Abstract
The area of judicial research previously referred to as the “freshman effect” has generated a substantial amount of interest among Supreme Court scholars. Until recently, however, efforts to establish the existence of this effect have met with mixed success. Hagle (1993a) contends that the mixed results of previous freshman or acclimation effect studies are primarily due to the use of the behavior of the experienced justices as a baseline to measure the behavior of the new justice. Given normal variations in the justices' behavior, using the behavior of experienced justices to determine whether a new justice experienced acclimation effects may lead to a false conclusion. In this study we examine the opinion writing behavior of 24 justices who joined the Court from the 1943 through the 1993 Terms. While controlling for the number of cases, we use each justice's own later opinion writing behavior in each of two control periods as a baseline against which to judge whether that justice experienced an acclimation effect in his or her first-term opinion writing. We also compare the opinion writing behavior of Rehnquist and the other three Chief Justices with that of the Associate Justices. Our results indicate that a substantial number of the justices (67%) manifest significant acclimation effects in their opinion writing for one or both of the two control periods. Our results also show a significant difference in Rehnquist's opinion writing behavior as he moved from Associate Justice to Chief Justice and a substantial difference between the opinion writing behavior of the Chief Justices as compared to the Associate Justices.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abraham, Henry J. (1993).The Judicial Process, 6th ed. New York: Oxford.
Baum, Lawrence (1995).The Supreme Court, 5th ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
Bowen, Terry, and Scheb, John M., II (1993). Freshman opinion writing on the U.S. Supreme Court, 1921–1991.Judicature 76: 239–243.
Brenner, Saul (1983). Another look at freshman indecisiveness on the United States Supreme Court.Polity 16: 320–328.
Cook, Beverly B. (1993). Measuring the significance of U.S. Supreme Court decisions.Journal of Politics 55: 1127–1139.
Danelski, David J. (1986). The influence of the Chief Justice in the decisional process. In Walter F. Murphy and C. Herman Pritchett (eds.),Courts, Judges, & Politics, 4th ed. New York: Random House.
Davis, Sue (1990). Power on the Court: Chief Justice Rehnquist's opinion assignments.Judicature 74: 66–72.
Epstein, Lee, Segal, Jeffrey A., Spaeth, Harold J., and Walker, Thomas, G. (1994).The Supreme Court Compendium: Data, Decisions & Developments. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.
Girden, Ellen R. (1992).ANOVA: Repeated Measures. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Hagle, Timothy M. (1993a). “Freshman effects” for Supreme Court justices.American Journal of Political Science 37: 1142–1157.
Hagle, Timothy M. (1993b). A new test for the freshman effect.Southeastern Political Review 21: 289–308.
Hall, Kermit L., ed. (1992).The Oxford Companion to the Supreme Court of the United States. New York: Oxford University Press.
Heck, Edward V., and Hall, Melinda Gann (1981). Bloc voting and the freshman justice revisited.Journal of Politics 43: 852–860.
Howard, Woodford (1965). Justice Murphy: The freshman years.Vanderbilt Law Review 18: 473–505.
Howard, J. Woodford, Jr. (1968). On the fluidity of judicial choice.American Political Science Review 62: 43–56.
Johnson, Scott P., and Smith, Christopher E. (1992). David Souter's first term on the Supreme Court: The impact of a new justice.Judicature 75: 238–243.
Lamb's Chapel v. Center Moriches, 508 US:384, (1993).
Melone, Albert P. (1990). Revisiting the freshman effect hypothesis: The first two terms of Justice Anthony Kennedy.Judicature 74: 6–13.
Novick, Sheldon M. (1989).Honorable Justice: The Life of Oliver Wendell Holmes. Boston: Little Brown.
O'Brien, David M. (1993).Storm Center: The Supreme Court in American Politics, 4th ed. New York: Norton.
Rehnquist, William H. (1987).The Supreme Court: How It Was, How It Is. New York: Morrow.
Rodell, Fred (1955).Nine Men. New York: Random House.
Roe v. Wade, 410 US 113 (1973).
Rohde, David W. (1972). Policy goals, strategic choice and majority opinion assignments in the U.S. Supreme Court.Midwest Journal of Political Science 16: 652–682.
Rubin, Thea F., and Melone, Albert P. (1988). Justice Antonin Scalia: A first year freshman effect?Judicature 72: 98–102.
Savage, David G. (1992).Turning Right: The Making of the Rehnquist Supreme Court. New York: Wiley.
Schaefer, Walter V. (1985). Precedent and policy: Judicial opinions and decision making. InViews from the Bench, Mark W. Cannon and David M. O'Brien (eds.). Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
Scheb, John M., II, and Ailshie, Lee W. (1985). Justice Sandra Day O'Connor and the freshman effect.Judicature 69: 9–12.
Schubert, Glendon A. (1959).Quantitative Analysis of Judicial Behavior. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
Segal, Jeffrey A., and Spaeth, Harold J. (1993).The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Slotnick, Elliot E. (1979). Judicial career patterns and majority opinion assignment on the Supreme Court.Journal of Politics 41: 640–648.
Smith, Christopher E., Baugh, Joyce Ann, and Hensley, Thomas R. (1995). The first-term performance of Justice Stephen Breyer.Judicature 79: 74–79.
Smith, Christopher E., Baugh, Joyce Ann, Hensley, Thomas R., Johnson, Scott Patrick (1994). The first-term performance of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.Judicature 78: 74–80.
Smith, Christopher E., and Johnson, Scott Patrick (1993). The first-term performance of Justice Clarence Thomas.Judicature 76: 172–178.
Snyder, Eloise C. (1958). The Supreme Court as small group.Social Forces 36: 232–238.
Spaeth, Harold J. (1979).Supreme Court Policy Making. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
Spaeth, Harold J. (1984). Distributive Justice: Majority opinion assignments in the Burger Court.Judicature 67: 299–304.
Spaeth, Harold J. (1994).Documentation for the United States Supreme Court Judicial Database: 1953–1992 Terms. Study 9422. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research.
Walker, Thomas G., Epstein, Lee, and Dixon, William J. (1988). On the mysterious demise of consensual forms in the United States Supreme Court.Journal of Politics 50: 361–389.
Wasby, Stephen L. (1989). “Into the Soup”?: The acclimation of Ninth Circuit Appellate judges.Judicature 73: 10–16.
Wasby, Stephen L. (1993).The Supreme Court in the Federal Judicial System, 4th ed. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
Webster v. Reproductive Health Services, 492 US 490 (1989).
White, G. Edward (1993).Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes: Law and the Inner Self. New York: Oxford.
Witt, Elder (1990).Congressional Quarterly's Guide to the U.S. Supreme Court, 2d ed. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brenner, S., Hagle, T.M. Opinion writing and acclimation effect. Polit Behav 18, 235–261 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01498601
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01498601