Attenuation of pattern recognition receptor signaling is mediated by a MAP kinase kinase kinase
- PMID: 26769563
- PMCID: PMC4772993
- DOI: 10.15252/embr.201540806
Attenuation of pattern recognition receptor signaling is mediated by a MAP kinase kinase kinase
Abstract
Pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) play a key role in plant and animal innate immunity. PRR binding of their cognate ligand triggers a signaling network and activates an immune response. Activation of PRR signaling must be controlled prior to ligand binding to prevent spurious signaling and immune activation. Flagellin perception in Arabidopsis through FLAGELLIN-SENSITIVE 2 (FLS2) induces the activation of mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) and immunity. However, the precise molecular mechanism that connects activated FLS2 to downstream MAPK cascades remains unknown. Here, we report the identification of a differentially phosphorylated MAP kinase kinase kinase that also interacts with FLS2. Using targeted proteomics and functional analysis, we show that MKKK7 negatively regulates flagellin-triggered signaling and basal immunity and this requires phosphorylation of MKKK7 on specific serine residues. MKKK7 attenuates MPK6 activity and defense gene expression. Moreover, MKKK7 suppresses the reactive oxygen species burst downstream of FLS2, suggesting that MKKK7-mediated attenuation of FLS2 signaling occurs through direct modulation of the FLS2 complex.
Keywords: Arabidopsis; innate immunity; phosphorylation; signaling; targeted proteomics.
© 2016 The Authors.
Figures
- A, B
LTQ ‐OrbitrapMS /MS spectra ofMKKK 7 peptides identified inFLS 2‐GFP ‐co‐immuno‐precipitated samples. Peptide sequence and fragmentation pattern are shown above the spectra together with the observed m/z and charge state of the precursor ion.
Protein structure of
MKKK 7 with the protein kinase domain shown in yellow and anARM /HEAT repeat domain shown in blue. The position of the phosphorylated serine residues (S) is shown with triangles. The green triangles indicate non‐differentially phosphorylated sites. The red triangles indicate phosphorylated serine (pS ) sites that were targeted for mutagenesis.Protein sequence of
MKKK 7, highlighted in yellow are all (phospho‐) peptides measured by mass spectrometry. Highlighted in green are modified residues, and the red box around the S residues indicates phosphorylated serine residues that were targeted for mutagenesis.
- A–I
Application of selected reaction monitoring (
SRM ) mass spectrometry to quantify phosphorylated peptides in cell extracts treated with 1 μM flg22. Bars represent the mean ratio of endogenous phosphopeptide versus spiked‐in synthetic phosphopeptide normalized to t = 0 with error bars ±SEM (n = 3.). Asterisks indicate a significant difference level compared to t = 0 (Student's t‐test, *P > 0.05, **P > 0.01 and ***P > 0.001). The color of each bar corresponds to the different time points (0 min = dark blue, 5 min = red, 10 min = green, 20 min = purple, 30 min = light blue). Above each graph is the protein name and the phosphorylated residue (in brackets) is indicated and below the corresponding phosphopeptide is shown with the serine (S), threonine (T), or tyrosine (Y) phosphorylation site indicated by “[+80]”.
Selected reaction monitoring (
SRM ) ofMPK 6 activation loop phosphorylation in response to flg22 stimulation in cultured cells.SRM ofMPK 3 activation loop phosphorylation in response to flg22 stimulation in cultured cells. Monophosphorylated and doubly phosphorylated versions of the trypticMPK activation loop peptides were monitored at 0, 5, 10, 20, and 30 min after stimulation with 1 μM flg22.
Immunoblot analyses showing
MAPK phosphorylation after flg22 induction in Col‐0 and in mkkk7. Protein extracts were made from the seedlings treated with 1 μM flg22, and samples were taken at t = 0, 10, and 30 min post‐induction. The p44/42 antibody was used to detect phosphorylatedMAPK s. Position of the individual phosphorylatedMAPK s is indicated at the right. Equal loading of proteins is shown with an α‐actin antibody as a loading control (bottom panel). Three biological replicates were done with identical results.MPK 6 phosphorylation is specifically enhanced in mkkk7. Comparison of phosphopeptide abundance from selectedMAP kinases in Col‐0 (blue) and mkkk7 (red) seedlings at t = 0 min and t = 10 min after 1 μM flagellin treatment by selected reaction monitoring (SRM ) mass spectrometry. Phosphopeptides corresponding toMKKK 7 are only detectable in Col‐0 seedlings and are non‐detectable (ND ) in mkkk7. Bars represent means of measured peptide areas (sum of all transition areas) for three biological replicates, with error bars ±SEM (n = 3). Asterisks indicate a significant difference between Col‐0 and mkkk7 at individual time points (Student's t‐test, *P > 0.05, **P > 0.01 and ***P > 0.001).ND indicates the integration of an area without transitions significantly above background. Above each graph the protein name and the phosphorylated residue (in brackets) is indicated as well as the corresponding phosphopeptide sequence. Serine (S), threonine (T), or tyrosine (Y) phosphorylation is indicated by “[+80]”.
Transient expression analysis in Arabidopsis mesophyll protoplasts shows enhanced defense gene expression in mkkk7 protoplasts after flg22 treatment. Protoplasts were isolated from 4‐week‐old plants and transfected with
pWKRY 29:fLUC (WRKY 29) orpFRK 1:fLUC (FRK 1) constructs together with 35S:rLUC , as indicated in the graph. Protoplasts were treated for 4 h with 10 μM flg22 or mock‐treated as indicated. The horizontal axis indicates the treatment, while the vertical axis represents expression levels relative to the mock‐treated control sample, as fold induction. All measurements were normalized to therLUC activity. Bars represent means ± SD (n = 2). Experiment was repeated 6 times with similar results.WRKY 29 transcripts measured byqRT –PCR in flg22‐treated leaf material. Leaf strips of Col‐0 and mkkk7 were treated with 1 μM flg22 for t = 0, 1, 2, and 4 h.WRKY 29 transcripts were normalized against Ubiquitin transcript as described before 62. Bars represent mean value, and error bars showSE (n = 3).FRK 1 transcripts measured byqRT –PCR in flg22‐treated leaf material. Leaf strips of Col‐0 and mkkk7 were treated with 1 μM flg22 for t = 0, 1, 2, and 4 h.FRK 1 transcripts were normalized against Ubiquitin transcript as described before 62. Bars represent mean value, and error bars showSE (n = 3).
Transient co‐expression of
MKKK 7 in Arabidopsis mesophyll protoplasts shows the suppression of flg22‐inducedWRKY 29 gene expression. Protoplasts were transfected withpWRKY 29:fLUC , 35S:rLUC and overexpression constructs ofMKKK 7 (OE ‐MKKK 7,OE ‐MKKK 7AA orOE ‐MKKK 7DD ) as indicated on the horizontal axis. Protoplasts were treated with 10 μM flg22 or mock‐treated for 4 h. All measurements were normalized to therLUC activity and expression is relative to the mock‐treated control sample, shown as fold induction on the vertical axis. Results shown are means ± SD (n = 2). At least two biological replicates were done with similar results.Protein structure of
MKKK 7 and mutated versions ofMKKK 7 with the protein kinase domain shown in yellow and anARM /HEAT repeat domain shown in blue. The position of the phosphorylated serine residues is indicated with triangles and bold S below the protein structure. The red triangles indicate phosphorylated serines that were targeted for mutagenesis or the corresponding phosphomimic aspartic acid. Blue triangles indicate the substitution with the non‐phosphorylatable amino acid alanine. Amino acid substitute versions ofMKKK 7 are shown below the wild type. S, serine; A, alanine; D, aspartic acid.
Transient co‐expression of
MKKK 7 in Arabidopsis mesophyll protoplasts shows the suppression ofFRK 1 gene expression in protoplasts after flg22 treatment. Protoplasts were isolated from 4‐week‐old plants and transfected withpFRK 1:fLUC , 35S:rLUC , and overexpression constructs ofMKKK 7 (OE ‐MKKK 7,OE ‐MKKK 7AA , orOE ‐MKKK 7DD ) as indicated on the horizontal axis. Sixteen hours later, protoplasts were treated with 10 μM flg22 for 4 h. All measurements were normalized to therLUC activity, and expression levels were calculated relative to the mock‐treated control sample as shown as fold induction represented on the vertical axis.
Four‐week‐old seedlings were dipped into a suspension containing virulent Pst
DC 3000, and 72 h later, the disease symptoms were scored. Data represent mean values ±SEM (n = 20; ***P < 0.001; paired t‐test). Three biological experiments were done showing similar results.Quantification of bacterial growth in Arabidopsis lines Col‐0, mkkk7, and p35S:
MKKK 7‐GFP in the mkkk7 background. Four‐ to five‐week‐old plants were pressure‐infiltrated with virulent PstDC 3000, and at indicated time points, six samples were harvested and bacteria re‐isolated on selective media. The number of colony‐forming units (cfu/cm2) was determined at t = 0, 2, and 3 days post‐inoculation (dpi). Data represent mean values ±SEM (n = 6; **P < 0.01; paired t‐test). Experiments were done at least twice with similar results.Disease symptom development in Pst‐infected lines with estradiol‐inducible constructs of ind‐
MKKK 7AA L8, ind‐MKKK 7AA L10, ind‐MKKK 7DD L1, and ind‐MKKK 7DD L3. Two independent transgenic lines for each construct were grown under short‐day conditions and disease symptoms were scored 3 dpi. Data represent mean values ±SEM (n = 20; *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; paired t‐test). The vertical axis represents the percentage disease symptoms. Experiments were done at least twice with similar results.
Example of symptom development at 2 dpi in the p35S:
MKKK 7‐GFP in mkkk7 background as compared to Col‐0 (left panel). Example of symptom development at 2 dpi in mkkk7 and p35S:MKKK 7‐GFP in mkkk7 background (right panel).Overexpression of
MKKK 7DD reduces resistance to Pst infection. Quantification of bacterial growth in Col‐0 and two independentiMKKK 7DD lines. Four‐ to five‐week‐old plants were pressure‐infiltrated with virulent PstDC 3000, and at 2 dpi, leaf disks were harvested and bacteria re‐isolated. The number of colony‐forming units (cfu/cm2) was determined at t = 2 days post‐inoculation (dpi). Data represent mean values ±SEM (n = 6; *P < 0.05; paired t‐test).
Effect of 100‐
nM flg22 treatment on theROS burst measured in 5‐week‐old plants of Col‐0 and mkkk7.Effect of 100‐
nM flg22 treatment on theROS burst measured in 5‐week‐old plants of Col‐0 and two independent inducibleMKKK 7AA transgenic lines.Effect of 100‐
nM flg22 treatment on theROS burst measured in 5‐week‐old plants of Col‐0 and two independent inducibleMKKK 7DD transgenic lines.
References
-
- Gomez‐Gomez L, Boller T (2000) FLS2: an LRR receptor‐like kinase involved in the perception of the bacterial elicitor flagellin in Arabidopsis. Mol Cell 5: 1003–1011 - PubMed
-
- Chinchilla D, Zipfel C, Robatzek S, Kemmerling B, Nurnberger T, Jones JDG, Felix G, Boller T (2007) A flagellin‐induced complex of the receptor FLS2 and BAK1 initiates plant defence. Nature 448: 497–500 - PubMed
-
- Sun Y, Li L, Macho AP, Han Z, Hu Z, Zipfel C, Zhou JM, Chai J (2013) Structural basis for flg22‐induced activation of the Arabidopsis FLS2‐BAK1 immune complex. Science 342: 624–628 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Molecular Biology Databases
