There’s no nice way to deport someone. But Trump’s ICE is hosting a cruelty Olympics
- Share via
When my father was crossing the U.S.-Mexico border like an undocumented Road Runner back in the 1970s, la migra caught him more than a few times.
They chased him and his friends through factories in Los Angeles and across the hills that separate Tijuana and San Diego. He was tackled and handcuffed and hauled off in cars, trucks and vans. Sometimes, Papi and his pals were dropped off at the border checkpoint in San Ysidro and ordered to walk back into Mexico. Other times, he was packed into grimy cells with other men.
But there was no anger or terror in his voice when I asked him recently how la migra treated him whenever they’d catch him.
“Like humans,” he said. “They had a job to do, and they knew why we mojados were coming here, so they knew they would see us again. So why make it difficult for both of us?”
His most vivid memory was the time a guard in El Centro gave him extra food because he thought my dad was a bit too skinny.
There’s never a pretty way to deport someone. But there’s always a less indecent, a less callous, a less ugly way.
The Trump presidency has amply proven he has no interest in skirting meanness and cruelty.
Easter is supposed to be a happy time, but all I can think of is the people who persecuted Jesus. At a time when Christians are called upon to embrace Jesus’ message of love and charity, our president continues to revel in a cruelty that’s, well, biblical.
“The way they treat immigrants now is a disgrace,” Papi said. “Like animals. It’s sad. It’s ugly. It needs to stop.”
I talked to him a few days after a gunman fired on a Dallas ICE facility, killing a detainee and striking two others before killing himself. One of the other wounded detainees, an immigrant from Mexico, died days later. Instead of expressing sympathy for the deceased, the Trump administration initially offered one giant shrug. What passed for empathy was Vice President JD Vance telling reporters, “Look, just because we don’t support illegal aliens, we don’t want them to be executed by violent assassins engaged in political violence” while blaming the attack on Democrats.
It was up to Homeland Security secretary Kristi Noem to try and show that the federal government has a heart. Her statement on the Dallas attack offered “prayers” to the victims and their families but quickly pivoted to what she felt was the real tragedy.
How ungrateful critics are of la migra.
“For months, we’ve been warning politicians and the media to tone down their rhetoric about ICE law enforcement before someone was killed,” Noem said. “This shooting must serve as a wake-up call to the far-left that their rhetoric about ICE has consequences…The violence and dehumanization of these men and women who are simply enforcing the law must stop.”
You might have been forgiven for not realizing from such a statement that the three people punctured by a gunman’s bullets were immigrants.
This administration is never going to roll out the welcome mat for illegal immigrants. But the least they can do it deal with them as if ... well, as if they are human.
Under Noem’s leadership, Homeland Security’s social media campaign has instead produced videos that call undocumented immigrants “the worst of the worst” and depict immigration agents as heroes called by God to confront invading hordes. A recent one even used the theme song to the cartoon version of the Pokémon trading card game — tagline “Gotta catch ‘em all” — to imply going after the mango guy and tamale lady is no different than capturing fictional monsters.
That’s one step away from “The Eternal Jew,” the infamous Nazi propaganda movie that compared Jews with rats and argued they needed to be eradicated.
Noem is correct when she said that words have consequences — but the “violence and dehumanization” she decries against ICE workers is nothing compared with the cascade of hate spewing from Trump and his goons against immigrants. That rot in the top has infested all parts of American government, leading to officials trying to outdo themselves over who can show the most fealty to Trump by being nastiest to people.
If there were a Cruelty Olympics, Trump’s sycophants would all be elbowing each other for the gold.
Politicians in red states propose repulsive names for their immigration detention facility — “Alligator Alcatraz” in Florida, for instance, or “Speedway Slammer” in Indiana. U.S. Atty. Bill Essayli, Trump’s top prosecutor in Southern California, has trumpeted the arrests of activists he claimed attacked federal agents even as video uploaded by civilians offers a different story. In a recent case, a federal jury acquitted Brayan Ramos-Brito of misdemeanor assault charges after evidence shown in court contradicted what Border Patrol agents had reported to justify his prosecution.
La migra regularly harass U.S. citizens even after they’ve offered proof of residency and have ignored court-ordered restraining orders banning them from targeting people because of their ethnicity. Border Patrol sector chief Gregory Bovino continually squanders taxpayer dollars on photo ops, like the Border Patrol’s July occupation of a nearly empty MacArthur Park or a recent deployment of boats on the Chicago River complete with agents bearing rifles as if they were safari hunters cruising the Congo.
Our nation’s deportation Leviathan is so imperious that an ICE agent, face contorted with anger, outside a New York immigration court recently shoved an Ecuadorean woman pleading for her husband down to the ground, stood over her and wagged his finger in front of her bawling children even as cameras recorded the terrible scene. The move was so egregious that Homeland Security spokesperson Tricia McLaughin quickly put out a statement claiming the incident was “unacceptable and beneath the men and women of ICE.”
The act was so outrageous and it was all caught on camera, so what choice did she have? Nevertheless, CBS News reported that the agent is back on duty.
Arellano: In an L.A. park, Trump unleashed his latest show of farce: The Battle of the Photo Op
But this wasn’t about saving MacArthur Park from the bad guys. Instead, the deployment of masked troops in tactical gear showed Trump and his berserkers only care about optics.
Noem and her crew are so high on their holy war that they don’t realize they’re their own worst enemy. La migra didn’t face the same public acrimony during Barack Obama’s first term, when deportation rates were so high immigration activists dubbed him the “deporter-in-chief.” They didn’t need local law enforcement to fend off angry crowds every time they conducted a raid in Trump’s first term.
The difference now is that cruelty seems like an absolute mandate, so forgive those of us who aren’t throwing roses at ICE when they march into our neighborhoods and haul off our loved ones. And it seems more folks are souring on Trump’s deportation plans. A June Gallup poll found that 79% of Americans said immigration was “a good thing” — a 15% increase since last year and the highest mark recorded by Gallup since it started asking the question in 2001. Meanwhile, a Washington Post/Ipsos September poll showed 44% of adults surveyed approved of Trump’s performance on immigration — a six-point drop since February.
I asked my dad how he thought the government should treat deportees. Our family has personally known Border Patrol agents.
“Well, most of them shouldn’t be deported in the first place,” he said. “If they want to work or already have families here, let them stay but say they need to behave well or they have to leave.”
That’s probably not going to happen, so what should the government do?
“Don’t yell at people,” my dad said. “Talk with patience. Feed immigrants well, give them clean clothes and give them privacy when they have to use the bathroom. Say, ‘sorry we have to do all this, but it’s what Trump wants.’
“And then they should apologize,” Papi concluded. “They should tell everyone, ’We’re sorry we’ve been so mean. We can do better.’”
Well, that ain’t happening, dad.
More to Read
Insights
L.A. Times Insights delivers AI-generated analysis on Voices content to offer all points of view. Insights does not appear on any news articles.
Viewpoint
Perspectives
The following AI-generated content is powered by Perplexity. The Los Angeles Times editorial staff does not create or edit the content.
Ideas expressed in the piece
The author argues that current immigration enforcement under the Trump administration represents a significant departure from past practices, contrasting the relatively humane treatment during the 1970s when border agents treated undocumented immigrants “like humans” with today’s approach that treats them “like animals.” The author’s father recalls receiving extra food from a guard and being treated with basic dignity during his multiple deportations decades ago.
Current immigration enforcement is characterized as unnecessarily cruel and dehumanizing, with the author asserting that while “there’s never a pretty way to deport someone,” the Trump administration has chosen the most callous approach possible. The author criticizes the administration’s response to violence at detention facilities, particularly highlighting how officials initially showed indifference to immigrant victims while quickly pivoting to defend ICE agents.
The administration’s messaging campaign is condemned as propaganda that dehumanizes immigrants, with the author specifically criticizing Department of Homeland Security videos that call undocumented immigrants “the worst of the worst” and comparing one video’s use of Pokémon imagery to Nazi propaganda film “The Eternal Jew.” The author argues this rhetoric creates a hostile environment that encourages cruelty at all levels of government.
The author contends that the emphasis on cruelty is counterproductive, noting that immigration enforcement didn’t face the same public opposition during previous administrations, including under Barack Obama despite high deportation rates. The author suggests that making cruelty a mandate has generated more public resistance and undermined enforcement effectiveness.
Polling data is presented to support the argument that Americans are becoming more supportive of immigration, with the author citing a June Gallup poll showing 79% of Americans view immigration as “a good thing” and a Washington Post/Ipsos poll indicating declining approval of Trump’s immigration performance.
Different views on the topic
The Trump administration justifies its enforcement policies as necessary to address what it characterizes as an “invasion” of unauthorized immigration, with officials arguing that aggressive measures are required to stem the flow of migrants to the United States[1]. Tom Homan, the administration’s border czar, maintains that deportation policy prioritizes removing individuals with criminal records and suspected national security threats[1].
Administration officials assert they are successfully targeting dangerous criminals through their enforcement efforts, with DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin claiming that “ramped-up immigration enforcement targeting the worst of the worst is removing more and more criminal illegal aliens off our streets every day”[3]. Officials argue this approach sends a clear deterrent message to others in the country illegally[3].
Congressional support for the administration’s approach is demonstrated through legislative action, as Republicans and Trump passed spending legislation in July 2025 that included $191 billion for the Department of Homeland Security to support immigration enforcement and expand detention capacity[2]. This funding reflects institutional backing for enhanced enforcement measures.
The administration has positioned its policies as fulfilling campaign promises and addressing national security concerns, with officials arguing they are “aggressively pursuing removal of noncitizens” as part of a comprehensive approach to reshape immigration policy and practice[4]. The administration frames these actions as necessary steps to protect American communities and enforce existing immigration law.