The dynamics of changes in individual electrical activity rhythms in the premotor, sensorimotor, and temporal-parietal areas of the cortex in both hemispheres were studied in chronic experiments in rabbits during sequential sessions of “animal hypnosis.” These experiments showed that during the first session of “animal hypnosis,” significant changes in electrical activity occurred only in the premotor area of the cortex of the right hemisphere, where there were increases in spectral power in the delta-1 and delta-2 ranges and decreases in spectral power in other ranges of electrical activity. Subsequent sessions of “animal hypnosis” formed increasing changes in electrical activity, which were particularly marked in cortical areas in the right hemisphere. Significant changes in spectral power in the delta and theta ranges of electrical activity in cortical areas did not arise at the beginning of the hypnotic state, but after 4–6 min. During the third session of “animal hypnosis,” the course of electrical activity in the alpha and beta rhythms in the premotor and sensorimotor areas of the cortex became wave-like in nature.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.References
A. V. Bogdanov and A. G. Galashina, “The structure of dependent relationships between neurons in the sensorimotor cortex of the left and right hemispheres in rabbits during immobilization catatonia,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 53, No. 4, 428–436 (2003).
O. M. Grindel, S. G. Gershman, G. N. Boldyreva, E. M. Bakar, Z. A. Malina, I. S. Dobronravova, and N. S. Glakina, “Intercenter relationships in the human cerebral cortex based on spectral coherence and phase spectral data,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 23, No. 4, 771–780 (1973).
E. V. Gubler and A. A. Genkin, Use of Nonparametric Statistical Tests in Medical and Biological Studies [in Russian], Meditsina, Leningrad (1973).
O. V. Krasnoperov and A. L. Panchenko, “Neurophysiological, behavioral, and humoral correlates of ‘animal hypnosis,’” Usp. Fiziol. Nauk., 22, No. 2, 90–102 (1991).
I. P. Levshina, A. B. Bogdanov, A. G. Galashina, and N. N. Shuikin, “Characteristics of external respiration as a measure of the state of ‘animal hypnosis’ in rabbits,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 54, No. 3, 420–424 (2004).
E. S. Moniava, The Influences of the Thalamic Nuclei on Brain Activity [in Russian], Metsniereba, Tbilisi (1985).
R. A. Pavlygina, A. K. Malikova, and Ya. Khori, “Analysis of power spectra and biopotentials coherence spectra in the neocortex during formation of a posture dominant,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 29, No. 6, 1293–1302 (1979).
R. A. Pavlygina, E. V. Rusinova, G. Ya. Roshchina, V. I. Koroleva, V. I. Davydov, A. V. Bogdanov, and A. G. Galashina, “The nature of animal hypnosis,” in: Questions in Neurocybernetics [in Russian], Rostov University, Rostov-on-Don, Vol. 1, pp. 69–72 (2005).
R. A. Pavlygina, V. S. Rusinov, and S. S. Sokolov, “Brain electrical activity during behavior directed to terminating a dominant,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 33, No. 2, 344–354 (1983).
D. I. Paikin, Neurophysiological Mechanisms of Hypnotization in Rabbits by Immobilization [in Russian], Author’s Abstract of Master’s Thesis in Medical Sciences, Institute of Higher Nervous Activity and Neurophysiology (1971).
E. V. Petrova, Functional Interhemisphere Asymmetry in the Brains of Rabbits and Rats in the State of Immobilization Catalepsy [in Russian], Author’s Abstract of Master’s Thesis in Biological Sciences, Institute of Higher Nervous Activity and Neurophysiology (1990).
G. Ya. Roshchina, E. V. Rusinova, and V. I. Davydov, “Asymmetry in brain electrical processes during the phenomenon of ‘animal hypnosis’ in rabbits,” Dokl. Ros. Akad. Nauk., 376, No. 4, 556–557 (2001).
V. S. Rusinov, The Dominant [in Russian], Meditsina, Moscow (1969).
V. S. Rusinov, “The polarization-electrotonic hypothesis of the formation of simple types of temporal associations,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 29, No. 2, 457–466 (1979).
V. S. Rusinov, O. M. Grindel, G. N. Boldyreva, and E. M. Vakar, “Symmetry and stability of EEG spectra in healthy human,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 26, No. 3, 576–586 (1976).
E. V. Rusinova, “EEG coherence analysis in ‘animal hypnosis’ trace processes in rabbits,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 44, No. 3, 541–547 (1994).
E. V. Rusinova, “The effects of ‘animal hypnosis’ on the motor polarization dominant in rabbits,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 45, No. 1, 132–139 (1995).
E. V. Rusinova, “Asymmetry of brain electrical processes in the rabbit forelimb during ‘animal hypnosis,’” in: Structural-Functional and Neurochemical Patterns of Brain Asymmetry and Plasticity [in Russian], Institute of the Brain, Russian Academy of Medical Sciences, Moscow (2006), pp. 261–264.
P. V. Simonov, “The nature and physiological mechanisms of ‘animal hypnosis,’” in: Brain and Behavior [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1990), pp. 16–22.
A. A. Ukhtomskii, The Dominant [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow, Leningrad (1966).
A. N. Shepovalnikov, M. N. Tsitseroshin, V. P. Rozhkov, E. I. Galperina, L. G. Zaitseva, and R. A. Shepovalnikova, “Characteristics of inter-regional interactions between cortical fields in different states of natural and hypnotic sleep (EEG data),” Fiziol. Cheloveka, 31, No. 2, 34–48 (2005).
G. Carli, “Animal hypnosis: an attempt to reach a definition,” Arch. Ital. Biol., 120, No. 1–3, 138–159 (1982).
L. F. Da Silva and L. Manescal-de-Oliveira, “Cholinergic modulation of tonic immobility and nociception in the NRM of guinea pig,” Physiol. Behav., 87, No. 4, 821–827 (2006).
L. F. Da Silva and L. Manescal-de-Oliveira, “Role of opioidergic and GABAergic neurotransmission of the nucleus raphe magnus in the modulation of tonic immobility in guinea pig,” Physiol. Behav., 72, No. 1, 25–31 (2007).
M. Fujishita, T. Hisamitzu, and C. Takeshigi, “Role of animal hypnosis,” Brain Res. Bull., 27, No. 1, 59–62 (1991).
T. Hisamitsu, M. Fujishita, and C. Takeshige, “Inhibition of animal hypnosis and enhancement of flexor muscle activity by microinjection of serotonin to animal hypnosis center in brain stem,” Jap. J. Physiol., 40, Supplement, 211 (1990).
W. R. Klemm, “Behavioral inhibition,” in: Brainstem Mechanisms of Behavior [in Russian], W. R. Klemm and R. P. Vertes (eds.), John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York (1990), pp. 497–533.
C. R. Leite-Panissi, A. A. Ferrerese, A. L. Terzian, and L. Manescalde-Oliveira, “Serotoninergic activation of the basolateral amygdala and modulation of tonic immobility in guinea pig,” Brain Res. Bull., 69, No. 4, 356–364 (2006).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Translated from Zhurnal Vysshei Nervnoi Deyatel’nosti imeni I. P. Pavlova, Vol. 59, No. 2, pp. 171–179, March–April, 2009.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rusinova, E.V., Davydov, V.I. Dynamics of Changes in Electrical Activity in the Rabbit Cerebral Cortex during Sequential Sessions of “Animal Hypnosis”. Neurosci Behav Physi 40, 471–478 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-010-9283-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-010-9283-7