![]() |
||
|
> Although 5.2 now allows '#' operator overloading on public interfaces > of table-based objects via __len, I'm not seeing why this change [1] > also affected the table library, whose low-level functions have not > been applicable to those public interfaces. What is the use case for > the table library change? The only reasons I can think of are (low > level) algorithmic ones of questionable utility: The main motivation is to allow what Rapin just suggested in a message to this thread. -- Roberto