Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:OneStream Software

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: speedy delete. The page was speedy deleted by User:Anthony Appleyard per WP:G11, "Unambiguous advertising or promotion". North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:47, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:OneStream Software

nonnotable and promotional. Previously decline seven times by a total of four different reviewers. No real improvment. Typical product of declared paid editing. DGG ( talk ) 04:51, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non-notable and without a doubt a problematic draft clogging up the system. Sulfurboy (talk) 05:52, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nominator, with a few observations. This was declined seven times. A rejection would have been appropriate, but the lack of a rejection is not a reason not to delete. This was declared paid editing, and illustrates that declared paid editing can be just as useless as undeclared paid editing. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:16, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Tendentious resubmission of advertising by an inexperienced paid editor. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 00:19, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per CSD G11. –User 45 65 41 21:44, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.