Introduction: Interest in fermented foods and their purported health benefits has led to increased scientific research investigating the development of starter cultures which maintain the characteristics of traditional products while allowing for industrial scale production. One such fermented food that is gaining steady attention for industrial production is kefir. To improve the ease of use and maintenance of starter cultures without compromising desirable fermentation characteristics and potential health benefits, this study investigated the impact of freeze-drying a previously described reconstituted kefir consortia with two lyoprotectants trehalose and milk.
Methods: 5 bacterial species (Lentilactobacillus kefiri, Lactobacillus kefiranofaciens, Lactococcus cremoris, Leuconostoc mesenteroides, and Acetobacter pasteurianus) and 4 yeast species (Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Pichia fermentans, Monosporozyma unispora, and Kluyveromyces marxianus) underwent freeze-drying prior to viability testing and use as starter cultures in kefir fermentations. Completed kefir fermentations were analyzed for pH, microbial composition, volatile compounds, organic acids, and sugar consumption. Freeze-dried starter culture fermentations were compared to kefir made with fresh starter cultures of the same species and pitching rate.
Results: All starter cultures were able to ferment milk to a similar pH, however the freeze-dried cultures prepared with milk took a longer time to complete fermentation. The total bacterial and yeast counts were comparable across the fermentations performed as was the composition of bacteria and yeast present as determined by shotgun metagenomic sequencing. High performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis showed no difference in the levels of lactic acid, acetic acid, ethanol, glucose, and galactose. Additionally, solid-phase microextraction followed by two-dimensional gas chromatography-time-of-flight mass spectrometry (SPME-GC \u00d7 GC-TOFMS) showed that kefir fermented with freeze-dried starter cultures did not change the volatile profile compared to fresh cultures.
Conclusion: These findings indicate that freeze-dried starter cultures consisting of traditional kefir microorganisms are able to recreate the fresh starter culture version of this product. This provides encouraging evidence for the development of commercially viable starter cultures that are capable of recreating traditional functional fermented foods."}, "link": "/reference/S100001428", "pubmed_id": 41140397, "journal": {"med_abbr": "Front Microbiol"}, "sgdid": "S100001428", "year": 2025, "id": 2732528, "related_references": [], "expression_datasets": [], "downloadable_files": [{"id": 2732923, "data_id": 247558, "format_id": 248597, "readme_file_id": "", "file_size": 1374556, "data": {"id": 247558, "name": "EDAM:2526", "obj_url": "/edam/EDAM:2526", "description": "Data concerning, extracted from, or derived from the analysis of a scientific text (or texts) such as a full text article from a scientific journal."}, "format": {"id": 248597, "name": "EDAM:2330", "obj_url": "/edam/EDAM:2330", "description": "Textual format."}, "is_public": "True", "file_extension": "gz", "topic": {"id": 250483, "name": "EDAM:3070", "obj_url": "/edam/EDAM:3070", "description": "A particular biological science, especially observable traits such as aspects of biochemistry, physiology, morphology, anatomy, development and so on."}, "s3_url": "https://sgd-prod-upload.s3.amazonaws.com/S000381168/41140397.tar.gz", "description": "PubMed Central download", "year": 2025, "display_name": "41140397.tar.gz", "status": "Active", "readme_file_url": null}], "urls": [{"display_name": "DOI full text", "link": "http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2025.1655390"}, {"display_name": "PMC full text", "link": "http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12549565/"}, {"display_name": "PubMed", "link": "http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/41140397"}, {"display_name": "PubTator", "link": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/research/pubtator3/publication/41140397?text=41140397"}], "reftypes": [{"display_name": "Journal Article"}], "authors": [{"display_name": "Mudoor Sooresh M", "link": "/author/Mudoor_Sooresh_M"}, {"display_name": "Jayawickrama A", "link": "/author/Jayawickrama_A"}, {"display_name": "Silva A", "link": "/author/Silva_A"}, {"display_name": "Nguyen S", "link": "/author/Nguyen_S"}, {"display_name": "Schmidt S", "link": "/author/Schmidt_S"}, {"display_name": "Sebastian J", "link": "/author/Sebastian_J"}, {"display_name": "Carey S", "link": "/author/Carey_S"}, {"display_name": "Harynuk J", "link": "/author/Harynuk_J"}, {"display_name": "Willing BP", "link": "/author/Willing_BP"}, {"display_name": "Bourrie BCT", "link": "/author/Bourrie_BCT"}], "counts": {"interaction": 0, "go": 0, "phenotype": 0, "disease": 0, "complement": 0, "regulation": 0, "ptms": 0}};
Mudoor Sooresh M, et al. (2025) | SGD
Reference: Mudoor Sooresh M, et al. (2025) Fermentation of kefir with traditional freeze-dried starter cultures successfully recreates fresh culture fermented kefir. Front Microbiol 16:1655390
Introduction: Interest in fermented foods and their purported health benefits has led to increased scientific research investigating the development of starter cultures which maintain the characteristics of traditional products while allowing for industrial scale production. One such fermented food that is gaining steady attention for industrial production is kefir. To improve the ease of use and maintenance of starter cultures without compromising desirable fermentation characteristics and potential health benefits, this study investigated the impact of freeze-drying a previously described reconstituted kefir consortia with two lyoprotectants trehalose and milk.
Methods: 5 bacterial species (Lentilactobacillus kefiri, Lactobacillus kefiranofaciens, Lactococcus cremoris, Leuconostoc mesenteroides, and Acetobacter pasteurianus) and 4 yeast species (Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Pichia fermentans, Monosporozyma unispora, and Kluyveromyces marxianus) underwent freeze-drying prior to viability testing and use as starter cultures in kefir fermentations. Completed kefir fermentations were analyzed for pH, microbial composition, volatile compounds, organic acids, and sugar consumption. Freeze-dried starter culture fermentations were compared to kefir made with fresh starter cultures of the same species and pitching rate.
Results: All starter cultures were able to ferment milk to a similar pH, however the freeze-dried cultures prepared with milk took a longer time to complete fermentation. The total bacterial and yeast counts were comparable across the fermentations performed as was the composition of bacteria and yeast present as determined by shotgun metagenomic sequencing. High performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis showed no difference in the levels of lactic acid, acetic acid, ethanol, glucose, and galactose. Additionally, solid-phase microextraction followed by two-dimensional gas chromatography-time-of-flight mass spectrometry (SPME-GC × GC-TOFMS) showed that kefir fermented with freeze-dried starter cultures did not change the volatile profile compared to fresh cultures.
Conclusion: These findings indicate that freeze-dried starter cultures consisting of traditional kefir microorganisms are able to recreate the fresh starter culture version of this product. This provides encouraging evidence for the development of commercially viable starter cultures that are capable of recreating traditional functional fermented foods.
Increase the total number of rows showing on this page using the pull-down located below the table, or use the page
scroll at the table's top right to browse through the table's pages; use the arrows to the right of a column header
to sort by that column; filter the table using the "Filter" box at the top of the table.
Increase the total number of rows showing on this page using the pull-down located below the table, or use the page
scroll at the table's top right to browse through the table's pages; use the arrows to the right of a column header
to sort by that column; filter the table using the "Filter" box at the top of the table; click on the small "i"
buttons located within a cell for an annotation to view further details.
Increase the total number of rows showing on this page using the pull-down located below the table, or use the page
scroll at the table's top right to browse through the table's pages; use the arrows to the right of a column header
to sort by that column; filter the table using the "Filter" box at the top of the table.
Increase the total number of rows displayed on this page using the pull-down located below the table, or use the
page scroll at the table's top right to browse through the table's pages; use the arrows to the right of a column
header to sort by that column; to filter the table by a specific experiment type, type a keyword into the Filter box
(for example, “microarray”); download this table as a .txt file using the Download button or click Analyze to
further view and analyze the list of target genes using GO Term Finder, GO Slim Mapper, or SPELL.
Increase the total number of rows showing on this page by using the pull-down located below the table, or use the
page scroll at the table's top right to browse through its pages; use the arrows to the right of a column header to
sort by that column; filter the table using the "Filter" box at the top of the table.
Increase the total number of rows showing on this page by using the pull-down located below the table, or use the
page scroll at the table's top right to browse through the table's pages; use the arrows to the right of a column
header to sort by that column; filter the table using the "Filter" box at the top of the table; click on the small
"i" buttons located within a cell for an annotation to view further details about experiment type and any other
genes involved in the interaction.
Increase the total number of rows showing on this page by using the pull-down located below the table, or use the
page scroll at the table's top right to browse through the table's pages; use the arrows to the right of a column
header to sort by that column; filter the table using the "Filter" box at the top of the table; click on the small
"i" buttons located within a cell for an annotation to view further details about experiment type and any other
genes involved in the interaction.
Increase the total number of rows showing on this page by using the pull-down located below the table, or use the
page scroll at the table's top right to browse through its pages; use the arrows to the right of a column header to
sort by that column; filter the table using the "Filter" box at the top of the table.
Increase the total number of rows displayed on this page using the pull-down located below the table, or use the
page scroll at the table's top right to browse through the table's pages; use the arrows to the right of a column
header to sort by that column; filter the table using the "Filter" box at the top of the table; download this table
as a .txt file using the Download button;
Increase the total number of rows displayed on this page using the pull-down located below the table, or use the
page scroll at the table's top right to browse through the table's pages; use the arrows to the right of a column
header to sort by that column; filter the table using the "Filter" box at the top of the table; download this table
as a .txt file using the Download button;