Skip to main page content
U.S. flag
See More

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009;4(1):e4170.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004170. Epub 2009 Jan 12.

Divergent effects of PERK and IRE1 signaling on cell viability

Jonathan H Lin  1 , Han Li, Yuhong Zhang, David Ron, Peter Walter
Affiliations

Divergent effects of PERK and IRE1 signaling on cell viability

Jonathan H Lin et al. PLoS One. 2009.

Abstract

Protein misfolding in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) activates a set of intracellular signaling pathways, collectively termed the Unfolded Protein Response (UPR). UPR signaling promotes cell survival by reducing misfolded protein levels. If homeostasis cannot be restored, UPR signaling promotes cell death. The molecular basis for the switch between prosurvival and proapoptotic UPR function is poorly understood. The ER-resident proteins, PERK and IRE1, control two key UPR signaling pathways. Protein misfolding concomitantly activates PERK and IRE1 and has clouded insight into their contributions toward life or death cell fates. Here, we employed chemical-genetic strategies to activate individually PERK or IRE1 uncoupled from protein misfolding. We found that sustained PERK signaling impaired cell proliferation and promoted apoptosis. By contrast, equivalent durations of IRE1 signaling enhanced cell proliferation without promoting cell death. These results demonstrate that extended PERK and IRE1 signaling have opposite effects on cell viability. Differential activation of PERK and IRE1 may determine life or death decisions after ER protein misfolding.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Selective and specific activation of PERK signaling.
(A) Parental wild-type and transgenic HEK293 cells expressing the AP20187-sensitized Fv2E-Perk allele were treated for the indicated times with AP20187 (2 nM). Fv2E-Perk, Gadd34, and Chop mRNA levels were measured by quantitative PCR, normalized to levels of a housekeeping gene, Rpl19, and are shown relative to levels in untreated cells. Fv2E-PERK, phospho-eIF2α, and ATF4 proteins were detected by immunoblotting. Total eIF2α protein was measured as a loading control. (B) Parental wild-type and transgenic HEK293 cells expressing the AP20187-sensitized Fv2E-Perk allele were treated for the indicated times with AP20187 (2 nM). Xbp1 mRNA splicing was assesed by RT-PCR. The unspliced (u) and spliced (s) Xbp1 mRNA products are indicated as labeled. The asterisk indicates the position of a hybrid amplicon.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Selective and specific activation of IRE1 signaling.
(A) Parental wild-type and transgenic HEK293 cells expressing the Ire1[I642G], or Ire1[I642G/K599A] allele were treated for the indicated times with 1NM-PP1 (1 µM), and wild-type cells were treated for 4 hours with thapsigargin (tg) (300 nM). IRE1[I642G] and IRE1[I642G/K599A] protein was detected by immunoblotting for the FLAG epitope. GAPDH levels were assessed as a protein loading control. Xbp1 mRNA splicing was determined by RT-PCR. The unspliced (u) and spliced (s) Xbp1 mRNA products are indicated as labeled. ERdj4 mRNA levels were measured by quantitative PCR, normalized to Rpl19 mRNA levels, and are shown relative to levels in untreated cells. (B) Parental wild-type and transgenic HEK293 cells expressing the Ire1[I642G] or Ire1[I642G/K599A] alleles were treated for the indicated times with 1NM-PP1 (1 µM); wild-type cells were also treated for 4 hours with thapsigargin (tg) (300 nM). ATF4 protein was detected by immunoblotting. GAPDH levels were assessed as a protein loading control.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Sustained Perk signaling impairs cell proliferation.
(A) Parental wild-type and isogenic HEK293 cells expressing Fv2E-Perk, Ire1[I642G], or Ire1[I642G/K599A] alleles were treated with tunicamycin (5 µg/ml), 1NM-PP1 (1 µM), or AP20187 (2 nM), videographed for 48 hours, and frames from indicated time points are shown. Magnification bar, 125 µm. (B) Parental wild-type and transgenic HEK293 cells expressing the Fv2E-Perk allele were treated with AP20187 (2 nM), counted, and are shown relative to numbers of mock-treated cells at the indicated times. (C) Parental wild-type and transgenic HEK293 cells expressing Ire1[I642G] or Ire1[I642G/K599A] alleles were treated with 1NM-PP1 (1 µM), counted, and are shown relative to numbers of mock-treated cells at the indicated times.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Sustained Perk signaling promotes apoptosis.
Parental wild-type and isogenic HEK293 cells expressing Ire1[I642G] or Fv2E-Perk were treated with thapsigargin (300 nM); 1NM-PP1 (1 µM); or AP20187 (2 nM) for the indicated times. Cleaved PARP protein was assessed by immunoblot. GAPDH protein levels served as a loading control.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Ron D, Walter P. Signal integration in the endoplasmic reticulum unfolded protein response. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2007;8:519–529. - PubMed
    1. Harding HP, Zhang Y, Ron D. Protein translation and folding are coupled by an endoplasmic-reticulum-resident kinase. Nature. 1999;397:271–274. - PubMed
    1. Harding HP, Novoa I, Zhang Y, Zeng H, Wek R, et al. Regulated translation initiation controls stress-induced gene expression in mammalian cells. Mol Cell. 2000;6:1099–1108. - PubMed
    1. Zhou D, Palam LR, Jiang L, Narasimhan J, Staschke KA, et al. Phosphorylation of eIF2 directs ATF5 translational control in response to diverse stress conditions. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:7064–7073. - PubMed
    1. Calfon M, Zeng H, Urano F, Till JH, Hubbard SR, et al. IRE1 couples endoplasmic reticulum load to secretory capacity by processing the XBP-1 mRNA. Nature. 2002;415:92–96. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms