Apoptosis or Programmed Cell Death has been among the fastest growing fields in the last decade. Indeed, the number of publications has increased from fewer than 100 in 1990 to over 13â000 in 2000, see Figure 1.
The total number of publications over this decade to date is 55â074, and a log scale has been used to demonstrate that the current trend seems to be reaching a plateau (Figure 1). The current number of papers per year (13â000) corresponds to about 1.8% of all papers published in life sciences, an extraordinary proportion. Is this plateau real and does it predict a subsequent decrease? More importantly, to what extent does this reflect a true plateau of the importance with which scientists view cell death or does it merely represent an increase in the quality of published manuscripts? In general, 40% of all publications receive no citations in the subsequent literature, and two thirds of them receive less than two citations. This proportion is similar in the field of cell death.1 Nevertheless, the immense expansion over the last decade is witness to the perceived relevance of the area, and the corresponding spread into the understanding of molecular mechanisms together with its relationships with other relevant areas of biology including practical medical applications.
Out of 1014 cells in the human body, about 107 are now known to undergo apoptosis daily. This awareness is reflected in the shift in regard of apoptosis from a curiosity (in the 1980s) to a highly relevant biological event, whose inappropriate regulation leads to an array of pathologies. The âGolden Ageâ of the Nineties has left all of us with a detailed knowledge of molecular mechanisms, for example, the families of Bcl-2, caspases, DNA damage pathways, signaling cascades, receptor regulation, cell cycle, mitochondria and regulation of cell clearance. This leap in academic understanding has expanded into more practical areas such as the role of apoptosis in development and in pathologies of the neuronal and immune systems. Further detailed description of these aspects is to be found in more specialized reviews (see for reviews2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11).
Cell Death and Differentiation (CDD) was started in 1994 to act as a forum for this new field. Figures 2 and 3 show how the journal has gradually but continuously increased its number of papers, total number of citations, and most importantly its quality over time, reaching 6.19 citations per paper (Figure 2C). The journal is cited by, and cites, all relevant and respected scientific media (Table 1), with some CDD papers achieving impressive numbers of citations/paper (Table 2). Despite some technical difficulties, such as for example a late entry into PubMed (see Table 3), the journal is now a major reference for its field. This has been achieved only through synergistic efforts between all editors and the publisher, to whom CDD is greatly indebted. The plan for the future aims to strengthen further the role of Cell Death and Differentiation in the scientific community.
Number of papers received (lower columns, in black) and published (upper columns, in grey) in Cell Death and Differentiation every year. The figure shows only papers, not added material (e.g. editorial, meeting reports, book reviews, letters). The rejection rate is based on final decision, not on the first evaluation. The rejection rate is also based on the year, even though material received in autumn, and often in summer, ends in the following year. The value for the year 2000 has been predicted based on the first 40 weeks
For this coming year the journal will improve its organization. First, the Editorial Board will have new members. We therefore welcome J Abrams (US), S Lipton (US), M Peter (US), D Altieri (US), H Ichijo (J), M Naito (J), M Miura (J), RC Bleackley (CAN) and JC Martinou (CH). Special thanks goes to those editors who have left the journal this year, as part of the normal rotation which allows for the introduction of new blood. As in previous years, collaboration with ex-editors will actively continue but on a less formal level. Second, a new Editorial Office will be opened in Tokyo, and will include both Japanese and Australian Editors. Third, the journal has recently opened a new section for airing discussion and comment of topical issues. Fourth, as every year, the journal will strive to continue the improvement at both the scientific and editorial levels. All three offices will further improve speed and homogeneity of decision, while the publisher will continue to improve marketing and develop new media technologies. Finally, the journal will continue to publish parallel reviews aimed at summarizing the current state of knowledge. Some of the recent areas covered include mitochondria (see for example12,13,14,15,16,17), Drosophila apoptosis (see for example18,19,20,21), neurodegeneration (see for example22,23,24), the p53 family (see for example25,26), and caspases (see for example27,28,29).
At the beginning of this new millennium, Cell Death and Differentiation would like to take this opportunity to thank sincerely all readers, contributors, editors, assistants and publishers for their time and effort dedicated to making it a success, and looks forward with pleasant anticipation to continuing to improve our positive interaction in the future.
References
Garfield E and Melino G . 1997 The evolution of Cell Death: an analysis from the ISI-Science Citation Index Cell Death Differ. 4: 352â361
Heemels MT . 2000 Nature insight apoptosis Nature 407: 769
Hengartner MO . 2000 The biochemistry of apoptosis Nature 407: 770â776
Rich T, Allen RL and Wyllie AH . 2000 Defying death after DNA damage Nature 407: 777â783
Savill J and Fadok V . 2000 Corpse clearance defines the meaning of cell death Nature 407: 784â788
Krammer PH . 2000 CD95's deadly mission in the immune system Nature 407: 789â795
Meier P, Finch A and Evan G . 2000 Apoptosis in development Nature 407: 796â801
Yuan J and Yankner BA . 2000 Apoptosis in the nervous system Nature 407: 802â809
Nicholson DW . 2000 From bench to clinic with apoptosis-based therapeutic agents Nature 407: 810â816
Green DR . 2000 Apoptotic pathways: paper wraps stone blunt scissors Cell 102: 1â4
Lockshin RA, Osborne B and Zakeri Z . 2000 Cell death in the third millennium Cell Death Differ. 7: 2â7
Vieira HLA, Haouzi D, El Hamel C, Jacotot E, Belzacq AS, Brenner C and Kroemer G . 2000 Permeabilization of the mitochondrial inner membrane during apoptosis. Impact of the adenine nucleotide translocator Cell Death Differ. 7: 1146â1154
Matsuyama S and Reed JC . 2000 Mitochondria-dependent apoptosis and cellular pH regulation Cell Death Differ. 7: 1155â1165
Korsmeyer SJ, Wei MC, Saito M, Weiler S, Oh KJ and Schlessinger P . 2000 Pro-apoptotic cascade activates BID, which oligomerizes BAK or BAX into pores that result in the release of cytochrome c Cell Death Differ. 7: 1166â1173
Tsujimoto Y and Shimizu S . 2000 VDAC regulation by the Bcl-2 family of proteins Cell Death Differ. 7: 1174â1181
Harris MH and Thompson CB . 2000 The role of Bcl-2 family in the regulation of outer mitochondrial membrane permeability Cell Death Differ. 7: 1182â1191
Von Ahsen O, Waterhouse NJ, Kuwana T, Newmeyer DD and Green DR . 2000 The âharmlessâ release of cytochrome c Cell Death Differ. 7: 1192â1199
Kumar S and Dousmanis J . 2000 The fly caspases Cell Death Differ. 7: 1039â1044
Bangs P, Franc N and White K . 2000 Molecular mechanisms of cell death and phagocytosis in Drosophila Cell Death Differ. 7: 1027â1034
Nordstrom W and Abrams JM . 2000 Guardian ancestry: fly p53 and damage-inducible apoptosis Cell Death Differ. 7: 1035â1038
Hay BA . 2000 Understanding IAP function and regulation: a view from Drosophila Cell Death Differ. 7: 1045â1056
Morison RS and Kinoshita Y . 2000 The role of p53 in neuronal cell death Cell Death Differ. 7: 868â879
Miller FD, Pozniak CD and Walsh GS . 2000 Neuronal life and death: an essential role for the p53 family Cell Death Differ 7: 880â888
Aguzzi A and Heppner FL . 2000 Pathogenesis of prion diseases: a progress report Cell Death Differ. 7: 889â902
Levrero M, De Laurenzi V, Costanzo A, Gong J, Melino G and Wang JYJ . 1999 Structure, function and regulation of p63 and p73 Cell Death Differ. 6: 1146â1153
Lohrum MAE and Vousden KH . 1999 Regulation and activation of p53 and its family members Cell Death Differ. 6: 1162â1168
Nicholson DW . 1999 Caspases structure, proteolytic substrates, and function during apoptotic cell death Cell Death Differ 6: 1028â1042
Zheng TS, Hunot S, Kuida K and Flavell RA . 1999 Caspase knockouts: matter of life and death Cell Death Differ. 6: 1043â1053
Ekert PG, Silke J and Vaux DL . 1999 Caspase inhibitors Cell Death Differ. 6: 1081â1086
Acknowledgements
During the preparation of this note, we have enjoyed discussions, reflections, thoughts, and comments (sometimes in a lab or an editorial office, more often sailing in Greece or in front of a beer) with many colleagues, including in particular Mauro Piacentini, Vincenzo De Laurenzi, Penny Lovat, Michael Osuch, Marie-Therese Heemels, Marie McVeigh and Gene Garfield. We would particularly like to thank those who daily help to create Cell Death and Differentiation, Cesare Vongher, Pauline Cripps, Nashita Nanu, Jane Torr and especially Tasmeen Monie who will sadly leave us during the present year. Since it is impossible in such a short note to be comprehensive, our apologies to many colleagues for having failed to cite their contributions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Melino, G., Knight, R. & Green, D. Publications in Cell Death: the golden age. Cell Death Differ 8, 1â3 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.cdd.4400809
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.cdd.4400809
This article is cited by
-
The birth of death, 30 years ago
Cell Death & Differentiation (2024)
-
Immunology of Apoptosis and Necrosis
Biochemistry (Moscow) (2005)


