Skip to main content
Log in

Sociology of law in Britain

  • Article
  • Published:
The American Sociologist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article reviews the state of law and society studies in Britain by revisiting the arguments raised by CM. Campbell and Paul Wiles in the late 1970s. It argues that the divide they identified between theoretically-oriented “sociology of law” and a-theoretical or empiricist “socio-legal studies” has widened, discusses some of the cultural and institutional reasons, and makes some practical recommendations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abel, Richard. 1988. The Legal Profession of England and Wales. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alcock, Pete. 1996. Social Policy in Britain: Themes and Issues. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anleu, Sharyn. 2000. Law and Social Change. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, J. Maxwell and Paul Drew. 1979. Order in Court: The Organisation of Verbal Interaction in Courtroom Settings. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, Howard. 1963. Outsiders. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, CM. and Paul Wiles. 1976. “The Study of Law in Society in Britain.” Law and Society Review: 10:547–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cotterrell, Roger 1992. The Sociology of Law: An Introduction. 2nd Edition. London: Butterworths.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1995. Law’s Community: Legal Theory in Sociological Perspective. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1993. “Trusting in Law: Legal and Moral Concepts of Trust.” Current Legal Problems 46: 75–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1998. “Why must Legal Ideas be Interpreted Sociologically?” Journal of Law and Society: 25(2): 171–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1999. Emile Durkheim: Law in a Moral Domain. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dezalay, Yves and Peter Sugarman (eds.). 1994. Professional Competition and Professional Power. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dingwall, Robert and Philip Lewis (eds.). 1983. The Sociology of the Professions. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Economic and Social Research Council. 1994. Report on Socio-Legal Studies. Swindon: ESRC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick, Peter. 1990. Dangerous Supplements: Resistance and Renewal in Jurisprudence. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick, Peter and Alan Hunt. 1987. Critical Legal Studies. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood, John. 1983. Barristers’ Clerks: The Law’s Middlemen. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galligan, Dennis. 1994a “Introduction.” In Dennis Galligan (ed.) “Socio-Legal Studies in Context: The Oxford Centre Past and Present.” Published as special issue of the Journal of Law and Society 22: 1–15.

  • -. (ed). 1994b. “Socio-Legal Studies in Context: The Oxford Centre Past and Present.” Published as special issue of the Journal of Law and Society 22.

  • Harris, Donald et al. 1984. Compensation and Support for Illness and Injury. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, Keith. 1997. “Prologue: Donald Harris and the Early Years of the Oxford Centre.” In Keith Hawkins (ed.) The Human Face of Law; Essays in Honour of Donald Harris. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillyard, Paddy and Joe Sim. 1997. “The Political Economy of Socio-Legal Research.” In Philip Thomas (ed.), Socio-Legal Studies. Aldershot: Dartmouth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmwood, John. 1996. Founding Sociology? Talcott Parsons and the Idea of General Theory. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, Alan. 1994. “Governing the Socio-Legal Project: Or What do Research Councils Do?” Journal of Law and Society 21(4): 520–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, Alan and Gary Wickham. 1996. Foucault and Law: Towards a Sociology of Law as Governance. London: Pluto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacey, Nicola. 1996. “Normative Reconstruction in Socio-Legal Theory.” Social and Legal Studies 5: 131–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynd, Robert. 1996. Knowledge for What? The Place of Social Science in American Culture. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McBarnet, Doreen. 1981. Conviction: Law, the State and the Construction of Justice. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • McBarnet, Doreen and Christopher Whelan. 1999. Creative Accounting and the One-Eyed Javeline Thrower. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelken, David. 1998. “Blinding insights? The Limits of a Reflexive Sociology of Law.” Journal of Law and Society 25(3): 407–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, Talcott. 1964. “A Sociologist Looks at the Legal Profession.” Pp. 370–85 in Talcott Parsons (ed.), Essays in Sociological Theory. Toronto: Collier-Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paterson, Alan. 1982. The Law Lords. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Picciotto, Sol. 2000. Review of Doreen McBarnet and Christopher Whelan’s Creative Accounting and the One-Eyed Javeline Thrower. Journal of Law and Society 27(3): 477–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins Report on Higher Education. 1963. London: HMSO.

  • Rocher, Guy. 1974. Talcott Parsons and American Sociology. London: Nelson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smart, Carol. 1989. Feminism and the Power of Law. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Somerlad, Hilary and Peter Sanderson. 1992. Gender, Choice and Commitment: Women Solicitors in England and Wales and the Search for Equal Status. Aldershot: Dartmouth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamanaha, Brian. 1997. Realistic Socio-Legal Theory: Pragmatism and a Social Theory of Law. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, Philip. 1997. “Socio-Legal Studies: The Case of Disappearing Fleas and Bustards.” Pp. 1–22 in Philip Thomas (ed.), Socio-Legal Studies. Aldershot: Dartmouth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Travers, Max. 1993. “Putting Sociology Back into the Sociology of Law.” Journal of Law and Society 20(4): 438–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1997. The Reality of Law: Work and Talk in a Firm of Criminal Lawyers. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1999. The British Immigration Courts: A Study of Law and Politics. Bristol: The Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, Bryan (ed.) 1996. The Blackwell Companion to Social Theory. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, Stephen and Jonathan Turner. 1990. The Impossible Science: An Institutional Analysis of American Sociology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Twining, William. 1997. Law in Context. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, Sally and Philip Thomas. 2000. “Socio-Legal Studies.” In David Hayter (ed.), Law’s Futures. Oxford: Hart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willock, I.D. 1974. “Getting on with Sociologists.” British Journal of Law and Society 1(1): 3–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zander, Michael. 1968. Lawyers and the Public Interest. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Travers, M. Sociology of law in Britain. Am Soc 32, 26–40 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-001-1018-3

Download citation

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-001-1018-3

Keywords