Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2007 Apr;8(4):346-53.
doi: 10.1038/sj.embor.7400940.

Replication fork barriers: pausing for a break or stalling for time?

Affiliations
Review

Replication fork barriers: pausing for a break or stalling for time?

Karim Labib et al. EMBO Rep. 2007 Apr.

Abstract

Defects in chromosome replication can lead to translocations that are thought to result from recombination events at stalled DNA replication forks. The progression of forks is controlled by an essential DNA helicase, which unwinds the parental duplex and can stall on encountering tight protein-DNA complexes. Such pause sites are hotspots for recombination and it has been proposed that stalled replisomes disassemble, leading to fork collapse. However, in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes it now seems that paused forks are surprisingly stable, so that DNA synthesis can resume without recombination if the barrier protein is removed. Recombination at stalled forks might require other events that occur after pausing, or might be dependent on features of the surrounding DNA sequence. These findings have important implications for our understanding of the regulation of genome stability in eukaryotic cells, in which pausing of forks is mediated by specific proteins that are associated with the replicative helicase.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Pausing of forks at replication fork barriers in Escherichia coli. (A) A fork normally pauses at a Tus protein–terminator sequence (Tus–Ter) barrier until another fork arrives from the opposite direction and induces termination. (B) Artificial inversion of Tus–Ter barriers blocks forks in both directions. Arrival of a new fork from the next round of replication produces linear DNA that might drive repair by recombination. (C) Forks stall at large arrays of Tet operators bound by the repressor protein, but removal of the barrier by an inducer (anhydrotetracycline) allows the rapid resumption of DNA synthesis in the absence of recombination. RFB, replication fork barrier.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The ribosomal DNA locus in budding yeast. The replication fork barrier (RFB) ensures that the 35S gene is replicated in the same direction as RNA polymerase I (Pol I) transcription. Maintenance of the copy number of the rDNA repeats is dependent on the EXP sequence (expansion of rDNA repeats) that comprises the RFB and the bi-directional Pol II promoter E-pro (expressing two non-coding mRNAs). The enhancer of rDNA transcription (E) element (containing the RFB and associated 5′ sequences) and the initiation of rDNA transcription (I) element (containing the Pol I promoter) of HOT1 stimulate recombination when placed at other chromosomal loci. Fob1, fork blocking 1; rDNA, ribosomal DNA.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Pausing of forks at eukaryotic replication fork barriers. (A) Pausing of forks at the replication termination sequence 1 (RTS1) barrier in Schizosaccharomyces pombe can have different outcomes depending on the chromosomal context (for (ii) see Lambert et al, 2005; for (iii) see Ahn et al, 2005). (B) Chromatin immunoprecipitation studies have shown that replisome components persist at paused forks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (see Calzada et al, 2005) and Xenopus laevis (see Pacek et al, 2006). Fob1, fork blocking 1; Pol, DNA polymerase; Rtf1, replication termination factor 1. The MCM (mini-chromosome maintenance) helicase is required for the progression of eukaryotic DNA replication forks, together with the Cdc45 protein and the four-protein GINS complex (Sld5–Psf1–Psf2–Psf3). In budding yeast, MCM–GINS–Cdc45 also interact with the regulatory proteins Tof1 and Mrc1.

References

    1. Admire A, Shanks L, Danzl N, Wang M, Weier U, Stevens W, Hunt E, Weinert T (2006) Cycles of chromosome instability are associated with a fragile site and are increased by defects in DNA replication and checkpoint controls in yeast. Genes Dev 20: 159–173 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ahn JS, Osman F, Whitby MC (2005) Replication fork blockage by RTS1 at an ectopic site promotes recombination in fission yeast. EMBO J 24: 2011–2023 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Azvolinsky A, Dunaway S, Torres JZ, Bessler JB, Zakian VA (2006) The S. cerevisiae Rrm3p DNA helicase moves with the replication fork and affects replication of all yeast chromosomes. Genes Dev 20: 3104–3116 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Benguria A, Hernandez P, Krimer DB, Schvartzman JB (2003) Sir2p suppresses recombination of replication forks stalled at the replication fork barrier of ribosomal DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res 31: 893–898 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bidnenko V, Ehrlich SD, Michel B (2002) Replication fork collapse at replication terminator sequences. EMBO J 21: 3898–3907 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources