Wikipedia:Peer review/Pokémon Scarlet and Violet/archive1

Pokémon Scarlet and Violet

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

I've listed this article for peer review because I want to take it to Featured Article at some point in the future, and wish to get a gauge for what more I need to add or rewrite before making a nomination. I've done a few FLs before, so I have a few ideas of what I need done, but I wished to get some more input since FA is a whole new beast for me as an editor. Please feel free to tear into any and all parts of the article with this, and all advice is appreciated!

Thanks, Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 19:34, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

LunaEclipse

I'll start a source review in 2 weeks' time. Please trout me if I don't.

This is unrelated, but I fear the admittedly funny image of Toby Fox covered in foam has to go. MOS:IMAGEREL issues have arised over its use on his article, and the same issue seems to persist here. An image of someone covered in foam is ambiguous enough to not be properly illustrative. 🌙Eclipse (she/they/all neos • talk • edits) 14:50, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@LunaEclipse

Any progress? Tarlby ^{(t) (c)} 16:05, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

fuck 💔 i'll get to this tonight — 🌙Eclipse (she/they/all neos • talk • edits) 17:21, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

[21]: OK

[33]: OK

[1]: OK

[40]: OK

[61]: OK

[107]: OK

[58]: OK

[113]: OK

[24]: OK

[84]: OK

[49]: OK

[96]: Review does not give the game a rating

[89]: OK

[88]: OK

[5]: No mention of the Pokemon being used to find tools in the aforementioned region

@Pokelego999: ping. 🌙Eclipse (she/they/all neos • talk • edits) 13:50, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@LunaEclipse 5 is a wording error; the sentence is discussing abilities the mounts can use that can be unlocked throughout the game. Changed word from "tools" to "abilities" to clarify, let me know if I can make this more clear. For 96, which ref do you mean? In editing mode ref 96 is Game Revolution, which lists the 6/10 score at the bottom, while outside of editing mode it's VG247, which lists the 4/5 score at the bottom as well.

Is there anything prose-wise you have issue with? Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 01:32, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Pokelego999,

That's fine. I have no issues with the sentence.
I am talking about the VG247 review.
Nothing I saw prose-wise in relation to the sources I checked was a problem.

— 🌙Eclipse (she/they/all neos • talk • edits) 14:23, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]