Choosing negative examples for the prediction of protein-protein interactions
- PMID: 16723005
- PMCID: PMC1810313
- DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-7-S1-S2
Choosing negative examples for the prediction of protein-protein interactions
Abstract
The protein-protein interaction networks of even well-studied model organisms are sketchy at best, highlighting the continued need for computational methods to help direct experimentalists in the search for novel interactions. This need has prompted the development of a number of methods for predicting protein-protein interactions based on various sources of data and methodologies. The common method for choosing negative examples for training a predictor of protein-protein interactions is based on annotations of cellular localization, and the observation that pairs of proteins that have different localization patterns are unlikely to interact. While this method leads to high quality sets of non-interacting proteins, we find that this choice can lead to biased estimates of prediction accuracy, because the constraints placed on the distribution of the negative examples makes the task easier. The effects of this bias are demonstrated in the context of both sequence-based and non-sequence based features used for predicting protein-protein interactions.
Figures
References
-
- von Mering C, Krause R, Snel B, Cornell M, Olivier SG, Fields S, Bork P. Comparative assessment of large-scale data sets of protein-protein interactions. Nature. 2002;417:399–403. - PubMed
-
- Sprinzak E, Margalit H. Correlated sequence-signatures as markers of protein-protein interaction. Journal of Molecular Biology. 2001;311:681–692. - PubMed
-
- Gomez SM, Noble WS, Rzhetsky A. Learning to predict protein-protein interactions. Bioinformatics. 2003;19:1875–1881. - PubMed
-
- Wang H, Segal E, Ben-Hur A, Koller D, Brutlag DL. Identifying Protein-Protein Interaction Sites on a Genome-Wide Scale. In: Saul LK, Weiss Y, Bottou L, editor. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 17. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2005. pp. 1465–1472.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
