Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Feb 20;11(1):972.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-14780-5.

Ultra-thermostable RNA nanoparticles for solubilizing and high-yield loading of paclitaxel for breast cancer therapy

Affiliations

Ultra-thermostable RNA nanoparticles for solubilizing and high-yield loading of paclitaxel for breast cancer therapy

Sijin Guo et al. Nat Commun. .

Abstract

Paclitaxel is widely used in cancer treatments, but poor water-solubility and toxicity raise serious concerns. Here we report an RNA four-way junction nanoparticle with ultra-thermodynamic stability to solubilize and load paclitaxel for targeted cancer therapy. Each RNA nanoparticle covalently loads twenty-four paclitaxel molecules as a prodrug. The RNA-paclitaxel complex is structurally rigid and stable, demonstrated by the sub-nanometer resolution imaging of cryo-EM. Using RNA nanoparticles as carriers increases the water-solubility of paclitaxel by 32,000-fold. Intravenous injections of RNA-paclitaxel nanoparticles with specific cancer-targeting ligand dramatically inhibit breast cancer growth, with nearly undetectable toxicity and immune responses in mice. No fatalities are observed at a paclitaxel dose equal to the reported LD50. The use of ultra-thermostable RNA nanoparticles to deliver chemical prodrugs addresses issues with RNA unfolding and nanoparticle dissociation after high-density drug loading. This finding provides a stable nano-platform for chemo-drug delivery as well as an efficient method to solubilize hydrophobic drugs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

P.G. is the consultant of Oxford Nanopore Technologies, the co-founder of Shenzhen P&Z Bio-medical Co. Ltd, and the co-founder of the ExonanoRNA, LLC and its subsidiary ExonanoRNA (Foshan) Biomedicine Co., Ltd.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Design and construction of thermostable RNA 4WJ-X nanostructure.
a Hypothetical 3D model of RNA 4WJ-X nanostructure (left), redesigned from pRNA-3WJ motif (right),. b Step-wise self-assembly of 4WJ-X, evaluated by native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) (size marker: ultra-low range DNA ladder; M, D, and T indicate RNA monomer, dimer, and trimer, respectively). c Size comparison of 4WJ-X (purple) and pRNA-3WJ (pink) by dynamic light scattering (DLS) (mean ± SD of one size distribution). d Ta comparison of 4WJ-X (purple) and pRNA-3WJ (pink) in representative annealing curves, measured by real-time-PCR (RT-PCR) (n = 3 independent samples over three independent measurements). Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Conjugation of RNA-PTX and construction of 4WJ-X-24 PTXs nanoparticles.
a Schematic of RNA-6 PTXs chemical conjugation and 4WJ-X-24 PTXs self-assembly. b Conjugating six PTXs to an RNA, evaluated by denaturing PAGE. c HPLC chromatogram (absorbance 260 nm) with an inserted gel image of RNA-6 alkynes (blue) and RNA-6 PTXs (red). d Turbidity changes of PTX and RNA-6 PTXs in aqueous solution at two-fold serial dilution. e Step-wise self-assembly of 4WJ-X-24 PTXs and 4WJ-X-24 PTXs-EGFRapt, evaluated by native PAGE (M, D, and T indicate RNA monomer, dimer, and trimer conjugated with PTX, respectively). f Size comparison of 4WJ-X, 4WJ-X-24 PTXs, and PTX in aqueous solution by DLS (n = 3 independent samples, mean ± SD). Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Comparison of 4WJ-X and 4WJ-X-24 PTXs nanoparticles by single-particle cryo-EM.
a Representative motion-corrected cryo-EM micrographs of 4WJ-X and b 4WJ-X-24 PTXs (scale bar: 500 Å). c Reference-free 2D class averages of 4WJ-X and d 4WJ-X-24 PTXs computed in Relion. e Gold standard Fourier shell correlation (FSC) plots to measure resolution at FSC = 0.143 for the 3D reconstruction of 4WJ-X and f 4WJ-X-24 PTXs. g 3D reconstructed cryo-EM maps of 4WJ-X and 4WJ-24 PTXs in four views, with a Supplementary Movie 1. A 3D design model is shown. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Thermodynamic and chemical stability of 4WJ-X-24 PTXs nanoparticles.
a Representative TGGE showing the Tm of 3WJ-10 PTXs (M = 20 nucleotides monomer) and 4WJ-X-24 PTXs (M = 40 nucleotides monomer) nanoparticles. b Quantitative calculation of Tm from the representative TGGE for 3WJ-10 PTXs and 4WJ-X-24 PTXs nanoparticles. c Ta comparison of 4WJ-X-24 PTXs (orange) and 3WJ-10 PTXs (green) nanoparticles in a representative annealing curve, measured by RT-PCR (n = 3 independent samples over three independent measurements). d Enzymatic stability curve of 4WJ-X nanoparticles after incubation in 50% FBS at 37 °C over time points. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5. In vitro cell binding, cytotoxicity and apoptotic effects of 4WJ-X-24 PTXs nanoparticles.
a In vitro cell binding of 4WJ-X-24 PTXs-EGFRapt nanoparticles, shown by confocal microscopy (blue: nucleus; green: cytoskeleton; red: RNA nanoparticles. Scale bar: 100 μm for original images, and 20 μm for magnified image). b In vitro cytotoxicity study of 4WJ-X-24 PTXs-EGFRapt nanoparticles by MTT assay (n = 3 independent samples, mean ± SD). c In vitro apoptosis effect of 4WJ-X-24 PTXs-EGFRapt nanoparticles by propidium iodide (PI)/Annexin V-FITC dual staining and fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis (Q2 = Annexin V-FITC and PI positive, indicating cells in late apoptosis or already dead; Q3 = PI negative & Annexin V-FITC positive, indicating early apoptotic cells). Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6. In vivo biodistribution and tumor inhibition of 4WJ-X-24 PTXs nanoparticles.
a Representative organ images showing specific tumor targeting of Alexa Fluor 647 labeled 4WJ-X-EGFRapt nanoparticles 8 h post-injection into mice bearing MDA-MB-231 xenograft (T: tumor, H: heart, S: spleen, L: lung, K: kidney, and Li: liver; Color scale: radiant efficiency, [p s−1 cm−2 sr−1] [μW cm−2]−1). Very low radiant mark was revealed in the liver of 4WJ-X-EGFRapt treated sample. b Quantitative analysis of biodistribution in tumors and normal organs, quantified from the organ images. c Intravenous treatment of nude mice bearing orthotopic MDA-MB-231 xenografts with 4WJ-X-24 PTXs-EGFRapt nanoparticles (purple) and control groups (turquoise: 4WJ-X-24 PTXs, red: PTX, blue: PBS) every other day for a total of five injections (8 mg kg−1, PTX per body weight, indicated by arrows). Mice body weight was monitored during the time course of treatments (n = 5 biologically independent animals, statistics was calculated by two-tailed unpaired t-test presented as mean ± SD, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ****p < 0.0001; p = 0.038, 9.99 × 10−4, and 6 × 10−6 comparing 4WJ-X-24 PTXs-EGFRapt to PTX, 4WJ-X-24 PTXs, and PBS, respectively). d Representative images of breast cancer tumors harvested from mice after treatments (n = 5 biologically independent animals, statistics was calculated by two-tailed unpaired t-test presented as mean ± SD, *p < 0.05, ****p < 0.0001; p = 0.033 and 2.2 × 10−5 comparing 4WJ-X-24 PTXs-EGFRapt to 4WJ-X-24 PTXs, and PBS, respectively). Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Fig. 7
Fig. 7. In vivo immunostimulation study of 4WJ-X-24 PTXs nanoparticles.
Evaluation of a IFN-α, b IFN-γ, c TNF-α, and d IL-6 secretion in mice after systemic injection of 4WJ-X-24 PTXs nanoparticles, evaluated by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (n = 3 biologically independent animals, statistics was calculated by two-tailed unpaired t-test presented as mean ± SD, p = 5.4 × 10−4, 0.013, and 5.9 × 10−3 comparing 4WJ-X-24 PTXs to PTX for IFN-γ, TNF-α, and IL-6, respectively). Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

References

    1. Spencer CM, Faulds D. Paclitaxel. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic potential in the treatment of cancer. Drugs. 1994;48:794–847. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199448050-00009. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rowinsky EK, Donehower RC. Paclitaxel (taxol) N. Engl. J. Med. 1995;332:1004–1014. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199504133321507. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Singh S, Dash AK. Paclitaxel in cancer treatment: perspectives and prospects of its delivery challenges. Crit. Rev. Ther. Drug Carr. Syst. 2009;26:333–372. doi: 10.1615/CritRevTherDrugCarrierSyst.v26.i4.10. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Singla AK, Garg A, Aggarwal D. Paclitaxel and its formulations. Int. J. Pharm. 2002;235:179–192. doi: 10.1016/S0378-5173(01)00986-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gelderblom H, Verweij J, Nooter K, Sparreboom A. Cremophor EL: the drawbacks and advantages of vehicle selection for drug formulation. Eur. J. Cancer. 2001;37:1590–1598. doi: 10.1016/S0959-8049(01)00171-X. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms