Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Oct 14;24(1):224.
doi: 10.1186/s12934-025-02848-0.

Uncoupling protein production from growth: different strategies for intracellular and secreted proteins in yeast

Affiliations

Uncoupling protein production from growth: different strategies for intracellular and secreted proteins in yeast

Nuran Temelli et al. Microb Cell Fact. .

Abstract

Background: Precision fermentation offers a sustainable alternative production route for proteins but still suffers from moderate productivities and low yields. Especially compared to biomass yields, recombinant protein yields on substrate are very low. Uncoupling recombinant protein production from growth would allow higher product yields, but requires that productivity is maintained. So far, two-phase production processes mostly rely on inducers to activate recombinant protein production after an initial growth phase, e.g., a change in carbon source. On large scale, specific growth rates can be controlled by nutrient availability, and we aim to use this as trigger to uncouple recombinant protein production from growth.

Results: We investigated the correlation between low specific growth rates (0.02 h- 1 < µ < 0.1 h- 1) and specific recombinant protein production rates, both for intracellularly accumulating and secreted proteins. By comparing two differently regulated promoters, the strong, constitutive PTEF1 and stress-induced PHSP12, we show that recombinant protein production rates and yields in Saccharomyces cerevisiae can be partially uncoupled from growth. The optimal strategy thereby differs for intracellular and secreted production. The PHSP12 resulted in increased product yields of intracellular protein at very low growth rates, including a 10-fold increase in intracellular protein titer, while titers remained virtually constant for the benchmark PTEF1. The PTEF1 on the other hand led to increased protein secretion rates and efficiencies at lower specific growth rates cumulating in higher extracellular protein titers.

Conclusion: Our results demonstrate that promoter selection plays a critical role in production performance under slow growing conditions. Moreover, it highlights that optimising intracellular and extracellular recombinant protein production requires distinct, strategy-specific approaches.

Keywords: General stress response; Growth uncoupling; Protein secretion limitation; Recombinant protein production; Slow growth; Yeast.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Not applicable. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Protein expression and growth characteristics of ScNti001 during fed-batch cultivation. a Cellular fluorescence intensity (a.u./cell) (left axis) - normalized to the average value (a.u./cell) at the start of feeding phase - and growth rate (h− 1) (continuous line, right) over time; b Specific protein production rate (qp) (a.u./g/h) - normalized to the average value (a.u./g/h) at the start of feeding phase - throughout the cultivation, dashed lines correspond to linear regression results; c Intracellular fluorescent protein titer (a.u./L) as function of fed-batch culture age; d Protein yield on glucose (a.u./g) at different growth rates – normalized to the average value (in a.u./g) at the start of feeding phase -. Green open triangles represent PTEF1-driven ymNeongreen; red closed circles indicate PHSP12 -driven mRuby2. See materials and methods for more details on normalization and units
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Histograms of intracellular fluorescence intensities per cell for strain ScNti001 during fed-batch cultivation. a ymNeongreen and (b) mRuby2 fluorescence intensities (a.u.) per cell. Y-axes indicate numbers of cells (per 10000) per time point. Corresponding growth rates are indicated as well. Data are shown for one culture, data for the replicate are shown in supplementary Fig. 2. Background control refers to data from S. cerevisiae strain CEN.PK 113- 7D that does not express any fluorescent proteins
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Impact of promoter type on protein (ymNeongreen) secretion efficiency under slow-growing conditions. a Extracellular protein titer (left axis) (a.u./L) – normalized to the average value (a.u./L) for both strains at the start of the feeding phase - and growth rate (right axis, continuous lines) during fed-batch cultivation; b specific secretion rate at different growth rates (a.u./g/h) normalized to the average value at the start of feeding phase; c intracellular protein titers (a.u./L) - normalized to the average value (a.u./L) for both strains at the start of the feeding phase; d intracellular specific protein production rate (a.u./g/h) normalized to the average value at the start of feeding phase. Dark green triangles represent ScNTp001 (PTEF1); light green circles indicate ScNTp002 (PHSP12). Data for two replicates (open and closed symbols) are shown. See materials and methods for more details on normalization and units
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
a Specific secretion rates (qP ex ) versus specific intracellular protein production rates (qP); b. Specific secretion rates (qPex) as function of average intracellular protein levels (intensity). Triangles in dark green represent ScNTp001 (P TEF1); the circles in light green indicate ScNTp002 (PHSP12). Data for two replicates (open and closed symbols) are shown

References

    1. Nielsen MB, Meyer AS, Arnau J. The next food revolution is here: Recombinant microbial production of milk and egg proteins by precision fermentation. Annual Rev Food Sci Technol. 2024;15:173–87. - PubMed
    1. Boender LGM, De Hulster EAF, Van Maris AJA, Daran-Lapujade PAS, Pronk JT. Quantitative physiology of Saccharomyces cerevisiae at near-zero specific growth rates. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009;75:5607–14. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pirt SJ. Maintenance energy: a general model for energy-limited and energy-sufficient growth. Arch Microbiol. 1982;133:300–2. - PubMed
    1. Vos T, de la Torre Cortés P, van Gulik WM, Pronk JT, Daran-Lapujade P. Growth-rate dependency of de Novo Resveratrol production in Chemostat cultures of an engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain. Microb Cell Fact. 2015;14:1–15. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ercan O, Bisschops MMM, Overkamp W, Jørgensen TR, Ram AF, Smid EJ, et al. Physiological and transcriptional responses of different industrial microbes at near-zero specific growth rates. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2015;81:5662–70. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources