See More

The Fama and French Three Factor model highlighted that investors must be able to ride out the extra volatility and periodic underperformance that could occur in the short term. Investors with a long-term time horizon of 15 years or more will be rewarded for losses suffered in the short term. Given that the model could explain as much as 95% of the return in a diversified stock portfolio, investors can tailor their portfolios to receive an average expected return according to the relative risks they assume.<\/p>

The main factors driving expected returns are sensitivity to the market, sensitivity to size, and sensitivity to value stocks, as measured by the book-to-market ratio. Any additional average expected return may be attributed to unpriced or unsystematic risk.<\/p>" } } , { "@type": "Question", "name": "What Are the Three Factors of the Model?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "

The Fama and French model has three factors: the size of firms, book-to-market values, and excess return on the market. In other words, the three factors used are SMB (small minus big), HML (high minus low), and the portfolio's return less the risk-free rate of return. SMB represents small-cap stocks with higher returns, while HML represents value stocks with higher book-to-market ratios.<\/p>" } } , { "@type": "Question", "name": "What Is the Fama and French Five Factor Model?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "

In 2014, Fama and French adapted their model to include five factors. Along with the original three factors, the new model adds the concept that companies reporting higher future earnings have higher returns in the stock market, a factor referred to as profitability. The fifth factor, referred to as "investment", relates the concept of internal investment and returns, suggesting that companies directing profit towards major growth projects are likely to experience losses in the stock market.<\/p>" } } ] } ] } ]

Fama French Three Factor Model: How It Works, Formula, and Impact

What Is the Fama and French Three Factor Model?

The Fama and French Three-Factor Model, introduced in 1992 by Nobel Laureate Eugene Fama and researcher Kenneth French, enhances the traditional capital asset pricing model (CAPM) by incorporating size and value risk factors alongside market risk. This model acknowledges that small-cap and value stocks consistently outperform the broader market. By integrating these additional factors, the Three-Factor Model offers a more refined evaluation tool for portfolio performance, adjusting for the typical outperformance of these stock categories.

Key Takeaways

  • The Fama and French Three-Factor Model improves upon the Capital Asset Pricing Model by including size and value risk factors, better explaining differences in diversified portfolio returns.
  • Developed by Eugene Fama and Kenneth French in 1992, the model highlights the tendency of small-cap and value stocks to outperform large-cap and growth stocks, adjusting expected returns accordingly.
  • The model uses three key factors: size (small minus big), value (high minus low), and market excess return, allowing investors to better assess portfolio performance.
  • The Three-Factor Model can explain up to 95% of diversified portfolio returns when accounting for size and value factors, providing clarity on market risk assessment.
  • In 2014, Fama and French expanded their model to include two additional factors—profitability and investment—further enhancing its comprehensive approach to asset pricing.
Fama and French Three Model

Investopedia / Joules Garcia

Breaking Down the Fama and French Three Factor Model

Eugene Fama and Kenneth French, former University of Chicago professors, found that value stocks often outperform growth stocks. Small-cap stocks also often outperform large-cap stocks. Portfolios heavy in small-cap or value stocks may show lower performance than CAPM suggests, as the Three-Factor Model accounts for their outperformance.

The Fama and French model has three factors: the size of firms, book-to-market values, and excess return on the market. In other words, the three factors used are small minus big (SMB), high minus low (HML), and the portfolio's return minus the risk-free rate of return. SMB accounts for publicly traded companies with small market caps that generate higher returns, while HML accounts for value stocks with high book-to-market ratios that generate higher returns in comparison to the market.

There is a lot of debate about whether the outperformance tendency is due to market efficiency or market inefficiency. Supporters of market efficiency explain stock outperformance by the extra risk and higher cost of capital that small and value stocks face. For market inefficiency, the outperformance is due to incorrect pricing by market participants, leading to excess returns over time. Investors who subscribe to the body of evidence provided by the Efficient Markets Hypothesis (EMH) are more likely to agree with the efficiency side.

The formula is:

R i t R f t = α i t + β 1 ( R M t R f t ) + β 2 S M B t + β 3 H M L t + ϵ i t where: R i t = total return of a stock or portfolio  i  at time  t R f t = risk free rate of return at time  t R M t = total market portfolio return at time  t R i t R f t = expected excess return R M t R f t = excess return on the market portfolio (index) S M B t = size premium (small minus big) H M L t = value premium (high minus low) β 1 , 2 , 3 = factor coefficients \begin{aligned} &R_{it} - R_{ft} = \alpha_{it} + \beta_1 ( R_{Mt} - R_{ft} ) + \beta_2SMB_t + \beta_3HML_t + \epsilon_{it} \\ &\textbf{where:} \\ &R_{it} = \text{total return of a stock or portfolio } i \text{ at time } t \\ &R_{ft} = \text{risk free rate of return at time } t \\ &R_{Mt} = \text{total market portfolio return at time } t \\ &R_{it} - R_{ft} = \text{expected excess return} \\ &R_{Mt} - R_{ft} = \text{excess return on the market portfolio (index)} \\ &SMB_t = \text{size premium (small minus big)} \\ &HML_t = \text{value premium (high minus low)} \\ &\beta_{1,2,3} = \text{factor coefficients} \\ \end{aligned} RitRft=αit+β1(RMtRft)+β2SMBt+β3HMLt+ϵitwhere:Rit=total return of a stock or portfolio i at time tRft=risk free rate of return at time tRMt=total market portfolio return at time tRitRft=expected excess returnRMtRft=excess return on the market portfolio (index)SMBt=size premium (small minus big)HMLt=value premium (high minus low)β1,2,3=factor coefficients

Fama and French highlighted that investors must be able to ride out the extra volatility and periodic underperformance that could occur in a short time. Investors with a long-term time horizon of 15 years or more will be rewarded for losses suffered in the short term. Fama and French tested their model and found that combining size and value factors with the beta factor explains up to 95% of returns in diversified portfolios.

Since the model explains 95% of portfolio returns, investors can construct portfolios to receive expected returns based on their assumed risks. The main factors driving expected returns are sensitivity to the market, sensitivity to size, and sensitivity to value stocks, as measured by the book-to-market ratio. Any additional average expected return may be attributed to unpriced or unsystematic risk.

Exploring the Expansion: Fama and French's Five Factor Model

Researchers have expanded the Three-Factor model in recent years to include other factors. These include "momentum," "quality," and "low volatility," among others. In 2014, Fama and French adapted their model to include five factors. Along with the original three factors, the new model adds the concept that companies reporting higher future earnings have higher returns in the stock market, a factor referred to as profitability.

The fifth factor, "investment," proposes that companies investing heavily in growth projects may face stock market losses.

What Does Fama and French Three Factor Model Mean for Investors?

The Fama and French Three Factor model highlighted that investors must be able to ride out the extra volatility and periodic underperformance that could occur in the short term. Investors with a long-term time horizon of 15 years or more will be rewarded for losses suffered in the short term. Given that the model could explain as much as 95% of the return in a diversified stock portfolio, investors can tailor their portfolios to receive an average expected return according to the relative risks they assume.

The main factors driving expected returns are sensitivity to the market, sensitivity to size, and sensitivity to value stocks, as measured by the book-to-market ratio. Any additional average expected return may be attributed to unpriced or unsystematic risk.

What Are the Three Factors of the Model?

The Fama and French model has three factors: the size of firms, book-to-market values, and excess return on the market. In other words, the three factors used are SMB (small minus big), HML (high minus low), and the portfolio's return less the risk-free rate of return. SMB represents small-cap stocks with higher returns, while HML represents value stocks with higher book-to-market ratios.

What Is the Fama and French Five Factor Model?

In 2014, Fama and French adapted their model to include five factors. Along with the original three factors, the new model adds the concept that companies reporting higher future earnings have higher returns in the stock market, a factor referred to as profitability. The fifth factor, referred to as "investment", relates the concept of internal investment and returns, suggesting that companies directing profit towards major growth projects are likely to experience losses in the stock market.

Article Sources
Investopedia requires writers to use primary sources to support their work. These include white papers, government data, original reporting, and interviews with industry experts. We also reference original research from other reputable publishers where appropriate. You can learn more about the standards we follow in producing accurate, unbiased content in our editorial policy.
  1. Fama, Eugene F., and Kenneth R. French. "Value versus Growth: The International Evidence." The Journal of Finance, vol. 53, no. 6, 1988, pp. 1975-1999.

  2. Fama, Eugene F., and Kenneth R. French. "Multifactor Explanations of Asset Pricing Anomalies." The Journal of Finance, vol. 51, no. 1, 1996, pp. 55-84.

  3. Journal of Financial Economics. "A Five-Factor Asset Pricing Model."

Take the Next Step to Invest
The offers that appear in this table are from partnerships from which Investopedia receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where listings appear. Investopedia does not include all offers available in the marketplace.
Take the Next Step to Invest
The offers that appear in this table are from partnerships from which Investopedia receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where listings appear. Investopedia does not include all offers available in the marketplace.

Related Articles