The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20230427145241/https://lwn.net/Articles/746423/
|
|
Subscribe / Log in / New account

Too many lords, not enough stewards

Too many lords, not enough stewards

Posted Feb 3, 2018 6:51 UTC (Sat) by blackwood (guest, #44174)
In reply to: Too many lords, not enough stewards by ttelford
Parent article: Too many lords, not enough stewards

>> I did not say that silent contributors are complicit, since that would indeed be a rather silly notion.

>I was actually rather puzzled, my thinking was along the lines of 'He just said those that don't intervene are complicit, and then gave reasons why contributors don't intervene?' In spite of my overall agreement of the ideas presented, that point stuck out to me as more than a little wrong.

Ah I understand now why this wasnt clear enough, I didn't emphasis enough that I mean different people. And I also didn't emphasis enough that I think the problematic aspect of apologizing/excusing is when it's done by people with influence and power, like maintainers or very long-term contributors.

Trying to press the mass of general contributors (who don't have any real power to stand up) into supporting anything is indeed problematic, since it's essentially a flavour of victim-blaming. With your background I understand why you reacted strongly to that idea.


(Log in to post comments)

Too many lords, not enough stewards

Posted Feb 3, 2018 16:34 UTC (Sat) by ttelford (guest, #44176) [Link]

I think we understand each other. It’s been a pleasure chatting with you.


Copyright © 2023, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds