Abstract
Garden pea is an important off-season vegetable in the hills of North Western Himalayas that provides high remuneration to growers. Lack of high yielding wider adaptive varieties restricts its productivity. To identify high yielding stable genotypes across environments, 48 lines were evaluated in Alpha Lattice design over seven diverse environments spreading in five locations from sub-tropical to dry temperate conditions of Himachal Pradesh during winter 2016–2017 (5 environments) and one location each during summer 2017 and winter 2017–2018. The highest mean pod yield over environments was produced by SP-3 (83.35 g) which was 20% higher over check Pb-89 while SP-6 (79.45 g) and SP-22 (76.90 g) got second and third rank with significant increase of 15 and 11% for pod yield over the check, respectively. The joint regression analysis depicted significant G × E (linear) interaction for pods/plant and pod yield/plant. Of the seven genotypes depicting stability for pod yield, SP-6 showed stability (bi = 1 and S2di = 0) for all the traits whereas SP-22 showed the same for seeds/pod and shelling percentage. G + GE biplot described Dhaulakuan as the most representative and discriminating environment for pod yield. In the mean vs. stability GGE biplot, SP-6, SP-22 and SP-17 were highly stable while SP-3 possessed medium stability. ‘Which won where’ polygon view represented SP-3, SP-6 and SP-22 as most stable for yield and pod attributes across environments, constellated into majority of the environments and can be released for commercial cultivation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Acikgoz E, Ustun A, Gul I, Anlarsal E, Tekeli AS, Nizam I, Avcioglu R, Geren H, Cakmakci S, Aydinoglu B, Yucel C, Avci M, Acar Z, Ayan I, Uzun A (2009) Genotype x environment interaction and stability analysis for dry matter and seed yield in field pea (Pisum sativum L.). Span J Agric Res 7:96–106. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2009071-402
Akter A, Hasan MJ, Kulsum U, Rahman MH, Khatun M, Islam M (2015) RGGE biplot analysis for yield stability in multienvironment trials of promising hybrid rice (Oryza sativa L.). Bangladesh Rice J 19:1–8. https://doi.org/10.3329/brj.v19i1.25213
Anonymous (2018) Indian Horticulture Database. National Horticulture Board, Ministry of Agriculture, Government of India, Gurgaon, India. nhb.gov.in
Anputhas M, Samita S, Abeysiriwardena DSDZ (2011) Stability and adaptability analysis of rice cultivars using environment- centered yield in two-way ANOVA model. Commun Biometry Crop Sci 6:80–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-019-2384-7
Asilo MAI, Swamy BPM, Amparado AF, Empleo GID, Arocena EC, Reinke EC (2019) Stability and G × E analysis of zinc-biofortified rice genotypes evaluated in diverse environments. Euphytica 215:61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-019-2384-7
Bishaw Z, Van Gastel AJG (2009) Variety release and policy options. In: Ceccarelli S, Guimaraes EP, Weltzien E (eds) Plant breeding and farmer participation, vol 21. FAO, Rome, pp 565–587
Ceyhan E, Kahraman A, Ates MK, Karadas S (2012) Stability analysis on seed yield and its components in peas. Bulg J Agric Sci 18:905–911
Cornelius PL, Crossa J, Seyedsadr MS (1996) Statistical tests and estimates of miltiplicative models for GE interaction. In: Kang MS, Gauch HG (eds) Genotype-by-environment interaction. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 199–234
Dahl WJ, Lauren MF, Robert TT (2012) Review of the health benefits of peas (Pisum sativum L.). Brit J Nutr 108:S3–S10. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114512000852
Danyali SF, Razavi F, Segherloo AE, Dehghani H, Sabaghpour SH (2012) Yield stability in Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) and study relationship among the univariate and multivariate stability parameters. Res Plant Biol 2:46–61. http://updatepublishing.com/journal/index.php/ripb/article/view/2550
Eberhart SA, Russell WA (1966) Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Sci 6:36–40
Fikere M, Bing DJ, Tadesse T, Ayana A (2014) Comparison of biometrical methods to describe yield stability in field pea (Pisum sativum L.) under south eastern Ethiopian conditions. Afr J Agric Res 9:2574–2583. http://www.academicjournals.org/AJAR
Fikere M, Tadesse T, Gebeyehu S, Hundie B (2010) Agronomic performances, disease reaction and yield stability of field pea (Pisum sativum L.) genotypes in Bale Highlands, Ethiopia. Aust J Crop Sci 4:238–246. https://search.informit.com.au/documentSummary;dn=216870134088210
Finley KW, Wilkinson CM (1963) The analysis of adaptation in plant breeding programme. Aust J Agric Res 14:742–757
Gauch HG, Zobel RW (1997) Identifying mega-environments and targeting genotypes. Crop Sci 37:311–326. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1997.0011183X003700020002x
Georgieva N, Nikolova I, Kosev V (2015) Stability analysis for seed yield in vetch cultivars. Emir J Food Agric 27:903–910. https://doi.org/10.9755/ejfa.2015-04-172
Hassan MS, Mohamed GIA, El-Said RAR (2013) Stability analysis for grain yield and its components of some durum wheat genotypes (Triticum durum L.) under different environments. Asian J Crop Sci 5:179–189. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajcs.2013.179.189
Kang MS (1993) Simultaneous selection for yield and stability in crop performance trials: consequences for growers. Agron J 85:754–757. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1993.00021962008500030042x
Kroonenberg PM (1995) Introduction to biplots for G x E tables, department of mathematics, research report. University of Queensland, Australia, p 51
Langer I, Frey KJ, Bailley TB (1979) Associations among productivity, production response and stability indices in oat varieties. Euphytica 28:17–24
Nur A, Syahruddin K, Azrai M, Farid M (2018) Genetic by environment interactions and stability of tropical wheat lines in Indonesian medium-plains. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 157:012049. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/157/1/012049
Pan RS, Prasad KVSR, Rai M (2001) Stability of yield and its components in graden pea (Pisum sativum). Indian J Agric Sci 71:701–703
Parsad R, Gupta VK, Batra PK, Satpati SK, Biswas P (2007) Alpha designs. IASRI, New Delhi
Perkins JM, Jinks JL (1968) Environmental and genotype environmental components of variability. VI. Diallel sets of crosses. Heredity 23:339–356
Perkins JM, Jinks JL (1973) The assessment and specificity of Environmental and genotype × environmental components of variability. Heredity 30:111–126
Sharma A, Pathak S, Sharma S (2006) Stability of diverse genotypes of garden pea (Pisum sativum L.) under a mountainous agro-eco region of a high hill and dry temperate zone. SABRAO J Breed Genet 38:123–130
Sharma A, Sekhon BS, Sharma S, Kumar R (2020) Newly isolated intervarietal garden pea (Pisum sativum L.) progenies (F7) under north western Himalayan conditions of India. Exp Agric 56:76–87. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0014479719000115
Sirohi SPS, Gaurav SS (2008) Stability analysis for yield and quality characters in Pea (Pisum sativum L.). Vegetos 21:103–109
Susanto U, Rohaeni WR, Johnson SB, Jamil A (2015) GGE biplot analysis for genotype x environment interaction on yield trait of high Fe content rice genotypes in Indonesian irrigated environments. Agrivita 37:265–275
Tayeh N, Aluome C, Falque M, Jacquin F, Klein A, Chauveau A, Berard A, Houtin H, Rond C, Kreplak J, Boucherot K, Martin C, Baranger A, Nayel MLP, Warkentin TD, Brunel D, Marget P, Paslier MC, Aubert G, Burstin J (2015) Development of two major resources for pea genomics: the GenoPea 13.2K SNP Array and a high density, high resolution consensus genetic map. Plant J 84:1257–1273. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.13070
Temesgen T, Kenenib G, Seferaa T, Jarsob M (2015) Yield stability and relationships among stability parameters in faba bean (Viciafaba L.) genotypes. Crop J 3:258–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cj.2015.03.004
Yan W, Hunt LA (2002) Biplot analysis of diallel data. Crop Sci 42:21–30. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2002.2100
Yan W, Kang MS (2003) GGE biplot analysis: a graphical tool for genetists, breeders and agronomists. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Yan W, Kang MS, Ma B, Sheila W, Cornelius PL (2007) GGE Biplot vs AMMI analysis of genotype-by-environment data. Crop Sci 47:643–653. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2006.06.0374
Yan W, Tinker NA (2006) Biplot analysis of multi-environment trail data: principles and applications. Can J Plant Sci 86:623–645. https://doi.org/10.4141/P05-169
Yihunie TA, Gesesse CA (2018) GGE biplot analysis of genotype by environment interaction in field pea (Pisum sativum L.) genotypes in Northwestern Ethiopia. J Crop Sci Biotechnol 21:67–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12892-017-0099-0
Zobel RW, Wright MJ, Gauch HGJ (1988) Statistical analysis of a yield trial. Agronomy J 80:388–393. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1988.00021962008000030002x
Funding
Not applicable.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
CR: Conduct of experiments and recording data, preparation of manuscript, AS: Developed breeding lines, planning, execution and monitoring experiments over location; preparation and revising of the manuscript, KCS: Helped in conducting the experiment at High land Agricultural Research and Extension Centre, Bajaura, (H.P) India, PM: Helped in conducting the experiment at Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Dhaulakuan, (H.P) India, BNS: Assisted in conduct of experiment at Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Una, (H.P) India, VKS: Helped in conducting the experiment at Highland Agricultural Research and Extension Centre, Kukumseri (H.P) India, AC: Recorded data during the experiment conducted in 2017-18 at CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur (H.P.) India, HT: Tabulation of data, preparation and revising the manuscript, VK: Helped in analysing the data and further interpretation, PS: Helped in monitoring the experiments, VR: Planning of the experiments.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors do not have any competing interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rana, C., Sharma, A., Sharma, K.C. et al. Stability analysis of garden pea (Pisum sativum L.) genotypes under North Western Himalayas using joint regression analysis and GGE biplots. Genet Resour Crop Evol 68, 999–1010 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-020-01040-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Version of record:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-020-01040-0