Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Albums and songs

This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Albums and songs. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.

Adding a new AfD discussion

Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:

Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Albums and songs|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.

There are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.

Removing a closed AfD discussion

Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.

Other types of discussions

You can also add and remove other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to Albums and songs. For the other XfD's, the process is the same as AfD (except {{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName}} is used for MFD and {{transclude xfd}} for the rest). For PRODs, adding a link with {{prodded}} will suffice.

Further information

For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.

Archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at:

Purge page cache

watch

Related deletion sorting

Albums and songs

Chokeslem

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Terribly-sourced AI-generated article with no evidence of meeting WP:NSONG. JTtheOG (talk) 21:17, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music and South Africa. JTtheOG (talk) 21:17, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 23:22, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nope Your Too Late I Already Died

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article fails general notability (WP:GNG) and WP:NMUSIC . The only citation that provides actual information is from KnowYourMeme. Sosumiw (talk) 17:53, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:55, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t think this is a professional article for Wikipedia. Also it’s only one source cited in the article. 2600:1700:4B40:8100:B101:A0EB:170B:1661 (talk) 02:11, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Papercut Chronicles

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Could only find a review from Gigwise (dead link via Album of the Year, found no archive for it). Would've fully expected to find more coverage for this, but came up short. Putting this to AfD in hopes that someone else has better luck. If not, redirect to Gym Class Heroes; the album is mentioned numerous times throughout the page. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 23:02, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 23:02, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Swam the Waters

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The album doesn't meet WP:GNG or WP:ALBUM. The references used are essentially track listings. I was unable to find anything more substantial. JSFarman (talk) 00:21, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:22, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yet to meet notability standards like WP:GNG, WP:SIGCOV and WP:NALBUM. Since, article is just created on 22 May 2025 and as per alternatives to deletion, I would like to support for Draftify. Fade258 (talk) 07:25, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Fails the requirements of WP:NALBUM, preferred option is Draftify. Dan arndt (talk) 09:14, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
~~Fails WP:NALBUM and WP:GNG. Draftify is the preferred option Halley ^{luv Filipino ❤} (Talk) 10:47, 23 May 2025 (UTC)~~ [reply]
- Change my vote to Delete because the votes below indicate that the artist of the album does not have their own page. And even the author who created this page was once found to have used AI to write an article. Halley ^{luv Filipino ❤} (Talk) 23:36, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the artists for this album doesn't even have an article. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 15:04, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Per WP:A9 an album article is unlikely to survive when the associated musician does not have an article. For everyone voting to draftify, the person behind this article should encouraged to work on an article for the band instead. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 15:23, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment This is one of three LLM-slop articles (written by the same editor). All of them are related to the band, and all three have hallucinatory references. (Both have been moved to draft: 8 Degrees and A Series of Moments). JSFarman (talk) 15:34, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: The artist of the album does not have their own page, making this very unlikely to be notable. Schützenpanzer (Talk) 21:29, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I already commented above on the draftify process, but until that gets organized this album article should be deleted for procedural reasons (possible conflict of interest, suspicions of AI, band article should come first if they are notable). ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 14:54, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NALBUM. ZachH007 (talk) 22:18, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fast and Curious

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NALBUM. The album has no significant coverage, award wins/nominations, music chart history. The same goes for the songs on the album. The page's references rely on music store links (Bandcamp, iTunes, BigCartel). Other "sources" include expired links and YouTube links. There are no further sources that can be gathered to support any album sale claims, recording dates, etc. Sackkid (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 02:29, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Sy_Smith#2011–2015:_Fast_and_Curious ApexParagon (talk) 03:08, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note I think it is worth nominating the artist page for deletion too. While she has an Emmy nomination, it doesn't strengthen the article and frankly she doesn't much media coverage outside of blogs. There is a Billboard charting song but again, the page is a weak keep at best. So I am open to nominating that page for deletion as well. Sackkid (talk) 03:43, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:15, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Sy Smith#2011–2015: Fast and Curious per nom. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 15:28, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Just a comment in case you don't have the script installed so you can see the font is in pink, but Sy Smith is nominated for an AFD discussion. So, it might not be the best target article. Or, if you believe it should be, you might consider participating in that AFD, too to ensure it is not deleted. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:17, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per above. At present the Sy Smith AfD discussion does appear to be tending towards WP:SNOW keep. ResonantDis_tortion 08:39, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Portrait (Mariah Carey song)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

NN song. Have changed this to a redirect to the album but edit is being reverted. Seeking consensus. TheLongTone (talk) 13:46, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: It has charted on some music charts. Also its content can't be ignored.

Camilasdandelions (talk!) 14:10, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

One week on a minor chart. What do you mean by'its content cannot be ignored'??TheLongTone (talk) 14:21, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There's significant contents of the song's background. No reason to delete them all. Camilasdandelions (talk!) 00:13, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:15, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Probably redirect. From WP:NSONG: "Songs and singles are probably notable if they have been the subject of multiple, non-trivial published works whose sources are independent of the artist and label". In the coverage, Portrait is not the subject nor is the coverage in-depth, because the articles are about the full-length album. We therefore need better "content" than that. Geschichte (talk) 15:57, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Caution (Mariah Carey album): per nom. voorts (talk/contributions) 20:38, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Caution (Mariah Carey album). The EP should be mention there and if sufficient sources are gathered an article of said EP can be created at a later date. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 21:55, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Moments: Red

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

EP fails all ramifications of WP:NALBUM and generally fails to meet WP:GNG. A cursory search did not help at all. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 12:48, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:58, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Carol of the Bells (Hugo Ferreira song)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Song fails all ramifications of WP:NSONG and generally fails to meet WP:GNG. A cursory search did not help at all. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 12:51, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:58, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete due to lack of sources that are relevant to pass WP:NSONG. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 13:57, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delele per nom. Very inadequate sources that fail general and song-specific notability requirements. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 17:24, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Born Loser

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

EP fails all ramifications of WP:NALBUM and generally fails to meet WP:GNG. A cursory search did not help at all. Suggest redirecting to Copperhead (Southern rock band)#Discography as an ATD. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 12:54, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:58, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per nomination reasoning. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 15:05, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Now You See

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

EP fails all ramifications of WP:NALBUM and generally fails to meet WP:GNG. A cursory search did not help at all. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 12:46, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:57, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete sources are either non-reliable and some others come across as such. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 07:37, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to where? Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 06:09, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind, I thought this was a song MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 13:55, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Freeky

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable single (song). It can be redirected to Ai Otsuka per WP:ATD. Mekomo (talk) 15:16, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:38, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:38, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Marble (EP): Not enough reliable sources to explain notability outside this subject. 🦅White-tailed eagle^{Talk to the eagle}Stalking eagle 17:03, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
"Not enough relaible sources"? The news from the artist's official website about this release, an article by Billboard Japan about the digital release of this single, plus an interview in which it explains its creative process from the artists themselves, all seem pretty reliable to me. クラウデド (talk) 17:51, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect Only one mention from Billboard Japan is not enough. The other sources are reliable, but it is by an interest third-party, in this case the artists and label. Need more independent sources. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 07:34, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Moments (One Direction song)

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

After careful analyzing the article and cross its references and search more online, I believe this song doesn't meet the criteria for its own article.

The song is a GA article, however GA criteria has changed since the song was approved. Moreover, a song being a GA articles doesn't grant it notability.

Despite charting, these are lower regions of said charts and charts alone don't guaranty a article about said song should exist. The song was only part of a limited edition of the album. Most of the references are about the album, not the song itself and there are also brief mentions of the song when reviewing concerts because it was part of the setlist.

Ed Sheeran is an interested third party since he wrote the song and most of these are just interviews he gave speaking about the song. Henceforth, self-promotion and product placement are not the routes to having an encyclopedia article. The published works must be someone else writing about the song/single.

The barometer of notability is whether people independent of the subject itself (or of its artist, record label, producers and songwriters) have actually considered the song/single notable enough that they have written and published non-trivial works that focus solely upon it. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 09:21, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 09:21, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The nominator of this discussion was the nominator for the 1st AfD back in 2021. WP:NSONGS is going to be argued here again, which hasn't changed since the 1st AfD. The charting isn't the main criterion to keep the article, but there seems to be sufficient sourcing present. There's a long history of songs that were originally from one artist and then offered/given to another artist. That does not make the artist an "interested third party." I think you mean if the information is coming off as a press release with multiple sources. The sourcing should be limited to a primary source, marking it as a press release via {{cite press release}}. – The Grid (talk) 14:16, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It makes when one of the songwriters, in this case, Ed Sheeran, gives interviews talking about the song. Moreover, said information can be included on the article. Moreover, it is already included there. He has written several songs for other artists not all of those have articles. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 08:05, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Songs needs 3+ reliable secondary sources with SIGCOV. This song has well above that amount. —LastJabberwocky (Rrarr) 16:05, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

11 Days

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSONG, lacks significant coverage (not mentions in passing) in multiple independent secondary sources. The band's website is a primary source , whilst Spotify and Discogs are not reliable sources. Dan arndt (talk) 09:04, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and Music. Dan arndt (talk) 09:04, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per nomination reasoning. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 09:22, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: No SIGCOV, only streaming, social media, lyrics and other minor sites. Doesn't meet WP:NSONG. No awards or national charting. — Itzcuauhtli11 (talk) 00:26, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Walk Away (Something Clever album)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NALBUM. The sources/references provided are either about the band, not the EP (series of mentions in passing) or are unreliable (Spotify) or are primary sources (SonicBids, band's website, The Bash, ReverbNation) which are not independent of the band. Dan arndt (talk) 08:55, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and Music. Dan arndt (talk) 08:55, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Zero Hour (Zero Hour album)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sources that I could find to confirm the article meeting WP:NALBUM. Most coverage of albums called "Zero Hour" is in reference to other albums with the same title. -Samoht27 (talk) 06:13, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and Music. -Samoht27 (talk) 06:13, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 06:38, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Zero Hour (band) as an alternative to deletion. ✗plicit 06:36, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: For engagement to have a consensus
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HilssaMansen19 (talk) 06:56, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Zero Hour (band) per Explicit. Tarlby ^{(t) (c)} 17:00, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Zero Hour (band) per above as an alternative to deletion.Timur9008 (talk) 08:50, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good Day (Forrest Frank song)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Redirect to Child of God (album). Despite charting, the song is not covered in reliable sources, thus failing WP:NSONG. UnregisteredBiohazard (what i do • what did i do now?) 04:23, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and Christianity. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 06:51, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: There is a passing mention in a Billboard article [1] but that's about it for WP:RS. UnregisteredBiohazard (what i do • what did i do now?) 17:54, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: I increased the amount of secondary sources in the article, if that's what you're requesting.
  01:26, 12 May 2025 (UTC) Javajourney (talk) 01:26, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  
  Thanks for adding more. However, I'm not sure if most of the sources are WP:RS. UnregisteredBiohazard (what i do • what did i do now?) 15:23, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Per Above Destinyokhiria (talk) 13:25, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Since this song won a Dove Award (which would help it meet WP:NSONG criteria), I withdraw this nomination. UnregisteredBiohazard (what i do • what did i do now?) 17:20, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep song has won an award and was nominated for another two. Some sources in the article don't seem reliable. I removed a striking one. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 06:36, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Nomination can not be withdrawn once a "delete" !vote has been cast.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 11:53, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Freaks Like You

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject fails WP:NSONG and there are no sources to establish WP:GNG either. There are no critical reception, chart performances, etc, none that I can find from a cursory search. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 11:26, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:36, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cavarrone 19:28, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, fails the requirements of WP:NSONG. Dan arndt (talk) 09:06, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Merge relevant information into parent album Season of Darkness. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 07:35, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I'm relisting this as I was going to close this as a Merge to Season of Darkness but found that article is also at AFD. So, given that fact and seeing that the likely closure there is a Redirect, does that impact people's opinions?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:50, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Croire (album)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Album fails WP:NALBUM, a cursory search does not help either. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 15:07, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and Canada. Shellwood (talk) 15:25, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

comment I did find this in depth review [2] but not much else and the article is pretty devoid of information. --hroest 17:21, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article is newly created. SRamzy (talk) 23:15, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Does not appear to have secondary sources to pass WP:NALBUM. m a MANÍ^{1990(talk | contribs)} 23:38, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I found no reviews either, and without this, it fails WP:NOTINHERITED. It somewhat charted, but this is completely fine to only mention on the artist page. Geschichte (talk) 08:04, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:NALBUM#2 appearing in at least two country charts. --hroest 14:44, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
From NALBUM: "All articles on albums or other recordings should meet the basic criteria at the notability guidelines, with significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". Where is the coverage? Without that, as you can see, charting doesn't help. Geschichte (talk) 10:57, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The charting references are to reliable sources in the music industry, which are independent of the artist. SRamzy (talk) 10:13, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It does not constitute "significant coverage in reliable sources". Geschichte (talk) 05:42, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I created the article because the album forms part of a notable artistic shift for Natasha St-Pier. The artist is one of the best known contemporary female French pop artists, known for her appearance in Eurovision Song Contest 2001, and for a string of hit albums of a strictly secular nature. Her shift to a Catholic devotional theme created considerable comment, as is reflected in the biography on the RFI website: note that this significant coverage in a reliable, independent source. SRamzy (talk) 10:35, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@User:SRamzy if this was so significant in her musical biography, there should be a couple of article that discuss this that appear in WP:RS. Could you provide any such discussions of this album in particular and add them to the article? --hroest 19:19, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, asilvering (talk) 19:50, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm disconcerted by the fact that SRamzy uses such subjective reasoning in their !vote. Significant coverage has been looked for, but not found. The album fails the sigcov guideline as well as WP:NOTINHERITED. Geschichte (talk) 05:44, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Geschichte you want to unbold this one, since you already !voted above. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 05:51, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Missd that! Geschichte (talk) 13:44, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete some useful information here and there but not deep discussion regarding this album. Only a couple of interviews, which is clearly self promo, no independent third part coverage such as album reviews. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 06:41, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:38, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Aimer c'est tout donner

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Album fails WP:NALBUM, a cursory search does not help either. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 15:06, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and Canada. Shellwood (talk) 15:25, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
keep per WP:NALBUM#2 as this has been on the charts in at least three countries FR, CH, BE [3] reaching a top position of 23 in France. --hroest 14:47, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
keep The singer herself has a level of notoriety in the francophone world that probably would make even the most obscure production notable. Superboilles (talk) 07:05, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Why says so? Other sources must decide that, not any one Wikipedia user. Geschichte (talk) 11:00, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: From NALBUM: "All articles on albums or other recordings should meet the basic criteria at the notability guidelines, with significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". Where is the coverage? Geschichte (talk) 11:00, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 06:16, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect, however if reliable sources that show third part independent coverage I will reconsider the vote. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 06:47, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep: I found two good sources with SIGCOV (one already was on the wiki page): [4] and [5]. ProQuest has more results but I don't have full access to confirm their usefulness. —LastJabberwocky (Rrarr) 16:35, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: To have a discussion on whether it is a redirect or a keep per policies for a clear consensus and to evaluate sources shared above.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HilssaMansen19 (talk) 10:33, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Album and song proposed deletions

for occasional archiving