Following the 1948 Nakba (disaster) and collapse of Palestinian society, its national project and cultural sites, a residue of 170,000 Palestinians became citizens of the emerging state of Israel, which existed under a strict military rule until 1966. This residue was mainly illiterate villagers who were left without national and intellectual leadership. After a few years of frightened silence, a new intellectual stratum of young poets from this group began to publish reflections on their national situation. Intentionally simple, direct, and mainly easily memorized, their poetry became the ultimate cultural channel to create and disseminate a Palestinian version of the 1948 war, its subsequent state, and the vision of a desired future. These young poets gradually became the leading producers of Palestinian culture in Israel and abroad. Their poetry became the ultimate reference point for Palestine's national ethos and myths. Palestinians abroad named them the "poets of resistance" and their poems were composed into inflaming national songs. But while this new intellectual strata became active cultural producers, intervening in "the nation building process," their social role remained ambivalent and problematic. Despite their national enthusiasm and appeal for social change, they were unable to transgress the patriarchic rule that was hegemonic in Palestinian society. This hegemonic narrative was interwoven in three themes: (1) using the lexicon of natural disaster to conceptualize the 1948 events, presenting them as an irresistible natural disaster (even by God who appeared during the events as pathetic and useless); (2) representing the Palestinian defeat in 1948 through patriarchal language of "collective shame," "land rape," and "honor lost;" and (3) articulating the national liberation project as masculine, promising to liberate the "captured land-woman" and to recover the collective honor of the nation.
International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society publishes original peer-reviewed papers on issues that arise at the intersections of nations, states, civil societies, and global institutions and processes. Themes examined in the journal include: changing patterns in world economic and political institutions; new configurations of ethnic groups, social classes, religions, personal networks, and special interests; the social effects of changes in mass culture, propaganda, and technologies of communication; and the impact of social transformations on the changing order of public and private life. The journal is interdisciplinary in orientation and international in scope. It is not tied to any theoretical or research tradition and encourages articles of varying length, from research notes to article-length monographs.
Springer is one of the leading international scientific publishing companies, publishing over 1,200 journals and more than 3,000 new books annually, covering a wide range of subjects including biomedicine and the life sciences, clinical medicine, physics, engineering, mathematics, computer sciences, and economics.
This item is part of a JSTOR Collection.
For terms and use, please refer to our Terms and Conditions
International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society
© 2009 Springer
Request Permissions