The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20100829160656/http://www.em.doe.gov/bemr/BEMRSites/pnpf.aspx
About DOE Button Organization Button News Button Contact Us Button
US Department of Energy Seal and Header Photo
Science and Technology Button Energy Sources Button Energy Efficiency Button The Environment Button Prices and Trends Button National Security Button Safety and Health Button
Office of Environmental Management Safety Performance Cleanup Closure
  You are here: DOE > Environmental Management >

Office of Environmental Management
Piqua Nuclear Power Facility

Small Box Arrow Home
Small Box Arrow BEMR Contents
Small Box Arrow U.S. Map

The Piqua Nuclear Power Facility is located on the bank of the Great Miami River in the town of Piqua, Ohio, approximately 55 kilometers (34 miles) north of Dayton.

LOCALITY MAP

Estimated Site Total
(Thousands of Current Year Dollars)
  FY 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000      
Environmental Restoration 12 12 13 13 14 Grey shaded area reflects annual cost estimates for the first five years of the site BEMR Base Case (as of October 1995) and includes 3% annual inflation, see Readers' Guide.
1996 Appropriation 0     These levels reflect the current estimates for compliance with applicable statutes and agreements (as of March 1996), see Readers' Guide.
1997 Congressional Request   0    
(Five-Year Averages, Thousands of Constant 1996 Dollars)
  FY 1996-2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 Life Cycle*
Environmental Restoration 12 12 12 12 10     288
* Total Life Cycle is the sum of the annual costs in constant FY 1996 dollars.

FACILITY MISSION

The Piqua Nuclear Power Facility contained a 45.5-megawatt (thermal) organically cooled and moderated reactor built and operated as a demonstration project by the Atomic Energy Commission between 1963 and 1966. The Facility was owned by the Atomic Energy Commission and operated under contract by the City of Piqua. In 1966, the Commission discontinued Facility operations and terminated the contract with the City of Piqua for operation and maintenance of the facility. Between 1967 and 1969 the Piqua Nuclear Power Facility was dismantled and decommissioned. At that time, the reactor fuel coolant and most of the radioactive materials were removed from the site. The reactor vessel and the spaces between the vessel and cavity liner were then filled with dry quartz sand.

The only current activities at the Piqua Nuclear Power Facility are the annual surveillance and monitoring conducted by the Environmental Management program. The minimal landlord activities associated with this facility are the responsibility of the City of Piqua.

FUTURE USE

Environmental management activities at the Piqua Nuclear Power Facility are currently scheduled to end in FY 2018. This report expects that the facility will be transferred to the City of Piqua, Ohio. Because the use of the property carries an absolute prohibition against breaching the barrier that encloses the radioactive source, this report assumes that future use is limited to Controlled Access.

ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION

There is currently no contamination in evidence outside the containment structure at the Piqua Nuclear Power Facility. Radiological contaminants consist of activation products dispersed in the stainless materials that constituted the reactor vessel and its internals. Lesser amounts of activation products are dispersed in the carbon steel thermal shield and guard vessel that surrounds the reactor vessel. The inventory of primary radionuclides remaining in the storage structure includes iron-55, cobalt-60, carbon-14, and beryllium-10.

Although the potential is minimal for transporting radioactive materials stored in the reactor complex to the environment, under the terms of the lease agreement between the U.S. Government and the City of Piqua, the Department of Energy is responsible for the nuclear safety of the land and structures. The Chicago Operations Office is responsible for implementing remedial measures should contamination be detected outside the facility. At this time, the results of annual surveillance and maintenance activities conducted verify that there has been no detectable release to the environment from the decommissioned facility.

Long-Term Surveillance and Monitoring

Long-term surveillance and monitoring activities consist of annual collection and analysis of radiological smears, sump water and sludge samples, facility tap water samples, radiation surveys, radon samples, and visual inspection of the containment structure. These activities are expected to conclude in FY 2018. This estimate assumes No Further Action beyond this date.

Environmental Restoration Activities Cost Estimate
(Five-Year Averages, Thousands of Constant 1996 Dollars)
  FY 1996-2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 Life Cycle*
Long-Term Surveil. and Monitoring 12 12 12 12 10     288
* Total Life Cycle is the sum of the annual costs in constant FY 1996 dollars.

Direct Program Management/Support

Program management and support at the Piqua Nuclear Power Facility consists of an annual review of the subcontract for sampling and inspection, and review of the analytical results. These activities are accomplished by the Department's Chicago Operations Office staff on a level-of-effort basis. The cost for these activities is minimal and is based on the planning and implementation activities necessary to conduct once-a-year surveillance and maintenance activities. These activities are included within the estimated long-term surveillance and monitoring cost.

STAKEHOLDER INTERACTIONS

The Ohio Operations Office had responsibility for public participation activities for five Ohio sites: Battelle Columbus Laboratories, Fernald Environmental Management Project, Mound Plant, Piqua Nuclear Power Facility, and Reactive Metals, Inc. The office presented information about the 1996 report in briefings to a local stakeholder group (Fernald Residents for the Environment, Safety, and Health); discussed the 1996 report during weekly meetings between the Fernald director and representatives of Fernald Residents for the Environment, Safety, and Health; placed the 1995 Report in the Fernald Public Reading Room; and considered Baseline Environmental Management Report issues in regular meetings of the Fernald Citizens Task Force. In addition, the Mound Associate Director included information about the report in a presentation to stakeholders at the Mound Action Committee meeting. No activities were reported for Reactive Metals, Inc., which is a private facility. If you would like more information about the report or have questions about the results for these sites, please contact:

Ohio Operations Office
Public Participation
Ken Morgan
(513) 865­3968 [email protected]
Technical Liaison
Pat Shirley
(513) 865-4298 [email protected]
Public Affairs
Ken Morgan
(513) 865-3968 [email protected]

DESCRIPTION OF PERSONNEL

Because only two technicians are required to spend two days per year at this facility, these activities are included within the personnel estimate in the Chicago Operations Office site summary.

CONTRACTING OPPORTUNITIES

If you would like more information about performing work for the Department of Energy's Environmental Management program at this site, please contact:

Major Procurements
John Greenwood
Acquisition and Assistance Group Manager
United States Department of Energy
Chicago Operations Office Avenue
9800 South Cass
Argonne, IL 60439
p: (708) 252-1912
f: (708) 252-5045
Small Business Procurements
Larry Thompson
United States Department of Energy
Chicago Operations Office
9800 South Cass Avenue
Argonne, IL 60439
p: (708) 252-2711
f: (708) 252-5045

FUNDING ESTIMATE

The following table presents estimated funding information for the Piqua Nuclear Power Facility.

Defense Funding Estimate
(Five-Year Averages, Thousands of Constant 1996 Dollars)
  FY 1996-2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 Life Cycle*
Environmental Restoration 12 12 12 12 10     288
* Total Life Cycle is the sum of the annual costs in constant FY 1996 dollars.

COMPARISON WITH PREVIOUS ESTIMATE

The cost estimates for the Piqua Nuclear Power Facility in the FY 1996 Baseline Environmental Management Report reflect no major changes in scope, technical approach, or major assumptions from information presented in the FY 1995 report. The 106 percent increase in the life-cycle cost estimate is primarily due to an extension of the scheduled completion date of Environmental Restoration program activities from FY 2005 in the FY 1995 report to FY 2018 in this report.

Comparison Table
Activity
FY 1995
Life Cycle
FY 1995 Only 1
FY 1996
Life Cycle
Change in
Dollars
Change in
Percent
 
Thousands of Dollars
 
Nuclear Mat. & Fac. Stab. - - - - -
Environmental Restoration 152 12 288 148 106
Waste Management - - - - -
Landlord - - - - -
Program Management 2 - - - - -
Site Total 152 12 288 148 106
1 The FY 1995 life-cycle and annual costs are provided to determine the corrected FY 1995 cost.
2 Program Management was reported in an independent cost table last year, but is reported as a line item in the relevant program (Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization, Environmental Restoration, and Waste Management) activity cost estimate tables for the FY 1996 Baseline Report.
 
The White House FirstGov.gov Link: Privacy Program E-gov IQ FOIA
U.S. Department of Energy | 1000 Independence Ave., SW | Washington, DC 20585
1-800-dial-DOE | f/202-586-4403 | e/General Contact

Web Policies | No Fear Act | Site Map | Privacy | Phone Book | Employment