Abstract
Purpose of Review
The ability to analyze the molecular events occurring within individual cells as opposed to populations of cells is revolutionizing our understanding of musculoskeletal tissue development and disease. Single cell studies have the great potential of identifying cellular subpopulations that work in a synchronized fashion to regenerate and repair damaged tissues during normal homeostasis. In addition, such studies can elucidate how these processes break down in disease as well as identify cellular subpopulations that drive the disease. This review highlights three emerging technologies: single cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq), Assay for Transposase-Accessible Chromatin using sequencing (ATAC-seq), and Cytometry by Time-Of-Flight (CyTOF) mass cytometry.
Recent Findings
Technological and bioinformatic tools to analyze the transcriptome, epigenome, and proteome at the individual cell level have advanced rapidly making data collection relatively easy; however, understanding how to access and interpret the data remains a challenge for many scientists. It is, therefore, of paramount significance to educate the musculoskeletal community on how single cell technologies can be used to answer research questions and advance translation.
Summary
This article summarizes talks given during a workshop on “Single Cell Omics” at the 2020 annual meeting of the Orthopedic Research Society. Studies that applied scRNA-seq, ATAC-seq, and CyTOF mass cytometry to cartilage development and osteoarthritis are reviewed. This body of work shows how these cutting-edge tools can advance our understanding of the cellular heterogeneity and trajectories of lineage specification during development and disease.



Similar content being viewed by others
References
Wu CL, Dicks A, Steward N, Tang R, Katz DB, Choi YR, et al. Single cell transcriptomic analysis of human pluripotent stem cell chondrogenesis. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):1–8.
Richard D, Liu Z, Cao JX, Kiapour AM, Willen J, Yarlagadda S, et al. Evolutionary selection and constraint on human knee chondrocyte regulation impacts osteoarthritis risk. Cell. 2020;181(2):362–81.
Grandi FC, Baskar R, Smeriglio P, Murkherjee S, Indelli PF, Amanatullah DF, et al. Single-cell mass cytometry reveals cross-talk between inflammation-dampening and inflammation-amplifying cells in osteoarthritic cartilage. Sci Adv. 2020;6(11):eaay5352.
Adkar SS, Wu CL, Willard VP, Dicks A, Ettyreddy A, Steward N, et al. Step-wise chondrogenesis of human induced pluripotent stem cells and purification via a reporter allele generated by CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing. Stem Cells. 2019;37(1):65–76.
Valihrach L, Androvic P, Kubista M. Platforms for single-cell collection and analysis. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19(3):807.
Butler A, Hoffman P, Smibert P, Papalexi E, Satija R. Integrating single-cell transcriptomic data across different conditions, technologies, and species. Nat Biotechnol. 2018;36(5):411–20.
Cao J, Spielmann M, Qiu X, Huang X, Ibrahim DM, Hill AJ, et al. The single-cell transcriptional landscape of mammalian organogenesis. Nature. 2019;566(7745):496–502.
Becht E, McInnes L, Healy J, Dutertre CA, Kwok IWH, Ng LG, et al. Dimensionality reduction for visualizing single-cell data using UMAP. Nat Biotechnol. 2019;37:38–44.
Huang d W, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat Protoc. 2009;4(1):44–57.
Hrvatin S, Hochbaum DR, Nagy MA, Cicconet M, Robertson K, Cheadle L, et al. Single-cell analysis of experience-dependent transcriptomic states in the mouse visual cortex. Nat Neurosci. 2018;21(1):120–9.
Ramilowski JA, Goldberg T, Harshbarger J, Kloppmann E, Lizio M, Satagopam VP, et al. A draft network of ligand-receptor-mediated multicellular signalling in human. Nat Commun. 2015;6:7866.
Mardones MD, Andaur GA, Varas-Godoy M, Henriquez JF, Salech F, Behrens MI, et al. Frizzled-1 receptor regulates adult hippocampal neurogenesis. Mol Brain. 2016;9:29.
Lie DC, Colamarino SA, Song HJ, Desire L, Mira H, Consiglio A, et al. Wnt signalling regulates adult hippocampal neurogenesis. Nature. 2005;437(7063):1370–5.
Gu Z, Gu L, Eils R, Schlesner M, Brors B. Circlize implements and enhances circular visualization in R. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(19):2811–2.
Langfelder P, Horvath S. WGCNA: an R package for weighted correlation network analysis. BMC Bioinformatics. 2008;9:559.
Shannon P, Markiel A, Ozier O, Baliga NS, Wang JT, Ramage D, et al. Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 2003;13(11):2498–504.
Bindea G, Mlecnik B, Hackl H, Charoentong P, Tosolini M, Kirilovsky A, et al. ClueGO: a Cytoscape plug-in to decipher functionally grouped gene ontology and pathway annotation networks. Bioinformatics. 2009;25(8):1091–3.
Morris JH, Apeltsin L, Newman AM, Baumbach J, Wittkop T, Su G, et al. clusterMaker: a multi-algorithm clustering plugin for Cytoscape. BMC Bioinformatics. 2011;12:436.
Barthelemy M. Betweenness centrality in large complex networks. Eur Phys J B. 2004;38(2):163–8.
Karsenty G, Wagner EF. Reaching a genetic and molecular understanding of skeletal development. Dev Cell. 2002;2(4):389–406.
Hojo H, McMahon AP, Ohba S. An emerging regulatory landscape for skeletal development. Trends Genet. 2016;32(12):774–87.
Buenrostro JD, Wu B, Chang HY, Greenleaf WJ. ATAC-seq: a method for assaying chromatin accessibility genome-wide. Curr Protoc Mol Biol. 2015;109:21 9 1–9.
Buenrostro JD, Giresi PG, Zaba LC, Chang HY, Greenleaf WJ. Transposition of native chromatin for fast and sensitive epigenomic profiling of open chromatin, DNA-binding proteins and nucleosome position. Nat Methods. 2013;10(12):1213–8.
Li Q, Brown JB, Huang H, Bickel PJ. Measuring reproducibility of high-throughput experiments. Ann Appl Stat. 2011;5(3):1752–79.
Mereu E, Lafzi A, Moutinho C, Ziegenhain C, McCarthy DJ, Alvarez-Varela A, et al. Benchmarking single-cell RNA-sequencing protocols for cell atlas projects. Nat Biotechnol. 2020;38(6):747–55.
Ding J, Adiconis X, Simmons SK, Kowalczyk MS, Hession CC, Marjanovic ND, et al. Systematic comparison of single-cell and single-nucleus RNA-sequencing methods. Nat Biotechnol. 2020;38(6):737–46.
Schep AN, Wu B, Buenrostro JD, Greenleaf WJ. chromVAR: inferring transcription-factor-associated accessibility from single-cell epigenomic data. Nat Methods. 2017;14(10):975–8.
Ji Z, Zhou W, Ji H. Single-cell regulome data analysis by SCRAT. Bioinformatics. 2017;33(18):2930–2.
de Boer CG, Regev A. BROCKMAN: deciphering variance in epigenomic regulators by k-mer factorization. BMC Bioinformatics. 2018;19(1):253.
Zhao C, Hu S, Huo X, Zhang Y. Dr.seq2: a quality control and analysis pipeline for parallel single cell transcriptome and epigenome data. PLoS One. 2017;12(7):e0180583.
Pliner HA, Packer JS, McFaline-Figueroa JL, Cusanovich DA, Daza RM, Aghamirzaie D, et al. Cicero predicts cis-regulatory DNA interactions from single-cell chromatin accessibility data. Mol Cell. 2018;71(5):858–71.e8.
Baker SM, Rogerson C, Hayes A, Sharrocks AD, Rattray M. Classifying cells with Scasat, a single-cell ATAC-seq analysis tool. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47(2):e10.
Urrutia E, Chen L, Zhou H, Jiang Y. Destin: toolkit for single-cell analysis of chromatin accessibility. Bioinformatics. 2019;35(19):3818–20.
Zamanighomi M, Lin Z, Daley T, Chen X, Duren Z, Schep A, et al. Unsupervised clustering and epigenetic classification of single cells. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):2410.
Cai S, Georgakilas GK, Johnson JL, Vahedi G. A cosine similarity-based method to infer variability of chromatin accessibility at the single-cell level. Front Genet. 2018;9:319.
Bravo Gonzalez-Blas C, Minnoye L, Papasokrati D, Aibar S, Hulselmans G, Christiaens V, et al. cisTopic: cis-regulatory topic modeling on single-cell ATAC-seq data. Nat Methods. 2019;16(5):397–400.
Ji Z, Zhou W, Hou W, Ji H. Single-cell ATAC-seq signal extraction and enhancement with SCATE. Genome Biol. 2020;21(1):161.
Bendall SC, Nolan GP, Roederer M, Chattopadhyay PK. A deep profiler's guide to cytometry. Trends Immunol. 2012;33(7):323–32.
Bendall SC, Simonds EF, Qiu P, el AD A, Krutzik PO, Finck R, et al. Single-cell mass cytometry of differential immune and drug responses across a human hematopoietic continuum. Science. 2011;332(6030):687–96.
Hartmann FJ, Simonds EF, Vivanco N, Bruce T, Borges L, Nolan GP, et al. Scalable conjugation and characterization of Immunoglobulins with stable mass isotope reporters for single-cell mass cytometry analysis. Methods Mol Biol. 1989;2019:55–81.
Severe N, Karabacak NM, Gustafsson K, Baryawno N, Courties G, Kfoury Y, et al. Stress-induced changes in bone marrow stromal cell populations revealed through single-cell protein expression mapping. Cell Stem Cell. 2019;25(4):570–83.e7.
Porpiglia E, Samusik N, Ho ATV, Cosgrove BD, Mai T, Davis KL, et al. High-resolution myogenic lineage mapping by single-cell mass cytometry. Nat Cell Biol. 2017;19(5):558–67.
Croft AP, Campos J, Jansen K, Turner JD, Marshall J, Attar M, et al. Distinct fibroblast subsets drive inflammation and damage in arthritis. Nature. 2019;570(7760):246–51.
Jiang Y, Tuan RS. Origin and function of cartilage stem/progenitor cells in osteoarthritis. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2015;11(4):206–12.
Jeon OH, Kim C, Laberge RM, Demaria M, Rathod S, Vasserot AP, et al. Local clearance of senescent cells attenuates the development of post-traumatic osteoarthritis and creates a pro-regenerative environment. Nat Med. 2017;23(6):775–81.
Zhang F, Wei K, Slowikowski K, Fonseka CY, Rao DA, Kelly S, et al. Defining inflammatory cell states in rheumatoid arthritis joint synovial tissues by integrating single-cell transcriptomics and mass cytometry. Nat Immunol. 2019;20(7):928–42.
Wu Z, Shou L, Wang J, Xu X. Identification of the key gene and pathways associated with osteoarthritis via single-cell RNA sequencing on synovial fibroblasts. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020;99(33):e21707.
Ji Q, Zheng Y, Zhang G, Hu Y, Fan X, Hou Y, et al. Single-cell RNA-seq analysis reveals the progression of human osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019;78(1):100–10.
Kiel DP, Kemp JP, Rivadeneira F, Westendorf JJ, Karasik D, Duncan E, et al. The musculoskeletal knowledge portal: making Omics data useful to the broader scientific community. J Bone Miner Res. 2020;35(9):1626–33.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (AR075899 to CLW, AG15768 to F Guilak, AR070139 to TC, AR070864 and AR070865 to NB) and National Science Foundation (Graduate Research Fellowship to F. Grandi).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
MFR, TC, PM, FG, NB, and JJW declare no conflicts of interest.
CLW, ARD, and FG have a patent pending on compositions and methods discussed within.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any primary studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Genetics
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rai, M.F., Wu, CL., Capellini, T.D. et al. Single Cell Omics for Musculoskeletal Research. Curr Osteoporos Rep 19, 131–140 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11914-021-00662-2
Accepted:
Published:
Version of record:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11914-021-00662-2

