Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Aug;3(8):e134.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.0030134.

A screen for suppressors of gross chromosomal rearrangements identifies a conserved role for PLP in preventing DNA lesions

Affiliations

A screen for suppressors of gross chromosomal rearrangements identifies a conserved role for PLP in preventing DNA lesions

Pamela Kanellis et al. PLoS Genet. 2007 Aug.

Abstract

Genome instability is a hallmark of cancer cells. One class of genome aberrations prevalent in tumor cells is termed gross chromosomal rearrangements (GCRs). GCRs comprise chromosome translocations, amplifications, inversions, deletion of whole chromosome arms, and interstitial deletions. Here, we report the results of a genome-wide screen in Saccharomyces cerevisiae aimed at identifying novel suppressors of GCR formation. The most potent novel GCR suppressor identified is BUD16, the gene coding for yeast pyridoxal kinase (Pdxk), a key enzyme in the metabolism of pyridoxal 5' phosphate (PLP), the biologically active form of vitamin B6. We show that Pdxk potently suppresses GCR events by curtailing the appearance of DNA lesions during the cell cycle. We also show that pharmacological inhibition of Pdxk in human cells leads to the production of DSBs and activation of the DNA damage checkpoint. Finally, our evidence suggests that PLP deficiency threatens genome integrity, most likely via its role in dTMP biosynthesis, as Pdxk-deficient cells accumulate uracil in their nuclear DNA and are sensitive to inhibition of ribonucleotide reductase. Since Pdxk links diet to genome stability, our work supports the hypothesis that dietary micronutrients reduce cancer risk by curtailing the accumulation of DNA damage and suggests that micronutrient depletion could be part of a defense mechanism against hyperproliferation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests. The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. The ChrXV-L GCR Assay
(A) Schematic of the ChrXV-L GCR reporter chromosome. A GCR event in this region of ChrXV-L can result in the loss of the URA3 and CAN1 genes, which yields a canavanine and 5-FOA resistant strain (canR 5-FOAR). PSF3 is the first essential gene on ChrXV-L. HRI and HRII denote two regions of homology that are centered around the PAU20 and HXT11 genes, respectively. (B) PFGE analysis of ChrXV-L terminal restriction fragments following PmeI digestion of genomic DNA isolated from either the parent strain (W) or strains that have undergone a GCR event (1–9). Asterisk indicates incomplete digestion products of ChrXV. (C) Array-based comparative genome hybridization of two strains that have undergone a GCR event at ChrXV-L. The above panel is a histogram representation of log2-tranformed relative signal enrichments on Chromosome XV viewed in the University of California Santa Cruz genome browser [69]. The location of the array probes (reporters) is also indicated. Note the large loss of sequences on the left arm of ChrXV in both strains. The lower panel zooms to the ChrXV-L subtelomeric region. The breakpoint in strain (i) must be in the vicinity of the PAU20 gene (YOL161C), whereas that of strain (ii) resides in the vicinity of HXT11.
Figure 2
Figure 2. A Genome-Wide Screen Identifies BUD16 as a Key Determinant for Genome Stability in S. cerevisiae
(A) GCR rates at ChrXV-L of the indicated strains. The data is presented as the fold-increase over the wild-type GCR rate +/− strandard error of the mean. Asterisk refers to genes with high GCR rates that were not identified in the screen, but were measured during the course of this study. (B) A plasmid encoding BUD16 suppresses the high GCR rate of bud16Δ. (C) PFGE analysis of ChrXV-L terminal restriction fragments following PmeI digestion of genomic DNA isolated from either the wild-type (W), parent bud16Δ strains (B), or bud16Δ strains that have undergone a GCR event (1–8). Asterisk indicates incomplete digestion products of ChrXV. (D) The bud16Δ mutation is synthetic lethal with the deletions of SNO1 and SNZ1.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Deletion of BUD16 Also Increases GCR Formation at ChrV-L
(A) GCR rate of either the wild-type (WT) or bud16Δ strain at ChrV-L. (B) Whole-chromosome PFGE analysis of wild-type (W), parental bud16Δ (B), or bud16Δ strains that have undergone a GCR event (1–8). Left panel: ethidium bromide–stained gel. Right panel: Southern blot with a ChrV-specific probe (MCM3).
Figure 4
Figure 4. Homologous Recombination Is Required for the BIR-Mediated GCR Events in bud16Δ Cells
(A) PFGE analysis of ChrXV-L terminal restriction fragments following PmeI digestion of genomic DNA isolated from either the wild-type (W), parent bud16Δrad52Δ strains (BR), or bud16Δrad52Δ strains that have undergone a GCR event (1–8). Asterisk indicates incomplete digestion products of ChrXV. An undigested Chromosome XV likely explains the presence of a signal in the well of strain 8, although a weak TRF signal can be detected. (B) Quantitation of the terminal restriction fragment length decrease following GCRs when the PmeI TRFs from bud16Δ and bud16Δrad52Δ cells are compared to those of wild type. TRF, terminal restriction fragment.
Figure 5
Figure 5. The BUD16 Gene Deletion Causes DNA Lesions and Checkpoint Activation
(A) Tetrad analysis of crosses between bud16Δ and rad52Δ, rad51Δ, mre11Δ, or rad6Δ. (B) Micrographs of wild-type (WT) or bud16Δ cells expressing Rad52-YFP. Left panels: differential interference contrast (DIC). Right panels: YFP fluorescence microscopy (YFP). Arrowheads point to Rad52-YFP foci. (C) Quantitation of Rad52-YFP foci per cell. Three independent isolates were examined with over 180 cells per isolate counted. (D) Survival curves of wild-type, bud16Δ or rad52Δ cells serially diluted and plated onto rich media +/− MMS (as indicated) and grown for 3–8 d at 30 °C in triplicate. Percent survival at a given MMS concentration represents the number of colony-forming units of the indicated strain divided by the colony-forming units of the wild type plated on media lacking MMS. No viable rad52Δ colonies were recovered at concentrations above 0.015% MMS. (E) bud16Δ cells engage the DNA damage checkpoint. Upper panel: Rad53 immunoblots of extracts of the indicated strains. Middle panel: Ponceau stain for loading control. Lower panel: Rad53 activity assessed by auto-kinase assays [40]. The immunoblot and auto-kinase assays were performed on the same extracts.
Figure 6
Figure 6. PLP Levels Correlate with Genome Stability
(A) Tetrad analysis of tpn1Δ (square) crossed to sno1snz1Δ (circle). Viable triple mutant tpn1Δ sno1snz1Δ can be recovered (circle in square). (B) GCR rates at ChrXV-L of the indicated strains. (C) Quantitation of Rad52-YFP foci per cell in wild-type and tpn1Δ cells. (D) GCR rates at ChrXV-L of tpn1Δ sno1snz1Δ triple mutant grown with pyridoxine (+PYR) or without added pyridoxine to the media. (E) Relative PLP levels of the tpn1Δ sno1snz1Δ triple mutant grown with pyridoxine (+PYR) or without added pyridoxine to the media.
Figure 7
Figure 7. Inhibition of Pdxk Causes DSBs in Human Cells
(A) HeLa cells display elevated levels of 53BP1 foci following inhibition of Pdxk by 4-DP. (B) Quantitation of cells with 53BP1 foci following 4-DP treatment. (C) 4-DP treatment activates the DNA damage checkpoint in HeLa cells as measured by Chk2 phospho-Thr68 and γ-H2AX immunoblotting. (D) SiHa cells treated with 4-DP accumulate γ-H2AX in S-phase, as measured by flow cytometry.
Figure 8
Figure 8. PLP levels Are Required for Optimal dTMP Biosynthesis
(A) The intersection of vitamin B6 and dTMP biosynthesis. (i) Dietary vitamin B6 (i.e., pyridoxine) is imported into the cell via the Tpn1 transporter (S. cerevisiae gene names in brackets). (ii) Pdxk phosphorylates the B6 vitamers (pyridoxine, pyridoxamine, and pyridoxal) to generate PLP, which acts (iii) as a cofactor for serine hydroxymethyl transferase (SHMT). (iv) SHMT is necessary for the formation of methylenetetrahydrofolate (CH2=THF), the methyl group donor for the conversion of dUMP into dTMP. (v) A deficiency in PLP is predicted to reduce dTMP levels leading to a nucleotide pool imbalance and incorporation of uracil into DNA. (B) bud16Δ cells accumulate uracil in DNA, as measured by a modified aldehydic slot blot assay. The results of the slot blot (bottom panel) were quantified and shown in the graph. IDV refers to the integrated density values of the bands. (C) Uracil accumulation in the bud16Δ genomic DNA is comparable to that observed in ung1Δ DNA. (D) bud16Δ cells are sensitive to nucleotide depletion by hydroxyurea at 0.2 M. The results of a colony forming assay can also be found in Table S3.

References

    1. McGlynn P, Lloyd RG. Recombinational repair and restart of damaged replication forks. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2002;3:859–870. - PubMed
    1. Kolodner RD, Putnam CD, Myung K. Maintenance of genome stability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae . Science. 2002;297:552–557. - PubMed
    1. Casper AM, Nghiem P, Arlt MF, Glover TW. ATR regulates fragile site stability. Cell. 2002;111:779–789. - PubMed
    1. Myung K, Datta A, Kolodner RD. Suppression of spontaneous chromosomal rearrangements by S phase checkpoint functions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae . Cell. 2001;104:397–408. - PubMed
    1. Lengronne A, Schwob E. The yeast CDK inhibitor Sic1 prevents genomic instability by promoting replication origin licensing in late G(1) Mol Cell. 2002;9:1067–1078. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances