Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Dec 9;16(1):87.
doi: 10.1186/s12910-015-0080-2.

Family tree and ancestry inference: is there a need for a 'generational' consent?

Affiliations
Review

Family tree and ancestry inference: is there a need for a 'generational' consent?

Susan E Wallace et al. BMC Med Ethics. .

Abstract

Background: Genealogical research and ancestry testing are popular recreational activities but little is known about the impact of the use of these services on clients' biological and social families. Ancestry databases are being enriched with self-reported data and data from deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) analyses, but also are being linked to other direct-to-consumer genetic testing and research databases. As both family history data and DNA can provide information on more than just the individual, we asked whether companies, as a part of the consent process, were informing clients, and through them clients' relatives, of the potential implications of the use and linkage of their personal data.

Methods: We used content analysis to analyse publically-available consent and informational materials provided to potential clients of ancestry and direct-to-consumer genetic testing companies to determine what consent is required, what risks associated with participation were highlighted, and whether the consent or notification of third parties was suggested or required.

Results: We identified four categories of companies providing: 1) services based only on self-reported data, such as personal or family history; 2) services based only on DNA provided by the client; 3) services using both; and 4) services using both that also have a research component. The amount of information provided on the potential issues varied significantly across the categories of companies. 'Traditional' ancestry companies showed the greatest awareness of the implications for family members, while companies only asking for DNA focused solely on the client. While in some cases companies included text recommending clients inform their relatives, showing they recognised the issues, often it was located within lengthy terms and conditions or privacy statements that may not be read by potential clients.

Conclusions: We recommend that companies should make it clearer that clients should inform third parties about their plans to participate, that third parties' data will be provided to companies, and that that data will be linked to other databases, thus raising privacy and issues on use of data. We also suggest investigating whether a 'generational consent' should be created that would include more than just the individual in decisions about participating in genetic investigations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Santos CA, Yan G. Genealogical Tourism: A Phenomenological Examination. J Travel Res. 2010;49(1):56–67. doi: 10.1177/0047287509332308. - DOI
    1. Cirulli ET, Goldstein DB. Uncovering the roles of rare variants in common disease through whole-genome sequencing. Nat Rev Genet. 2010;11:415–25. doi: 10.1038/nrg2779. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ott J, Kamatani Y, Lathrop M. Family-based designs for genome-wide association studies. Nat Rev Genet. 2011;12(7):465–74. doi: 10.1038/nrg2989. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wijsman EM. The role of large pedigrees in an era of high through-put sequencing. Human Gen. 2013;131:1555–63. doi: 10.1007/s00439-012-1190-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Staples J, Qiao D, Cho MH, Silverman EK. University of Washington Center for Mendelian G, Nickerson DA et al. PRIMUS: rapid reconstruction of pedigrees from genome-wide estimates of identity by descent. Am J Hum Genet. 2014;95(5):553–64. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2014.10.005. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms