Wikifunctions:Community portal

Welcome to the community portal for Wikifunctions!

This is the central place to document Wikifunctions's to-do lists and ongoing project work. [To-do!]

The catalogue of functions is a good place to start.

For discussions, see Wikifunctions:Project chat.

Useful Links

Noticeboards

Task centre

Perennial tasks

Tasks listed by users

Example:

Fix this implementation please. Example2 (talk · contribs)

Done. Thanks for pointing that out! Example (talk · contribs)

[signing to enable reply link:--GrounderUK (talk) 11:27, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can anyone look into why the test for Z21848 is failing? JJPMaster (talk) 04:53, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This problem has been fixed. Could the implementation and test be connected? JJPMaster (talk) 18:46, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Done 99of9 (talk) 10:31, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please connect the implementations and tests of Z21851. JJPMaster (talk) 17:03, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Done Feeglgeef (talk) 17:04, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please connect the implementations and tests for Z21903, Z20659, and Z21898. JJP_{Mas_ter} (she/they) 18:28, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Done GrounderUK (talk) 19:16, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Can someone see why the test for Z21917 is failing? It appears to be a problem involving a mismatch between the expected return type and the actual return type, but I can't determine exactly what caused this problem. JJP_{Mas_ter} (she/they) 20:08, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Done Feeglgeef2 (talk) 20:26, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please fix Z21049, round(pi, 2) is 314/100 (not 314/10). --Matěj Suchánek (talk) 14:13, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Done It is indeed. Thanks! GrounderUK (talk) 14:39, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The "type parameters" in the expected value of test ([1, 2, 4, 7, 9], isEven) => ([2, 4], [1, 7, 9]) (Z21810) are wrong, those should read Typed list(Object, 2, 4) and Typed list(Object, 1, 7, 9) respectively. The editor refuses to co-operate when I try to fix it though. YoshiRulz (talk) 09:14, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Done (Sorry for the delay; I lost my subscription to this topic, somehow.) GrounderUK (talk) 07:54, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please connect the implementations and tests for Z24025, Z24026, Z24027, Z24028, Z24029. Mr. Ibrahem (talk) 05:25, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Done GrounderUK (talk) 08:01, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please connect Z24261. Aaron Liu (talk) 13:48, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Done ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 13:50, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Could someone create a new type, Grapheme? It's basically one user-perceived character; like A̱ is one grapheme made out of two characters: A and a lower-macron joiner. All I need is for this type to have a single key that is a String that is its value. I'll take care of the rest if I can edit the type. Thanks. Aaron Liu (talk) 13:09, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hey @Aaron Liu. Currently types can only be created by staff, and requests for them go at Wikifunctions:Type proposals. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 14:10, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, I didn't see that. Thanks! Aaron Liu (talk) 14:49, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed at Wikifunctions:Type proposals/Grapheme. Aaron Liu (talk) 01:26, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for kicking off the proposal. It is indeed a reasonable idea. I'm even more glad that you're attempting the splitter. With it we should be able to do almost everything we need with regards to graphemes. And we need an algorithm to do that before we can make the type validator anyway. --99of9 (talk) 03:32, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! Honestly I plan to just "port" an existing, MIT-licensed implementation to Wikifunctions. Let's see if I can navigate everything...
I would split the existing implementations into different functions if mixing composition and original code weren't impossible. Aaron Liu (talk) 14:51, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Please connect iterate through String (Z24457). Aaron Liu (talk) 14:50, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done Dv103 (talk) 15:58, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]