Trump’s AI poop post caps a week of MAGA indifference to Hitler jokes
- Share via
- An estimated 7 million Americans protested peacefully Saturday against the breakdown of our democracy.
- What if most Americans really do believe Trump’s behavior is acceptable? Or even funny?
An estimated 7 million Americans turned out Saturday to peacefully protest against the breakdown of our checks-and-balances democracy into a Trump-driven autocracy, rife with grift but light on civil rights.
Trump’s response? An AI video of himself wearing a crown inside a fighter plane, dumping what appears to be feces on these very protesters. In a later interview, he called participants of the “No Kings” events “whacked out” and “not representative of this country.”
I’m beginning to fear he’s right. What if the majority of Americans really do believe this sort of behavior by our president, or by anyone really, is acceptable? Even funny? A recent Economist/YouGov poll found that 81% of Republicans approve of the way Trump is handling his job. Seriously, the vast majority of Republicans are just fine with Trump’s policies and behavior.
According to MAGA, non-MAGA people are just too uptight these days.
Vice Troll JD Vance has become a relentless force for not just defending the most base and cruel of behaviors, but celebrating them. House Speaker Mike Johnson has made the spineless, limp justification of these behaviors an art form.
Between the two approaches to groveling to Trump’s ego and mendacity is everything you need to know about the future of the Republican Party. It will stop at nothing to debase and dehumanize any opposition — openly acknowledging that it dreams of burying in excrement even those who peacefully object.
As ‘No Kings’ rallies took over streets across the United States, the California state Capitol was not spared from the resistance.
Not even singer Kenny Loggins is safe. His “Top Gun” hit “Danger Zone” was used in the video. When he objected with a statement of unity, saying, “Too many people are trying to tear us apart, and we need to find new ways to come together. We’re all Americans, and we’re all patriotic. There is no ‘us and them’,” the White House responded with ... a dismissive meme, clearly the new norm when responding to critics.
It may seem obvious, and even old news that this administration lacks accountability. But the use of memes and AI videos as communication, devoid of truth or consequence, adds a new level of danger to the disconnect.
These non-replies not only remove reality from the equation, but remove the need for an actual response — creating a ruling class that does not feel any obligation to explain or defend its actions to the ruled.
Politico published a story last week detailing the racist, misogynistic and hate-filled back-and-forth of an official, party-sanctioned “young Republican” group. Since most of our current politicians are part of the gerontocracy, that young is relative — these are adults, in their 20s and 30s — and they are considered the next generation of party leaders, in a party that has already skewed so far right that it defends secret police.
Here’s a sample.
Bobby Walker, the former vice chair of the New York State Young Republicans, called rape “epic,” according to Politico.
Another member of the chat called Black Americans “watermelon people.”
“Great. I love Hitler,” wrote another when told delegates would vote for the most far-right candidate.
There was also gas chamber “humor” in there and one straight up, “I’m ready to watch people burn now,” from a woman in the conversation, Anne KayKaty, New York’s Young Republican’s national committee member, according to the Hill.
Group members engaged in slurs against South Asians, another popular target of the far right these days. There’s an entire vein of racism devoted to the idea that Indians smell bad, in case you were unaware.
Speaking of a woman mistakenly believed to be South Asian, one group member — Vermont state Sen. Samuel Douglass, wrote: “She just didn’t bathe often.”
While some in the Republican party have denounced, albeit half-heartedly, the comments, others, including Vance, have gone on the attack. Vance, whose wife is Indian, claims everyone is making a big deal out of nothing.
“But the reality is that kids do stupid things. Especially young boys, they tell edgy, offensive jokes. Like, that’s what kids do,” Vance said. “And I really don’t want us to grow up in a country where a kid telling a stupid joke — telling a very offensive, stupid joke — is cause to ruin their lives.”
President Trump’s suggestion that he will soon send federal forces into San Francisco was met with outrage and eye-rolls from local residents and leaders, who called it unnecessary.
Not to be outdone, Johnson responded to the poop jet video by somehow insinuating there is an elevated meaning to it.
“The president was using social media to make a point,” Johnson said, calling it “satire.”
Satire is meant to embarrass and humiliate, to call out through humor the indefensible. I’ll buy the first part of that. Trump meant to embarrass and humiliate. But protesting, of course, is anything but indefensible and the use of feces as a weapon is a way of degrading those “No Kings” participants so that Trump doesn’t have to answer to their anger — no different than degrading Black people and women in that group chat.
Those 7 million Americans who demonstrated on Saturday simply do not matter to Trump, or to Republicans. Not their healthcare, not their ability to pay the bills, not their worry that a country they love is turning in to one where their leader literally illustrates that he can defecate on them.
But not everyone can be king.
While the young Republicans believe they shared in their leader’s immunity, it turns out they don’t. That Vermont state senator? He resigned after the Republican governor put on pressure.
Maybe 7 million Americans angry at Trump can’t convince him to change his ways, but enough outraged Vermont voters can make change in their corner of the country.
Which is why the one thing Trump does fear is the midterms, when voters get to shape our own little corners of America — and by extension, whether Trump gets to keep using his throne.
Insights
L.A. Times Insights delivers AI-generated analysis on Voices content to offer all points of view. Insights does not appear on any news articles.
Viewpoint
Perspectives
The following AI-generated content is powered by Perplexity. The Los Angeles Times editorial staff does not create or edit the content.
Ideas expressed in the piece
The author condemns Trump’s AI-generated video depicting himself wearing a crown and dumping what appears to be feces on peaceful “No Kings” protesters from a fighter jet, viewing it as a disturbing illustration of how the administration openly dehumanizes those who oppose it. Rather than addressing the concerns of an estimated 7 million Americans who demonstrated against what they perceive as democratic breakdown, Trump dismissed participants as “whacked out” and “not representative of this country,” revealing a fundamental contempt for citizens exercising their constitutional right to protest.
The piece argues that Vice President JD Vance and House Speaker Mike Johnson have normalized cruel and base behavior through their responses to controversies. Vance defended Young Republican leaders whose leaked Telegram chats contained racist slurs, antisemitic comments, rape jokes, and statements like “I love Hitler,” dismissing this as merely “kids” telling “edgy, offensive jokes” despite many participants being adults in their 20s and 30s holding government positions[1][3]. Johnson’s characterization of Trump’s video as “satire” and calling Trump “probably the most effective person who has ever used social media” represents what the author sees as spineless justification of indefensible conduct[2].
The author expresses alarm at the administration’s use of AI videos and memes as official communication, arguing this creates a dangerous disconnect where leaders feel no obligation to explain or defend their actions to citizens. This non-response approach removes truth and accountability from governance, establishing what amounts to a ruling class unbound by democratic norms. The dismissive meme sent in response to Kenny Loggins, whose song was used without permission in Trump’s video, exemplifies this pattern of avoiding substantive engagement with criticism.
The leaked Young Republican group chat messages reveal a disturbing culture within the party’s emerging leadership, featuring comments like calling rape “epic,” referring to Black Americans as “watermelon people,” Holocaust jokes about gas chambers, and extensive use of racial slurs[1][3]. These weren’t isolated incidents but part of sustained conversations among individuals positioned to become the next generation of Republican leaders, suggesting the party’s rightward trajectory will continue and intensify.
Different views on the topic
Defenders of Trump’s video argue the president was employing satire to make a political point rather than genuinely advocating harm against protesters. Johnson specifically stated Trump is “using satire to make a point” and emphasized that “He’s not calling for the murder of his political opponents,” contrasting Trump’s approach with protesters who carried signs calling for the president’s execution[2]. This framing positions Trump’s video as a proportional response to what Republicans characterized as violent rhetoric from demonstrators.
Republicans have contextualized the “No Kings” rallies as “hate America” gatherings rather than legitimate expressions of dissent, with House leadership using this characterization throughout press conferences and blaming the demonstrations for Senate Democrats’ refusal to pass a clean continuing resolution to keep the government open[2]. This perspective views the protests not as patriotic civic engagement but as obstructionist political theater designed to undermine the administration.
Vance’s defense of the Young Republicans centers on the argument that society has become too quick to permanently destroy people’s lives over youthful indiscretions. In his view, “kids do stupid things” and tell “edgy, offensive jokes,” and holding adults accountable for messages in private group chats represents an excessive culture of cancellation[1]. This position frames the controversy as an overreaction by political opponents seeking to weaponize private conversations, rather than a legitimate concern about racism and antisemitism among party leaders.
More From the Los Angeles Times
Podcasts
Jonathan Rinderknecht is charged with starting the Lachman Fire, which became the Palisades Fire. The “holdover” fire burned for a week. A critical LAFD report leaves survivors without answers.
A powerful LA sheriff. A smuggled phone. Alzheimer’s claims. James Sexton testifies, and a three-year sentence shocks the county. The conviction that closed a turbulent chapter. Hear the explosive finale.
A small house fire in San Marino leads police to the body of local doctor and mother, Irene Gaw-Lai. Madison McGhee and LA Times Reporter Salvador Hernandez discuss the investigation and the domestic conflict that culminated in her death.
