Web Servers: Architecture and Security Chris Munt M/Gateway Developments Ltd
Agenda Web Servers Microsoft IIS, Apache, Sun JSWS  Development trends Extending Web Servers Support for application development environments Performance and Scalability Security The Web Server is very much on the “front line”
Evolution “ Since 1999, the web has grown from a document retrieval system into an application delivery system. ” Douglas Crockford at AjaxWorld 2008 Implications for: Web Server extensibility Resilience Performance and scalability Architecture Security
Web Servers: Market Share 2005: Apache 71% IIS 20% 2008: Apache 50% (Trend: falling slightly) IIS 35% (Tend: increasing slightly) Source: Netcraft
Internet Information Services  ( IIS) v1.0 Introduced as free add-on for NT v3.51 (mid 1990s) Single multi-threaded process Extensibility Common Gateway Interface (CGI) Internet Server Application Programming Interface (ISAPI)
IIS: CGI Modules implemented as stand-alone scripts/executables Application requests processed in separate server process Non-optimal but secure Overhead of starting new process to serve each request; Overhead of inter-process communication Application crash does not impact hosting web server Architecturally the same for all web servers
IIS: ISAPI Modules implemented as Windows DLLs Can be a Filter (e.g. GZIP) or Extension (e.g. PHP, CSP) Application requests serviced in process space of IIS host Optimal but there are risks No overhead in process management  and inter-process communication Application crash does impact hosting web server Supported for all versions of IIS The only web server API (excluding CGI) that’s completely backwards (and forwards) compatible!
IIS v5.0 & Windows 2000 Concept of isolation levels (or application protection levels). Low All in same process Medium ISAPI extensions run in a separate process High ISAPI extensions run in a separate process per  application An  application  is broadly defined in terms of its path
IIS: Security alert: code red worm Exploiting a buffer overrun in the Windows 2000 Indexing Service DLL GET /default.ida?NNNNNNNN Inject code after provoking overrun Microsoft reference: MS01-033 Wake-up call to severity of compromises caused by bad extensions
IIS v6.0 & Windows 2003 Concept of Worker Process Isolation and Application pools Application pool Applications associated with one or more worker processes Web Gardens Multiple worker processes supporting an application Not to be confused with web farms where multiple web server installations manage the work load Process recycling Process idle-time timeout
IIS v7.0 & Windows 2008 Major upgrade Previewed in Vista: A good reason to get Vista Modular architecture Administrators choose the modules required Improved security Application pools New configuration schema.  XML based. New API ISAPI still supported (as a supplied module) Third-party modules can be added
IIS Resources www.microsoft.com www.iis.net Particularly interesting because IIS developers participate
Apache v1.0 Consolidated in mid-90s  Robert McCool Successor to NCSA HTTPd ( National Center for Supercomputing Application) Modular architecture Multi-threaded for Windows; Multi-process for UNIX Extensibility Common Gateway Interface (CGI) Apache API
Apache: API Modules implemented as Dynamic Shared Objects (DSOs) DLLS for Windows, Shared Objects/Libraries for UNIX, Shareable Images for OpenVMS Modules can process any phase of request/response cycle Request handling (e.g. mod_csp, mod_weblink) Authentication (e.g. mod_auth) Security (e.g. mod_ssl) Filters (e.g. mod_deflate) Miscellaneous (e.g. mod_rewrite)
Apache: v2.0 - 2002 Substantial rewrite of core with improved modularization Multi-threaded for Windows and OpenVMS Support for UNIX threading Multi-process/Multi-threaded hybrid server New API Use mod_csp2.so instead of mod_csp.so
Apache: v2.2 - 2005 Improved Modules – particularly for authorization Same API but binary incompatibilities Use mod_csp22.so instead of mod_csp2.so
Web Servers based on Apache HP Secure Web Server (HPSWS) For OpenVMS v1.3-1 based on Apache v1.3.26 v2.1-1 based on Apache v2.0.52 Tomcat (Java/JSP), Perl, PHP CSP Many others
Apache: Resources www.apache.org Access to various forums for support
Sun JSWS Netscape Enterprise (mid 1990s) FastTrack – lightweight offering iPlanet (late 1990s) America Online, Sun Sun ONE (early 2000s) Sun Java System Web Server (mid 2000s) Resources: www.sun.com
Sun JSWS Multi-threaded for Windows Multi-process/Multi-threaded hybrid for UNIX Extensibility Common Gateway Interface (CGI) Netscape Server Application Programming Interface (NSAPI) Modules implemented as DLLS for Windows, Shared Objects/Libraries for UNIX Binary incompatibility between Netscape Enterprise v2 and v3
Trends: All web servers Multi-process/Multi-threaded servers Increased flexibility/extensibility through modularization Better security
Trends: Implications for WebLink and CSP State-aware mode (preserve mode 1 for CSP) increasingly non-optimal Connection pool distributed amongst multiple process with no control over the relationship between requests and processes Using Network Service Daemon (NSD) in single process mode becomes essential Channel load into single multi-threaded process Maintain single process pool
Web Standards? Applications using AJAX techniques generate much more HTTP traffic than conventional web applications. Poor performance unless connection between client and server is kept open between requests. HTTP v1.0: Asymmetric protocol by default Client opens connection to server then sends request Server sends response then closes connection to server
HTTP Keep-Alive Connection kept open between requests HTTP v1.0: Default off Connection: Keep-Alive (switch on) HTTP v1.1: Default on Connection: Close (switch off) Must send response size notification Content-Length Chunked transfer (HTTP v1.1) Transfer-Encoding: chunked WebLink/CSP Gateway will do this automatically
HTTP Connections: The current status Standard specifies the maximum number of simultaneous connections to a given server HTTP v1.0: usually 4 HTTP v1.1: always 2  (Section 8.1.4 RFC2616) Objective: to improve response times and avoid congestion. Can change setting in browser configuration Inappropriate for web based applications Proxys will implement standard
HTTP Connections: The future Now recognised that high-bandwidth connections are now commonplace Key development since HTTP v1.1 which was drafted in January 1997. Client-side bandwidth no longer gating factor in connection speed. IE v8 will almost certainly increase the number of connections to 6 Direct response to needs of AJAX applications
Security through Obscurity Most attacks on web servers are against known vulnerabilities Hide identity of web server Use header masking facilities if they are available Don’t rely on standard error pages
Securing Applications: High grade Two aspects Client authentication Protecting content SSL/TLS Transport Layer Security (successor to SSL) Usually authenticates server to a non-authenticated client Certificate issued to server. Client identifies him/herself using a username/password over the secure channel (all communications encrypted). Supports mutual authentication Certificate issued to both client and server Kerberos Possible (apparently)
Securing Applications: Low grade authentication HTTP Basic authentication Supported by all browsers Client credentials passed to server in the clear Really only useful for secured (internal) networks HTTP digest authentication Protection for password Some compatibility issues with browsers Still not as strong as authentication over SSL/TLS or Kerberos.
Conclusion Keep web servers updated with upgrades and service packs for best security Keep eye on developments in standards Use HTTP Keep-alive for applications using AJAX techniques Don’t use state-aware mode in WebLink or CSP

Web Servers: Architecture and Security

  • 1.
    Web Servers: Architectureand Security Chris Munt M/Gateway Developments Ltd
  • 2.
    Agenda Web ServersMicrosoft IIS, Apache, Sun JSWS Development trends Extending Web Servers Support for application development environments Performance and Scalability Security The Web Server is very much on the “front line”
  • 3.
    Evolution “ Since1999, the web has grown from a document retrieval system into an application delivery system. ” Douglas Crockford at AjaxWorld 2008 Implications for: Web Server extensibility Resilience Performance and scalability Architecture Security
  • 4.
    Web Servers: MarketShare 2005: Apache 71% IIS 20% 2008: Apache 50% (Trend: falling slightly) IIS 35% (Tend: increasing slightly) Source: Netcraft
  • 5.
    Internet Information Services ( IIS) v1.0 Introduced as free add-on for NT v3.51 (mid 1990s) Single multi-threaded process Extensibility Common Gateway Interface (CGI) Internet Server Application Programming Interface (ISAPI)
  • 6.
    IIS: CGI Modulesimplemented as stand-alone scripts/executables Application requests processed in separate server process Non-optimal but secure Overhead of starting new process to serve each request; Overhead of inter-process communication Application crash does not impact hosting web server Architecturally the same for all web servers
  • 7.
    IIS: ISAPI Modulesimplemented as Windows DLLs Can be a Filter (e.g. GZIP) or Extension (e.g. PHP, CSP) Application requests serviced in process space of IIS host Optimal but there are risks No overhead in process management and inter-process communication Application crash does impact hosting web server Supported for all versions of IIS The only web server API (excluding CGI) that’s completely backwards (and forwards) compatible!
  • 8.
    IIS v5.0 &Windows 2000 Concept of isolation levels (or application protection levels). Low All in same process Medium ISAPI extensions run in a separate process High ISAPI extensions run in a separate process per application An application is broadly defined in terms of its path
  • 9.
    IIS: Security alert:code red worm Exploiting a buffer overrun in the Windows 2000 Indexing Service DLL GET /default.ida?NNNNNNNN Inject code after provoking overrun Microsoft reference: MS01-033 Wake-up call to severity of compromises caused by bad extensions
  • 10.
    IIS v6.0 &Windows 2003 Concept of Worker Process Isolation and Application pools Application pool Applications associated with one or more worker processes Web Gardens Multiple worker processes supporting an application Not to be confused with web farms where multiple web server installations manage the work load Process recycling Process idle-time timeout
  • 11.
    IIS v7.0 &Windows 2008 Major upgrade Previewed in Vista: A good reason to get Vista Modular architecture Administrators choose the modules required Improved security Application pools New configuration schema. XML based. New API ISAPI still supported (as a supplied module) Third-party modules can be added
  • 12.
    IIS Resources www.microsoft.comwww.iis.net Particularly interesting because IIS developers participate
  • 13.
    Apache v1.0 Consolidatedin mid-90s Robert McCool Successor to NCSA HTTPd ( National Center for Supercomputing Application) Modular architecture Multi-threaded for Windows; Multi-process for UNIX Extensibility Common Gateway Interface (CGI) Apache API
  • 14.
    Apache: API Modulesimplemented as Dynamic Shared Objects (DSOs) DLLS for Windows, Shared Objects/Libraries for UNIX, Shareable Images for OpenVMS Modules can process any phase of request/response cycle Request handling (e.g. mod_csp, mod_weblink) Authentication (e.g. mod_auth) Security (e.g. mod_ssl) Filters (e.g. mod_deflate) Miscellaneous (e.g. mod_rewrite)
  • 15.
    Apache: v2.0 -2002 Substantial rewrite of core with improved modularization Multi-threaded for Windows and OpenVMS Support for UNIX threading Multi-process/Multi-threaded hybrid server New API Use mod_csp2.so instead of mod_csp.so
  • 16.
    Apache: v2.2 -2005 Improved Modules – particularly for authorization Same API but binary incompatibilities Use mod_csp22.so instead of mod_csp2.so
  • 17.
    Web Servers basedon Apache HP Secure Web Server (HPSWS) For OpenVMS v1.3-1 based on Apache v1.3.26 v2.1-1 based on Apache v2.0.52 Tomcat (Java/JSP), Perl, PHP CSP Many others
  • 18.
    Apache: Resources www.apache.orgAccess to various forums for support
  • 19.
    Sun JSWS NetscapeEnterprise (mid 1990s) FastTrack – lightweight offering iPlanet (late 1990s) America Online, Sun Sun ONE (early 2000s) Sun Java System Web Server (mid 2000s) Resources: www.sun.com
  • 20.
    Sun JSWS Multi-threadedfor Windows Multi-process/Multi-threaded hybrid for UNIX Extensibility Common Gateway Interface (CGI) Netscape Server Application Programming Interface (NSAPI) Modules implemented as DLLS for Windows, Shared Objects/Libraries for UNIX Binary incompatibility between Netscape Enterprise v2 and v3
  • 21.
    Trends: All webservers Multi-process/Multi-threaded servers Increased flexibility/extensibility through modularization Better security
  • 22.
    Trends: Implications forWebLink and CSP State-aware mode (preserve mode 1 for CSP) increasingly non-optimal Connection pool distributed amongst multiple process with no control over the relationship between requests and processes Using Network Service Daemon (NSD) in single process mode becomes essential Channel load into single multi-threaded process Maintain single process pool
  • 23.
    Web Standards? Applicationsusing AJAX techniques generate much more HTTP traffic than conventional web applications. Poor performance unless connection between client and server is kept open between requests. HTTP v1.0: Asymmetric protocol by default Client opens connection to server then sends request Server sends response then closes connection to server
  • 24.
    HTTP Keep-Alive Connectionkept open between requests HTTP v1.0: Default off Connection: Keep-Alive (switch on) HTTP v1.1: Default on Connection: Close (switch off) Must send response size notification Content-Length Chunked transfer (HTTP v1.1) Transfer-Encoding: chunked WebLink/CSP Gateway will do this automatically
  • 25.
    HTTP Connections: Thecurrent status Standard specifies the maximum number of simultaneous connections to a given server HTTP v1.0: usually 4 HTTP v1.1: always 2 (Section 8.1.4 RFC2616) Objective: to improve response times and avoid congestion. Can change setting in browser configuration Inappropriate for web based applications Proxys will implement standard
  • 26.
    HTTP Connections: Thefuture Now recognised that high-bandwidth connections are now commonplace Key development since HTTP v1.1 which was drafted in January 1997. Client-side bandwidth no longer gating factor in connection speed. IE v8 will almost certainly increase the number of connections to 6 Direct response to needs of AJAX applications
  • 27.
    Security through ObscurityMost attacks on web servers are against known vulnerabilities Hide identity of web server Use header masking facilities if they are available Don’t rely on standard error pages
  • 28.
    Securing Applications: Highgrade Two aspects Client authentication Protecting content SSL/TLS Transport Layer Security (successor to SSL) Usually authenticates server to a non-authenticated client Certificate issued to server. Client identifies him/herself using a username/password over the secure channel (all communications encrypted). Supports mutual authentication Certificate issued to both client and server Kerberos Possible (apparently)
  • 29.
    Securing Applications: Lowgrade authentication HTTP Basic authentication Supported by all browsers Client credentials passed to server in the clear Really only useful for secured (internal) networks HTTP digest authentication Protection for password Some compatibility issues with browsers Still not as strong as authentication over SSL/TLS or Kerberos.
  • 30.
    Conclusion Keep webservers updated with upgrades and service packs for best security Keep eye on developments in standards Use HTTP Keep-alive for applications using AJAX techniques Don’t use state-aware mode in WebLink or CSP