Worksheet	
  for	
  Developing	
  a	
  Meaningful	
  Learning	
  Experience	
  
	
  
WE15	
  Session	
  -­‐	
  Creating	
  Meaningful	
  Learning	
  Experiences	
  
Dr.	
  Jacquelyn	
  K.	
  Nagel	
  –	
  nageljk@jmu.edu	
  
Title	
  of	
  Experience:	
  ___________________________________________________	
  
Ideally	
  each	
  experience	
  has	
  all	
  elements.	
  Aim	
  to	
  have	
  at	
  least	
  the	
  first	
  four.	
  
Design	
  
Considerations	
  
Pedagogical	
  Design	
  Elements	
  and	
  
Function	
  in	
  Learning	
   Experience	
  Element	
  
1.	
  Appropriate	
  
to	
  participant’s	
  
abilities	
  and	
  
needs?	
  
The	
  content	
  is	
  appropriate	
  to	
  level	
  of	
  
thinking	
  and	
  present	
  knowledge	
  of	
  
participants.	
  Connects	
  with	
  existing	
  
knowledge	
  and	
  perceptions	
  to	
  enable	
  
building	
  rather	
  than	
  confusion.	
  
	
  
2.	
  Carries	
  an	
  
affective	
  
“hook”?	
  
Conveys	
  relevance,	
  worth,	
  and	
  links	
  
to	
  personal	
  interest	
  or	
  experience.	
  
Engages	
  participants	
  desire	
  to	
  learn.	
  
	
  
3.	
  Makes	
  use	
  
of	
  interactive	
  
engagement?	
  
Working	
  with	
  others	
  or	
  whole	
  group	
  
summarization.	
  Requires	
  listening	
  
and	
  speaking,	
  which	
  develops	
  
confidence	
  and	
  sense	
  of	
  being	
  
supported	
  in	
  learning.	
  
	
  
4.	
  Encourages	
  
visualization?	
  
Explanation	
  of	
  ideas	
  or	
  concepts	
  
through	
  diagrams,	
  mind	
  maps,	
  flow	
  
charts,	
  etc.	
  Builds	
  and	
  stabilizes	
  
mental	
  picture	
  of	
  information.	
  
	
  
5.	
  Requires	
  
writing	
  and	
  
encourages	
  
revision?	
  
Explanation	
  of	
  concepts	
  and	
  problem	
  
solving	
  through	
  writing.	
  Builds	
  and	
  
stabilizes	
  information	
  through	
  
repeated	
  editing,	
  reorganizing,	
  and	
  
polishing.	
  
	
  
6.	
  Requires	
  
metacognitive	
  
reflection?	
  
The	
  mind’s	
  ability	
  to	
  monitor	
  and	
  
control	
  its	
  own	
  activities.	
  What	
  
learning	
  resulted?	
  Builds	
  and	
  
stabilizes	
  information	
  through	
  review	
  
of	
  content,	
  process,	
  and	
  self	
  
assessment.	
  
	
  
7.	
  Possesses	
  an	
  
effective	
  
rubric?	
  
Conveys	
  specific	
  meaning	
  of	
  high	
  
quality	
  achievement.	
  The	
  product	
  or	
  
performance	
  required	
  relates	
  clearly	
  
to	
  the	
  outcome	
  intended.	
  
	
  
Table	
  adapted	
  from	
  Nuhfer,	
  E.	
  B.	
  (2010)	
  Cooperative	
  learning	
  in	
  geological	
  science.	
  In	
  Cooperative	
  Learning	
  in	
  Higher	
  Education:	
  Across	
  Disciplines,	
  Across	
  
the	
  Academy.	
  Mills,	
  B.	
  J.	
  (editor).	
  Stylus	
  Press,	
  pp.	
  181-­‐200.	
  	
  
Worksheet	
  for	
  Developing	
  a	
  Meaningful	
  Learning	
  Experience	
  
	
  
WE15	
  Session	
  -­‐	
  Creating	
  Meaningful	
  Learning	
  Experiences	
  
Dr.	
  Jacquelyn	
  K.	
  Nagel	
  –	
  nageljk@jmu.edu	
  
Example	
  Experience:	
  Lunar	
  Lander	
  Assignment	
  (1	
  week)–Senior	
  systems	
  analysis	
  course	
  	
  
Assignment	
  can	
  be	
  found	
  here:	
  Nagel,	
  J.K.S.	
  (2015)	
  “Development	
  of	
  an	
  Innovative	
  Multidisciplinary	
  
Course	
  in	
  Systems	
  Analysis,”	
  Proceedings	
  of	
  ASEE	
  Conference	
  2015,	
  Seattle,	
  WA.	
  
Design	
  
Considerations	
  
Pedagogical	
  Design	
  Elements	
  and	
  
Function	
  in	
  Learning	
   Experience	
  Element	
  
1.	
  Appropriate	
  
to	
  participant’s	
  
abilities	
  and	
  
needs?	
  
The	
  content	
  is	
  appropriate	
  to	
  level	
  of	
  
thinking	
  and	
  present	
  knowledge	
  of	
  
participants.	
  Connects	
  with	
  existing	
  
knowledge	
  and	
  perceptions	
  to	
  enable	
  
building	
  rather	
  than	
  confusion.	
  
System	
  response	
  characterization	
  is	
  a	
  necessary	
  
skill	
  for	
  systems	
  analysis	
  and	
  builds	
  off	
  of	
  junior	
  
level	
  core	
  engineering	
  courses.	
  
2.	
  Carries	
  an	
  
affective	
  
“hook”?	
  
Conveys	
  relevance,	
  worth,	
  and	
  links	
  
to	
  personal	
  interest	
  or	
  experience.	
  
Engages	
  participants	
  desire	
  to	
  learn.	
  
Stereotypes	
  -­‐	
  What	
  are	
  some	
  stereotypes	
  of	
  
engineers	
  and	
  the	
  discipline	
  of	
  engineering?	
  What	
  
do	
  stereotypes	
  impact?	
  We	
  can	
  stereotype	
  a	
  
system	
  based	
  on	
  its	
  response	
  –	
  we	
  call	
  this	
  
characterization.	
  
3.	
  Makes	
  use	
  
of	
  interactive	
  
engagement?	
  
Working	
  with	
  others	
  or	
  whole	
  group	
  
summarization.	
  Requires	
  listening	
  
and	
  speaking,	
  which	
  develops	
  
confidence	
  and	
  sense	
  of	
  being	
  
supported	
  in	
  learning.	
  
Students	
  work	
  in	
  teams	
  of	
  two	
  to	
  complete	
  the	
  
assignment.	
  
4.	
  Encourages	
  
visualization?	
  
Explanation	
  of	
  ideas	
  or	
  concepts	
  
through	
  diagrams,	
  mind	
  maps,	
  flow	
  
charts,	
  etc.	
  Builds	
  and	
  stabilizes	
  
mental	
  picture	
  of	
  information.	
  
Students	
  must	
  create	
  a	
  schematic	
  representation	
  
of	
  the	
  system	
  in	
  order	
  to	
  generate	
  equations	
  that	
  
describe	
  the	
  dynamics.	
  	
  Matlab	
  is	
  used	
  to	
  evaluate	
  
the	
  equations	
  and	
  create	
  response	
  graphs.	
  
5.	
  Requires	
  
writing	
  and	
  
encourages	
  
revision?	
  
Explanation	
  of	
  concepts	
  and	
  problem	
  
solving	
  through	
  writing.	
  Builds	
  and	
  
stabilizes	
  information	
  through	
  
repeated	
  editing,	
  reorganizing,	
  and	
  
polishing.	
  
Students	
  must	
  characterize	
  the	
  system	
  response	
  
and	
  explain	
  the	
  system	
  performance	
  before	
  
(baseline)	
  and	
  after	
  changes	
  (improvements)	
  are	
  
made.	
  	
  They	
  must	
  describe	
  trade-­‐offs	
  in	
  the	
  
design,	
  changes	
  in	
  the	
  context	
  of	
  the	
  physical	
  
system,	
  explain	
  if	
  changes	
  are	
  realistic,	
  and	
  
provide	
  justification	
  for	
  answers.	
  
6.	
  Requires	
  
metacognitive	
  
reflection?	
  
The	
  mind’s	
  ability	
  to	
  monitor	
  and	
  
control	
  its	
  own	
  activities.	
  What	
  
learning	
  resulted?	
  Builds	
  and	
  
stabilizes	
  information	
  through	
  review	
  
of	
  content,	
  process,	
  and	
  self	
  
assessment.	
  
Students	
  must	
  reflect	
  on	
  their	
  problem	
  solving	
  
process	
  by	
  discussing	
  the	
  thought	
  process	
  taken	
  
when	
  analyzing	
  the	
  lunar	
  lander	
  system,	
  and	
  
elaborating	
  on	
  steps	
  taken	
  and	
  how	
  decisions	
  
were	
  made.	
  	
  	
  
	
  
7.	
  Possesses	
  an	
  
effective	
  
rubric?	
  
Conveys	
  specific	
  meaning	
  of	
  high	
  
quality	
  achievement.	
  The	
  product	
  or	
  
performance	
  required	
  relates	
  clearly	
  
to	
  the	
  outcome	
  intended.	
  
Students	
  know	
  the	
  evaluation	
  breakdown	
  for	
  the	
  
assignment	
  components.	
  	
  Emphasis	
  is	
  placed	
  on	
  
justification	
  of	
  choices	
  made	
  during	
  analysis.	
  	
  
Professionalism	
  is	
  graded.	
  
Table	
  adapted	
  from	
  Nuhfer,	
  E.	
  B.	
  (2010)	
  Cooperative	
  learning	
  in	
  geological	
  science.	
  In	
  Cooperative	
  Learning	
  in	
  Higher	
  Education:	
  Across	
  Disciplines,	
  Across	
  
the	
  Academy.	
  Mills,	
  B.	
  J.	
  (editor).	
  Stylus	
  Press,	
  pp.	
  181-­‐200.	
  	
   	
  
Worksheet	
  for	
  Developing	
  a	
  Meaningful	
  Learning	
  Experience	
  
	
  
WE15	
  Session	
  -­‐	
  Creating	
  Meaningful	
  Learning	
  Experiences	
  
Dr.	
  Jacquelyn	
  K.	
  Nagel	
  –	
  nageljk@jmu.edu	
  
Example	
  Experience:	
  	
  Engineering	
  Candy	
  Bridges	
  Outreach	
  activity	
  (50	
  min)	
  
Activity	
  description	
  can	
  be	
  found	
  here:	
  	
  https://www.jmu.edu/mathstat/eyh/workshop-­‐
descriptions/student-­‐workshops%20.shtml	
  	
  
Design	
  
Considerations	
  
Pedagogical	
  Design	
  Elements	
  and	
  
Function	
  in	
  Learning	
   Experience	
  Element	
  
1.	
  Appropriate	
  
to	
  participant’s	
  
abilities	
  and	
  
needs?	
  
The	
  content	
  is	
  appropriate	
  to	
  level	
  of	
  
thinking	
  and	
  present	
  knowledge	
  of	
  
participants.	
  Connects	
  with	
  existing	
  
knowledge	
  and	
  perceptions	
  to	
  enable	
  
building	
  rather	
  than	
  confusion.	
  
Strength	
  of	
  different	
  shapes	
  and	
  geometry	
  are	
  
appropriate	
  for	
  6-­‐11th
	
  grade	
  girls.	
  
2.	
  Carries	
  an	
  
affective	
  
“hook”?	
  
Conveys	
  relevance,	
  worth,	
  and	
  links	
  
to	
  personal	
  interest	
  or	
  experience.	
  
Engages	
  participants	
  desire	
  to	
  learn.	
  
Bridges	
  are	
  familiar	
  and	
  are	
  recognizable	
  in	
  
everyday	
  life.	
  Understanding	
  why	
  bridges	
  are	
  
made	
  of	
  certain	
  shapes	
  and	
  how	
  they	
  distribute	
  
load	
  gives	
  value	
  to	
  math.	
  Building	
  bridges	
  out	
  of	
  
candy	
  is	
  exciting!	
  	
  	
  
3.	
  Makes	
  use	
  
of	
  interactive	
  
engagement?	
  
Working	
  with	
  others	
  or	
  whole	
  group	
  
summarization.	
  Requires	
  listening	
  
and	
  speaking,	
  which	
  develops	
  
confidence	
  and	
  sense	
  of	
  being	
  
supported	
  in	
  learning.	
  
Girls	
  work	
  in	
  teams	
  of	
  two	
  (three	
  if	
  there	
  is	
  an	
  odd	
  
number)	
  to	
  design	
  and	
  build	
  a	
  bridge	
  that	
  can	
  
span	
  an	
  8	
  inch	
  gap.	
  
4.	
  Encourages	
  
visualization?	
  
Explanation	
  of	
  ideas	
  or	
  concepts	
  
through	
  diagrams,	
  mind	
  maps,	
  flow	
  
charts,	
  etc.	
  Builds	
  and	
  stabilizes	
  
mental	
  picture	
  of	
  information.	
  
Girls	
  must	
  individually	
  draw	
  their	
  bridge	
  design	
  on	
  
paper	
  to	
  visualize	
  the	
  shapes,	
  and	
  then	
  share	
  with	
  
their	
  sketches	
  with	
  their	
  teammate.	
  
5.	
  Requires	
  
writing	
  and	
  
encourages	
  
revision?	
  
Explanation	
  of	
  concepts	
  and	
  problem	
  
solving	
  through	
  writing.	
  Builds	
  and	
  
stabilizes	
  information	
  through	
  
repeated	
  editing,	
  reorganizing,	
  and	
  
polishing.	
  
None.	
  
6.	
  Requires	
  
metacognitive	
  
reflection?	
  
The	
  mind’s	
  ability	
  to	
  monitor	
  and	
  
control	
  its	
  own	
  activities.	
  What	
  
learning	
  resulted?	
  Builds	
  and	
  
stabilizes	
  information	
  through	
  review	
  
of	
  content,	
  process,	
  and	
  self	
  
assessment.	
  
After	
  testing	
  the	
  candy	
  bridges	
  we	
  have	
  a	
  group	
  
discussion	
  on	
  what	
  was	
  learned	
  about	
  the	
  roles	
  
geometry	
  and	
  weight	
  distribution	
  play	
  in	
  bridge	
  
design	
  (and	
  failure).	
  
7.	
  Possesses	
  an	
  
effective	
  
rubric?	
  
Conveys	
  specific	
  meaning	
  of	
  high	
  
quality	
  achievement.	
  The	
  product	
  or	
  
performance	
  required	
  relates	
  clearly	
  
to	
  the	
  outcome	
  intended.	
  
Bridge	
  can	
  span	
  an	
  8	
  inch	
  gap	
  and	
  hold	
  a	
  load	
  of	
  
full	
  size	
  candy	
  bars.	
  
Table	
  adapted	
  from	
  Nuhfer,	
  E.	
  B.	
  (2010)	
  Cooperative	
  learning	
  in	
  geological	
  science.	
  In	
  Cooperative	
  Learning	
  in	
  Higher	
  Education:	
  Across	
  Disciplines,	
  Across	
  
the	
  Academy.	
  Mills,	
  B.	
  J.	
  (editor).	
  Stylus	
  Press,	
  pp.	
  181-­‐200.	
  	
  

Creating Meaningful Learning Experiences - Worksheet

  • 1.
    Worksheet  for  Developing  a  Meaningful  Learning  Experience     WE15  Session  -­‐  Creating  Meaningful  Learning  Experiences   Dr.  Jacquelyn  K.  Nagel  –  [email protected]   Title  of  Experience:  ___________________________________________________   Ideally  each  experience  has  all  elements.  Aim  to  have  at  least  the  first  four.   Design   Considerations   Pedagogical  Design  Elements  and   Function  in  Learning   Experience  Element   1.  Appropriate   to  participant’s   abilities  and   needs?   The  content  is  appropriate  to  level  of   thinking  and  present  knowledge  of   participants.  Connects  with  existing   knowledge  and  perceptions  to  enable   building  rather  than  confusion.     2.  Carries  an   affective   “hook”?   Conveys  relevance,  worth,  and  links   to  personal  interest  or  experience.   Engages  participants  desire  to  learn.     3.  Makes  use   of  interactive   engagement?   Working  with  others  or  whole  group   summarization.  Requires  listening   and  speaking,  which  develops   confidence  and  sense  of  being   supported  in  learning.     4.  Encourages   visualization?   Explanation  of  ideas  or  concepts   through  diagrams,  mind  maps,  flow   charts,  etc.  Builds  and  stabilizes   mental  picture  of  information.     5.  Requires   writing  and   encourages   revision?   Explanation  of  concepts  and  problem   solving  through  writing.  Builds  and   stabilizes  information  through   repeated  editing,  reorganizing,  and   polishing.     6.  Requires   metacognitive   reflection?   The  mind’s  ability  to  monitor  and   control  its  own  activities.  What   learning  resulted?  Builds  and   stabilizes  information  through  review   of  content,  process,  and  self   assessment.     7.  Possesses  an   effective   rubric?   Conveys  specific  meaning  of  high   quality  achievement.  The  product  or   performance  required  relates  clearly   to  the  outcome  intended.     Table  adapted  from  Nuhfer,  E.  B.  (2010)  Cooperative  learning  in  geological  science.  In  Cooperative  Learning  in  Higher  Education:  Across  Disciplines,  Across   the  Academy.  Mills,  B.  J.  (editor).  Stylus  Press,  pp.  181-­‐200.    
  • 2.
    Worksheet  for  Developing  a  Meaningful  Learning  Experience     WE15  Session  -­‐  Creating  Meaningful  Learning  Experiences   Dr.  Jacquelyn  K.  Nagel  –  [email protected]   Example  Experience:  Lunar  Lander  Assignment  (1  week)–Senior  systems  analysis  course     Assignment  can  be  found  here:  Nagel,  J.K.S.  (2015)  “Development  of  an  Innovative  Multidisciplinary   Course  in  Systems  Analysis,”  Proceedings  of  ASEE  Conference  2015,  Seattle,  WA.   Design   Considerations   Pedagogical  Design  Elements  and   Function  in  Learning   Experience  Element   1.  Appropriate   to  participant’s   abilities  and   needs?   The  content  is  appropriate  to  level  of   thinking  and  present  knowledge  of   participants.  Connects  with  existing   knowledge  and  perceptions  to  enable   building  rather  than  confusion.   System  response  characterization  is  a  necessary   skill  for  systems  analysis  and  builds  off  of  junior   level  core  engineering  courses.   2.  Carries  an   affective   “hook”?   Conveys  relevance,  worth,  and  links   to  personal  interest  or  experience.   Engages  participants  desire  to  learn.   Stereotypes  -­‐  What  are  some  stereotypes  of   engineers  and  the  discipline  of  engineering?  What   do  stereotypes  impact?  We  can  stereotype  a   system  based  on  its  response  –  we  call  this   characterization.   3.  Makes  use   of  interactive   engagement?   Working  with  others  or  whole  group   summarization.  Requires  listening   and  speaking,  which  develops   confidence  and  sense  of  being   supported  in  learning.   Students  work  in  teams  of  two  to  complete  the   assignment.   4.  Encourages   visualization?   Explanation  of  ideas  or  concepts   through  diagrams,  mind  maps,  flow   charts,  etc.  Builds  and  stabilizes   mental  picture  of  information.   Students  must  create  a  schematic  representation   of  the  system  in  order  to  generate  equations  that   describe  the  dynamics.    Matlab  is  used  to  evaluate   the  equations  and  create  response  graphs.   5.  Requires   writing  and   encourages   revision?   Explanation  of  concepts  and  problem   solving  through  writing.  Builds  and   stabilizes  information  through   repeated  editing,  reorganizing,  and   polishing.   Students  must  characterize  the  system  response   and  explain  the  system  performance  before   (baseline)  and  after  changes  (improvements)  are   made.    They  must  describe  trade-­‐offs  in  the   design,  changes  in  the  context  of  the  physical   system,  explain  if  changes  are  realistic,  and   provide  justification  for  answers.   6.  Requires   metacognitive   reflection?   The  mind’s  ability  to  monitor  and   control  its  own  activities.  What   learning  resulted?  Builds  and   stabilizes  information  through  review   of  content,  process,  and  self   assessment.   Students  must  reflect  on  their  problem  solving   process  by  discussing  the  thought  process  taken   when  analyzing  the  lunar  lander  system,  and   elaborating  on  steps  taken  and  how  decisions   were  made.         7.  Possesses  an   effective   rubric?   Conveys  specific  meaning  of  high   quality  achievement.  The  product  or   performance  required  relates  clearly   to  the  outcome  intended.   Students  know  the  evaluation  breakdown  for  the   assignment  components.    Emphasis  is  placed  on   justification  of  choices  made  during  analysis.     Professionalism  is  graded.   Table  adapted  from  Nuhfer,  E.  B.  (2010)  Cooperative  learning  in  geological  science.  In  Cooperative  Learning  in  Higher  Education:  Across  Disciplines,  Across   the  Academy.  Mills,  B.  J.  (editor).  Stylus  Press,  pp.  181-­‐200.      
  • 3.
    Worksheet  for  Developing  a  Meaningful  Learning  Experience     WE15  Session  -­‐  Creating  Meaningful  Learning  Experiences   Dr.  Jacquelyn  K.  Nagel  –  [email protected]   Example  Experience:    Engineering  Candy  Bridges  Outreach  activity  (50  min)   Activity  description  can  be  found  here:    https://www.jmu.edu/mathstat/eyh/workshop-­‐ descriptions/student-­‐workshops%20.shtml     Design   Considerations   Pedagogical  Design  Elements  and   Function  in  Learning   Experience  Element   1.  Appropriate   to  participant’s   abilities  and   needs?   The  content  is  appropriate  to  level  of   thinking  and  present  knowledge  of   participants.  Connects  with  existing   knowledge  and  perceptions  to  enable   building  rather  than  confusion.   Strength  of  different  shapes  and  geometry  are   appropriate  for  6-­‐11th  grade  girls.   2.  Carries  an   affective   “hook”?   Conveys  relevance,  worth,  and  links   to  personal  interest  or  experience.   Engages  participants  desire  to  learn.   Bridges  are  familiar  and  are  recognizable  in   everyday  life.  Understanding  why  bridges  are   made  of  certain  shapes  and  how  they  distribute   load  gives  value  to  math.  Building  bridges  out  of   candy  is  exciting!       3.  Makes  use   of  interactive   engagement?   Working  with  others  or  whole  group   summarization.  Requires  listening   and  speaking,  which  develops   confidence  and  sense  of  being   supported  in  learning.   Girls  work  in  teams  of  two  (three  if  there  is  an  odd   number)  to  design  and  build  a  bridge  that  can   span  an  8  inch  gap.   4.  Encourages   visualization?   Explanation  of  ideas  or  concepts   through  diagrams,  mind  maps,  flow   charts,  etc.  Builds  and  stabilizes   mental  picture  of  information.   Girls  must  individually  draw  their  bridge  design  on   paper  to  visualize  the  shapes,  and  then  share  with   their  sketches  with  their  teammate.   5.  Requires   writing  and   encourages   revision?   Explanation  of  concepts  and  problem   solving  through  writing.  Builds  and   stabilizes  information  through   repeated  editing,  reorganizing,  and   polishing.   None.   6.  Requires   metacognitive   reflection?   The  mind’s  ability  to  monitor  and   control  its  own  activities.  What   learning  resulted?  Builds  and   stabilizes  information  through  review   of  content,  process,  and  self   assessment.   After  testing  the  candy  bridges  we  have  a  group   discussion  on  what  was  learned  about  the  roles   geometry  and  weight  distribution  play  in  bridge   design  (and  failure).   7.  Possesses  an   effective   rubric?   Conveys  specific  meaning  of  high   quality  achievement.  The  product  or   performance  required  relates  clearly   to  the  outcome  intended.   Bridge  can  span  an  8  inch  gap  and  hold  a  load  of   full  size  candy  bars.   Table  adapted  from  Nuhfer,  E.  B.  (2010)  Cooperative  learning  in  geological  science.  In  Cooperative  Learning  in  Higher  Education:  Across  Disciplines,  Across   the  Academy.  Mills,  B.  J.  (editor).  Stylus  Press,  pp.  181-­‐200.