Home
BEMR
Contents
U.S.
Map
The Piqua Nuclear Power Facility is located on the bank of the Great Miami River
in the town of Piqua, Ohio, approximately 55 kilometers (34 miles) north of
Dayton.
LOCALITY MAP
Estimated Site Total
(Thousands of Current Year Dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
Environmental Restoration
|
12
|
12
|
13
|
13
|
14
|
Grey shaded area reflects annual cost
estimates for the first five years of the site BEMR Base Case (as of October
1995) and includes 3% annual inflation, see Readers' Guide.
|
1996 Appropriation
|
0
|
|
|
These levels reflect the current estimates for
compliance with applicable statutes and agreements (as of March 1996), see
Readers' Guide.
|
1997 Congressional Request
|
|
0
|
|
|
(Five-Year Averages, Thousands of Constant 1996
Dollars)
|
|
2025
|
2030
|
Environmental Restoration
|
12
|
12
|
12
|
12
|
10
|
|
|
288
|
* Total Life Cycle is the sum of the annual costs in
constant FY 1996 dollars.
|
FACILITY MISSION
The Piqua Nuclear Power Facility contained a 45.5-megawatt (thermal)
organically cooled and moderated reactor built and operated as a demonstration
project by the Atomic Energy Commission between 1963 and 1966. The Facility was
owned by the Atomic Energy Commission and operated under contract by the City
of Piqua. In 1966, the Commission discontinued Facility operations and
terminated the contract with the City of Piqua for operation and maintenance of
the facility. Between 1967 and 1969 the Piqua Nuclear Power Facility was
dismantled and decommissioned. At that time, the reactor fuel coolant and most
of the radioactive materials were removed from the site. The reactor vessel and
the spaces between the vessel and cavity liner were then filled with dry quartz
sand.
The only current activities at the Piqua Nuclear Power Facility are the annual
surveillance and monitoring conducted by the Environmental Management program.
The minimal landlord activities associated with this facility are the
responsibility of the City of Piqua.
FUTURE USE
Environmental management activities at the Piqua Nuclear Power Facility are
currently scheduled to end in FY 2018. This report expects that the facility
will be transferred to the City of Piqua, Ohio. Because the use of the property
carries an absolute prohibition against breaching the barrier that encloses the
radioactive source, this report assumes that future use is limited to
Controlled Access.
ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION
There is currently no contamination in evidence outside the containment
structure at the Piqua Nuclear Power Facility. Radiological contaminants
consist of activation products dispersed in the stainless materials that
constituted the reactor vessel and its internals. Lesser amounts of activation
products are dispersed in the carbon steel thermal shield and guard vessel that
surrounds the reactor vessel. The inventory of primary radionuclides remaining
in the storage structure includes iron-55, cobalt-60, carbon-14, and
beryllium-10.
Although the potential is minimal for transporting radioactive materials stored
in the reactor complex to the environment, under the terms of the lease
agreement between the U.S. Government and the City of Piqua, the Department of
Energy is responsible for the nuclear safety of the land and structures. The
Chicago Operations Office is responsible for implementing remedial measures
should contamination be detected outside the facility. At this time, the
results of annual surveillance and maintenance activities conducted verify that
there has been no detectable release to the environment from the decommissioned
facility.
Long-Term Surveillance and Monitoring
Long-term surveillance and monitoring activities consist of annual collection
and analysis of radiological smears, sump water and sludge samples, facility
tap water samples, radiation surveys, radon samples, and visual inspection of
the containment structure. These activities are expected to conclude in FY
2018. This estimate assumes No Further Action beyond this date.
Environmental Restoration Activities Cost Estimate
(Five-Year Averages, Thousands of Constant 1996
Dollars)
|
|
2025
|
2030
|
Long-Term Surveil. and Monitoring
|
12
|
12
|
12
|
12
|
10
|
|
|
288
|
* Total Life Cycle is the sum of the annual costs in
constant FY 1996 dollars.
|
Direct Program Management/Support
Program management and support at the Piqua Nuclear Power Facility consists of
an annual review of the subcontract for sampling and inspection, and review of
the analytical results. These activities are accomplished by the Department's
Chicago Operations Office staff on a level-of-effort basis. The cost for these
activities is minimal and is based on the planning and implementation
activities necessary to conduct once-a-year surveillance and maintenance
activities. These activities are included within the estimated long-term
surveillance and monitoring cost.
STAKEHOLDER INTERACTIONS
The Ohio Operations Office had responsibility for public participation
activities for five Ohio sites: Battelle Columbus Laboratories, Fernald
Environmental Management Project, Mound Plant, Piqua Nuclear Power Facility,
and Reactive Metals, Inc. The office presented information about the 1996
report in briefings to a local stakeholder group (Fernald Residents for the
Environment, Safety, and Health); discussed the 1996 report during weekly
meetings between the Fernald director and representatives of Fernald Residents
for the Environment, Safety, and Health; placed the 1995 Report in the Fernald
Public Reading Room; and considered Baseline Environmental Management Report
issues in regular meetings of the Fernald Citizens Task Force. In addition, the
Mound Associate Director included information about the report in a
presentation to stakeholders at the Mound Action Committee meeting. No
activities were reported for Reactive Metals, Inc., which is a private
facility. If you would like more information about the report or have questions
about the results for these sites, please contact:
|
DESCRIPTION OF PERSONNEL
Because only two technicians are required to spend two days per year at this
facility, these activities are included within the personnel estimate in the
Chicago Operations Office site summary.
CONTRACTING OPPORTUNITIES
If you would like more information about performing work for the Department of
Energy's Environmental Management program at this site, please contact:
|
Major Procurements
John Greenwood
Acquisition and Assistance Group Manager
United States Department of Energy
Chicago Operations Office Avenue
9800 South Cass
Argonne, IL 60439
p: (708) 252-1912
f: (708) 252-5045
|
Small Business Procurements
Larry Thompson
United States Department of Energy
Chicago Operations Office
9800 South Cass Avenue
Argonne, IL 60439
p: (708) 252-2711
f: (708) 252-5045
|
FUNDING ESTIMATE
The following table presents estimated funding information for the Piqua
Nuclear Power Facility.
Defense Funding Estimate
(Five-Year Averages, Thousands of Constant 1996
Dollars)
|
|
2025
|
2030
|
Environmental Restoration
|
12
|
12
|
12
|
12
|
10
|
|
|
288
|
* Total Life Cycle is the sum of the annual costs in
constant FY 1996 dollars.
|
COMPARISON WITH PREVIOUS ESTIMATE
The cost estimates for the Piqua Nuclear Power Facility in the FY 1996 Baseline
Environmental Management Report reflect no major changes in scope, technical
approach, or major assumptions from information presented in the FY 1995
report. The 106 percent increase in the life-cycle cost estimate is primarily
due to an extension of the scheduled completion date of Environmental
Restoration program activities from FY 2005 in the FY 1995 report to FY 2018 in
this report.
Comparison Table
|
Thousands of Dollars
|
|
Nuclear Mat. & Fac. Stab.
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Environmental Restoration
|
152
|
12
|
288
|
148
|
106
|
Waste Management |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Landlord |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Program Management 2
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Site Total |
152
|
12
|
288
|
148
|
106
|
1 The FY 1995 life-cycle and annual costs are provided
to determine the corrected FY 1995 cost.
2 Program Management was reported in an independent cost table last year, but
is reported as a line item in the relevant program (Nuclear Material and
Facility Stabilization, Environmental Restoration, and Waste Management)
activity cost estimate tables for the FY 1996 Baseline Report.
|
|
 |