Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Nov 20;21(17):3104-13.
doi: 10.1089/scd.2011.0691. Epub 2012 Jul 13.

Vascular smooth muscle cells initiate proliferation of mesenchymal stem cells by mitochondrial transfer via tunneling nanotubes

Affiliations

Vascular smooth muscle cells initiate proliferation of mesenchymal stem cells by mitochondrial transfer via tunneling nanotubes

Krishna C Vallabhaneni et al. Stem Cells Dev. .

Abstract

Multipotent mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are promising candidates for regenerative cell-based therapy. The mechanisms underlying MSC differentiation and other functions relevant to therapeutic avenues remain however a matter of debate. Recent reports imply a critical role for intercellular contacts in MSC differentiation. We studied MSC differentiation to vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) in a coculture model using human primary MSCs and VSMCs. We observed that under these conditions, MSCs did not undergo the expected differentiation process. Instead, they revealed an increased proliferation rate. The upregulated MSC proliferation was initiated by direct contacts of MSCs with VSMCs; indirect coculture of both cell types in transwells was ineffective. Intercellular contacts affected cell growth in a unidirectional fashion, since VSMC proliferation was not changed. We observed formation of so-called tunneling nanotubes (TNTs) between MSCs and VSMCs that revealed an intercellular exchange of a fluorescent cell tracker dye. Disruption of TNTs using cytochalasin D or latrunculin B abolished increased proliferation of MSCs initiated by contacts with VSMCs. Using specific fluorescent markers, we identified exchange of mitochondria via TNTs. By generation of VSMCs with mitochondrial dysfunction, we show that mitochondrial transfer from VSMCs to MSCs was required to regulate MSC proliferation in coculture. Our data suggest that MSC interaction with other cell types does not necessarily result in the differentiation process, but rather may initiate a proliferative response. They further point to complex machinery of intercellular communications at the place of vascular injury and to an unrecognized role of mitochondria in these processes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.
MSC coculture with VSMCs does not induce MSC differentiation. (a) Representative flow cytometric analysis shows no change of VSMC markers α-SMA and calponin in MSCs and VSMCs in mono- and cocultures; n=3. (b) Expression of VSMC markers in MSCs and VSMCs after cell sorting in mono- and cocultures was assessed by western blotting, with GAPDH as loading control; n=3. MSC, mesenchymal stem cells; VSMC, vascular smooth muscle cells; α-SMA, alpha-smooth muscle actin; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase.
FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.
VSMCs induce increased MSC proliferation. (a) Real-time cell proliferation of mono- and cocultures was monitored by using the xCELLigence Real Time Cell Analyzer DP Instrument (Roche). Cell proliferation in coculture was significantly increased when compared to monocultures. Average slope for mono- and cocultures was calculated between 30 and 120 h for at least 6 measurements, each from 2 replicate experiments±standard deviation. #P<0.05; **P<0.012. (b) Graph showing MFI represents the cell proliferation in CFSE-labeled MSCs and VSMCs in direct and transwell cocultures after 4 days. Cell proliferation was indicated by decrease in MFI as a result of cell divisions. Reduced MFI was observed in CFSE-labeled MSCs in direct coculture with VSMCs when compared to monoculture and transwell cocultures (left panel). **P<0.012; n=4. However, no change in MFI was observed in VSMC proliferation (right panel) either in direct or transwell cocultures when compared to monocultures. MFI, mean fluorescent intensity; CFSE, 5,6-carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester.
FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.
MSCs and VSMCs form TNT-like structures for intercellular contacts. Flow cytometry of cocultured MSCs and VSMCs. MSCs were labeled with CellTracker (CM-DiI), whereas VSMCs were unlabeled; cytochalasin D (1 μM) was used to disrupt intercellular transfer. Flow cytometry analysis was performed after 2 h (a, b, top panels), 24 h without (a, b, middle left panels) or with (a, b, middle right panel) cytochalasin D, and 48 h without (a, b, bottom left panels) or with (a, b, bottom center panels) of mono- and coculture. Recovery of intercellular transfers was observed after cytochalasin D was washed out after the treatment (a, b, bottom right panels). (c) Representative phase-contrast images showing TNT formation between MSC-MSC and MSC-VSMC after 24 h of co-culture; MSCs (white arrow), VSMCs (black arrow). TNTs, tunneling nanotubes.
FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.
Intercellular exchange of mitochondria between MSCs and VSMCs. MSCs or VSMCs were labeled with either MitoTracker Red (red) or CFSE (green). MitoTracker Red-labeled cells were cocultured for 2 and 24 h with CFSE-labeled cells. Fluorescence confocal microscopy revealed mitochondria in the lumen of the TNT formed between MSCs and VSMCs (left panels). Right panels show the corresponding phase-contrast images. (a) Initiation of TNT formation was observed between MSCs and VSMCs after 2 h of coculture. (b, c) Bidirectional exchange of mitochondria between MSCs and VSMCs after 24 h of coculture is shown (white arrows). Yellow arrows show double-positive cells with exchanged mitochondria; nuclear staining is shown in blue (DAPI). n=3. DAPI, 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole. Color images available online at www.liebertpub.com/scd
FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.
VSMC-induced MSC proliferation requires TNT formation. (a) Graph showing MFI represents the cell proliferation in CFSE-labeled MSCs and VSMC cocultures. Increase in MSC proliferation was completely abolished by TNT disruption with cytochalasin D (1 μM) and latrunculin B (0.5 μM), when compared to the control coculture. **P<0.01; n=4. (b, c) Fluorescence confocal microscopy images represent the uptake of transferrin by endocytosis in VSMCs (b, left panel), whereas MSCs failed transferrin uptake without (b, right panel) or with CytD (c, left panel) or LatB (c, right panel). Color images available online at www.liebertpub.com/scd
FIG. 6.
FIG. 6.
VSMC-induced MSC proliferation requires mitochondrial transfer from VSMCs to MSCs. Graph showing MFI represents the cell proliferation in CFSE-labeled MSCs and in cocultures with control VSMCs and with VSMCs having mitochondrial dysfunction. Cell proliferation was indicated by decrease in MFI as a result of cell divisions. Reduced MFI was observed in CFSE-labeled MSC cocultured with control VSMCs, but not in cocultures with mtDNA-depleted VSMCs. ***P<0.0002; ###P<0.0001, n=4.

References

    1. Ohishi M. Schipani E. Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. J Cell Biochem. 2009;109:277–282. - PubMed
    1. Lee J. Fang W. Krasnodembskaya A. Howard J. Matthay M. Concise review: mesenchymal stem cells for acute lung injury: role of paracrine soluble factors. Stem Cells. 2011;29:913–919. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Williams AR. Hare JM. Mesenchymal stem cells: biology, pathophysiology, translational findings, and therapeutic implications for cardiac disease. Circ Res. 2011;109:923–940. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Huang NF. Li S. Mesenchymal stem cells for vascular regeneration. Regen Med. 2008;3:877–892. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Abedin M. Tintut Y. Demer LL. Mesenchymal stem cells and the artery wall. Circ Res. 2004;95:671–676. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources