Skip to main page content
U.S. flag
See More

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Jul;138(14):2895-902.
doi: 10.1242/dev.067041. Epub 2011 Jun 8.

tcf21+ epicardial cells adopt non-myocardial fates during zebrafish heart development and regeneration

Kazu Kikuchi  1 , Vikas Gupta, Jinhu Wang, Jennifer E Holdway, Airon A Wills, Yi Fang, Kenneth D Poss
Affiliations

tcf21+ epicardial cells adopt non-myocardial fates during zebrafish heart development and regeneration

Kazu Kikuchi et al. Development. 2011 Jul.

Abstract

Recent lineage-tracing studies have produced conflicting results about whether the epicardium is a source of cardiac muscle cells during heart development. Here, we examined the developmental potential of epicardial tissue in zebrafish during both embryonic development and injury-induced heart regeneration. We found that upstream sequences of the transcription factor gene tcf21 activated robust, epicardium-specific expression throughout development and regeneration. Cre recombinase-based, genetic fate-mapping of larval or adult tcf21(+) cells revealed contributions to perivascular cells, but not cardiomyocytes, during each form of cardiogenesis. Our findings indicate that natural epicardial fates are limited to non-myocardial cell types in zebrafish.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Zebrafish wt1b and tbx18 regulatory sequences drive expression in epicardial and non-epicardial tissue including cardiomyocytes. (A,B) wt1b:EGFP (green) is detectable in epicardial cells (arrowheads), as well as in ventricular (A) and atrial (B) cardiac muscle (arrows), where it colocalizes with cmlc2:DsRed2 (red) at 3 days post-fertilization (dpf). (C,D) wt1b-driven EGFP marks a subset of epicardial cells (arrowheads) in the uninjured adult ventricle, as well as intra-myocardial cells (inset, arrow) that do not express cmlc2:DsRed2 (C). At 3 days post-amputation (dpa), many wt1b:EGFP+ cells lacking cmlc2:DsRed2 are evident in and around the injury site (D). A subset of these cells are epicardial (arrowheads), whereas many are intra-myocardial (arrows). Higher magnification of the boxed area is shown in each channel on the right. An antibody was used to detect EGFP in A-D. (E) tbx18:DsRed2 (red) labels epicardial cells (arrowheads) at 6 dpf, but does not colocalize with cmlc2:EGFP (green). (F,G) tbx18:DsRed2 has little or no detectable expression in the uninjured adult ventricle (F), but is detectable after injury in epicardial cells and EPDCs (G, arrows), where it does not colocalize with cmlc2:EGFP. (H) At 7 dpa, tbx18:DsRed2 colocalizes with cmlc2:EGFP in many cardiomyocytes at the injury site (arrows). Arrowheads indicate epicardial tbx18:DsRed2 fluorescence. An antibody was used to detect DsRed in E-H. at, atrium; ve, ventricle. Scale bars: 50 μm.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Zebrafish tcf21 regulatory elements drive epicardial-specific expression. (A-C) Cardiac tcf21:DsRed2 expression (white) at 3 dpf (A), 6 dpf (B) and adult (C) stages. Asterisks indicate extracardiac expression in A and B. Inset in C shows enlargement of area in yellow box. (D,E) tcf21:DsRed2+ epicardial cells (magenta) within the adult ventricular wall, assessed for wt1b:EGFP (D) or antibody staining for Raldh2 (E; green) colocalization. Arrowheads and arrows in C-E indicate the outer (epithelial) epicardial cell layer and EPDCs, respectively. (F-I) tcf21:DsRed2 (magenta) and cmlc2:EGFP (green) expression in distinct cells of 6 dpf (F-H) and adult (I) ventricles. An antibody was used to detect DsRed in F-H; this antibody also failed to detect DsRed2+EGFP+ cells in adult tcf21:DsRed2; cmlc2:EGFP ventricles (data not shown). (J-N) tcf21:DsRed2 (magenta or red) and cmlc2:EGFP (green) expression also mark distinct cells during regeneration. Arrows indicate tcf21:DsRed2+ nuclei in M and N. (O-R) tcf21:DsRed2 (magenta or red) and fli1:EGFP (green) do not colocalize in uninjured or regenerating adult ventricles. Insets in P and Q are enlarged views of boxed areas. Dashed lines indicate approximate amputation planes. at, atrium; ba, bulbus arteriosus; ve, ventricle. Scale bars: 100 μm for A-C; 10 μm for D-H,R; 50 μm for I-Q.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
gata5 and tcf21 regulatory sequences drive expression that overlaps in the zebrafish epicardium. (A-E) A gata5:EGFP; tcf21:DsRed2 larva at 6 dpf. Insets are magnified images of the areas in white boxes in B-D. A single confocal slice visualizing gata5:EGFP; tcf21:DsRed2 ventricles shows colocalization limited to the epicardium (E, arrowhead). Each channel of the image is shown on the right (E). (F,G) The gata5:RnG indicator line efficiently reports induced Cre-mediated recombination in cardiomyocytes. cmlc2:CreER; gata5:RnG adults treated with 4-HT, showing EGFP labeling in Mef2+ cardiomyocytes nuclei of uninjured (F) and regenerated (G, brackets) cardiac tissue. Arrowheads in insets indicate EGFP immunofluorescence. Scale bars: 10 μm for E; 50 μm for F,G.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Efficient and specific induced epicardial labeling in tcf21:CreER; gata5:RnG zebrafish. (A,B) tcf21:CreER; gata5:RnG larvae incubated with vehicle (A) or 4-HT (B) at 3-5 days post-fertilization (dpf) and visualized at 6 dpf, indicating 4-HT-induced labeling of the larval epicardium (green). Confocal projections of 10 μm z-stacks are shown. (C,D) Confirmation of epicardial specificity at 6 dpf embryos, assessed by Myosin heavy chain (MHC) and Mef2 staining. Arrows indicate an epicardial cell nucleus in each image. (E,F) 30 days post-amputation (dpa) ventricles from adult tcf21:CreER; gata5:RnG animals treated with vehicle as larvae (E) or adults (F). Occasional epicardial labeling (E, asterisks) was observed in injured or uninjured hearts. Arrowheads indicate apical regenerate. (G,H) 4-HT treatment at larvae or adult stages specifically labeled the majority of adult epicardial cells. at, atrium; ba, bulbus arteriosus; ve, ventricle. An antibody was used to detect EGFP in these experiments. Scale bars: 10 μm for A-D; 100 μm for E-H.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.
Adult progeny of labeled larval epicardial cells. (A) Schematic of the experimental design. (B,C) Portions of the ventricle from the lineage-traced heart, stained with an antibody for EGFP (green) and muscle markers (red). Lineage-labeled EGFP+ cells (arrows in inset) did not colocalize with cytosolic Myosin heavy chain (MHC; B) or nuclear Mef2 (C; n=10). The small EGFP+ region at the bottom of the inset of B is a thin strand of epicardial cytosol partially overlaying myocardial cytosol. A structure like this cannot be resolved by confocal imaging in processed tissue sections, but has neither the size nor morphology of a cardiomyocyte. Moreover, EGFP fluorescence was never observed in Mef2+ nuclei. (D,E) Portions of the atrium from the lineage-traced heart, stained with an antibody for EGFP (green) and muscle markers (red). Lineage-labeled EGFP+ cells (arrow in inset) did not colocalize with MHC (D) or Mef2 (E) (n=10). (F-I) EGFP+ cells in the outflow tract colocalize with Myosin light chain kinase (MLCK; red), a smooth muscle marker (F-H). This colocalization was not observed in coronary vascular smooth muscle (I). An antibody was used to detect EGFP in these experiments. Scale bars: 50 μm for B-H; 10 μm for I.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 6.
Epicardial cells contribute vascular support cells during heart regeneration. (A) Schematic of the experimental design. (B,C) Lineage-labeled EGFP+ cells (arrows, green) did not colocalize with Myosin heavy chain (MHC; B, red) or Mef2 (C, red) in 30 days post-amputation (dpa) regenerates of the larvally labeled animals (brackets; n=20). (D,E) EGFP+ cells (arrowheads) surrounds a vessel within the larvally labeled regenerate. Asterisk marks vascular lumen. (F) Schematic of the experimental design. (G,H) Lineage-labeled EGFP+ cells (arrows) did not colocalize with MHC (G) or Mef2 (H) in 30 dpa regenerates of the adult-labeled animals (brackets; n=6). (I,J) EGFP+ cells (arrowheads) surround a vessel within the adult-labeled regenerate. Asterisk marks vascular lumen. An antibody was used to detect EGFP in these experiments. Scale bars: 50 μm for B,C,G,H; 10 μm for D,E,I,J.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Bersell K., Arab S., Haring B., Kuhn B. (2009). Neuregulin1/ErbB4 signaling induces cardiomyocyte proliferation and repair of heart injury. Cell 138, 257-270 - PubMed
    1. Burns C. G., Milan D. J., Grande E. J., Rottbauer W., MacRae C. A., Fishman M. C. (2005). High-throughput assay for small molecules that modulate zebrafish embryonic heart rate. Nat. Chem. Biol. 1, 263-264 - PubMed
    1. Cai C. L., Martin J. C., Sun Y., Cui L., Wang L., Ouyang K., Yang L., Bu L., Liang X., Zhang X., et al. (2008). A myocardial lineage derives from Tbx18 epicardial cells. Nature 454, 104-108 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Christoffels V. M., Grieskamp T., Norden J., Mommersteeg M. T., Rudat C., Kispert A. (2009). Tbx18 and the fate of epicardial progenitors. Nature 458, E8-E9; discussion E9-E10 - PubMed
    1. Dettman R. W., Denetclaw W., Jr, Ordahl C. P., Bristow J. (1998). Common epicardial origin of coronary vascular smooth muscle, perivascular fibroblasts, and intermyocardial fibroblasts in the avian heart. Dev. Biol. 193, 169-181 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms