Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Mar 8:14:1132024.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1132024. eCollection 2023.

Differential analysis of transcriptomic and metabolomic of free fatty acid rancidity process in oil palm (Elaeis guineensis) fruits of different husk types

Affiliations

Differential analysis of transcriptomic and metabolomic of free fatty acid rancidity process in oil palm (Elaeis guineensis) fruits of different husk types

Shuyan Zhang et al. Front Plant Sci. .

Abstract

Introduction: Oil palm is the world's highest yielding oil crop and its palm oil has high nutritional value, making it an oilseed plant with important economic value and application prospects. After picking, oil palm fruits exposed to air will gradually become soft and accelerate the process of fatty acid rancidity, which will not only affect their flavor and nutritional value, but also produce substances harmful to the human body. As a result, studying the dynamic change pattern of free fatty acids and important fatty acid metabolism-related regulatory genes during oil palm fatty acid rancidity can provide a theoretical basis for improving palm oil quality and extending its shelf life.

Methods: The fruit of two shell types of oil palm, Pisifera (MP) and Tenera (MT), were used to study the changes of fruit souring at different times points of postharvesting, combined with LC-MS/MS metabolomics and RNA-seq transcriptomics techniques to analyze the dynamic changes of free fatty acids during fruit rancidity, and to find out the key enzyme genes and proteins in the process of free fatty acid synthesis and degradation according to metabolic pathways.

Results and discussion: Metabolomic study revealed that there were 9 different types of free fatty acids at 0 hours of postharvest, 12 different types of free fatty acids at 24 hours of postharvest, and 8 different types of free fatty acids at 36 hours of postharvest. Transcriptomic research revealed substantial changes in gene expression between the three harvest phases of MT and MP. Combined metabolomics and transcriptomics analysis results show that the expression of SDR, FATA, FATB and MFP four key enzyme genes and enzyme proteins in the rancidity of free fatty acids are significantly correlated with Palmitic acid, Stearic acid, Myristic acid and Palmitoleic acid in oil palm fruit. In terms of binding gene expression, the expression of FATA gene and MFP protein in MT and MP was consistent, and both were expressed higher in MP. FATB fluctuates unevenly in MT and MP, with the level of expression growing steadily in MT and decreasing in MP before increasing. The amount of SDR gene expression varies in opposite directions in both shell types. The above findings suggest that these four enzyme genes and enzyme proteins may play an important role in regulating fatty acid rancidity and are the key enzyme genes and enzyme proteins that cause differences in fatty acid rancidity between MT and MP and other fruit shell types. Additionally, differential metabolite and differentially expressed genes were present in the three postharvest times of MT and MP fruits, with the difference occurring 24 hours postharvest being the most notable. As a result, 24 hours postharvest revealed the most obvious difference in fatty acid tranquility between MT and MP shell types of oil palm. The results from this study offer a theoretical underpinning for the gene mining of fatty acid rancidity of various oil palm fruit shell types and the enhancement of oilseed palm acid-resistant germplasm cultivation using molecular biology methods.

Keywords: free fatty acid; metabolite; oil palm; rancidity; transcriptome.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Principal component analysis of MP and MT overall samples. MP1 (MT1): 0h postharvest fruit under natural conditions; MP2 (MT2): 24h postharvest fruit under natural conditions; MP3 (MT3): 36h postharvest fruit under natural conditions; QC is the quality control sample.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Statistics of MP and MT oil palm significant differential metabolite (A) Venn diagram of metabolites with a significant difference in free fatty acids; (B) Histogram of free fatty acid metabolism with a significant difference.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Cluster heatmap of significant differential metabolite for free fatty acids of each group. The 6 columns in each heatmap represent the fruits postharvest stages (MP1, MP2, MP3, MT1, MT2, and MT3).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Oil palm differentially expressed genes statistics of MP and MT. (A) Venn diagram of differentially expressed genes; (B) Histogram of significantly differentially expressed genes.
Figure 5
Figure 5
KEGG enrichment classification scatter chart for the pairwise comparisons of MP1-vs-MT1, MP2-vs-MT2, and MP3-vs-MT3.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Dynamic changes of key enzyme gene expression in MT and MP oil palm species postharvest.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Relative expression levels of 5 selected genes during fruits postharvest rancidity stages (MP1, MP2, MP3, MT1, MT2, and MT3). The 2-ΔΔCt method was used to determine the relative expression levels of genes. The statistical differences were analyzed by ANOVA based on Duncan’s multiple test (P<0.05). Different letters indicate significant differences in the relative expression level and FPKM values.

References

    1. Ahmed M., Pickova J., Ahmad T., Liaquat M., Farid A., Jahangir M. (2016). Oxidation of lipids in foods. Sarhad J. Agric. 32 (3), 230–238. doi: 10.17582/journal.sja/2016.32.3.230.238 - DOI
    1. Boateng L., Ansong R., Owusu W. B., Steiner-Asiedu M. (2016). Coconut oil and palm oil's role in nutrition, health and national development: A review. Ghana Med. J. 50 (3), 189–196. doi: 10.4314/gmj.v50i3.11 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Clegg A. J. (1973). Composition and related nutritional and organoleptic aspects of palm oil. J. Am. Oil Chemists' Society. 50 (8), 321–324. doi: 10.1007/BF02641365 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Damayant S., Andry S., Khairurrijal., Kartasasmita R. E. (2014). Isolation of β-carotene from palm (Elaeis guineensis jacq.) oil using transesterification-adsorption-desorption method and its characterization. J. Appl. Sci. 14, 2615–2621. doi: 10.3923/jas.2014.2615.2621 - DOI
    1. Dieuaide-Noubhani M., Novikov D., Baumgart E., Vanhooren J. C., Fransen M., Goethals M., et al. . (1996). Further characterization of the peroxisomal 3-hydroxy acyl-CoA dehydrogenases from rat liver. relationship between the different dehydrogenases and evidence that fatty acids and the C27 bile acids di- and tri-hydroxycoprostanic acids are metabolized by separate multifunctional proteins. Eur. J. Biochem. 15;240 (3), 660–666. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1996.0660h.x - DOI - PubMed