User talk:Jo-Jo Eumerus
| This is Jo-Jo Eumerus's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86Auto-archiving period: 7 days  |
FAC candidates
[edit] | This section is pinned and will not be automatically archived. |
- Misti
- Macauley Island, needs prose cleanup
- Aucanquilcha, needs a rewrite with Google Scholar
- Cerro Guacha, needs a rewrite with Google Scholar
- El Laco, needs a rewrite with Google Scholar
- Lastarria, needs a rewrite with Google Scholar
- Purico complex, needs a rewrite with Google Scholar
- Aguas Calientes caldera, needs a rewrite (and some mergers) with Google Scholar
- Pastos Grandes, needs a rewrite with Google Scholar or shortened.
- Mount Okmok
- Mount Aniakchak
- Candlemas Island
- Laguna Verde (Bolivia), needs expansion with talkpage sauces
- Altiplano-Puna volcanic complex, needs a rewrite
- Sabancaya, may need a rewrite
Most of 'em need a root-and-branch rewrite first, though. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 17:38, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Llullaillaco scheduled for TFA
[edit]Hi Jo-Jo, This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 11 July 2025. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/July 2025, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/July 2025. Please keep an eye on that page, as notifications of copy edits to or queries about the draft blurb may be left there by user:JennyOz, who assists the coordinators by reviewing the blurbs, or by others. I also suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from two days before it appears on the Main Page. Thanks, and congratulations on your work! SchroCat (talk) 13:28, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Art Magazine "The Works"
[edit]You are the first person I know on here that I can ask this in regards to a source I found. I am currently trying to finish up expanding my article on Begotten (1989) and I found a source on the Internet archive that I might use. It is from an independent art magazine called "The Works" and it covers the earliest review and screening of the film. However, when I have attempted to look around online for more information on the magazine I have come up empty. It is the only source I have found that lists this early release date. Would it still be able to pass a source review during FAR or should I exclude it?