Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Jan 1;176(1):43-9.
doi: 10.1083/jcb.200608015. Epub 2006 Dec 26.

The phosphotyrosine-independent interaction of DLC-1 and the SH2 domain of cten regulates focal adhesion localization and growth suppression activity of DLC-1

Affiliations

The phosphotyrosine-independent interaction of DLC-1 and the SH2 domain of cten regulates focal adhesion localization and growth suppression activity of DLC-1

Yi-Chun Liao et al. J Cell Biol. .

Abstract

The tensin family member cten (C-terminal tensin like) is an Src homology 2 (SH2) and phosphotyrosine binding domain-containing focal adhesion molecule that may function as a tumor suppressor. However, the mechanism has not been well established. We report that cten binds to another tumor suppressor, deleted in liver cancer 1 (DLC-1), and the SH2 domain of cten is responsible for the interaction. Unexpectedly, the interaction between DLC-1 and the cten SH2 domain is independent of tyrosine phosphorylation of DLC-1. By site-directed mutagenesis, we have identified several amino acid residues on cten and DLC-1 that are essential for this interaction. Mutations on DLC-1 perturb the interaction with cten and disrupt the focal adhesion localization of DLC-1. Furthermore, these DLC-1 mutants have lost their tumor suppression activities. When these DLC-1 mutants were fused to a focal adhesion targeting sequence, their tumor suppression activities were significantly restored. These results provide a novel mechanism whereby the SH2 domain of cten-mediated focal adhesion localization of DLC-1 plays an essential role in its tumor suppression activity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Identification of DLC-1 as a cten binding partner. (A) A549 cells were transfected with pEGFP (lane 1) or pEGFP–DLC-1 (lane 2). Cell lysates were coimmunoprecipitated with anti-GFP and analyzed by immunoblotting (IB) with anti-cten (left) or anti-GFP (right). The arrow indicates cten, and arrowheads show GFP and GFP–DLC-1. (B) NIH 3T3 cells in 24-well dishes were cotransfected with pCMV-AD-cten, and pCMV-BD vector with no insert as a negative control (column 1), pCMV-BD-DLC-1 (column 2), pCMV-BD-DLC-1S440A (column 3), or pCMV-BD-DLC-1Y442F (column 4), and together with the reporter plasmid pFR-Luc. The luciferase activities were measured by luminometry and shown as relative light units (RLU) per milligram of cellular proteins. Data are from two independent triplicate experiments. Error bars indicate mean ± SD. (C) MLC SV-40 cell lysates were coimmunoprecipitated with normal rabbit serum (lane 1) or anti–DLC-1 (lane 2) and analyzed by immunoblotting with anti-cten (left) or anti–DLC-1 (right). The arrow indicates cten, and the arrowhead shows DLC-1.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Determination of binding regions on cten and DLC-1 and their binding specificities. (A) Schematic diagram of cten and DLC-1 and their segments that were used for mapping the binding sites. (B) AH109 yeast cells transformed with the indicated plasmids and grown on two-dropout plates were restreaked on four-dropout plates. (C) Bacterial lysates containing Xpress–DLC-1 (113–535) were incubated with immobilized GST (lane 1) or GST-cten SH2 (lane 2). After washing, the associated proteins were analyzed by immunoblotting (IB) with anti-Xpress antibody. (D) 0.5 μg of purified GST-cten SH2 (lane 1), GST-Src SH2 (lane 2), and GST-p85 SH2 (lane 3) recombinant proteins were incubated with DLC-1 peptide (CSRLSIY442DNVPG) immobilized on agarose beads. After washing, the associated proteins were analyzed by immunoblotting with anti-GST antibody. (E) 0.5 μg of purified GST-cten SH2 recombinant proteins were incubated with DLC-1 peptide (CSRLSIY442DNVPG; lane 1), tyrosine-phosphorylated DLC-1 peptide (CSRLSIpY442DNVPG; lane 2), EGFR peptide (CSVQNPVY1086HNQP; lane 3), or tyrosine-phosphorylated EGFR peptide (CSVQNPVpY1086HNQP; lane 4) immobilized on agarose beads. After washing, the associated proteins were analyzed by immunoblotting with anti-GST antibody.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Subcellular localization of DLC-1 and its recruitment by cten SH2. (A) A549 cells grown on coverslips were transfected with pEGFP–DLC-1 (1–535), pEGFP–DLC-1 (1–535)S440A, or pEGFP–DLC-1 (1–535)Y442F. After labeling with anti-cten antibodies followed by Alexa Fluor 594–conjugated secondary antibody, cells were visualized with a confocal microscope. Arrows indicate cten and GFP fusion protein colocalized at focal adhesions. Arrowheads show only cten at focal adhesions. About 100 GFP-positive cells were examined in each transfection. More than 90% of GFP-positive cells showed focal adhesion localization when transfected with GFP–DLC-1 (1–535), and no GFP-positive cells transfected with DLC-1 mutants showed focal adhesion localization. Cell lysates from A549 transiently expressing GFP–DLC-1 (1–535; lane 1), GFP–DLC-1(1–535)S440A (lane 2), or GFP–DLC-1 (1–535)Y442F (lane 3) were immunoprecipitated with anti-GFP and analyzed by immunoblotting with anti-GFP to show similar amounts, and correct sizes of recombinant proteins were expressed. (B) A549 cells grown on coverslips were cotransfected with pDsRed1/pEGFP–DLC-1 (1–535) or pDsRed1-cten SH2-SKL/pEGFP-DLC-1 (1–535). Cells were visualized with a confocal microscope. Note that the DsRed-cten SH2-SKL and GFP–DLC-1 (1–535) were colocalized at peroxisomes (arrows), although some GFP–DLC-1 (1–535) proteins were still detected at focal adhesions (at different focus plane; not depicted), as predicted, because of the presence of endogenous tensins in A549 cells. Arrowheads show only GFP–DLC-1 (1–535) at focal adhesions. Bars, 10 μm.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Colony formation and cell growth assays in MDA-MB-468 cells transfected with wild-type and mutant DLC-1. (A) Cells were transfected with the indicated constructs. After being cultured in media containing 0.8 mg/ml G418 for 2 wk, G418-resistant colonies were stained with crystal violet. (B) The histogram shows the colony formation assay of GFP (column 1), GFP–DLC-1 (column 2), GFP–DLC-1S440A (column 3), GFP–DLC-1Y442F (column 4), GFP–FAB–DLC-1 (column 5), GFP–FAB–DLC-1S440A (column 6), and GFP–FAB–DLC-1Y442F (column 7) from four independent experiments. (C) G418-resistant MDA-MB-468 cells (2 × 105) expressing the indicated proteins were seeded in triplicate in 60-mm dishes. Cells were harvested at 24-h intervals for 4 d, and the numbers of viable cells were counted by trypan blue exclusion assay with a hematocytometer. Error bars indicate mean ± SD. (D) Cell lysates from MDA-MB-468 transfected with GFP vector (lane 1), GFP–DLC-1 (lane 2), GFP–DLC-1S440A (lane 3), GFP–DLC-1Y442F (lane 4), GFP–FAB–DLC-1 (lane 5), GFP–FAB–DLC-1S440A (lane 6), or GFP–FAB–DLC-1Y442F (lane 7) were immunoprecipitated with anti-GFP and analyzed by immunoblotting with anti-GFP to show similar expression levels and correct sizes of recombinant proteins. The arrow indicates GFP, and arrowheads show GFP–DLC-1 and GFP–FAB–DLC-1 fusion proteins. (E) A549 cells grown on coverslips were transfected with pEGFP–FAB–DLC-1, pEGFP–FAB–DLC-1S440A, or pEGFP–FAB–DLC-1Y442F. After labeling with anti-cten antibodies followed by Alexa Fluor 594–conjugated secondary antibody, cells were visualized with a confocal microscope. Arrows indicate cten and GFP fusion protein colocalized at focal adhesions. Bars, 10 μm.

References

    1. Calderwood, D.A., Y. Fujioka, J.M. de Pereda, B. Garcia-Alvarez, T. Nakamoto, B. Margolis, C.J. McGlade, R.C. Liddington, and M.H. Ginsberg. 2003. Integrin beta cytoplasmic domain interactions with phosphotyrosine-binding domains: a structural prototype for diversity in integrin signaling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 100:2272–2277. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chen, H., and S.H. Lo. 2003. Regulation of tensin-promoted cell migration by its focal adhesion-binding and Src homology 2 domains. Biochem. J. 370:1039–1045. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chiang, M.K., Y.C. Liao, Y. Kuwabara, and S.H. Lo. 2005. Inactivation of tensin3 in mice results in growth retardation and postnatal lethality. Dev. Biol. 279:368–377. - PubMed
    1. Cui, Y., Y.C. Liao, and S.H. Lo. 2004. Epidermal growth factor modulates tyrosine phosphorylation of a novel tensin family member, tensin3. Mol. Cancer Res. 2:225–232. - PubMed
    1. Davis, S., M.L. Lu, S.H. Lo, S. Lin, J.A. Butler, B.J. Druker, T.M. Roberts, Q. An, and L.B. Chen. 1991. Presence of an SH2 domain in the actin-binding protein tensin. Science. 252:712–715. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms