Skip to main content
PNAS Nexus logoLink to PNAS Nexus
. 2025 Oct 14;4(10):pgaf300. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf300

Ribonucleoprotein (RNP) condensates modulate survival in response to Mars-like stress conditions

Riya Dhage 1, Arijit Roy 2, Bhalamurugan Sivaraman 3, Purusharth I Rajyaguru 4,b,
Editor: Martha Field
PMCID: PMC12526142  PMID: 41103577

Abstract

Scientific advances have emboldened human efforts toward exploring the potential of extinct, extant, or future life on Mars. An important aspect of this endeavor is understanding how an organism adapts to stress-inducing environmental conditions on Mars, such as radiation, shock waves, extreme temperatures, and chaotropic stress due to higher levels of perchlorates. A conserved approach used by organisms across evolutionary scales to adapt and overcome stress conditions is the assembly of ribonucleoprotein (RNP) condensates. In this study, we employ a multidisciplinary approach to understand yeast survivability and adaptation under Mars-like stress conditions, specifically shock waves and perchlorate, by focusing on RNP condensates. Our study reveals that yeast survives 5.6 M intensity shock waves. Exposure to either shock waves or sodium perchlorate induces the formation of P-bodies, a conserved stress-induced condensate. Yeast mutants defective in P-body assembly show defective growth in response to perchlorate stress. Transcriptome analysis, followed by validation, identified several relevant transcripts whose levels are perturbed in response to Mars-like conditions. Finally, identification of several transcripts whose abundance is altered in the P-body assembly mutant upon stress highlights a new connection between response to Martian stress conditions and RNP condensates. This study, a first of its kind, highlights the importance of RNP condensates in understanding the impact of Martian conditions on life in general. This study paves the way for using RNP condensates as a biomarker for assessing the health of life forms during space explorations.

Keywords: ribonucleoprotein (RNP) condensates, Mars, perchlorate stress, shock waves


Significance Statement.

Exploring the possibility of the survival of life under extraterrestrial conditions is an important goal of astrobiology. In this study, we use baker's yeast, a powerful model organism, to assess the impact of Mars-like conditions. We observe that yeast survive shock waves and perchlorate treatment—two stressors relevant to Mars. Further, yeast responds to Martian conditions by assembling P-bodies (conserved RNA–protein complexes). Yeast mutants unable to form P-bodies exhibit impaired growth under perchlorate stress. RNA-sequencing and validation studies reveal that several stress-responsive transcripts are stabilized upon perchlorate treatment that induces P-body assembly. This unique study links P-bodies to survival under Martian stress, offering new insights for astrobiology and space exploration.

Introduction

With advances in space science and astrobiology, exploring the potential of Mars in supporting life forms is gaining significant attention. Mars offers a range of hostile environmental conditions that a potential life form would need to overcome. Thus, understanding its unique and challenging environmental conditions becomes important. Martian stress conditions are characterized by the following: (i) high-intensity shock waves resulting from meteorite impacts, (ii) extreme temperature and pressure fluctuations, (iii) ionizing and solar UV radiations due to a thin atmosphere, and (iv) chaotropic agents like perchlorates. These conditions pose a serious obstacle to the survival of potential life forms (1, 2). To explore the possibility of extinct/extant/future life forms on Mars, it would be imperative to assess the response of life forms on Earth to Martian conditions.

The Martian land is marked by a history of several meteorite impacts, generating high-intensity shock waves that resonate through the thin Martian atmosphere (3). Shock waves are characterized by rapid changes in pressure and temperature, posing a unique challenge to any potential life forms, as they can induce physiological stresses demanding robust adaptive mechanisms. Exploring the effects of these shock waves on simple eukaryotic microorganisms such as yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) could be a good starting point to understand the possibility of life on Mars.

Apart from shockwaves, the presence of perchlorates in Martian soil poses a significant hazard to potential life forms. The presence of perchlorates in Martian regolith has been detected in significant concentrations (0.5–1 wt%) at multiple sites, such as the Phoenix landing site (4). Perchlorates are highly oxidizing salts which are chaotropic (disrupting) macromolecules that destabilize hydrogen bonds and hydrophobic interactions. This poses severe chemical stress, making it difficult for life to sustain itself.

Bacteria and yeast have been extensively used as models to study the impact of space and other planetary conditions on life (5). Saccharomyces cerevisiae (a single-celled organism), also known as budding yeast, is a simple yet elegant model system with evolutionarily conserved cellular processes. Its well-documented responses to various stressors make it an ideal model organism for studying the impact of Martian stress conditions on survival. The effect of space travel-related stresses, such as microgravity and ionizing radiation, has been assessed on yeast physiology (6–9). Specifically, a biosensor using S. cerevisiae (BioSentinel) was recently developed by NASA to support deep space missions (9) to Mars and space habitation beyond low Earth orbit. These observations highlight the importance of S. cerevisiae as a model system for space biology experiments. However, the role of RNP condensates in response to any Martian stresses in altering yeast physiology is currently unexplored.

Assembly of ribonucleoprotein (RNP) condensates like stress granules and P-bodies is a stress response mechanism conserved from yeast to humans. RNP condensates are dynamic, membrane-less structures formed by reversible assembly of RNA and proteins (10, 11). These structures regulate stress response by orchestrating mRNA fate decisions at the level of mRNA stability and translation to control protein abundance. RNP condensates assemble in response to various stress conditions, such as temperature shock, nutrient deprivation, and oxidative stress, and disassemble upon recovery from stress (11, 12). Whether Martian conditions, such as shock waves and perchlorate, induce the assembly of RNP condensates is not known. Additionally, the role of RNP condensates in mounting a response to perchlorate or shock waves alone or in combination has not been explored.

In this study, we employ a multidisciplinary approach comprising engineering, imaging, genetics, and genomics to explore the survivability of S. cerevisiae under Mars-like stress conditions, specifically focusing on shock waves and perchlorate stress. We aim to assess whether these stresses could induce RNP condensate assembly and their contribution to yeast survival in these stressful conditions.

Materials and methods

Yeast strains and growth conditions

The yeast strains used in this study are listed in Table S1. All strains were transformed with a plasmid expressing Dcp2-mCherry and Pab1-GFP (green fluorescent protein) (a list of plasmids used in the study is listed in Table S2). All strains were grown at 30 °C in synthetic dropout media without uracil supplemented with 2% glucose.

Shock processing

We utilized the High-Intensity Shock Tube for Astrochemistry (HISTA) housed in the Physical Research Laboratory (PRL), Ahmedabad, India. It is a 7 m long shock tube with a 2 m long driver section and a 5 m long driven section, and these two sections are separated by an Aluminum diaphragm. The driver sections are filled with high-pressure Helium gas, and the driven sections are usually filled with low-pressure Argon gas. The various factors that influence the shock intensity in the shock tube are the bursting pressure of the driver side, the diaphragm's groove thickness, and the driven gas pressure. By adjusting these parameters, we can generate different shock intensities according to our requirements. The details of HISTA's operation principles, procedure, and data collection can be found in the literature by (13, 14)

Before the shock processing, we drop casted different yeast samples on the end flange of the shock tube, followed by closing the shock tube's driven section using the metal end flange. The entire driven sections are then pumped up to 10−2 mbar order, followed by purging using Argon (Ar) to reduce any chance of contamination from the residual atmospheric gas. The driven section is filled with very low-pressure Ar. The driven section pressure can be varied according to the desired shock Mach number. A shock response curve can be collected using two pressure sensors with a separation distance of 30 cm attached to HISTA. After the shock processing the internal pressure of the shock tube becomes very high (can be as high as 18 bar). The high-pressure He and Ar mixture is slowly released further with the help of a leak valve. Once the internal pressure of the shock tube equilibrates with the atmospheric pressure, the end flange can be opened, and shocked yeast samples were collected. For the unshocked control, the yeast samples were similarly drop casted on the metal flange as done for shock processing and for a similar duration of time before collecting them for growth curve and imaging experiments.

Growth curve

Growth curve was performed on yeast cells recovered from the shock tube following the exposure to shock waves, along with unshocked cells. The cells were then cultured in fresh media by dilution to an initial optical density of 0.05 OD600nm. The cultures were then incubated at 30 °C (180 rpm) and monitored the growth periodically till 40 h.

The growth curve for the perchlorate-treated condition was obtained by growing yeast in fresh media with dilution to an initial optical density of 0.1 OD600nm. The cultures were then split into two parts, one treated with 100 mM of sodium perchlorate and one with vehicle control (milli-Q water). The cultures were then incubated at 30 °C (180 rpm) and monitored the growth periodically for 30–40 h.

For combined stress, yeast cells were first exposed to 5.6 Mach intensity shock waves, followed by dilution to an initial optical density of 0.05 OD600nm in fresh medium supplemented with 100 mM sodium perchlorate. The cultures were incubated at 30 °C (180 rpm) and monitored the growth periodically till 60 h. Synthetic dropout media (-uracil) supplemented with 2% glucose were used for all growth curve experiments. All absorbance measurements were performed at 600 nm. The data were analyzed, and the growth curve was then plotted using GraphPad Prism 9.0. Lag time and growth rate were derived from the first derivative of the growth curve, subjected to linear regression with Gaussian fit using GraphPad Prism 9.0. For Figs. 1C and S3B, C, lag time was calculated as the time taken to reach 0.25 OD600nm.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Saccharomyces cerevisiae survives 5.6 Mach intensity shock waves and 100 mM sodium perchlorate. A) Shock response curve of HISTA, used to calculate the Mach value and the reflected shock temperature. B) Growth curve for wild-type BY4741 yeast strain postexposure to 3.5, 4.8, and 5.6 Mach intensity shock waves (n = 7 biological replicates for 4.8 and 5.6 M, n = 2 for 3.5 M). C) Lag time for wildtype BY4741 yeast strain postexposure to 3.5, 4.8, and 5.6 Mach intensity shock waves obtained from Fig. 1B (n = 7 biological replicates for 4.8 and 5.6 M, n = 2 for 3.5 M). D) Growth curve for wildtype BY4741 yeast under different concentrations of sodium perchlorate stress (n = 3 biological replicates). E) Growth rate for wildtype under different concentrations of sodium perchlorate obtained from Fig. 1D (n = 3 biological replicates). F) Growth curve for wildtype BY4741 yeast under continuous 100 mm sodium chloride and sodium perchlorate stress (n = 3 biological replicates). G) Growth rate for wildtype under continuous 100 mm sodium chloride and sodium perchlorate stress obtained from 1F. In the above experiments, error bars represent the SEM. The significance of the data was calculated by Tukey's multiple comparison test and P-values for all comparisons are summarized in Table S4.

Sample preparation for microscopy

Postshock wave treatment, samples were recovered from the shock tube and fixed with 2% paraformaldehyde in 1× PBS (phosphate buffer saline pH 7) at room temperature (RT). Fixed samples were then incubated with poly-L-lysine-coated coverslips at RT for 45 min, followed by mounting on a glass slide with Fluorochrome G.

For the sodium perchlorate-treated condition, cells were grown in the presence of 100 mM sodium perchlorate to reach 0.5 OD, followed by fixing with 2% paraformaldehyde as mentioned above.

Microscopy

All images were acquired using a Deltavision RT microscope system running softWoRx 6.1.3 software (Applied Precision, LLC), using a 100X, oil-immersion objective. Exposure time and transmittance settings for the GFP channel were 0.3 s and 32%, and for the mCherry channel were 0.5 s and 50%, respectively. Images were acquired at a resolution of 512 × 512 pixels using a CoolSnapHQ camera (Photometrics) with 1 × 1 binning. All the images were deconvolved using standard softWoRx deconvolution algorithms. ImageJ was used to analyze the data. For each experiment, 100 cells were counted to determine the number of foci (Pab1-GFP, Edc3-mCherry, or Scd6-GFP) per cell. For Fig. 2F and G, live-cell images were acquired using an Apotome microscope (Zeiss Axio observer) and processed using ImageJ software, as there were technical issues with Deltavision RT microscope system. The images were taken at 63X, oil immersion objective. Exposure time and transmittance settings for the GFP channel were 0.15 s and 50%, and for the mCherry channel were 0.75 s and 100%, respectively.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Shock waves and sodium perchlorate induce the assembly of RNP condensates in wildtype (BY4741) yeast strain. Microscopy analysis for wildtype (BY4741) yeast strain—A) upon exposure to 5.6, 4.8, and 3.5 Mach intensity shock waves, D) upon continuous 100 mM sodium perchlorate treatment, F) upon continuous 100 mM sodium chloride and sodium perchlorate treatment. Pab1-GFP and Dcp2-mCherry are the markers of stress granules and P-bodies, respectively. Arrows in Dcp2-mCherry and Pab1-GFP panels represent P-bodies and stress granules, respectively. Scale Bar, 2 µm. B and C) Graph depicting the number of granules per cell in wild-type upon exposure to 5.6, 4.8, and 3.5 Mach intensity shock wave for B) Pab1-GFP, C) Dcp2-mcherry (n = 6 biological replicates for 5.6 and 4.8 M, n = 2 for 3.5 M); E and G) graph depicting the number of Dcp2-mCherry granules per cell in wild-type strain upon E) continuous sodium perchlorate treatment G) continuous sodium chloride and sodium perchlorate treatment (n = 3 biological replicates). In the above experiments, error bars represent the SEM. The significance of the data was calculated by a two-tailed paired student t test and P-values are summarized as: ****, P < 0.0001 ***, P < 0.005; **, P < 0.01; *, P < 0.05.

Colony-forming unit assay

The yeast cells were diluted at an OD600 of 0.1 from an overnight-grown primary culture and grown in synthetic dropout media without uracil (SD Ura-), supplemented with 2% glucose, with or without 100 mM sodium perchlorate, and allowed to reach 0.5 OD600. After which the cultures were washed twice with perchlorate-free media. The cells were serially diluted and plated on SD Ura- agar plates. The plates were incubated at 30 °C for 48 h. The colony-forming unit (CFU) count was used to determine the survival.

mRNA stability assay

A thermo-sensitive mutant of RNA polymerase II, rpb1-1, was used to perform an mRNA stability assay (15, 16). The rpb1-1 strain was grown in YEPD with or without 100 mM sodium perchlorate at 30 °C (180 rpm) till 0.5 OD600nm. For transcription shut off, prewarmed (55 °C) YEPD was added to cultures at 30 °C followed by incubating at 42 °C for heat shock. Cells were collected at time intervals of 0, 15, 30, 45, and 60 min of heat shock, followed by immediate snap freezing with liquid nitrogen. RNA isolation was performed by the hot-phenol method, followed by cDNA synthesis. Gene-specific primers were used for qRT-PCR and were normalized to PGK1. Statistical analysis was done by two-way ANOVA using Šídák's multiple comparisons test.

RNA isolation

RNA was isolated from biological replicates for each test sample using the hot acidic phenol protocol described in Current Protocols in Molecular Biology (1996), Unit 13.12 (17, 18). Briefly, the cell pellet was washed with DEPC-treated autoclaved Milli-Q water (DEPC-AMQ) once and resuspended thoroughly in TES (10 mM Tris-Cl pH 7.5, 10 mM ethylene-diamine-tetraacetic acid [EDTA], and 0.5% SDS). Four hundred microliters of acidic phenol pH 4.5 (0.1 M citrate buffer saturated) were added to the suspension and incubated at 65 °C for 60 min with occasional vortexing. Samples were spun at 14,000 rpm for 10 min at 4 °C. The top aqueous layer was transferred to a fresh tube. Subsequently, 400 μL chloroform was added, mixed, and spun as above. The aqueous layer was mixed with 1/10th volume 3 M sodium acetate, pH 5.2, and 2.5 volumes of 100% ethanol, followed by snap freezing in liquid N2. The samples were allowed to thaw on ice, followed by pelleting down the precipitated RNA at 14,000 rpm at 4 °C for 30 min. The RNA pellets were washed with 70% ethanol (prepared in DEPC-AMQ), followed by air drying and resuspending the pellet in 50 μL DEPC-AMQ, and RNA quality was determined by 1% agarose formamide gel electrophoresis. The concentration and purity of RNA were quantified using a Nanodrop Spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific; 2000). The integrity of RNA in the samples was assessed on TapeStation (Agilent). RNA concentration was quantified using a Qubit RNA HS assay kit (Q32855).

RNA library preparation and sequencing

RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) libraries were prepared with Illumina-compatible NEBNext® Ultra II. Directional RNA Library Prep Kit (New England BioLabs, MA, USA) at Genotypic Technology Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore, India. 200 ng of total RNA was used for mRNA isolation, fragmentation, and priming. Fragmented and primed mRNA was then subjected to first-strand synthesis followed by second-strand synthesis. The double-stranded cDNA was purified using NEBNext sample purification beads. Purified cDNA was end-repaired, adenylated, and ligated to Illumina adapters as per NEBNext Ultra II Directional RNA Library Prep protocol, followed by second-strand excision using the USER enzyme at 37 °C for 15 min. Adapter-ligated cDNA was purified using NEBNext beads and was subjected to 12 cycles for Indexing-(98 °C for 30 s, cycling (98 °C for 10 s 65 °C for 75 s) and 65 °C for 5 min) and enriched the adapter-ligated fragments. Final PCR products (sequencing library) were purified with NEBNext beads, followed by a library quality control check. Illumina-compatible sequencing libraries were quantified by Qubit fluorometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA), and fragment size distribution was analyzed on Agilent 4150 TapeStation. The libraries were paired-end sequenced on an Illumina NovaSeqX Plus sequencer for 150 cycles (Illumina, San Diego, USA) following the manufacturer's instructions.

Transcriptome analysis

The QC-passed reads were mapped to the indexed S. cerevisiae reference genome (S288c) using a splice-aware aligner (19). The quantification of expressed transcripts was performed using the genome-aligned reads. This expression data was subsequently utilized for downstream analyses, including gene ontology (GO) and pathway annotations, to study the function of each expressed transcript. The Featurecounts4 tool was used to estimate and calculate transcript abundance (20). DESeq25 was used to calculate the differentially expressed transcripts (21). Transcripts were functionally annotated based on homology using the BLAST5 tool against Fungal protein sequences available from the UniProt database (22). Pathway analysis was done on the KAAS6 server using S. cerevisiae as the reference organism (23).

Reverse transcription and quantitative real-time PCR

The isolated RNA was subjected to DNase treatment to remove any DNA contamination. For this, 5 μg of total RNA, 0.75 units of DNase I (Thermo Fisher Scientific EN0525), and DNase I buffer (with MgCl2 added to it), 0.2 units of RiboLock RNase Inhibitor (Thermo Fisher Scientific, EO0381), and DEPC-AMQ were added for a 20 μL reaction. The above reaction was incubated at 37 °C for 30 min, followed by adding 2 μL EDTA and incubating it at 65 °C for 10 min to inhibit the DNase I activity. The DNaseI-treated RNA concentration was measured in a spectrophotometer, followed by an RNA quality check by 1% agarose formamide gel electrophoresis. DNase I-treated RNA was used for cDNA preparation. One microgram of RNA was used to synthesize cDNA using the RevertAid RT Reverse Transcription Kit (Thermo K1691) according to the manufacturer's protocol. The synthesized cDNA was then diluted 1:10, followed by quantitative real-time PCR.

TB GreenTM Premix Ex TaqTM (TakaRa). The reactions were set up in technical duplicates for each biological replicate. Data points in all graphs represent biological replicates. Primers used for qRT-PCR are listed in Table S3. The PCR conditions were 95 °C for 10 min for initial denaturation, followed by 30 cycles of 95 °C for 15 s and 60 °C for 45 s. DNA was quantified in every cycle at the step of extension. Melt cure acquisition was carried out at 60 °C for 15 s. PGK1 was used as an internal control. To calculate the final log2 fold-change values, ΔΔCt method was used, where log2 Fold-change values were plotted using GraphPad Prism software, version 9.00. The significance of the data was calculated by a paired t test.

Results

Saccharomyces cerevisiae survives 5.6 Mach intensity shock waves

Using a unicellular eukaryote, S. cerevisiae (budding yeast) as a model system, our study aims to understand the impact of Mars-like stress conditions on survival and growth. To address this question, we employed a multidisciplinary approach to simulate conditions similar to those on Mars, specifically shock waves. Using a HISTA, the S. cerevisiae wild-type BY4741 strain was subjected to varying intensities of shock waves such as 3.5, 4.8, and 5.6 Mach (M) (detailed in the Methods section). The various operational parameters for shock processing used in this study are outlined in Table 1. The shock response curve (5.6 M) of HISTA (Fig. 1A) was recorded on a digital oscilloscope using two piezoelectric pressure sensors, PS1 and PS2, positioned at the end of HISTA. The inset highlights the time delay between the pressure signals from PS1 and PS2 during the arrival of the incident shock. It is notable that shock wave treatment also exposes the cells to very high estimated temperatures, albeit for a very short (2 ms) period of time (Table 1; 24). This indicates that shockwaves could expose lifeforms to transient heat shock stress. To assess the effect of shock waves on S. cerevisiae survival, growth curve analysis was performed on wild-type BY4741 yeast cells collected postshock from the shock tube. Interestingly, as shown in Fig. 1B and C, the S. cerevisiae wild-type BY4741 strain survives 5.6 Mach intensity shock waves with an extended lag phase compared to the unshocked controls. 5.6 M shocked wild-type strain began to grow after ∼20 h of incubation at 30 °C, indicating a prolonged recovery period from the stress induced by shock waves. Cells exposed to 3.5 and 4.8 M intensity shockwaves also underwent an extended lag phase, but to a lesser extent than 5.6 M intensity shockwaves (Fig. 1B and C). This indicates a graded response by yeast cells to increasing intensity of shock waves.

Table 1.

The details of the shock tube parameters used in the experiment.

Serial number Bursting pressure (He) (Bar) Driven gas (Ar) pressure (Bar) Mach number (M) Estimated reflected shock temperature (K) calculated using Rankine–Hugoniot jump equations
1 62.5 0.1 5.5 7,300
2 30.3 0.1 4.8 5,355
3 27.8 0.4 3.5 2,915

Saccharomyces cerevisiae survives sodium perchlorate concentrations equivalent to Martian conditions

To further study the impact of Martian stress conditions on S. cerevisiae, we investigated the effect of perchlorate salts at concentrations equivalent to those found on the Martian surface. The Martian soil is reported to contain perchlorates in the range of 0.5–1% by weight (4). To test this, we used sodium salt of perchlorate (NaClO4) as it is highly soluble in water among all other perchlorates. We then analyzed the growth of wild-type BY4741 yeast strain in the continuous presence of sodium perchlorate at concentrations of 50 mM, 100 mM, 200 mM, 500 mM, 1, and 2 M. As shown in Fig. 1D and E, we observed a concentration-dependent increase in growth defect, indicating the negative effect of sodium perchlorate on yeast growth. While 50 mM NaClO4 impacts yeast growth slightly, concentrations of 100 and 200 mM show significant growth defects, and concentrations of 500 mM or above result in little or no growth till 40 h of incubation at 30 °C. Since perchlorates are present on Martian soil in the range of 0.5–1%, we have therefore used 100 mM (1.22% by weight) of sodium perchlorate for all subsequent experiments.

To check whether the observed growth defect is specific to sodium perchlorate, we looked at yeast growth in the presence of 100 mM sodium chloride. We observed no growth defect for wildtype at 100 mM NaCl compared to untreated control, unlike sodium perchlorate (Fig. 1F and G). This highlights the specific effect of perchlorate ions on growth.

5.6 M intensity shock induces RNP condensates in yeast

Yeast cells survive 5.6 M shock waves and grow after an 18–20 h lag, indicating a stress response. We, therefore, investigated the assembly of two conserved, classical RNP condensates: stress granules (Pab1-GFP) and P-bodies (Dcp2-mCherry) in response to shock waves. Exposure to 5.6 M intensity shock waves induced the assembly of both P-bodies as well as stress granules (Fig. 2A). This observation indicates that exposure to shock waves induces the assembly of ribonucleoprotein condensates as a cellular response to this stress. Moreover, the number of stress granules and P-bodies decreased in cells exposed to 4.8 M compared to 5.6 M (Fig. 2B and C). Interestingly, no condensates were induced in response to a 3.5 M shockwave, suggesting that the induction of the condensates occurs in a graded manner depending on the shockwave intensity. Since we observed the assembly of P-bodies and stress granules in wild-type strain upon exposure to 5.6 M shock waves, we wanted to confirm the assembly of these condensates with another condensate resident marker protein, Scd6, which is reported to localize to both P-bodies and stress granules. As shown in Fig. S1, the assembly of Scd6-GFP granules was also observed in wild-type yeast strains upon exposure to 5.6 M intensity shock. This again confirms our observation that exposure to shock waves induces the assembly of ribonucleoprotein condensates as a cellular response to the stress condition.

Sodium perchlorate induces P-body assembly

Saccharomyces cerevisiae survived 100 mM sodium perchlorate with a significant growth defect. Therefore, we investigated the assembly of RNP condensates in response to sodium perchlorate stress. As depicted in Fig. 2D and E, P-bodies but not stress granules were induced in wild-type strain grown in the presence of continuous 100 mM NaClO4. This observation indicates that signaling pathways for the assembly of PBs and SGs are distinct in response to sodium perchlorate stress. To determine whether this response is specific to perchlorate ions or a general effect of sodium salts, we assessed assembly of RNP condensates in the presence of sodium chloride. Notably, neither stress granules nor P-bodies were induced in response to sodium chloride, indicating the effect is specific to perchlorate ions (Fig. 2F and G).

edc3Δlsm4ΔC mutant fails to assemble RNP condensates in response to shock waves or sodium perchlorate stress

We wanted to investigate the importance of these condensates in the recovery of yeast cells from the two Martian stress conditions mentioned above. To address this, we examined the mutant strain edc3Δlsm4ΔC, which is known to be defective in the assembly of P-bodies and stress granules under stresses such as glucose starvation (25). This strain is deleted for EDC3, the gene encoding a conserved P-body marker, and a part of the LSM4 gene encoding the prion-like C-terminal of the Lsm4 protein. We assessed whether this mutant could assemble RNP condensates in response to shock waves and/or perchlorate stress. As shown in Fig. 3A and B and Fig. S2A–C, P-body and stress granule assembly were hampered in the edc3Δlsm4ΔC mutant upon exposure to 5.6 M intensity shock wave and sodium perchlorate. This finding suggests that the formation of Dcp2-mCherry marked P-bodies and Pab1-GFP marked stress granules depends on the presence of Edc3 and Lsm4, highlighting similarities between the condensate assembly in various stress conditions.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

edc3Δlsm4C mutant is defective in condensate assembly and demonstrates an extended lag phase in sodium perchlorate stress. Microscopy analysis for edc3Δlsm4ΔC mutant strain upon—A) exposure to 5.6 Mach intensity shock waves, B) continuous sodium perchlorate (NaClO4) treatment. Dcp2-mCherry and Pab1-GFP are the markers of P-bodies and stress granules, respectively. Scale Bar, 2 µm. Comparison of the growth curve for wild-type and edc3Δlsm4ΔC mutant—C) grown in continuous 100 mM sodium perchlorate, E) postexposure to 5.6 M intensity shock. D) Graph depicting growth rate in wild-type and edc3Δlsm4ΔC upon sodium perchlorate stress obtained from Fig. 3C (n = 4); F) Lag time for wild-type and edc3Δlsm4ΔC mutant obtained from Fig. 3E (n = 3 biological replicates); G) Survival of wild-type and edc3Δlsm4ΔC post continuous treatment with 100 mM sodium perchlorate shown as CFU. H) Quantification for CFU obtained from Fig. 3G (n = 6 biological replicates). In the above experiments, error bars represent the SEM. The significance of the data was calculated by Tukey's multiple comparison test for growth curves and two-tailed paired student t test for CFU assay with P-values summarized as: ****, P < 0.0001 ***, P < 0.005; **, P < 0.01; *, P < 0.05.

The edc3Δlsm4ΔC mutant demonstrates an extended lag phase in sodium perchlorate stress. We hypothesized that if the formation of RNP condensates played a crucial role in survival under these stresses, then the edc3Δlsm4ΔC mutant, which fails to assemble these condensates, could exhibit altered growth under these stresses compared to wild-type. Therefore, we assessed the growth of the edc3Δlsm4ΔC mutant upon exposure to these stresses. Interestingly, the edc3Δlsm4ΔC mutant exhibited significantly slower growth than the wild-type strain (Fig. 3C and D) in continuous perchlorate stress. This suggests that RNP condensate assembly could facilitate better cellular adaptation and growth under perchlorate stress. In contrast, there was no significant difference in growth between wild-type and mutant strains during recovery after exposure to shock waves (Fig. 3E and F). Next, we examined the effect of sodium perchlorate on the survival of edc3Δlsm4ΔC. To test this, we performed a CFU assay. Our results revealed a significant decrease in CFU count in edc3Δlsm4ΔC compared to the wild-type following sodium perchlorate treatment, as shown in Fig. 3G and H, indicating decreased survival of edc3Δlsm4ΔC under these conditions. This is consistent with our earlier observation of slower growth in edc3Δlsm4ΔC compared to wild-type during continuous perchlorate treatment.

Transcriptome analysis reveals that granule assembly affects mRNA abundance in wildtype and edc3Δlsm4ΔC in response to sodium perchlorate RNP condensates regulate stress response by altering the mRNA abundance and translation. To understand the transcriptome-wide changes induced by the perchlorate stress and the possible contribution of RNP condensates to it, we performed sequencing of total RNA samples from wildtype and the edc3Δlsm4ΔC mutant (Fig. 4). For differential gene expression analysis, the category listed prior in all comparisons serves as a control. Genes with P-value ≤ 0.05 were considered significantly differentially expressed. Figure 4A–C and Figs. S4 and S5 show a summary of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and GO enrichment.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Transcriptomic analysis in wildtype and edc3Δlsm4ΔC reveals differential gene expression in response to sodium perchlorate. A) Graph depicting the summary of differentially expressed genes in different conditions. B and C) Volcano plot showing changes in transcripts level in B) wildtype cells upon sodium perchlorate treatment, C) wildtype cells upon edc3Δlsm4ΔC mutant under sodium perchlorate treatment. The green dots represent upregulated transcripts, the red dots represent downregulated transcripts and neutrally expressed transcripts are represented as black. D) Gene enrichment analysis based on the biological process of DEGs in wild-type cells upon sodium perchlorate treatment. The x-axis represents the number of genes; a positive x-axis refers to upregulated transcripts, and a negative x-axis represents downregulated transcripts. E) String analysis for four upregulated biological processes enriched in wild-type cells upon sodium perchlorate treatment. F) Venn diagrams showing several differentially expressed transcripts upon sodium perchlorate treatment in wild-type and edc3Δlsm4ΔC cells. G) Gene enrichment analysis based on the biological process of downregulated transcripts in edc3Δlsm4ΔC cells upon sodium perchlorate treatment compared to wild-type cells upon sodium perchlorate treatment. A negative x-axis represents downregulated transcripts. H) String analysis for a downregulated biological process enriched in edc3Δlsm4ΔC cells upon sodium perchlorate treatment.

RNA-seq analysis of wild-type yeast cells treated with 100 mM sodium perchlorate identified 1,321 DEGs, of which 773 were upregulated and 548 were significantly downregulated. GO enrichment analysis of the upregulated genes revealed significant enrichment in several biological processes. Notably, genes associated with cellular respiration represented the largest category of upregulated genes in sodium perchlorate-treated wild-type cells (Fig. 4D and E). Other enriched categories among the upregulated genes included those involved in oxidative stress response, cell wall organization, carbohydrate metabolism, ion transport, and mitochondrial autophagy. Additionally, genes involved in ascospore formation and ubiquitin-dependent protein degradation processes were also significantly upregulated. Conversely, the downregulated genes were enriched in processes related to cytoplasmic translation, methylation, nucleocytoplasmic transport, and ribosome biogenesis (Fig. 4D). These findings suggest that sodium perchlorate might induce a metabolic shift, promoting stress adaptation while suppressing translation-related processes that are energy-intensive.

In the edc3Δlsm4ΔC mutant, sodium perchlorate treatment altered gene expression, with some DEGs overlapping with those in perchlorate-treated wild-type cells. Four hundred sixty-two upregulated genes and 154 downregulated genes were common between wild-type and mutant cells treated with sodium perchlorate, highlighting a perchlorate-specific stress response (Fig. 4F).

Comparison of the edc3Δlsm4ΔC mutant to wild-type under sodium perchlorate stress revealed 1,099 DEGs, with 610 genes upregulated and 489 genes significantly downregulated. GO enrichment analysis of the downregulated genes in the mutant highlighted significant enrichment of mRNAs encoding proteins involved in processes such as cell wall organization, protein folding, detoxification, transmembrane transport, and ascospore formation (Fig. 4G and H). This suggests that the edc3Δlsm4ΔC mutant likely exhibits an impaired response, particularly in pathways critical for maintaining cellular integrity and stress adaptation under perchlorate stress. This is consistent with the observed growth defects in the edc3Δlsm4ΔC mutant under continuous sodium perchlorate stress (Fig. 3C and D).

To further elucidate the alteration of the global transcriptome during recovery from the shock wave, transcriptomic analysis was performed on wild-type S. cerevisiae recovering from exposure to 5.6 M intensity shock waves. Direct analysis of shocked cells was not possible due to technical limitations of the shock tube, which yielded only a small sample amount. Since shocked cells demonstrated a marked lag phase, we were curious to identify the transcriptome changes just before the cells moved out of the extended lag phase induced by shock waves. Transcriptome analysis revealed differential expression of 1,322 genes. Among these, 686 genes were upregulated, and 636 genes were downregulated (Fig. 4A). GO enrichment analysis of the upregulated genes highlighted significant enrichment in processes such as methylation, translation, and nuclear export (Fig. S6). Conversely, the downregulated genes were enriched in pathways associated with glucose import and cellular respiration. Notably, genes involved in oxidative stress response and temperature stimulus were also downregulated, which is intriguing as these pathways are commonly associated with stress adaptation (Fig. S6). This suggests that the recovery from shock waves might involve a distinct regulatory mechanism prioritizing specific cellular processes over generalized stress responses. The edc3Δlsm4ΔC mutant was not subjected to transcriptome analysis upon shock wave exposure, as we did not observe a significant difference in growth rate compared to wild-type shocked cells (Fig. 3C and D).

Validation of the transcriptome data

To select an appropriate internal control for validating the RNA-seq results, we assessed the mRNA levels of three reference genes PGK1, ACT1, and SCR1 using qRT-PCR under the same conditions applied in the RNA-seq experiments. Among these, PGK1 and ACT1 exhibited no change in expression across all tested conditions, while SCR1 showed variable expression upon perchlorate treatment (Fig. S7A). Therefore, PGK1 was chosen as the internal control for mRNA target validation. To validate the differentially expressed transcripts identified through RNA-seq in wild-type yeast upon sodium perchlorate treatment, we focused on CTT1, GRE1, HXT5, and HSP31, which were upregulated, and TIF4631, TRM1, RPS0A, and RPL24A, which were downregulated. These transcripts were selected as representatives from each enriched GO category for qRT-PCR analysis. Notably, GRE1 was among the transcripts that exhibited the highest fold change in RNA-seq analysis. The qRT-PCR results validated the RNA-seq findings, with all tested transcripts exhibiting trends consistent with the sequencing data. The upregulated genes, including CTT1 and GRE1, which are associated with oxidative stress response, and HXT5, linked to carbohydrate metabolism, showed increased mRNA levels. Similarly, HSP31, which is involved in stress protection, was also significantly upregulated (Fig. 5A). Conversely, genes, such as TIF4631 and TRM1, associated with translation initiation and methylation, respectively, exhibited reduced mRNA levels. Ribosomal protein genes RPS0A and RPL24A also showed decreased expression, aligning with the observed downregulation of translation-related processes (Fig. 5B).

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

Validation of differentially expressed genes by qRT-PCR analysis. Validation of genes by qRT-PCR A) upregulated in wildtype untreated vs. sodium perchlorate treated; B) downregulated in wildtype untreated vs. sodium perchlorate treated; C) neutrally expressed in wildtype treated but downregulated in edc3Δlsm4ΔC sodium perchlorate-treated condition. D and E) Validation of genes upregulated in wildtype treated (D) but downregulated in edc3Δlsm4ΔC sodium perchlorate-treated condition (E) by qRT-PCR. F and G) Validation of ascospore-related genes upregulated in wildtype treated (F) but downregulated in edc3Δlsm4ΔC sodium perchlorate-treated condition (G) by qRT-PCR. Each data point represents biological replicate. For all validations, PGK1 was used as internal control. In the above experiments, error bars represent the SEM. The significance of the data was calculated by paired t test and P-values are summarized as: ***, P < 0.005; **, P < 0.01; *, P < 0.05. log2FC values obtained from RNA-seq for all genes validated are shown in Fig. S7.

Among the transcripts downregulated in edc3Δlsm4ΔC perchlorate-treated condition compared to wild-type perchlorate-treated, we validated the six transcripts. ROM2, SSA1, PDR5, TPO3, ERO1, and ARN2 transcripts (Fig. 5C). These transcripts do not change in response to perchlorate in wild-type compared to untreated but are significantly downregulated in edc3Δlsm4ΔC perchlorate-treated condition compared to wild-type perchlorate-treated, suggesting that these may be destabilized in the absence of RNP condensates. We also validated four transcripts, such as DAK1, SRX1, SSE2, and SPI1, which were upregulated in wild-type treated compared to untreated, but significantly downregulated in edc3Δlsm4ΔC perchlorate-treated condition. Of all tested transcripts, except TPO3, all transcripts were validated (Fig. 5D and E). Furthermore, we validated three transcripts involved in ascospore wall assembly SPR3, SPO19, and SPS18—which were upregulated in wildtype upon sodium perchlorate treatment but are significantly downregulated in edc3Δlsm4ΔC mutant under perchlorate stress (Fig. 5F and G).

Similarly, to validate RNA-seq result for differentially expressed mRNAs in wild-type during recovery from exposure to 5.6 M intensity shock waves, four mRNAs such as TIF4631, NSR1, TRM1, and HMT1 were chosen as representatives from upregulated GO transcripts. TIF4631 was selected as it encodes a translation initiation factor crucial for translation regulation, while HMT1 was chosen as it is a major arginine methyltransferase. The following five transcripts CTT1, HXT5, SCO1, SDH1, and COX4 were chosen to validate downregulated mRNAs (Fig. S6E and F). CTT1 and HXT5 were among the transcripts that exhibited the lowest expression levels in RNA-seq analysis. We observed that all tested transcripts except COX4 validated the changes observed in RNA-seq analysis. Taken together, these observations validate the RNA-seq results by qRT-PCR and highlight the involvement of specific pathways that may facilitate adaptation in response to Martian stress conditions.

Stabilization of transcripts correlates with the induction of P-bodies upon sodium perchlorate treatment

We hypothesized that the reduced abundance of transcripts in the edc3Δlsm4ΔC mutant could be a result of post-transcriptional regulation due to the absence of P-bodies. To investigate this, we performed a transcription shut-off assay using a temperature-sensitive mutant of RNA polymerase II, rpb1-1. Upon heat shock, RNA polymerase II becomes inactive, halting mRNA synthesis, enabling us to assess mRNA stability (15, 16). We assessed the mRNA decay profile in untreated and NaClO4-treated cells over a 60-min time course postheat shock to assess how transcript stability is affected by sodium perchlorate. When rpb1-1 untreated and sodium perchlorate-treated conditions were subjected to transcription shut-off by heat shock, we observed stabilization of specific transcripts such as SSA1 (involved in protein folding), TPO2 (involved in ion transport), ROM2 (involved in cell wall signaling) in sodium perchlorate-treated condition compared to untreated condition (Fig. 6B–D) whereas RPL24 which was used as a negative control shows a steady decrease in abundance over time in both untreated and treated condition. These results support the notion of stabilization of stress-responsive transcripts and correlation with induction of P-bodies under sodium perchlorate treatment.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6.

Stabilization of transcripts in wildtype upon sodium perchlorate treatment. mRNA stability assay by qRT-PCR in rpb1-1 untreated and sodium perchlorate-treated conditions for A) RPL24; B) SSA1; C) TPO2; D) ROM2 (n = 3 biological replicates). For all validations PGK1 was used as internal control. In the above experiments, error bars represent SEM. The significance of the data was calculated by two-way ANOVA using Šídák's multiple comparisons test and P-values are summarized as: ****, P  < 0.0001; *, P  < 0.05.

Discussion

Our study focuses on the impact of Martian stress conditions, such as shock waves and perchlorate stress, on S. cerevisiae. Our study makes the following conclusions: (i) wild-type yeast survives exposure to 5.6 Mach intensity shock waves with an extended lag phase (Fig. 1B and C), (ii) wild-type yeast grows in presence of continuous 100 mM sodium perchlorate with a significant growth defect compared to wildtype (Fig. 1D and E), (iii) Shock waves induces the assembly of RNP condensates (Fig. 2A–C), (iv) Sodium perchlorate induces P-body assembly (Fig. 2D and E), (v) edc3Δlsm4ΔC mutant fails to assemble RNP condensates in response to either shock waves or sodium perchlorate (Fig. 3A and B), (vi) edc3Δlsm4ΔC mutant exhibits decreased and delayed growth compared to wild-type in response to sodium perchlorate stress alone and shock waves combined with perchlorate stress (Figs. 3C and D and S3, respectively), (vii) transcriptome data indicate that sodium perchlorate treatment triggers a metabolic shift in yeast, likely enhancing stress adaptation by ascospore formation while downregulating translation-related processes (Fig. 4D), (viii) Several transcripts are stabilized during perchlorate treatment, a condition under which P-body assembly is also induced in wildtype (Fig. 6). (ix) edc3Δlsm4ΔC mutant exhibits an impaired stress response under sodium perchlorate stress, with downregulation of key transcripts associated with cellular integrity, protein folding and ascospore formation (Fig. 4G and H), (x) Recovery from shock waves exposure triggers transcriptional changes in yeast including increased expression of genes related to translation and methylation, alongside reduced expression of transcripts associated with oxidative stress and metabolic pathways (Fig. S6). These results identify an exciting possible connection between granule assembly and survival under Martian conditions.

Shock waves have been widely used for therapeutic applications (26). Use of shock waves for the destruction of kidney stones has been well-established (27). Shock wave therapy has also been used for various other therapeutic applications, such as in orthopedics for treating plantar fasciitis (28), in cardiology as an effective strategy for coronary artery disease (29–31), in neurology to reduce lower limb spasticity in stroke patients (32) and for peripheral nerve regeneration (33). Interestingly, beyond therapeutic uses, recent studies reveal the synthesis of amino acids from simple molecules in response to shock processes, which mimics the impact-induced shock events, highlighting the potential role of shock waves in the origin of life forms (14). However, the strength of shock waves used for therapeutic purposes in these studies is much weaker, around 0.09 mJ/mm2, corresponding to 2 bars. We hypothesized that shock waves of higher intensities could be stressful for lifeforms on Earth, as certain reports have shown shock waves to be detrimental (34, 35). To mimic the Martian conditions, we tested the ability of yeast cells to survive higher Mach value shockwaves generated by shock tubes in laboratory conditions. In our experiments, yeast survived and grew after exposure to 5.6 M shock waves (Fig. 1B), which was surprising. To the best of our knowledge, the survival of any model systems to such high-intensity shock waves has not been reported. Similar and much higher intensity shockwaves could be generated on Mars surface due to the impact of micrometeorites (36). Our study highlights the credentials of yeast as a model system for studying survival under harsh Martian conditions in the future. However, upon exposure to the increasing intensity of shock waves, there was an increase in the lag phase, indicating that shock waves affect the cell physiology and induce a stress response. The ability to survive such high-intensity shock waves also highlights the presence of a robust repair mechanism and stress response pathway in yeast, making it capable of mitigating the impacts of sudden pressure and temperature changes of such high magnitude.

Interestingly, exposure to 5.6 Mach intensity shock waves in wild-type yeast induced the formation of P-bodies and stress granules (Fig. 2A–C). A recent study focused on understanding the impact of specific simulated microgravity conditions on yeast. A major group of genes belonging to RNP condensate-related proteins was among the subset of genes that were reported to be differentially expressed in response to microgravity (8). This aligns with our observation, highlighting the involvement of RNP condensate in response to such stresses.

Our findings indicate that wild-type yeast can survive perchlorate at a concentration equivalent to that found on Martian soil with a slower growth rate than in unstressed conditions (Fig. 1D). This growth defect could possibly be due to the chaotropic properties of perchlorate on biomolecules and their metabolic processes. In addition to its impact on growth, we observe that 100 mM sodium perchlorate induced the formation of P-bodies in wild-type yeast (Fig. 2D and E). Unlike shock waves, perchlorate stress did not induce the formation of stress granules. This differential response indicates that the type of RNP condensates formed is specific to the nature of the Martian stress. These RNP condensates are known to play important roles in cellular stress responses by regulating mRNA fate at the level of mRNA stability and translation to alter the proteome (37, 38). The formation of condensates suggests that yeast cells activate a conserved stress response pathway to cope with the damage caused by sodium perchlorate.

The edc3Δlsm4ΔC mutant, which is defective in assembly of RNP condensates, exhibited delayed growth compared to the wild-type in response to sodium perchlorate (Fig. 3C and D). This delay in growth likely highlights the importance of RNP condensates in adaptation to stressful conditions like perchlorate. Considering that Martian conditions involve a combination of stresses, the combined effect of 5.6 Mach intensity shock waves and 100 mM sodium perchlorate on the growth of wild-type and edc3Δlsm4ΔC mutant strains was also assessed. The wild-type strain exhibited slower growth under combined stress compared to individual stresses, and this growth retardation was more pronounced in the edc3Δlsm4ΔC mutant (Fig. S3). The combined stress of shock waves and sodium perchlorate worsens the growth defect in the mutant, indicating that multiple simultaneous stresses present a more significant challenge to cellular survival and adaptation. Assessing the impact of other Martian stress individually and in combination would be an important future direction. Interestingly, edc3Δlsm4ΔC mutant also demonstrates decreased survival postcontinuous sodium perchlorate treatment (Fig. 3G and H). This observation further highlights the possible critical role of RNP condensates in facilitating recovery from perchlorate stress. In contrast to perchlorate stress and combined stress, exposure to shock waves alone did not cause any growth defect for edc3Δlsm4ΔC mutant, indicating the specific role of condensates in regulating specific stress responses.

Our study provides some insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying yeast adaptation to Martian-like stress conditions, specifically sodium perchlorate and shock wave stress. Combining RNA-seq and qRT-PCR validation, we identified key transcriptome changes and pathways likely involved in the cellular response to these stressors. RNA-seq analysis revealed that wild-type S. cerevisiae exposed to 100 mM sodium perchlorate undergoes extensive transcriptome remodeling, with changes in the abundance of 1,321 transcripts. Upregulated transcripts were enriched inprocesses such as cellular respiration, oxidative stress response, carbohydrate metabolism, and mitochondrial autophagy, indicating a robust adaptive response. These findings suggest that wild-type cells engage in metabolic and stress response pathways to mitigate the detrimental effects of sodium perchlorate. For instance, the upregulation of 39 transcripts involved in oxidative stress response, including CTT1 and GRE1, validated by qRT-PCR, may indicate activation of oxidative stress defence mechanisms. However, further work is needed to determine the extent to which these changes correspond to functional outcomes. Similarly, increased expression of HXT5, a gene linked to carbohydrate metabolism, may reflect enhanced glucose utilization. We also observed the upregulation of cell wall organization-related genes in mitochondrial autophagy ria suggesting that perchlorate stress may impact cell wall and mitochondria. The upregulation of ubiquitin-dependent protein degradation process suggests that perchlorate stress induces protein damage or misfolding, requiring enhanced proteasomal activity to clear toxic protein aggregates or misfolded proteins and maintain cellular integrity to survive under perchlorate stress. This is consistent with the proteomic level changes in response to perchlorate reported in a halotolerant yeast D. hansenii (39). The upregulation of genes SPR3, SPO19, SPS18 involved in ascospore formation is intriguing. Since ascospore formation allows yeast cells to enter a stress-resistant dormant state, it is possible that S. cerevisiae initiates spore formation to adapt to perchlorate stress. Sporulation is typically induced under nutrient deprivation (40, 41), this further highlights that perchlorate stress might trigger a broader cellular response mimicking nutrient deprivation, leading to the activation of the sporulation process. Notably, genes such as NDT80, a key regulator for the sporulation process known to induce downstream transcriptional targets involved in the assembly of prospore membrane and spore wall (42, 43), are also upregulated in wild-type upon perchlorate treatment. The upregulation of NDT80 suggests that the yeast cells may be attempting to undergo a developmental transition to enhance survival under adverse conditions. The laboratory strains, including BY4741, used here are haploid strains; however, our results argue that a diploid yeast might undergo sporulation in response to perchlorate stress.

Interestingly, the downregulated transcripts were enriched in processes such as cytoplasmic translation and ribosome biogenesis. This may indicate suppression of energy-intensive processes such as translation. Our observation is consistent with reports on other stresses in S. cerevisiae, which lead to global translation repression (44–47). The reduced abundance of ribosomal protein genes RPS0A and RPL24A, as validated by qRT-PCR, supports this possibility, of survival over growth (which requires active translation and, therefore, energy) during stress. These observations indicate that the response to sodium perchlorate stress is similar to other oxidative stress response pathways.

In contrast, the edc3Δlsm4ΔC mutant, defective in RNP condensate assembly, exhibited a markedly impaired response to sodium perchlorate. Transcripts associated with key pathways, including cell wall organization, protein folding, and detoxification, were significantly downregulated in the mutant, likely suggesting an impaired ability to mount an effective stress response. These findings raise the possibility that RNP condensates, such as P-bodies, may contribute to transcript stabilization during stress, consistent with previous studies suggesting their role in mRNA storage and protection (48, 49). mRNA stability analysis (Fig. 6) further support this notion, showing that transcripts like SSA1, ROM2, and TPO2 are more stable in wild-type cells upon perchlorate exposure, a condition under which P-bodies are induced. This observation aligns with the hypothesis that in wild-type cells, RNP condensate formation may help buffer specific transcripts from degradation, thereby facilitating a more robust stress response.

However, it is important to note that both Edc3 and Lsm4 are RNA-binding proteins that could affect mRNA stability independently of P-bodies. Therefore, the edc3Δlsm4ΔC mutation might have pleiotropic effects beyond disrupting P-body assembly. This is a general caveat that applies to all studies using such mutants (25), and it is challenging to rescue the PB assembly defect in this background to assess the pleiotropic effects resulting from this mutant background. Therefore, while our data are consistent with a role for P-bodies in transcript stabilization and stress resilience, we cannot rule out additional effects of the edc3Δ lsm4ΔC mutation on cell physiology, mRNA decay pathways, or stress response regulation. Having said that, this study provides a robust framework to initiate functional analysis of condensates in response to Martian stress.

In wild-type yeast exposed to 5.6 Mach intensity shock waves, we observed a distinct mRNA abundance profile. The upregulation of genes involved in methylation, translation, and nuclear export, suggests likely activation of transcriptional and translational machinery postshock wave exposure. This observation can be explained by the timing of RNA sequencing, as samples were collected during the recovery phase, capturing the cellular response during recovery rather than the immediate impact of shock waves. This likely reflects a cellular effort to restore homeostasis and initiate repair mechanisms. For example, the increased expression of TIF4631 and NSR1, validated by qRT-PCR, may reflect a cellular attempt to restore translation and ribosome function, processes that are important for recovery under stress in general. Conversely, the downregulation of genes associated with glucose import (HXT5) and cellular respiration (SDH1 and SCO1) might suggest a strategic conservation of energy during recovery. This downregulation may reflect a shift toward suppressing metabolic activity to prioritize repair processes. Intriguingly, genes typically associated with generalized stress responses, such as oxidative stress and temperature stimulus, were also downregulated during recovery. This likely suggests that the cellular response to shock waves involves a unique regulatory mechanism that diverges from canonical stress pathways. Nonetheless, the functional relevance of these transcript abundance changes requires further exploration.

The mRNA abundance profiles observed in response to sodium perchlorate and shock wave stress highlight the ability of yeast to adapt to diverse environmental challenges. The ability of wild-type cells to modulate energy metabolism, stress response pathways, and translational activity underscores the robustness of their adaptive mechanisms. In contrast, the impaired response in edc3Δlsm4ΔC mutant likely emphasizes the critical role of RNP condensates in coordinating these processes (Fig. 7). These findings have broader implications for understanding the resilience of yeast under Martian conditions. Sodium perchlorate and shock waves represent just two of the many stressors present on Mars. The ability of yeast to survive and adapt to these stresses provides valuable insights into the potential for life to endure extraterrestrial environments. Moreover, the conserved nature of stress response pathways from yeast to humans suggests that these findings could inform strategies for utilizing RNP condensates as markers for assessing human health before and after space explorations, as stress-induced RNA granule assembly is a conserved feature of human cells.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7.

Model depicting the importance of RNP condensate in mediating survival under Mars-like stress condition. In wild-type cells, sodium perchlorate stress causes cell wall damage and protein misfolding, which coincides with P-body assembly and stabilization of stress-related transcripts (SPI1, ROM2, SSE2, ERO1, and SSA1). This enables maintenance of cell wall integrity and protein folding, thereby promoting survival. In contrast, P-body assembly mutants fail to form condensates, leading to decreased abundance of these transcripts and heightened sensitivity to perchlorate stress.

Supplementary Material

pgaf300_Supplementary_Data

Acknowledgments

P.I.R. and B.S. thank IISc-ISRO space technology cell (STC) STC/BES/PR/479 for the funding. R.D. thanks STC/BES/PR/479 for the project assistantship. The authors also thank CRG/2022/000594 for funding. The authors thank the Physical Research Laboratory (PRL) Department of Space, Government of India, for funding. Funding from DST-FIST is graciously acknowledged. We acknowledge Genotypic Technology Private Limited, Bangalore for NGS sequencing and data analysis reported in this study. We thank Vijay Thiruvenkatam, Dhiraj Bhatia, and Sivapriya Kirubakaran at the Indian Institute of Technology, Gandhinagar, for providing logistical and infrastructure support to perform some of the experiments.

Contributor Information

Riya Dhage, Department of Biochemistry, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012, India.

Arijit Roy, Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics Division, Physical Research Laboratory, Ahmedabad 380009, India.

Bhalamurugan Sivaraman, Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics Division, Physical Research Laboratory, Ahmedabad 380009, India.

Purusharth I Rajyaguru, Department of Biochemistry, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012, India.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary material is available at PNAS Nexus online.

Funding

IISc-ISRO Space Technology Cell (ISTC/BES/PR/479); Department of Science and Technology (CRG/2022/000594). Fund for Improvement of S&T Infrastructure program (DST-FIST), Ministry of Education, India, 501100004541.

Author Contributions

Riya Dhage (Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Validation, Writing—original draft, Writing—review & editing), Arijit Roy (Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology), Bhalamurugan Sivaraman (Conceptualization, Project administration, Resources, Supervision), Purusharth I. Rajyaguru (Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing—review & editing)

Preprints

This manuscript was posted on a preprint: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.07.09.663920v1.

Data Availability

The data discussed in this study have been deposited in NCBI's Gene Expression Omnibus, and are accessible through GEO accession number: GSE293434. (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?&acc=GSE293434).

References

  • 1. Beblo-Vranesevic  K, et al.  2020. Impact of simulated Martian conditions on (facultatively) anaerobic bacterial strains from different Mars analogue sites. Curr Issues Mol Biol. 38(1):103–122. 10.21775/cimb.038.103 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Cockell  CS, Andrady  AL. 1999. The Martian and extraterrestrial UV radiation environment—1. Biological and closed-loop ecosystem considerations. Acta Astronaut. 44(1):53–62. 10.1016/s0094-5765(98)00186-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Osinski  GR, Cockell  CS, Pontefract  A, Sapers  HM. 2020. The role of meteorite impacts in the origin of life. Astrobiology. 20(9):1121–1149. 10.1089/ast.2019.2203 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Hecht  MH, et al.  2009. Detection of perchlorate and the soluble chemistry of Martian soil at the Phoenix lander site. Science. 325(5936):64–67. 10.1126/science.1172466 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Bijlani  S, Stephens  E, Singh  NK, Venkateswaran  K, Wang  CCC. 2021. Advances in space microbiology. iScience. 24(5):102395. 10.1016/j.isci.2021.102395 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Fukuda  APM, et al.  2021. Simulated microgravity accelerates aging in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Life Sci Space Res (Amst). 28:32–40. 10.1016/j.lssr.2020.12.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Horne  WH, et al.  2022. Effects of desiccation and freezing on microbial ionizing radiation survivability: considerations for Mars sample return. Astrobiology. 22(11):1337–1350. 10.1089/ast.2022.0065 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Nemoto  S, Ohnuki  S, Abe  F, Ohya  Y. 2019. Simulated microgravity triggers characteristic morphology and stress response in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast. 36(2):85–97. 10.1002/yea.3361 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Santa Maria  SR, Marina  DB, Massaro Tieze  S, Liddell  LC, Bhattacharya  S. 2023. BioSentinel: long-term Saccharomyces cerevisiae preservation for a deep space biosensor mission. Astrobiology. 23(6):617–630. 10.1089/ast.2019.2073 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Buchan  JR. 2014. mRNP granules. Assembly, function, and connections with disease. RNA Biol. 11(8):1019–1030. 10.4161/15476286.2014.972208 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Buchan  JR, Muhlrad  D, Parker  R. 2008. P bodies promote stress granule assembly in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Cell Biol. 183(3):441–455. 10.1083/jcb.200807043 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Hoyle  NP, Castelli  LM, Campbell  SG, Holmes  LEA, Ashe  MP. 2007. Stress-dependent relocalization of translationally primed mRNPs to cytoplasmic granules that are kinetically and spatially distinct from P-bodies. J Cell Biol. 179(1):65–74. 10.1083/jcb.200707010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Roy  A, et al.  2022. Shock-induced transformation of non-magnetic to magnetic ISM dust analogue. Mon Not R Astron Soc. 517:4845–4855. 10.1093/mnras/stac2637 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Singh  SV, et al.  2020. Shock processing of amino acids leading to complex structures—implications to the origin of life. Molecules. 25(23):5634. 10.3390/molecules25235634 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Nonet  M, Scafe  C, Sexton  J, Young  R. 1987. Eucaryotic RNA polymerase conditional mutant that rapidly ceases mRNA synthesis. Mol Cell Biol. 7(5):1602–1611. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Parker  R, Herrick  D, Peltz  SW, Jacobson  A. 1991. Measurement of mRNA decay rates in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Methods Enzymol. 194:415–423. 10.1016/0076-6879(91)94032-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Collart  MA, Oliviero  S. 2001. Preparation of yeast RNA. Curr Protoc Mol Biol. Chapter 13:Unit13.12. 10.1002/0471142727.mb1312s23 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Togra  C, Dhage  R, Rajyaguru  PI. 2024. Tdh3 and Rom2 are functional modulators of a conserved condensate-resident RNA-binding protein, Scd6, in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 228(2):iyae127. 10.1093/genetics/iyae127 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Langmead  B, Wilks  C, Antonescu  V, Charles  R. 2019. Scaling read aligners to hundreds of threads on general-purpose processors. Bioinformatics. 35(3):421–432. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty648 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Liao  Y, Smyth  GK, Shi  W. 2014. featureCounts: an efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features. Bioinformatics. 30(7):923–930. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt656 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Love  MI, Huber  W, Anders  S. 2014. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 15(12):550. 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Buchfink  B, Xie  C, Huson  DH. 2015. Fast and sensitive protein alignment using DIAMOND. Nat Methods. 12(1):59–60. 10.1038/nmeth.3176 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Kanehisa  M, Furumichi  M, Sato  Y, Ishiguro-Watanabe  M, Tanabe  M. 2021. KEGG: integrating viruses and cellular organisms. Nucleic Acids Res. 49(D1):D545–D551. 10.1093/nar/gkaa970 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Roy  A, et al.  2022. Shock processing of amorphous carbon nanodust. Adv Space Res. 70(8):2571–2581. 10.1016/j.asr.2022.06.068 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Decker  CJ, Teixeira  D, Parker  R. 2007. Edc3p and a glutamine/asparagine-rich domain of Lsm4p function in processing body assembly in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Cell Biol. 179(3):437–449. 10.1083/jcb.200704147 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Rola  P, Włodarczak  A, Barycki  M, Doroszko  A. 2022. Use of the shock wave therapy in basic research and clinical applications—from bench to bedsite. Biomedicines. 10(3):568. 10.3390/biomedicines10030568 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Chaussy  C, Brendel  W, Schmiedt  E. 1980. Extracorporeally induced destruction of kidney stones by shock waves. Lancet. 2(8207):1265–1268. 10.1016/s0140-6736(80)92335-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Sun  J, et al.  2017. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy is effective in treating chronic plantar fasciitis. Medicine (Baltimore). 96(15):e6621. 10.1097/MD.0000000000006621 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Nishida  T, et al.  2004. Extracorporeal cardiac shock wave therapy markedly ameliorates ischemia-induced myocardial dysfunction in pigs in vivo. Circulation. 110(19):3055–3061. 10.1161/01.CIR.0000148849.51177.97 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Tepeköylü  C, et al.  2017. Shockwaves prevent from heart failure after acute myocardial ischaemia via RNA/protein complexes. J Cell Mol Med. 21(4):791–801. 10.1111/jcmm.13021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Vainer  J, et al.  2016. Cardiac shockwave therapy in patients with chronic refractory angina pectoris. Neth Heart J. 24(5):343–349. 10.1007/s12471-016-0821-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Cabanas-Valdés  R, et al.  2020. The effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave therapy to reduce lower limb spasticity in stroke patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Top Stroke Rehabil. 27(2):137–157. 10.1080/10749357.2019.1654242 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Sağir  D, et al.  2019. Efficacy of extracorporeal shockwaves therapy on peripheral nerve regeneration. J Craniofac Surg. 30(8):2635–2639. 10.1097/SCS.0000000000005671 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Li  X, Long  Q, Cheng  X, He  D. 2014. Shock wave induces biological renal damage by activating excessive inflammatory responses in rat model. Inflammation. 37(4):1317–1325. 10.1007/s10753-014-9859-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Ohmori  K, Matsuda  T, Horii  Y, Yoshida  O. 1994. Effects of shock waves on the mouse fetus. J Urol. 151(1):255–258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Kurosawa  K, Okamoto  T, Genda  H. 2018. Hydrocode modeling of the spallation process during hypervelocity impacts: implications for the ejection of Martian meteorites. Icarus. 301:219–234. 10.1016/j.icarus.2017.09.015 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Liboy-Lugo  JM, et al.  2024. G3BP isoforms differentially affect stress granule assembly and gene expression during cellular stress. Mol Biol Cell. 35(11):ar140. 10.1091/mbc.E24-02-0062 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Marcelo  A, Koppenol  R, de Almeida  LP, Matos  CA, Nóbrega  C. 2021. Stress granules, RNA-binding proteins and polyglutamine diseases: too much aggregation?  Cell Death Dis. 12(6):592. 10.1038/s41419-021-03873-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Heinz  J, et al.  2022. Perchlorate-specific proteomic stress responses of Debaryomyces hansenii could enable microbial survival in Martian brines. Environ Microbiol. 24(11):5051–5065. 10.1111/1462-2920.16152 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Honigberg  SM, Purnapatre  K. 2003. Signal pathway integration in the switch from the mitotic cell cycle to meiosis in yeast. J Cell Sci. 116(11):2137–2147. 10.1242/jcs.00460 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Neiman  AM. 2011. Sporulation in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 189(3):737–765. 10.1534/genetics.111.127126 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Chu  S, et al.  1998. The transcriptional program of sporulation in budding yeast. Science. 282(5389):699–705. 10.1126/science.282.5389.699 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Winter  E. 2012. The sum1/Ndt80 transcriptional switch and commitment to meiosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 76(1):1–15. 10.1128/mmbr.05010-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Ashe  MP, De Long  SK, Sachs  AB. 2000. Glucose depletion rapidly inhibits translation initiation in yeast. Mol Biol Cell. 11(3):833–848. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Garg  M, Poornima  G, Rajyaguru  PI. 2020. Elucidation of the RNA-granule inducing sodium azide stress response through transcriptome analysis. Genomics. 112(5):2978–2989. 10.1016/j.ygeno.2020.05.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Melamed  D, Pnueli  L, Arava  Y. 2008. Yeast translational response to high salinity: global analysis reveals regulation at multiple levels. RNA. 14(7):1337–1351. 10.1261/rna.864908 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Shenton  D, et al.  2006. Global translational responses to oxidative stress impact upon multiple levels of protein synthesis. J Biol Chem. 281(39):29011–29021. 10.1074/jbc.M601545200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Hubstenberger  A, et al.  2017. P-body purification reveals the condensation of repressed mRNA regulons. Mol Cell. 68(1):144–157.e5. 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.09.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Standart  N, Weil  D. 2018. P-bodies: cytosolic droplets for coordinated mRNA storage. Trends Genet. 34(8):612–626. 10.1016/j.tig.2018.05.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

pgaf300_Supplementary_Data

Data Availability Statement

The data discussed in this study have been deposited in NCBI's Gene Expression Omnibus, and are accessible through GEO accession number: GSE293434. (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?&acc=GSE293434).


Articles from PNAS Nexus are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES