separation Program, gas separations). We acknowledge J. Eckert, D. Tranchemontagne and D. Britt (Yaghi group) for discussions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Omar M. Yaghi.

Additional information

Crystallographic data for the reported crystal structures have been deposited at the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre via http://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk with codes 668214 (ZIF-95) and 668215 (ZIF-100).

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

The file includes Supplementary Figures S1-S33 with Legends, Supplementary Methods, Supplementary Tables S1-S2, Supplementary Notes, Supplementary Equations 1-3 and additional references 1-5. (PDF 1656 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, B., Côté, A., Furukawa, H. et al. Colossal cages in zeolitic imidazolate frameworks as selective carbon dioxide reservoirs. Nature 453, 207–211 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06900

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06900

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing