Dr. Divya Sharma
Assistant Professor
Somaclonal Variation and Its
Crop Improvement
SOMACLONAL VARIATION
Soma ----- Somatic cells
Clonal ----- Clones ----- Generations
Variation ----- Changes
SOMACLOANL VARIATION ------ SOMACLONES
(variation in somaclones)
SOMACLONAL VARIATION
 “Somaclonal variation” term was first coined by Larkin
and Scowcroft (1981).
According to Larkin and Scowcroft (1981), “Somaclonal variation is the
genetic variability which is regenerated during tissue culture” or plant
variants derived from any form of cell or tissue cultures.
Larkin and Scowcroft. 1981
 The phenomenon of high variability in individuals from plant cell
cultures or adventitious shoots is called Somaclonal
variation.
 Somaclonal variation is the variation seen in plants that have been
produced by plant tissue culture.
 Genetic variation (genetic mutation) in plants that have been
produced by plant tissue culture and can be used detected as
genetic or phenotypic traits (caused by in-vitro conditions or by
chimeral separation).
 Genetic variations are inherited by the clones of the treated plant.
 Somaclonal variations may lead to desirable characteristics like
increased pest resistance etc. This work performed to achieve some
of beneficial properties of plants like disease resistance, fruit
quality, stress resistance, nutritional quality
improvement, yield improvement, etc.
Larkin, 1981
 The recovery of genetic changes in plants generated from somatic
cells thus offers an opportunity to unravel natural variability and to
use this variation for development of new varieties for plenty of
good purpose (Larkin, 1981).
 Plant tissue culture cycle is a process that involves establishment of
a differentiated cells/tissue culture under defined conditions of
proliferation for a number of generation and subsequent
regeneration of plant.
Larkin, 1981
Somaclonal variation in Sugarcane [Saccharum officinarum]
Gametoclonal Variation
 If the somatic-issue derived variants have a gametophytic
origin such as pollen or egg cell, then its known as
“Gametophytic variation”.
 It introduced for variation observed among plants
regenerated from cultured gametic cells.
Larkin, 1981
Basis of Somaclonal Variation
Somaclonal variation --- occur as a result of genetic heterogeneity in
plant tissue culture (inside the plant or explant) that changes can passes
from one generation to another.
This maybe due to:
 Expression of chromosomal mosaicism or Genetic disorders
 Spontaneous mutations due to culture conditions or Physiological
cause
General Features of Somaclonal Variation
 Variation in karyotype, isozyme characteristics and
morphology (number and structure of chromosomes) in
somaclones may be observed.
 Regenerated plants with altered chromosomal changes often
show changes in leaf shapes and color, growth rate and habit,
and sexual fertility.
 Generally heritable mutations and persist in plant population
even after plantation into the field.
 Variations occur in both Qualitative and Quantitative traits
(Larkin, 1981).
Larkin, 1981
Types of Somaclonal Variation
•Preexisting variations in the somatic cells
of explant
•Caused by mutations and other DNA
changes
•Occur at high frequency
Genetic
(heritable)
variations
•Variations generated during tissue culture
•Caused by temporary phenotypic changes
•Due to culture conditions, varied
nutrients, etc
•Occur at low frequency
Epigenetic
(non-heritable)
variations
Satyanarayana, 2015
Types of Somaclonal Variation
Gametoclonal
variation
[variation observed
the plants
regenerated from
gametic cultures]
(clones of gametes)
Protoclonal
variation
[variation observed
among the plants
protoplast cultures]
(clones of
protoplast)
Calliclonal
variation
[variation
observed among
the plants callus]
(clones of callus)
Calliclone
Mericlone
Protoclone
• Clones of callus
• Clones of meristem
• Clones of protoplast
Causes of Somaclonal Variation
Physiological cause
Genetic cause
Biochemical cause
Physiological Cause
• Exposure of culture to plant
growth regulators
• Culture media conditions
Physiological
cause
Evan et al., 1984
Genetic cause
Change in
chromosome
number
• Aneuploidy (gain
or loss set of
chromosomes)
• Polyploidy
(organism with more
than 2 chromosomes
set)
• Monoploidy
(organism with one
chromosomes set)
Change in
chromosome
structure
• Deletion (a segment
of base is deleted)
• Inversion (a segment
of chromosomes is
reversed)
• Duplication
(addition of
chromosomes)
• Translocation (arms
of chromosomes
switched)
Gene mutation
• Transition
• Transversion
• Insertion
• Deletion
Lee and Ronald, 1988
Plasma gene
mutation
• Changes in genetic
material which
present inside
mitochondria and
chloroplast
• Mutant character
shows cytoplasmic
inheritance
Transposable
element
activation
• Transposable
element / jumping
genes cause
mutation via
replication,
recombination and
repair
DNA sequence
• Changes in DNA –
Detection of altered
fragment size by
using Restriction
enzyme
• Change in protein
– Loss or gain in
protein band; and
Alteration in level of
specific protein
• Methylation of
DNA – Methylation
inactivates
transcription process
[Base mutation]
Lee and Ronald, 1988
Biochemical Cause
• Lack of photosynthetic ability due
to alteration in carbon metabolism
• Biosynthesis of starch via
carotenoid pathway
• Nitrogen metabolism
• Antibiotic resistance
Biochemical
cause
Callus tissue
Organogenesis
Regenerated
plants
Hardening
and selfing
Somaclonal
variants
Factors Affecting Variation
 Selection agents (toxin, herbicide, amino acid analogue)
 Selection propagule (cells, protoplasts, calli)
 Duration of cell culture
 Growth hormone effects
 Technique used for selection
 Stability of resistant substance
 In-vivo testing procedure
 Genotype and explants source
 Ability for regeneration of plants
Isolation of Somaclonal Variation
(via two schemes)
Without in-vitro
selection
With in-vitro
selection
Generation of
somaclonal
Without in-
vitro selection
Satyanarayana, 2015
 Unorganized callus and cells, grown in cultures for various periods on
a medium that contain no selective agents, are induced to differentiate
whole plants.
 An explant is cultivated on a suitable medium, supplemented with
grown regulators
 The unorganized callus and cells do not contain any selective agent
(toxic or inhibitory substance)
 These cultures are normally sub-cultured and transferred to shoot
induction medium for regeneration of plants
 The so produced plants are grown in pots, transferred to field, and
analyzed for somaclonal variants
Without in-vitro technique
Limitation of Without in-vitro Selection
 No specific approach for isolation of somaclones
 Appearance of desired traits are purely by chance
 Time consuming procedure
 Require screening in many plants
Generation of
somaclonal
With in-vitro
selection
Satyanarayana, 2015
Chaleff, 1981 has
labeled:
Plant regenerated from
tissue culture (R or R0)
Self fertilized progeny of
R0 plant as R1
Larkin and Scowcroft,
1981 have referred:
Regenerated plants as
SC1 (=R0)
Self fertilized
generations as SC2,
SC3, SC4 etc.
 Cell lines are analyzed from plant cultures for their capability to
survive in the presence of a toxic substance in medium or under
environmental stress conditions
 The differentiated callus obtained from an explant (any cells,
protoplast or calli) is exposed in the medium to inhibitors like toxins,
antibiotics, amino acid analogs.
 Selection cycles are carried out to isolate the tolerant callus cultures
and these calli are regenerated into plants
 The plants so obtained are in-vitro screened against the toxin (or
pathogen or any other inhibitor)
 The plants resistant to the toxin are selected and grown further by
vegetative propagation or self-pollination
 The subsequent generations are analyzed for disease resistant plants
against the specific pathogenic organism.
With in-vitro technique
Advantages of With in-vitro Selection
 Specific approach for isolation of desired trait
 Less time consuming procedure as compare without in-
vitro approach
Detection and Isolation of
Somaclonal Variants
Analysis of morphological characters
• Qualitative characters: Plant height, maturity date, flowering
date and leaf size
• Quantitative characters: Yield of flower, seeds and wax contents
in different plants parts
Variants detection by cytological studies
• Staining of meristematic tissues like root tip, leaf tip with
feulgen and acetocarmine provide the number and morphology of
chromosomes
Skirvin et al., 1994
Variants detection by DNA contents
• Cytophotometer detection of feulgen stained nuclei can be used
to measure the DNA contents
Variants detection by gel electrophoresis
• Change in concentration of enzymes, proteins and
chemical products like pigments, alkaloids and amino acids can
be detected by their electrophoretic pattern
Detection of disease resistance variant
• Pathogen or toxin responsible for disease resistance can be used
as selection agent during culture
Skirvin et al., 1994
Detection of herbicide resistance variant
• Plantlets generated by the addition of herbicide to the cell culture
system can be used as herbicide resistance plant
Detection of environmental stress tolerant
variant
• Selection of high tolerant cell lines in tobacco
• Selection of water-logging and drought resistance cell lines in
tomato
• Selection of temperature stress tolerant in cell lines in pear
• Selection of mineral toxicities tolerant in sorghum plant (mainly for
aluminum toxicity)
Skirvin et al., 1994
Occurrence of Somaclonal Variation
 Avoiding long term cultures
 Using axillary shoot induction systems where possible
 Propagating chimeras by other clonal systems
 Well known that, Increasing numbers of subcultures increase the
likelihood of somaclonal variation, so the number of subcultures in
micropropagation protocols should be kept to a minimum
 Regularly reinitiating clones from new explants, which might reduce
variability over time
 Avoiding 2,4-D in the culture medium, as this hormone (Introduce
variation).
Applications of
Somaclonal Variations
 Production of agronomically useful plants
 Resistance to disease
 Resistance to abiotic stresses
 Resistance to herbicides
 Improved seed quality and geraniums (esp. scented
varieties)
 Woody ornamentals
E x a m p l e s : S u g a r c a n e – s e l e c t i o n s f o r h i g h e r y i e l d & d i s e a s e
r e s i s t a n c e ; P o t a t o e s – y i e l d & d i s e a s e r e s i s t a n c e ; P a u l o w n i a –
s e l e c t i o n f o r l e a f v a r i e g a t i o n .
Production of agronomically useful plants
[different crop species with their morphological characters]
Crop Character (s)
Rice Flowering period, panicle size; like number plant height; leaf length, shape and color;
frequency of fertile seed; sterility mutants
Wheat Plant height; tiller number; grain color; seed storage protein
Maize Reduced pollen fertility and male sterility; twin stalks from a single node
Sugarcane High sugar yield; increasing stalk length, diameter, weight and density
Barley Increased grain yield; leaf shape; heading date; ash content
Oats Plant height; heading date; morphology and fertility
Soybean Variable height; maturity; seed protein and oil content
Potato Higher yield; growth habit, maturity and morphology
Tomato Dwarf habit; early flowering; orange fruit color
Carrot Higher carotene content
Pineapple Foliage density; leaf color, width and spine formation
Brassica Multiple branching stem; altered leaf; slow growth; failure to flower or delay in flowering;
large pollen grains
Tobacco Increased yield; plant height; leaf number, shape, width and yield; type of inflorescence
and yield
Resistance to disease
 Development of disease resistance in many crops : Rice, Wheat,
Maize, Sugarcane, Tobacco, Apple, Tomato, etc
 Selected crops somaclonal variants, with increasing disease resistance
developed, without in-vitro selection are respectively .
Resistance first reported in Sugarcane for eye spot disease
(Heminthosporium sacchari), downy mildew (Sclerospora sacchari)
and Fiji virus disease by regenerating plants from the callus of
susceptible clones and screening the somaclones.
Crop Pathogenic
organism(s)
Rice Helminthosporium oryzae
Maize Helminthosporium maydis
Barley Rhynchosporium secalis
Sugarcane Puccinia melanocephala,
Sclerospora saccharii,
Helminthosporium sacchari
Potato Streptomyces scabie, Alternaria
solani, Phytophthora infestans,
Potato virus X and Y
Tomato Pseudomonas solanacearum,
Fusarium oxysporum
Tobacco Phytophthora parasitica
Apple Phytophthora cactorum
Banana Fusarium oxysporum
Lettuce Lettuce mosaic virus
Alfalfa Fusarium solanii, Verticillium
albo-atrum
Crop Pathogenic
organism(s)
Selection
agent
Rice Helminthosporium oryzae,
Xanthomonas oryzae
Crude toxin
Bacterial cells
Maize Helminthosporium maydis Hm T toxin
Wheat Helminthosporium sativum,
Pseudomonas syringae
Crude toxin
Syringomycin
Barley Helminthosporium sativum,
Fusarium spp.
Crude toxin
Fusaric acid
Sugar-
cane
Helminthosporium sacchari Toxin
Potato Phytophthora infestans,
Fusarium oxysporum,
Erwinia carotovora
Crude filtrate
Crude filtrate
Pathogen
Tomato Pseudomonas
solanacearum, tobacco
mosaic virus X
Crude filtrate
Virus
Tobacco Phytophthora syringae,
Pseudomonas syrinae
Toxin
Methionine
sulfoximine
Alfalfa Fusarium oxysporum Crude filtrate
A list of disease resistant crop plants
obtained by somaclones at the plant level
without in-vitro selection
A list of disease resistant crop plants obtained
by with in-vitro selection
Resistance to abiotic stresses
 Freezing tolerance [Eg. Wheat]
 Salt tolerance [Eg. Rice, Maize, Tobacco]
 Aluminium tolerance [Eg. Carrot, Sorghum, Tomato]
 Drought tolerance
Herbicide resistance
 Tobacco resistant to Glyphosate, Sulfonyl urea and Picloram.
 Carrot resistant to Glyphosate
 Lotus resistant to 2,4-dichlorophenoxy acetic acid (2,4-D)
Crop Common name Herbicide
Glycine max Soybean Imazethapyr
Nicotina tabacum Tobacco Glyphosate
Gossypium hirsutum Cotton Sulfonylurea, Imidazolinone
Zea mays Maize Sethoxydim, Cycloxydim
Zea mays Maize Glyphosate
Triticum aestivum Wheat Difenzoquat
Beta vulgaris Beet Imidazolinone
Datura innoxia Sacred datura Chlorosulfuron
Improved seed quality
New variety of Lathyrus sativa seeds [Lathyrus Bio L212]
with low content of neurotoxin has been developed through
somaclonal variations.
Advantages and Disadvantages of
Somaclonal Variations
Advantages Disadvantages
Help in crop improvement Require extensive and extended field trails
Provides additional genetic variability (under in-
vitro conditions)
Sometime lead to undesirable results such as
reduced fertility, growth rate and overall
performance of plant
Increased and improved production of secondary
metabolites
Selected variants are random and genetically
unstable and non-heritable
Selection of plants resistant to various toxins,
herbicides, abiotic stress, high salt concentration,
mineral toxicity; and plant improved quality of
seeds (a new variety Lathyrus sativus)
A series advantage occur in operations which
require clonal uniformity, as in the horticulture and
forestry industries where tissue culture is employed
for rapid propagation of elite genotypes
Suitable for breeding of higher plants Not suitable for complex agronomic traits like yield,
quality etc
Simpler and easier as compared to recombinant
DNA technology
May develop variants with pleiotropic effects which
are not true
Stable cell line can be preserved by cryopreservation Required extensive and extended field trails
Examples: Bio-13, a somaclonal variant of
Citronella java (with 37% more oil an 39% more
citronellon) a medicinal plant
Plants often lost the power of regeneration
 Evans D.A., Sharp W .R ., Medina H. “Somaclonal and
Gametoclonal Variation” Am J Botany (1984 ) 759-774.
 Satanarayana U. “Somaclonal Variation, Biotechnology, 9th Ed,
(2015 ) 855 : 546-549.
 Skirvin R .M ., Margaret N. “Sources and Frequency of
Somaclonal Variation” Hor tSci 29.11 (1994 ) 1232-1237 .
 Larkin P .J., Scowcroft R . “Somaclonal Variation -A Novel
Source o f Variability from Cell Cultures for Plant
Improvement” Theor Appl Genet 60.4 (1981 ) 197-214 .
References
Sharma’s Classes - Dr. Divya Sharma

Somaclonal Variation and It's Crop Improvement

  • 1.
    Dr. Divya Sharma AssistantProfessor Somaclonal Variation and Its Crop Improvement
  • 2.
    SOMACLONAL VARIATION Soma -----Somatic cells Clonal ----- Clones ----- Generations Variation ----- Changes SOMACLOANL VARIATION ------ SOMACLONES (variation in somaclones)
  • 3.
    SOMACLONAL VARIATION  “Somaclonalvariation” term was first coined by Larkin and Scowcroft (1981). According to Larkin and Scowcroft (1981), “Somaclonal variation is the genetic variability which is regenerated during tissue culture” or plant variants derived from any form of cell or tissue cultures. Larkin and Scowcroft. 1981
  • 4.
     The phenomenonof high variability in individuals from plant cell cultures or adventitious shoots is called Somaclonal variation.  Somaclonal variation is the variation seen in plants that have been produced by plant tissue culture.  Genetic variation (genetic mutation) in plants that have been produced by plant tissue culture and can be used detected as genetic or phenotypic traits (caused by in-vitro conditions or by chimeral separation).  Genetic variations are inherited by the clones of the treated plant.  Somaclonal variations may lead to desirable characteristics like increased pest resistance etc. This work performed to achieve some of beneficial properties of plants like disease resistance, fruit quality, stress resistance, nutritional quality improvement, yield improvement, etc. Larkin, 1981
  • 5.
     The recoveryof genetic changes in plants generated from somatic cells thus offers an opportunity to unravel natural variability and to use this variation for development of new varieties for plenty of good purpose (Larkin, 1981).  Plant tissue culture cycle is a process that involves establishment of a differentiated cells/tissue culture under defined conditions of proliferation for a number of generation and subsequent regeneration of plant. Larkin, 1981 Somaclonal variation in Sugarcane [Saccharum officinarum]
  • 6.
    Gametoclonal Variation  Ifthe somatic-issue derived variants have a gametophytic origin such as pollen or egg cell, then its known as “Gametophytic variation”.  It introduced for variation observed among plants regenerated from cultured gametic cells. Larkin, 1981
  • 7.
    Basis of SomaclonalVariation Somaclonal variation --- occur as a result of genetic heterogeneity in plant tissue culture (inside the plant or explant) that changes can passes from one generation to another. This maybe due to:  Expression of chromosomal mosaicism or Genetic disorders  Spontaneous mutations due to culture conditions or Physiological cause
  • 8.
    General Features ofSomaclonal Variation  Variation in karyotype, isozyme characteristics and morphology (number and structure of chromosomes) in somaclones may be observed.  Regenerated plants with altered chromosomal changes often show changes in leaf shapes and color, growth rate and habit, and sexual fertility.  Generally heritable mutations and persist in plant population even after plantation into the field.  Variations occur in both Qualitative and Quantitative traits (Larkin, 1981). Larkin, 1981
  • 9.
    Types of SomaclonalVariation •Preexisting variations in the somatic cells of explant •Caused by mutations and other DNA changes •Occur at high frequency Genetic (heritable) variations •Variations generated during tissue culture •Caused by temporary phenotypic changes •Due to culture conditions, varied nutrients, etc •Occur at low frequency Epigenetic (non-heritable) variations Satyanarayana, 2015
  • 10.
    Types of SomaclonalVariation Gametoclonal variation [variation observed the plants regenerated from gametic cultures] (clones of gametes) Protoclonal variation [variation observed among the plants protoplast cultures] (clones of protoplast) Calliclonal variation [variation observed among the plants callus] (clones of callus)
  • 11.
    Calliclone Mericlone Protoclone • Clones ofcallus • Clones of meristem • Clones of protoplast
  • 12.
    Causes of SomaclonalVariation Physiological cause Genetic cause Biochemical cause
  • 13.
    Physiological Cause • Exposureof culture to plant growth regulators • Culture media conditions Physiological cause Evan et al., 1984
  • 14.
    Genetic cause Change in chromosome number •Aneuploidy (gain or loss set of chromosomes) • Polyploidy (organism with more than 2 chromosomes set) • Monoploidy (organism with one chromosomes set) Change in chromosome structure • Deletion (a segment of base is deleted) • Inversion (a segment of chromosomes is reversed) • Duplication (addition of chromosomes) • Translocation (arms of chromosomes switched) Gene mutation • Transition • Transversion • Insertion • Deletion Lee and Ronald, 1988
  • 15.
    Plasma gene mutation • Changesin genetic material which present inside mitochondria and chloroplast • Mutant character shows cytoplasmic inheritance Transposable element activation • Transposable element / jumping genes cause mutation via replication, recombination and repair DNA sequence • Changes in DNA – Detection of altered fragment size by using Restriction enzyme • Change in protein – Loss or gain in protein band; and Alteration in level of specific protein • Methylation of DNA – Methylation inactivates transcription process [Base mutation] Lee and Ronald, 1988
  • 16.
    Biochemical Cause • Lackof photosynthetic ability due to alteration in carbon metabolism • Biosynthesis of starch via carotenoid pathway • Nitrogen metabolism • Antibiotic resistance Biochemical cause
  • 17.
  • 18.
    Factors Affecting Variation Selection agents (toxin, herbicide, amino acid analogue)  Selection propagule (cells, protoplasts, calli)  Duration of cell culture  Growth hormone effects  Technique used for selection  Stability of resistant substance  In-vivo testing procedure  Genotype and explants source  Ability for regeneration of plants
  • 19.
    Isolation of SomaclonalVariation (via two schemes) Without in-vitro selection With in-vitro selection
  • 20.
    Generation of somaclonal Without in- vitroselection Satyanarayana, 2015
  • 21.
     Unorganized callusand cells, grown in cultures for various periods on a medium that contain no selective agents, are induced to differentiate whole plants.  An explant is cultivated on a suitable medium, supplemented with grown regulators  The unorganized callus and cells do not contain any selective agent (toxic or inhibitory substance)  These cultures are normally sub-cultured and transferred to shoot induction medium for regeneration of plants  The so produced plants are grown in pots, transferred to field, and analyzed for somaclonal variants Without in-vitro technique
  • 22.
    Limitation of Withoutin-vitro Selection  No specific approach for isolation of somaclones  Appearance of desired traits are purely by chance  Time consuming procedure  Require screening in many plants
  • 23.
    Generation of somaclonal With in-vitro selection Satyanarayana,2015 Chaleff, 1981 has labeled: Plant regenerated from tissue culture (R or R0) Self fertilized progeny of R0 plant as R1 Larkin and Scowcroft, 1981 have referred: Regenerated plants as SC1 (=R0) Self fertilized generations as SC2, SC3, SC4 etc.
  • 24.
     Cell linesare analyzed from plant cultures for their capability to survive in the presence of a toxic substance in medium or under environmental stress conditions  The differentiated callus obtained from an explant (any cells, protoplast or calli) is exposed in the medium to inhibitors like toxins, antibiotics, amino acid analogs.  Selection cycles are carried out to isolate the tolerant callus cultures and these calli are regenerated into plants  The plants so obtained are in-vitro screened against the toxin (or pathogen or any other inhibitor)  The plants resistant to the toxin are selected and grown further by vegetative propagation or self-pollination  The subsequent generations are analyzed for disease resistant plants against the specific pathogenic organism. With in-vitro technique
  • 25.
    Advantages of Within-vitro Selection  Specific approach for isolation of desired trait  Less time consuming procedure as compare without in- vitro approach
  • 26.
    Detection and Isolationof Somaclonal Variants Analysis of morphological characters • Qualitative characters: Plant height, maturity date, flowering date and leaf size • Quantitative characters: Yield of flower, seeds and wax contents in different plants parts Variants detection by cytological studies • Staining of meristematic tissues like root tip, leaf tip with feulgen and acetocarmine provide the number and morphology of chromosomes Skirvin et al., 1994
  • 27.
    Variants detection byDNA contents • Cytophotometer detection of feulgen stained nuclei can be used to measure the DNA contents Variants detection by gel electrophoresis • Change in concentration of enzymes, proteins and chemical products like pigments, alkaloids and amino acids can be detected by their electrophoretic pattern Detection of disease resistance variant • Pathogen or toxin responsible for disease resistance can be used as selection agent during culture Skirvin et al., 1994
  • 28.
    Detection of herbicideresistance variant • Plantlets generated by the addition of herbicide to the cell culture system can be used as herbicide resistance plant Detection of environmental stress tolerant variant • Selection of high tolerant cell lines in tobacco • Selection of water-logging and drought resistance cell lines in tomato • Selection of temperature stress tolerant in cell lines in pear • Selection of mineral toxicities tolerant in sorghum plant (mainly for aluminum toxicity) Skirvin et al., 1994
  • 29.
    Occurrence of SomaclonalVariation  Avoiding long term cultures  Using axillary shoot induction systems where possible  Propagating chimeras by other clonal systems  Well known that, Increasing numbers of subcultures increase the likelihood of somaclonal variation, so the number of subcultures in micropropagation protocols should be kept to a minimum  Regularly reinitiating clones from new explants, which might reduce variability over time  Avoiding 2,4-D in the culture medium, as this hormone (Introduce variation).
  • 30.
    Applications of Somaclonal Variations Production of agronomically useful plants  Resistance to disease  Resistance to abiotic stresses  Resistance to herbicides  Improved seed quality and geraniums (esp. scented varieties)  Woody ornamentals E x a m p l e s : S u g a r c a n e – s e l e c t i o n s f o r h i g h e r y i e l d & d i s e a s e r e s i s t a n c e ; P o t a t o e s – y i e l d & d i s e a s e r e s i s t a n c e ; P a u l o w n i a – s e l e c t i o n f o r l e a f v a r i e g a t i o n .
  • 31.
    Production of agronomicallyuseful plants [different crop species with their morphological characters] Crop Character (s) Rice Flowering period, panicle size; like number plant height; leaf length, shape and color; frequency of fertile seed; sterility mutants Wheat Plant height; tiller number; grain color; seed storage protein Maize Reduced pollen fertility and male sterility; twin stalks from a single node Sugarcane High sugar yield; increasing stalk length, diameter, weight and density Barley Increased grain yield; leaf shape; heading date; ash content Oats Plant height; heading date; morphology and fertility Soybean Variable height; maturity; seed protein and oil content Potato Higher yield; growth habit, maturity and morphology Tomato Dwarf habit; early flowering; orange fruit color Carrot Higher carotene content Pineapple Foliage density; leaf color, width and spine formation Brassica Multiple branching stem; altered leaf; slow growth; failure to flower or delay in flowering; large pollen grains Tobacco Increased yield; plant height; leaf number, shape, width and yield; type of inflorescence and yield
  • 32.
    Resistance to disease Development of disease resistance in many crops : Rice, Wheat, Maize, Sugarcane, Tobacco, Apple, Tomato, etc  Selected crops somaclonal variants, with increasing disease resistance developed, without in-vitro selection are respectively . Resistance first reported in Sugarcane for eye spot disease (Heminthosporium sacchari), downy mildew (Sclerospora sacchari) and Fiji virus disease by regenerating plants from the callus of susceptible clones and screening the somaclones.
  • 33.
    Crop Pathogenic organism(s) Rice Helminthosporiumoryzae Maize Helminthosporium maydis Barley Rhynchosporium secalis Sugarcane Puccinia melanocephala, Sclerospora saccharii, Helminthosporium sacchari Potato Streptomyces scabie, Alternaria solani, Phytophthora infestans, Potato virus X and Y Tomato Pseudomonas solanacearum, Fusarium oxysporum Tobacco Phytophthora parasitica Apple Phytophthora cactorum Banana Fusarium oxysporum Lettuce Lettuce mosaic virus Alfalfa Fusarium solanii, Verticillium albo-atrum Crop Pathogenic organism(s) Selection agent Rice Helminthosporium oryzae, Xanthomonas oryzae Crude toxin Bacterial cells Maize Helminthosporium maydis Hm T toxin Wheat Helminthosporium sativum, Pseudomonas syringae Crude toxin Syringomycin Barley Helminthosporium sativum, Fusarium spp. Crude toxin Fusaric acid Sugar- cane Helminthosporium sacchari Toxin Potato Phytophthora infestans, Fusarium oxysporum, Erwinia carotovora Crude filtrate Crude filtrate Pathogen Tomato Pseudomonas solanacearum, tobacco mosaic virus X Crude filtrate Virus Tobacco Phytophthora syringae, Pseudomonas syrinae Toxin Methionine sulfoximine Alfalfa Fusarium oxysporum Crude filtrate A list of disease resistant crop plants obtained by somaclones at the plant level without in-vitro selection A list of disease resistant crop plants obtained by with in-vitro selection
  • 34.
    Resistance to abioticstresses  Freezing tolerance [Eg. Wheat]  Salt tolerance [Eg. Rice, Maize, Tobacco]  Aluminium tolerance [Eg. Carrot, Sorghum, Tomato]  Drought tolerance
  • 35.
    Herbicide resistance  Tobaccoresistant to Glyphosate, Sulfonyl urea and Picloram.  Carrot resistant to Glyphosate  Lotus resistant to 2,4-dichlorophenoxy acetic acid (2,4-D) Crop Common name Herbicide Glycine max Soybean Imazethapyr Nicotina tabacum Tobacco Glyphosate Gossypium hirsutum Cotton Sulfonylurea, Imidazolinone Zea mays Maize Sethoxydim, Cycloxydim Zea mays Maize Glyphosate Triticum aestivum Wheat Difenzoquat Beta vulgaris Beet Imidazolinone Datura innoxia Sacred datura Chlorosulfuron
  • 36.
    Improved seed quality Newvariety of Lathyrus sativa seeds [Lathyrus Bio L212] with low content of neurotoxin has been developed through somaclonal variations.
  • 37.
    Advantages and Disadvantagesof Somaclonal Variations Advantages Disadvantages Help in crop improvement Require extensive and extended field trails Provides additional genetic variability (under in- vitro conditions) Sometime lead to undesirable results such as reduced fertility, growth rate and overall performance of plant Increased and improved production of secondary metabolites Selected variants are random and genetically unstable and non-heritable Selection of plants resistant to various toxins, herbicides, abiotic stress, high salt concentration, mineral toxicity; and plant improved quality of seeds (a new variety Lathyrus sativus) A series advantage occur in operations which require clonal uniformity, as in the horticulture and forestry industries where tissue culture is employed for rapid propagation of elite genotypes Suitable for breeding of higher plants Not suitable for complex agronomic traits like yield, quality etc Simpler and easier as compared to recombinant DNA technology May develop variants with pleiotropic effects which are not true Stable cell line can be preserved by cryopreservation Required extensive and extended field trails Examples: Bio-13, a somaclonal variant of Citronella java (with 37% more oil an 39% more citronellon) a medicinal plant Plants often lost the power of regeneration
  • 38.
     Evans D.A.,Sharp W .R ., Medina H. “Somaclonal and Gametoclonal Variation” Am J Botany (1984 ) 759-774.  Satanarayana U. “Somaclonal Variation, Biotechnology, 9th Ed, (2015 ) 855 : 546-549.  Skirvin R .M ., Margaret N. “Sources and Frequency of Somaclonal Variation” Hor tSci 29.11 (1994 ) 1232-1237 .  Larkin P .J., Scowcroft R . “Somaclonal Variation -A Novel Source o f Variability from Cell Cultures for Plant Improvement” Theor Appl Genet 60.4 (1981 ) 197-214 . References
  • 39.
    Sharma’s Classes -Dr. Divya Sharma