Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Feb 10;59(7):2776-2783.
doi: 10.1002/anie.201911762. Epub 2020 Jan 7.

Theranostic Layer-by-Layer Nanoparticles for Simultaneous Tumor Detection and Gene Silencing

Affiliations

Theranostic Layer-by-Layer Nanoparticles for Simultaneous Tumor Detection and Gene Silencing

Natalie Boehnke et al. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. .

Abstract

Layer-by-layer nanoparticles (NPs) are modular drug delivery vehicles that incorporate multiple functional materials through sequential deposition of polyelectrolytes onto charged nanoparticle cores. Herein, we combined the multicomponent features and tumor targeting capabilities of layer-by-layer assembly with functional biosensing peptides to create a new class of nanotheranostics. These NPs encapsulate a high weight percentage of siRNA while also carrying a synthetic biosensing peptide on the surface that is cleaved into a urinary reporter upon exposure to specific proteases overexpressed in the tumor microenvironment. Importantly, this biosensor reports back on a molecular signature characteristic to metastatic tumors and associated with poor prognosis, MMP9 protease overexpression. This nanotheranostic mediates noninvasive urinary-based diagnostics in mouse models of three different cancers with simultaneous gene silencing in flank and metastatic mouse models of ovarian cancer.

Keywords: gene delivery; layer-by-layer assembly; nanoparticles; self-assembly; theranostics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest:

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Click-functionalized LbL NPs remain stable and exhibit protease-responsive behavior.
(a) Diameter, polydispersity index, and (b) zeta potential of click-modified LbL NPs. (c) In vitro cleavage of biosensor LbL NPs in the presence of MMP9. Nanoparticle modifications are abbreviated as follows: biosensor peptide (+S), iRGD targeting peptide (+R), and PEG pendants (+P). Error bars represent standard deviation, and statistical analysis of panel b uses one-way ANOVA with a Dunnett post-hoc test and alpha of 0.05.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Addition of the biosensing peptide onto siRNA-loaded LbL NPs provides a NP capable of simultaneous tumor detection and gene silencing.
Analysis of the urine of the mice one hour after injection indicates that theranostic LbL NPs yield significantly elevated levels of the peptide reporter fragment in the urine in a (a) pancreatic cancer flank model, (b) a metastatic model of colorectal cancer, and (c) two models of ovarian cancer. (d) Theranostic LbL NPs were intravenously administered via tail vein injection to the subcutaneous flank ovarian cancer model to provide an siRNA dosage of 0.5 mg/kg to silence the model gene luciferase in vivo. (e) Bioluminescence levels were monitored over three days using an IVIS imaging device, also used to generate the images shown in a–c. Error bars represent SEM, and statistical analysis of panels a and b uses students t-tests, while panel c uses a one-way ANOVA with a Dunnett post-hoc test and alpha of 0.05. Panel e uses a one-way ANOVA with a Tukey post-hoc test and alpha of 0.05.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Addition of targeting ligands and biosensor peptides improves LbL NP binding to ovarian cancer cells.
Flow cytometry was used to assess NP-associated fluorescence of OVCAR8 cells after incubating with NPs for (a) 4 and (b) 24 hours. Analysis of the mean NP-associated fluorescence intensity of the NP-positive cell population at (c) 4 and (d) 24 hours. Error bars represent SEM, and statistical analysis was carried out using a one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post-hoc test and an alpha of 0.05. (e) Super resolution microscopy images of OVCAR8 cells incubated with sulfoCy-3 labeled LbL NPs for 24 hours. Wheat germ agglutinin, shown in red, was used to stain endosomal membranes. NPs are shown in green and nuclei in cyan. Scale bar = 10 μm.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.. Theranostic LbL NP biodistribution in a metastatic model of ovarian cancer indicates tumor targeting capabilities, especially using intraperitoneal (IP) administration.
(a) A metastatic model of ovarian cancer was used to evaluate whether IP-administration of nanoparticles improved biodistribution and sensistivity of the diagnostic function of the theranostic NPs. (b) NP accumulation in liver, spleen, and tumors was measured 72 hours post-administration using a fluorescent flatbed scanner (Li-COR Odyssey). Tissue autofluorescence was used to generate a region-of-interest (indicated by the white outline) in which to quantify signal from the Cy7-labeled NPs (Figure S6). (c) Urine was collected 1-hour post-IP administration of NP+SR and analyzed for the MMP9-sensitive biomarker. (d–f) Cryohistology was performed on tumor tissue and imaged using a fluorescent slide scanner to detect tissue autofluorescence (pseudo-colored magenta) and NP signal (pseudo-colored green). These representative images of LbL NP distribution through tumors when administered (d–e) IP and (f) intravenously. Scale bar = 100 μm. Error bars represent SEM, and statistical analysis was carried out using an unpaired student’s t-test.
Scheme 1.
Scheme 1.
Biosensor peptides can be conjugated onto siRNA-containing LbL liposomes via copper(I)-catalyzed click chemistry to create theranostic LbL NPs. In the tumor microenvironment, biosensor peptides are cleaved, and the resulting fragments can be non-invasively detected in the urine to monitor disease progression. PLR = poly-l-arginine, pPLD = propargyl-modified poly-l-aspartic acid..

References

    1. Chen H, Zhang W, Zhu G, Xie J, Chen X, Nat. Rev. Mater 2017, 2, 17024. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chen HM, Zhang WZ, Zhu GZ, Xie J, Chen XY, Nat. Rev. Mater 2017, 2. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Warren AD, Kwong GA, Wood DK, Lin KY, Bhatia SN, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 3671; - PMC - PubMed
    2. Kim JS, Rieter WJ, Taylor KM, An H, Lin W, Lin W, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2007, 129, 8962. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pellikainen JM, Ropponen KM, Kataja VV, Kellokoski JK, Eskelinen MJ, Kosma V-M, Clin. Cancer Res 2004, 10, 7621; - PubMed
    2. Wu ZS, Wu Q, Yang JH, Wang HQ, Ding XD, Yang F, Xu XC, Int. J. Cancer 2008, 122, 2050; - PubMed
    3. Sier CFM, Kubben FJGM, Ganesh S, Heerding MM, Griffioen G, Hanemaaijer R, vanKrieken JHJM, Lamers CBHW, Verspaget HW, Br. J. Cancer 1996, 74, 413. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Morton SW, Poon ZY, Hammond PT, Biomaterials 2013, 34, 5328; - PMC - PubMed
    2. Choi KY, Correa S, Min J, Li JH, Roy S, Laccetti KH, Dreaden E, Kong S, Heo R, Roh YH, Lawson EC, Palmer PA, Hammond PT, Adv. Funct. Mater 2019, 29. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types