Family tree and ancestry inference: is there a need for a 'generational' consent?
- PMID: 26645273
- PMCID: PMC4673846
- DOI: 10.1186/s12910-015-0080-2
Family tree and ancestry inference: is there a need for a 'generational' consent?
Abstract
Background: Genealogical research and ancestry testing are popular recreational activities but little is known about the impact of the use of these services on clients' biological and social families. Ancestry databases are being enriched with self-reported data and data from deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) analyses, but also are being linked to other direct-to-consumer genetic testing and research databases. As both family history data and DNA can provide information on more than just the individual, we asked whether companies, as a part of the consent process, were informing clients, and through them clients' relatives, of the potential implications of the use and linkage of their personal data.
Methods: We used content analysis to analyse publically-available consent and informational materials provided to potential clients of ancestry and direct-to-consumer genetic testing companies to determine what consent is required, what risks associated with participation were highlighted, and whether the consent or notification of third parties was suggested or required.
Results: We identified four categories of companies providing: 1) services based only on self-reported data, such as personal or family history; 2) services based only on DNA provided by the client; 3) services using both; and 4) services using both that also have a research component. The amount of information provided on the potential issues varied significantly across the categories of companies. 'Traditional' ancestry companies showed the greatest awareness of the implications for family members, while companies only asking for DNA focused solely on the client. While in some cases companies included text recommending clients inform their relatives, showing they recognised the issues, often it was located within lengthy terms and conditions or privacy statements that may not be read by potential clients.
Conclusions: We recommend that companies should make it clearer that clients should inform third parties about their plans to participate, that third parties' data will be provided to companies, and that that data will be linked to other databases, thus raising privacy and issues on use of data. We also suggest investigating whether a 'generational consent' should be created that would include more than just the individual in decisions about participating in genetic investigations.
Similar articles
-
Paternity testing under the cloak of recreational genetics.Eur J Hum Genet. 2017 Jun;25(6):768-770. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2017.31. Epub 2017 Mar 8. Eur J Hum Genet. 2017. PMID: 28272533 Free PMC article.
-
Review of policies of companies and databases regarding access to customers' genealogy data for law enforcement purposes.Per Med. 2020 Mar;17(2):141-153. doi: 10.2217/pme-2019-0100. Epub 2020 Mar 3. Per Med. 2020. PMID: 32125932 Review.
-
PGTandMe: social networking-based genetic testing and the evolving research model.Health Matrix Clevel. 2012;22(1):33-74. Health Matrix Clevel. 2012. PMID: 22616542
-
Direct-to-consumer genomics and research ethics: should a more robust informed consent process be included?Am J Bioeth. 2009;9(6-7):56-8. doi: 10.1080/15265160902893965. Am J Bioeth. 2009. PMID: 19998119 No abstract available.
-
Direct-to-consumer personal genome testing: ethical and regulatory issues that arise from wanting to 'know' your DNA.Intern Med J. 2010 Mar;40(3):220-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2010.02190.x. Intern Med J. 2010. PMID: 20446967 Review.
Cited by
-
Paternity testing under the cloak of recreational genetics.Eur J Hum Genet. 2017 Jun;25(6):768-770. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2017.31. Epub 2017 Mar 8. Eur J Hum Genet. 2017. PMID: 28272533 Free PMC article.
-
The Y chromosome as the most popular marker in genetic genealogy benefits interdisciplinary research.Hum Genet. 2017 May;136(5):559-573. doi: 10.1007/s00439-016-1740-0. Epub 2016 Nov 5. Hum Genet. 2017. PMID: 27817057 Review.
-
Awareness of family health history in a predominantly young adult population.PLoS One. 2019 Oct 25;14(10):e0224283. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224283. eCollection 2019. PLoS One. 2019. PMID: 31652289 Free PMC article.
-
The Advantages and Challenges of Diversity in Pharmacogenomics: Can Minority Populations Bring Us Closer to Implementation?Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2019 Aug;106(2):338-349. doi: 10.1002/cpt.1491. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2019. PMID: 31038731 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Santos CA, Yan G. Genealogical Tourism: A Phenomenological Examination. J Travel Res. 2010;49(1):56–67. doi: 10.1177/0047287509332308. - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials