Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Nov 30;14(4):863-879.
doi: 10.5964/ejop.v14i4.1626. eCollection 2018 Nov.

Differential Effects of Workaholism and Work Engagement on the Interference Between Life and Work Domains

Affiliations

Differential Effects of Workaholism and Work Engagement on the Interference Between Life and Work Domains

Giovanni Di Stefano et al. Eur J Psychol. .

Abstract

This study analyzed the differences between workaholism and work engagement in relation to their influence on work-life interference. Workaholism is an addiction to work, characterized by obsessive attitude towards job, whereas work engagement concerns a positive pattern of thoughts and feelings about one's job; these two constructs thus represent pathological and healthy forms of heavy work investment, respectively. As a consequence, it was expected that workaholism and work engagement would have different effects on perceived interference between work and life domains. We assessed levels of workaholism, work engagement, work-to-life interference, and life-to-work interference in a sample of 212 Italian workers. Results from structural equation modeling showed an inverse symmetry involving patterns and magnitudes of the relations observed: work engagement was more negatively related to life-to-work interference than work-to-life interference, whereas workaholism was more positively related to work-to-life interference than life-to-work interference. Implications about findings of the study are discussed.

Keywords: life-to-work conflict; work engagement; work-to-life conflict; workaholism; work–life interference.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Theoretical model of the study.
Note. WIPL = Work Interference to Personal Life; PLIW = Personal Life Interference to Work.
Figure 2
Figure 2. The relations between work engagement, workaholism, work-to-life conflict and life-to-work conflict.
Note. WIPL = Work Interference to Personal Life; PLIW = Personal Life Interference to Work; DE = Dedication; AB = Absorption; VI = Vigor; WE = Working Excessively; WC = Working Compulsively. For parsimony, latent variable errors are omitted. *p < .01. **p < .001.

References

    1. Amstad F. T., Meier L. L., Fasel U., Elfering A., Semmer N. K. (2011). A meta-analysis of work–family conflict and various outcomes with a special emphasis on cross-domain versus matching-domain relations. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 16(2), 151–169. doi:. 10.1037/a0022170 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arbuckle, J. L. (2011). IBM SPSS AMOS 20 user’s guide. Armonk, NY, USA: IBM.
    1. Aziz S., Cunningham J. (2008). Workaholism, work stress, work-life imbalance: Exploring gender’s role. Gender in Management, 23(8), 553–566. doi:. 10.1108/17542410810912681 - DOI
    1. Bailey C., Madden A., Alfes K., Fletcher L. (2017). The Meaning, antecedents and outcomes of employee engagement: A narrative synthesis. International Journal of Management Reviews, 19(1), 31–53. doi:. 10.1111/ijmr.12077 - DOI
    1. Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2013). The spillover-crossover model. In J. G. Grzywacz & E. Demerouti (Eds.), New frontiers in work and family research (pp. 54–70). Hove, United Kingdom: Psychology Press.