Skip to main content
BMC is moving to Springer Nature Link. Visit this journal in its new home.

Table 1 Demographic data

From: Dual mediolateral mini-open technique for the release of elbow contracture

Patient ID

Gender

Age (yrs)

Dominant side

Injured side

Etiology

Duration

HO

Follow-up (m)

1

F

33

R

R

UO

24

55

2

M

30

R

L

RH, ED

6

32

3

M

28

R

L

UC, ED

24

 + 

36

4

M

57

R

L

UO

13

 + 

37

5

M

35

R

L

TTE

12

28

6

F

56

R

L

UO, ME

60

 + 

42

7

F

29

R

R

RH

12

30

8

F

34

R

R

TTE

13

24

9

M

39

R

R

UO, RH

19

26

10

M

30

R

R

ME, ED

36

29

11

M

10

R

L

SFH

7

25

12

F

45

R

R

ED

11

 + 

25

13

F

35

R

R

UO

16

30

14

F

33

R

R

UO

11

 + 

27

15

M

35

R

L

RH

10

 + 

27

16

M

33

R

R

DHF

5

25

17

F

37

R

L

UC, ED

17

 + 

25

18

F

42

R

R

UO

22

 + 

26

19

M

44

R

L

ED

6

24

20

F

46

R

R

UO

12

28

21

M

35

R

R

DHF

8

24

  1. F female, M male, L left, R right, UO ulna olecranon fracture, DHF distal humeral fracture, ED elbow dislocation, ME medial epicondyle fracture, RH radial head fracture, TTE terrible triad of the elbow, SFH Supracondylar fracture of humerus, UC ulna coronoid fracture