Skip to main content
BMC is moving to Springer Nature Link. Visit this journal in its new home.

Intracranial Pressure and Vascular Aging: A Narrative Review on its Role in Monitoring Cognitive Decline

Abstract

Vascular aging is closely associated with the development of cardiovascular disease and cognitive impairment and is a determining factor in overall morbidity and mortality. The continued presence of modifiable risk factors, such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, obesity, and a sedentary lifestyle, accelerates this process and contributes to its complications. In this context, arteriosclerosis and atherosclerosis play a central role in the loss of arterial elasticity, increasing susceptibility to cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events. Arterial stiffness, measured by pulse wave velocity, has been correlated with the risk of dementia and cognitive decline, highlighting the need for early intervention. In addition, monitoring intracranial pressure has emerged as a potential biomarker for assessing the impact of vascular aging on the brain, helping to preserve brain integrity and prevent cognitive impairment. In this narrative review, we discuss the pathophysiological mechanisms of vascular aging and their relationship with pulse wave velocity, as well as explore intracranial pressure monitoring as a possible marker for the progression of cerebral vascular aging and its impact on cognitive function.

1 Background

In an aging population scene, cardiovascular disease (CVD) compromises the quality of life of millions of people [1]. The relationship between cardiovascular disease and vascular aging is complex and multifaceted, involving processes such as arteriosclerosis and atherosclerosis, which promote progressive damage to arterial structure and function [2]. These alterations not only contribute to the occurrence of cardiovascular outcomes but also play a central role in the development of cognitive decline and dementia, conditions of increasing global relevance [3, 4].

Despite advances in understanding the pathophysiological mechanism of CVD, important gaps remain, especially regarding the early identification and management of accelerated vascular aging (AVA). Recent studies suggest that early interventions may offer a unique opportunity to prevent cardiovascular and neurological complications in the medium and long term [5, 6].

During vascular aging, arteries lose elasticity and become stiffer, and this arterial stiffening can be quantified by pulse wave velocity (PWV). Increased PWV reflects systemic arterial stiffness, which can compromise cerebral autoregulation and intensify pulsatile flow in the cerebral microcirculation [7, 8]. These changes can reduce intracranial compliance, although the relationship between arterial stiffness and intracranial pressure (ICP) is still under investigation. Increased ICP, in turn, decreases cerebral perfusion pressure, favoring the development of neurological dysfunctions, including cognitive impairment and vascular dementia [9]. In addition, evidence indicates that increased PWV may be associated with reduced cerebral blood flow and worsened cognitive performance, especially in areas such as memory and executive functions [10,11,12,13].

The recent ability to non-invasively monitor intracranial compliance it possible to use it as a cerebral vital sign, supporting its potential as a biomarker for vascular brain aging and related structural damage. In light of this, the aim of this review was to explore the mechanism underlying vascular aging and its relationship with pulse wave velocity, as well as to explore ICP monitoring as a possible biomarker for the progress of cerebral vascular aging and its impact on cognitive function. By addressing cardiovascular risk factors, cardiovascular risk biomarkers, and potential cardiovascular assessment strategies, we aim to contribute to a better understanding of the possibilities that permeate prevention and treatment, mitigating the impacts of CVD on global health.

2 Methods

A narrative approach was used in this review, allowing for a synthesis of relevant evidence on the relationship between vascular aging, pulse wave velocity, cognitive decline, and intracranial pressure. The information collected was organized systematically to build a cohesive and comprehensive narrative. The bibliographic search was carried out in the PubMed/MedLine, Scopus, and SciELO databases using the following descriptors: arterial hypertension, arterial stiffness, pulse wave velocity, aging, vascular aging, intracranial hypertension, intracranial pressure, cognitive decline, and cognition. Boolean operators (AND, OR, and NOT) were used to refine the results. Articles published up to December 2024 in English or Portuguese were included. In addition, a manual search was conducted in the reference lists of the selected studies to identify additional potentially relevant publications.

3 Main Text

3.1 Vascular Aging

3.1.1 Epidemiology

CVD continue to be the leading cause of death worldwide, producing significant morbidity and high costs for health services [14]. It is estimated that CVD are responsible for more than 40 million years lost due to disability each year, and this figure has doubled in the last two decades and may rise as a result of population growth and global aging [15].

Among the elderly population, CVD and cerebrovascular disease are the main causes of morbidity and disability. In addition to the impact of biological aging on age-related macrovascular diseases, the growing importance attributed to associated microvascular pathologies stands out [16]. Evidence suggests that up to 48% of dementias could be prevented by controlling risk factors [17]. Studies indicate that CVD subclinical lesions and cognitive decline begin decades before clinical events, offering a window for early interventions [5].

Identifying and treating Early Vascular Aging (EVA) is critical for primordial prevention. In. this context, it is important to understand this concept as the deterioration in arterial structure and function leading to damage of the heart, brain, kidney, and other organs. Many cardiovascular risk factors, along with genetic predisposition, can accelerate and promote EVA (Fig. 1)[18].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Source: Climie et al., 2023

Factors contributing to why some people display early EVA compared to others. IFG impaired fasting glucose, IGT impaired glucose tolerance.

3.2 Physiopathology

3.2.1 Vascular Aging and the Process of Atherosclerosis

This process of vascular aging involves structural and functional changes in the artery wall, associated with arteriosclerosis and atherosclerosis mechanism [19]. While arteriosclerosis refers to the general stiffening and loss of elasticity of arteries and atherosclerosis involves the buildup of plaques within the arterial wall, physiological vascular aging encompasses both processes but can also occur independently as part of normal aging, even in the absence of overt cardiovascular disease.

In atherosclerosis, there is a predominant impairment on the medium tunic, characterized by the replacement of elastin fibers for collagen, destruction of muscle fibers, and calcium deposition. These changes lead to arterial stiffness, reducing the damping capacity of pulsatile blood flow and causing damage to target organs [2, 20]. Increased arterial stiffness mainly affects organs with higher blood flow demand and low resistance, such as the brain and kidneys, and can result in cerebral damage (cognitive impairment/dementia) and the progression of chronic kidney disease [21, 22].

In atherosclerosis, there is a progressive accumulation of inflammatory and immune cells, smooth muscle cells, lipids, and connective tissue in the intimal of medium and large-caliber arteries. This process leads to the narrowing of the arterial lumen and increased arterial stiffness, especially in the older and calcified atherosclerotic plaques, which in combination with local thrombotic phenomena result in clinical events [23].

Arteriosclerosis and atherosclerosis, although different, are linked anatomically and functionally [24, 25], often coexisting in a vicious cycle in which increased arterial stiffness precedes and promotes the progression of atherosclerosis [26,27,28].

Arterial stiffness analysis has been used as a tool to detect AVA early and identify individuals who are more susceptible to cardiovascular risk factors [29]. Early interventions and prevention strategies focused on risk factors can help to mitigate the effects of vascular stiffness triggered by AVA (Fig. 2) [6, 18].

Fig. 2
figure 2

Source: Bruno et al (2020)

Phenotypes of vascular aging. For a substantially similar vascular age and cardiovascular (CV) risk profile (solid arrows), EVA individuals are significantly younger and supernormal vascular aging (SUPERNOVA) are significantly older than the normal vascular aging (VA) aging group. As a consequence, SUPERNOVA subjects have the largest difference between chronological and vascular age (Δ-age,); conversely, EVA subjects have negative Δ-age. This translates into a lower rate of CV events in SUPERNOVA subjects, and a higher rate in EVA subjects; in other words, Δ-age is inversely associated with CV events.

3.3 Risk Factors for Early Vascular Aging and Cardiovascular Disease

3.3.1 Non-modifiable

Genetic and epigenetic factors significantly influence the morbidity and mortality associated with CVD [30,31,32,33]. However, a meta-analysis with twins revealed that genetics is responsible for only 20–30% of the variability in life expectancy, indicating that environmental and behavioral factors play a predominant role in this process.

3.4 Modifiable

The environment influences vascular aging from the intrauterine period onwards, with the impact of the parents’ lifestyle modifying the health of their offspring in the long term [34, 35].

Factors such as a balanced diet, physical exercise, smoking cessation, and alcohol control are essential for preventing CVD. Diets based on vegetables and unprocessed foods, such as the Mediterranean diet, are associated with healthy vascular aging [33]. Sedentarism is also a major risk factor, and even small amounts of exercise reduce CVD and mortality [36, 37].

Hypertension (HT) stands out as a crucial factor in increasing arterial stiffness [21]. It is suggested that an increase in blood pressure (BP) occurs to compensate for the deleterious effects of hypertrophy on the arterial wall [38]. The progressive increase in arterial stiffness with advancing age has been parallel to the increase in BP. If the increase in wall stress persists, as in the presence of HT, we will have remodeling arterial wall remodeling [39, 40].

In addition, growing evidence suggests that there is a vicious cycle between hyperglycemia, metabolic syndrome, and arterial stiffness, resulting in AVA in individuals with diabetes and metabolic syndrome [2, 20]. Furthermore, obesity influences measures of vascular age, including arterial stiffness and markers of inflammation, as well as representing a risk factor for type 2 diabetes, impacting increased CVD-related mortality [41], which is worrying given the obesity pandemic present in the world today [31].

Diseases with chronic inflammation (such as autoimmune disease) are known to accelerate the atherosclerosis process and are also associated with an accelerated arterial stiffening process [42].

Other factors that influence aging and longevity can also be mentioned, for example, air quality, household air pollution, quality and duration of sleep, physiological factors, and socioeconomic status [43,44,45,46].

3.5 Vascular Aging Phenotypes

Individual variability in vascular aging reflects differences in the mechanisms involved, leading to the concept of biological aging, which is distinct from chronological aging. While chronological aging refers only to the passage of time, biological aging is related to the decline of organic function. Individuals with EVA have more CVD risk and early mortality, while those with normal aging or supernormal aging (Fig. 2) tend to be longer-lived [47, 48]. Also important to understand the ADAM concept, meaning that adequate and early interventions may counteract the process involved in the EVA syndrome (fig. 3) [18].

Fig. 3
figure 3

Source: Nilsson, Boutouyrie, and Laurent (2009).

Time course for the development of EVA and start of intervention with ADAM in patients at increased cardiovascular risk.

Biomarkers that truly reflect the state of vascular aging are needed to improve the early detection of individuals at high risk of developing CVD. These must surpass chronological age as determinants of morbidity and mortality. In addition, their quantification must be easy, safe, and non-invasive [49].

3.6 Assessment Methods

When assessing arterial stiffness, the important variables are central systolic BP (cSBP), central pulse pressure (cPPP), Augmentation Index (Aix), and PWV.

cSBP is an indicator of left ventricular ejection pressure, with a proven association with future cardiovascular events [29, 37, 50]. PPc is the difference between PASc and central diastolic BP (cPAD), representing the pulsatile component of hemodynamics [51, 52]. The Aix represents the amplitude of the reflected wave, influenced by the stiffness of the small arteries. It is an alternative index derived from the analysis of the central aortic pressure curve and quantifies the effect of wave reflection, as shown in Fig. 4 [51,52,53,54].

Fig. 4
figure 4

Source: Ghiadoni et al (2009)

Graph representing blood pressure curves and Augmentation index. Central blood pressure wave and calculation of the augmentation index (AIx). AIx is the ratio between augmented pressure (AP) and pulse pressure (PP). AP is the increase of systolic pressure due to the reflected wave; it is calculated as the difference between the second systolic peak (P2) and the first systolic peak (P1). [44]

PWV is a simple, non-invasive biomarker and can be considered the gold standard for measuring arterial stiffness and can be inferred as subclinical target organ damage associated with increased cardiovascular risk [55].

3.7 Pulse Wave Velocity

The PWV is a biomarker widely recognized for arterial stiffness and cardiovascular risk [56,57,58]. Studies indicate that carotid-femoral PWV values above 10 m/s or above the 90th percentile of the distribution are considered high-risk markers [59].

The PWV is measured using transducers placed on the skin at the prominence of the right common carotid artery and the right femoral artery. The device calculates the time interval between the start of the carotid wave and the start of the femoral wave, which using the measurement of the distance between the transducers then gives the aortic PWV.

Arterial stiffening causes the ejection of blood from the left ventricle (LV) to generate a pressure wave of greater amplitude in the aorta than in the LV, due to a decrease in aortic compliance. Another effect that can be observed is that with increased arterial stiffness there is an increase in the speed of pulse wave propagation through the aorta and large arteries [60].

In hypertensive patients, significant changes in the stiffness of the large arteries are observed, while the small cerebral vessels do not show such obvious structural changes [61]. Thus, the association between HT and brain damage is attributed to molecular, structural, and mechanical factors that compromise the cerebral blood flow (CBF) autoregulation mechanism [62].

The reduction in the contractile capacity of cerebral vascular smooth muscle cells, often related to aging, results in an imbalance between perfusion pressure and cerebral vascular resistance. This phenomenon amplifies the transmission of pulsatile energy and favors the occurrence of microvascular injuries [8, 62].

Increased pulse pressure, characteristic of states of high arterial stiffness, is associated with mechanical stress on the cerebral microcirculation, exposing the brain parenchyma to a greater risk of injury (Fig. 5) [63]. Furthermore, in hypertensive patients, the BP variability correlates with worse cognitive performance, as observed in prospective studies with many years of follow-up [64, 65].

Fig. 5
figure 5

Source: Toth et al (2017)

Age-related autoregulatory dysfunction exacerbates hypertension-induced cerebromicrovascular injury. Shown is a schematic illustration of the likely consequences of autoregulatory dysfunction in the aging brain. The model proposed implies that in healthy young organisms pressure-induced myogenic constriction of the proximal cerebral arteries acts as a critical homeostatic mechanism that assures that increased arterial pressure does not penetrate the distal portion of the microcirculation and cause damage to the thin-walled arteriolar and capillary microvessels in the brain (103, 147). In aging, proximal resistance arteries lose their capability to adapt to hypertension with an enhanced pressure-induced constriction, which leads to a mismatch in perfusion pressure and segmental vascular resistance (resistance is inversely related to the 4th power of vessel radius). Lack of proper autoregulatory protection in aging likely allows high blood pressure to penetrate the vulnerable downstream portion of the cerebral microcirculation. The hemodynamic burden exacerbates age-related disruption of the blood–brain barrier (BBB), leading to extravasation of plasma factors, which promote neuroinflammation (e.g., activation of microglia by IgG via the IgG Fc receptors). Microglia-derived proinflammatory cytokines, chemokines, proteases [i.e., matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)], and reactive oxygen species (ROS) promote neuronal damage (273, 281). In addition, the increased microvascular pressure activates matrix metalloproteinases in the vascular wall in a redox-sensitive manner, contributing to the development of microhemorrhages (276). The age-related autoregulatory dysfunction and its consequences may also contribute to the dysfunction of the glymphatic system (128, 148), and the development of age-related vascular rarefaction (281). We posit that exacerbation of neuroinflammation, cerebral microhemorrhages, glymphatics dysfunction, and/or microvascular rarefaction are causally linked to hypertension-induced cognitive impairment in aging (85, 210, 285) and contribute to the increased prevalence of Alzheimer’s disease in hypertensive elderly individuals. Bottom: representative images showing cerebral microhemorrhages (brown lesions after diaminobenzidine–hematoxylin staining, scale bar200 m) in the brain of aged (24-month old) hypertensive mice, which associate with autoregulatory dysfunction. Note that most hypertension-induced microhemorrhages are located in the cortical and subcortical region. Hypertension was induced in the mice by treatment with angiotensin II and the nitric oxide synthase inhibitor nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME). [54]

Evidence suggests that high PWV plays a crucial role in the development of brain lesions, such as lacunar infarcts (LI), microhemorrhages, and damage to cerebral white matter, as well as being associated with dementia and reduced cognitive function (Fig. 6) [21, 66,67,68].

Fig. 6
figure 6

Source: Toth et al (2017)

Functional vascular contributions to cognitive impairment and dementia in aging. The schematic representation illustrates the interrelated microvascular mechanisms that contribute to age-related cognitive decline. The model highlights that age-related IGF-1 deficiency compromises the neurovascular unit, impairing the function of astrocytes, endothelial cells, and smooth muscle cells. The resulting endothelial dysfunction and decreased no bioavailability, increased oxidative stress, and/or dysregulation of astrocytic mediators contribute to neurovascular uncoupling, which impairs cognitive function due to inadequate supply of oxygen and nutrients to active brain regions. Age-related impairment of microvascular homeostasis, including alterations of myogenic autoregulatory mechanisms, renders the aged brain more susceptible to damage induced by comorbid conditions such as hypertension. In particular, the model predicts that impaired myogenic adaptation to hypertension promotes both the pathogenesis of cerebral microhemorrhages and blood–brain-barrier disruption, contributing to neuronal damage and cognitive decline. Aging and age-related IGF-1 deficiency also promote structural remodeling of the cerebral microcirculation, including microvascular rarefaction, contributing to an age-related decline in cerebral blood flow. They also promote structural maladaptation to hypertension, increasing microvascular fragility. Additionally, age-related microvascular proinflammatory alterations, impairment of vascular clearance of toxic waste products (such as A␤) and metabolic by-products from the brain parenchyma and impaired trophic function of the microvascular endothelium that regulate stem cell self-renewal and differentiation in neurogenic niches could be implicated in impaired cognitive function. [54]

Neuroimaging studies show that hypertensive patients with higher PWV have a greater extent of white matter and silent LI [69]. An analysis involving more than 7.000 individuals in the Framingham Study, with an average follow-up of 15 years, demonstrated that PWV has an independent predictive value for dementia, transient ischemic attack, and stroke [10]. Similarly, the Toledo Study for Healthy Aging identified a correlation between high PWV (baseline values of 13–18 m/s) and progressive worsening in cognitive performance after 3–4 years of follow-up [11].

A post hoc analysis of 8563 patients from SPRINT-MIND (Memory and Cognition in Decreased Hypertension) showed that the estimated PWV had an independent predictive value for cognitive alterations (probable dementia or mild cognitive impairment) in hypertensive patients. In addition, patients who responded to intensive treatment for HT (assessed by PWV) had a lower risk of cognitive alterations, suggesting that the PWV estimate could be used as a potential tool for assessing antihypertensive treatment [12].

Data from ELSA-Brazil (Longitudinal Study of Adult Health) also reinforces the impact of high baseline arterial stiffness on the rate of cognitive decline. In a cohort of 6.927 individuals with a mean age of 58.8 years, high carotid-femoral PWV was found to be associated with low performance in verbal fluency and memory tests, regardless of systolic BP [13].

Therefore, PWV analysis stands out as an essential tool in the early identification of cognitive alterations related to vascular aging and HT. Its clinical use makes it possible not only to monitor the progression of arterial stiffness but also to implement preventive strategies to minimize the impact of associated cardiovascular and neurological conditions, such as dementia and cognitive decline.

3.8 Vascular Aging and Decline Cognitive

The prevalence of dementia increases exponentially with advancing age, from 5% at the age of 65 to 20% at the age of 80 and 40% at the age of 90, which highlights the significant impact of this condition. Between 1990 and 2016, the global prevalence of the syndrome grew by 117%, making it the fifth leading cause of death worldwide. In 2019, it was estimated that 55 million people in the world were living with dementia [70, 71].

In Brazil, data from the ELSI-Brazil study indicated a prevalence of dementia of 5.8% among individuals aged 60 and over [71]. Population studies show that this prevalence increases progressively with age, ranging from 3.2% to 5.3% in the 60–64 age group and reaching up to 71.4% among individuals aged over 90.

Cognitive impairment, characterized by memory loss, learning difficulties, and reduced ability to concentrate, can range from mild deficits, often not clinically detectable, to dementia. The latter is defined as a syndrome characterized by cognitive decline, with or without behavioral changes, which interferes with activities of daily living (ADLs), provided it is not associated with psychiatric disorders or delirium [72]. The clinical spectrum includes subjective cognitive decline (SCD), which presents memory complaints without changes in neuropsychological tests; mild cognitive impairment (MCI), in which there is cognitive impairment without significant impairment of ADLs; and dementia, in which the decline interferes with the individual’s independence [73,74,75].

Vascular aging plays a fundamental role in the genesis of cognitive deficits and the risk of dementia, due to a complex interaction of pathophysiological mechanisms [76]. The relationship between microcirculation and macrocirculation forms a vicious cycle in which damage to the small arteries increases peripheral resistance, raising mean arterial pressure and causing hardening of the large arteries. This process promotes higher central systolic pressure, perpetuating damage to target organs, and increasing the risk of cardiovascular and neurological complications [77].

Arterial stiffness has been consistently associated with mild cognitive impairment and dementia [78]. In the ARIC-NCS study of 3550 participants, elevated PWV was related to a higher prevalence of dementia, while elevated cPP showed an association with both dementia and MCI [4]. Macrostructural and microstructural brain damage, as well as diseases of the small cerebral vessels, are often identified before the onset of dementia-related diseases such as Alzheimer’s and other types of cognitive decline. This condition is also related to a reduction in gray matter volume and indicators of microvascular diseases, such as white matter hyperintensities, microbleeds, and LI [69, 79].

Studies such as the “Nuns’ Study” reinforce the role of cerebrovascular diseases in the clinical manifestation of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Elderly women with cerebral infarcts associated with AD showed worse cognitive function compared to those without infarcts [80].

Notably, evidence suggests that up to 40% of dementia cases could be prevented by addressing modifiable risk factors, with HT being the main cardiovascular factor. It is argued that up to half of Alzheimer’s patients have cerebrovascular lesions [81, 82]. AH in middle age is associated with changes in memory, executive function, and global cognition, due to increased pulsatile stress and vascular remodeling [83,84,85].

A systematic review and meta-analysis highlighted that white matter hyperintensities (WMH), LI, and cerebral microhemorrhages (CMB) are widely prevalent markers in the population and are strongly associated with a significant increase in the risk of stroke, dementia, and mortality. A high burden of WMH, LI, and CMB was related to a twofold increased risk of ischemic stroke and a threefold increased risk of hemorrhagic stroke. In addition, the significant presence of WMH was associated with an increased risk of dementia and Alzheimer’s disease, with risk ratios ranging from 1.5 to 1.8. Likewise, high loads of these markers were correlated with an increase in mortality, with risk ratios between 1.5 and 2.0 [86].

Recent research indicates a significant relationship between vascular risk factors and biomarkers such as beta-amyloid protein (Aβ) and phosphorylated tau (p-tau), both pathological elements of AD. These biomarkers precede alterations such as brain atrophy and the development of cognitive impairment [87]. Evidence shows that arterial stiffness is associated with the extent and progression of Aβ plaques in the brain, as assessed by positron emission tomography in older adults without signs of dementia [88]. These associations have been confirmed in studies with diverse populations, showing consistency in both white and black older adults [89].

These findings highlight the importance of arteriosclerosis over atherosclerosis as the main therapeutic target for preventing cerebrovascular disease and cognitive decline, to preserve the structural and functional integrity of the brain. The robustness of the evidence linking arterial stiffness to dementia highlights the need for further research, such as clinical trials, to explore the links between the progression of arterial stiffness and the onset of dementia. This reinforces the central role of arterial stiffness in understanding the mechanisms that lead to cognitive decline.

3.9 Intracranial Pressure

Cerebral vascular aging has been evaluated as a relevant factor in cognitive decline and the development of dementia. Despite the relevance of this relationship for understanding these diseases, there is still no specific biomarker to quantify cerebral vascular aging. This gap is remarkable, considering that vascular aging is not restricted to structural changes in the vessels, but also affects important functions such as CBF and vascular stiffness, with a direct impact on ICP.

ICP can be elevated due to impaired cerebral autoregulation resulting from vascular aging. Arterial stiffness, often observed with advancing age, reduces the ability of vessels to adapt to pressure variations, compromising cerebral autoregulation and constant CBF [64]. This loss of vascular elasticity makes the brain more susceptible to pressure variations, increasing ICP and, consequently, the risk of permanent brain damage, such as cerebral edema and ischemia [88, 90, 91].

In addition, vascular aging can contribute to increased ICP through changes in cerebral microcirculation, such as small vessel disease, which can cause lacunar infarcts and cerebral microhemorrhages [92]. Impairment of the blood–brain barrier (BBB) can also exacerbate the formation of cerebral edema [93]. These cumulative effects promote an increase in ICP and can lead to the development of intracranial hypertension (ICH).

The consequences of ICH on the brain can be severe, including CBF restriction, which can result in permanent neurological damage, such as cognitive and vascular dementia [94]. Other complications include cerebral edema, cerebral herniation, papilledema, ischemia, and symptoms such as severe headaches [95]. Thus, monitoring ICP is relevant, especially in individuals with AVA, since this process compromises both the structure and functionality of cerebral vessels, increasing the risk of serious complications.

Traditional ICP monitoring is carried out invasively in intensive care settings, using intracranial devices which, although accurate, carry significant risks such as infection and bleeding. Non-invasive methods, such as ultrasound of the optic nerve, allow for the pinpoint detection of ICH that has already occurred. However, the brain4care system has emerged as an innovative alternative, capable of monitoring ICP continuously and non-invasively by analyzing micrometric cranial expansions. This method provides detailed data on the morphology of the pressure wave, such as the P2/P1 ratio and peak time, as shown in Fig. 7 [96,97,98].

Fig. 7
figure 7

Source: Based on Ocatomo et al. (2024)

Intracranial hypertension alert flow. P1 peak corresponds to the systolic component of blood pressure, P2 reflects cerebral compliance, and P3 is related to venous blood flow. TTP time to peak, HIC intracranial hypertension. [94]

The ICP wave is made up of three peaks (P1, P2, and P3), which represent different aspects of cerebral hemodynamics. The P1 peak corresponds to the systolic component of BP, P2 reflects cerebral compliance, and P3 is related to venous blood flow. Under normal conditions, the relationship between the peaks is P1>P2>P3 but this relationship changes when cerebral compliance is compromised or ICP rises [99]. Wave morphology analysis could be a promising tool for investigating cerebral vascular aging, integrating intracranial data to develop new diagnostic approaches.

Although there are still no studies that directly relate the behavior of the ICP wave to cerebral vascular aging, evidence suggests that arterial stiffness, measured by PWV, is associated with changes in CBF, which may contribute to increased ICP. A recent study by Liu et al. (2021) showed that arterial stiffness is negatively correlated with CBF in hypertensive men, using magnetic resonance imaging and specialized tools to assess intracranial vascular function [100]. Similar results were observed by Jefferson et al. (2018) and Tarumi et al. (2011), who identified an inverse relationship between carotid-femoral PWV and CBF in patients with no history of cerebrovascular events [101, 102]. Additionally, studies have recently been published showing that increased blood pressure can lead to increased ICP [103,104,105].

In addition, several studies have highlighted the relationship between chronological aging and increased cerebral arterial stiffness [66, 106,107,108,109]. Fico et al (2022) analyzed the impact of age on the cerebral pulsatility index, an important indicator of intracranial compliance in clinical practice [107]. The findings indicated that both age and carotid-femoral PWV are significant predictors of ICP, suggesting that increased ICP may be associated with arterial stiffness and small vessel disease.

Therefore, vascular aging, characterized by arterial stiffness and increased PWV, is directly associated with cognitive decline due to its effects on the cerebral vasculature and neurovascular unit. This results in greater transmission of pulsatile energy to the small vessels of the cerebral microcirculation, causing structural and functional damage such as edema and increased intracranial volume. In addition to this effect, arterial stiffness also compromises cerebral autoregulation, making it difficult to maintain constant blood flow in the face of variations in systemic BP, which can lead to a significant increase in ICP due to small volumetric variations. Thus, PWV is indirectly associated with ICP, and the behavior of the ICP wave could be explored as a potential biomarker to show changes in cerebral compliance.

4 Conclusion

Vascular aging is associated with structural and functional changes in the vasculature, such as increased arterial stiffness and reduced adaptive capacity of blood vessels. These changes can compromise cerebral perfusion and vascular autoregulation, favoring the progression of cognitive dysfunction over time. Arterial stiffness, often assessed by pulse wave velocity, has been linked to changes in cerebral blood flow and can impact both autoregulation and intracranial compliance, which reinforces its possible link with cognitive decline. In this context, the behavior of intracranial pressure could be considered a potential biomarker for monitoring cerebral vascular aging, allowing for a more accurate assessment of brain dynamics. Further studies are needed to deepen this relationship and explore its potential in the early identification of cognitive impairment and in the development of diagnostic and therapeutic strategies to minimize the impacts of vascular aging on the brain.

Availability of Data and Materials

No datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

Abbreviations

BP:

Blood pressure

CVD:

Cardiovascular disease

AVA:

Accelerated vascular aging

EVA:

Early vascular aging

HT:

Hypertension

cPAS:

Central systolic blood pressure

cPP:

Central pulse pressure

Aix:

Augmentation Index

PWV:

Pulse wave velocity

cPAD:

Central diastolic blood pressure

LV:

Left ventricle

ADL:

activities of daily living

MCI:

mild cognitive impairment

ADRD:

Other types of cognitive decline

AD:

Alzheimer disease

WMH:

white matter hyperintensities

LI:

lacunar infarcts

CBF:

Cerebral blood flow

ICP:

Intracranial pressure

BBB:

Blood–brain barrier

ICH:

Intracranial hypertension

References

  1. de Oliveira GMM, Brant LCC, Polanczyk CA, Malta DC, Biolo A, Nascimento BR, et al. Estatística Cardiovascular – Brasil 2023. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2025;121(2): e20240079.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Climie RE, Gallo A, Picone DS, Di Lascio N, van Sloten TT, Guala A, et al. Measuring the interaction between the macro- and micro-vasculature. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2019;6:49878w3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Poels MMF, Van Oijen M, Mattace-Raso FUS, Hofman A, Koudstaal PJ, Witteman JCM, et al. Arterial stiffness, cognitive decline, and risk of dementia: the rotterdam study. Stroke. 2007;38(3):888–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Meyer ML, Palta P, Tanaka H, Deal JA, Wright J, Knopman DS, et al. Association of central arterial stiffness and pressure pulsatility with mild cognitive impairment and dementia. The atherosclerosis risk in communities study - neurocognitive study (ARIC-NCS). J Alzheimers Dis. 2017;57(1):195.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Saeed A, Lopez O, Cohen A, Reis SE. Cardiovascular disease and Alzheimer’s disease: the heart-brain axis. J Am Heart Assoc. 2023;12(21):30780. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.123.030780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bruno RM, Nilsson PM, Engström G, Wadström BN, Empana JP, Boutouyrie P, et al. Early and supernormal vascular aging: clinical characteristics and association with incident cardiovascular events. Hypertension. 2020;76(5):1616–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ungvari Z, Toth P, Tarantini S, Prodan CI, Sorond F, Merkely B, et al. Hypertension-induced cognitive impairment: from pathophysiology to public health. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2021;17(10):639–54.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Toth P, Tarantini S, Csiszar A, Ungvari Z. Functional vascular contributions to cognitive impairment and dementia: mechanisms and consequences of cerebral autoregulatory dysfunction, endothelial impairment, and neurovascular uncoupling in aging. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2017;312(1):H1-20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ocamoto GN, Russo TL, Mendes Zambetta R, Frigieri G, Hayashi CY, Brasil S, et al. Intracranial compliance concepts and assessment: a scoping review. Front Neurol. 2021. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.756112.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Vasan RS, Pan S, Xanthakis V, Beiser A, Larson MG, Seshadri S, et al. Arterial stiffness and long-term risk of health outcomes: the framingham heart study. Hypertension. 2022;79(5):1045–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bareiro FAQ, Carnicero JA, Acha AA, Artalejo CR, Jimenez MCG, Mañas LR, et al. Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity score, an estimator of cognitive performance in the elderly: results from the toledo study for healthy aging. Geroscience. 2024;46(6):5711–23.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Hao P, Feng S, Suo M, Wang S, Zheng K, Wu X. Estimated pulse wave velocity and cognitive outcomes: a post hoc analysis of SPRINT-MIND. Am J Hypertens. 2024;37(7):485–92. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajh/hpae032.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Menezes ST, Giatti L, Colosimo EA, Ribeiro ALP, Brant LCC, Viana MC, et al. Aortic stiffness and age with cognitive performance decline in the elsa-brasil cohort. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.119.013248.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Vaduganathan M, Mensah GA, Turco JV, Fuster V, Roth GA. The global burden of cardiovascular diseases and risk: a compass for future health. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022;80(25):2361–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Brasil - OPAS/OMS | Organização Pan-Americana da Saúde [Internet]. [cited 2025 Mar 5]. Available from: https://www.paho.org/pt/brasil

  16. Ungvari Z, Tarantini S, Sorond F, Merkely B, Csiszar A. Mechanisms of vascular aging, a geroscience perspective: JACC focus seminar. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;75(8):931–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2019.11.061.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Suemoto CK, Mukadam N, Brucki SMD, Caramelli P, Nitrini R, Laks J, et al. Risk factors for dementia in Brazil: Differences by region and race. Alzheimers Dement. 2023;19(5):1849–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Climie RE, Alastruey J, Mayer CC, Schwarz A, Laucyte-Cibulskiene A, Voicehovska J, et al. 2023 Vascular ageing: moving from bench towards bedside. European Journal of Preventive Cardiology. Oxford University Press; 2023. p. 1101–17.

  19. Climie RE, Bruno RM, Hametner B, Mayer CC, Terentes-Printzios D. Vascular age is not only atherosclerosis, it is also arteriosclerosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;76(2):229–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Climie RE, Van Sloten TT, Bruno RM, Taddei S, Empana JP, Stehouwer CDA, et al. Macrovasculature and Microvasculature at the Crossroads Between Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Hypertension. Hypertension. 2019;73(6):1138–49.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. O’Rourke MF, Safar ME. Relationship between aortic stiffening and microvascular disease in brain and kidney: cause and logic of therapy. Hypertension. 2005. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.HYP.0000168052.00426.65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Mitchell GF. Aortic stiffness and cerebral blood flow. Am J Hypertension. 2011;24:1056.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Cecelja M, Jiang B, Bevan L, Frost ML, Spector TD, Chowienczyk PJ. Arterial stiffening relates to arterial calcification but not to noncalcified atheroma in women: a twin study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57(13):1480.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Jankowski P, Kawecka-Jaszcz K, Czarnecka D. Ascending aortic blood pressure waveform is related to coronary atherosclerosis in hypertensive as well as in normotensive subjects. Blood Press. 2007;16(4):246–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Leung MCH, Meredith IT, Cameron JD. Aortic stiffness affects the coronary blood flow response to percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2006. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00380.2005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Oberoi S, Schoepf UJ, Meyer M, Henzler T, Rowe GW, Costello P, et al. Progression of arterial stiffness and coronary atherosclerosis: longitudinal evaluation by cardiac CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013;4:798–804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Stoka KV, Maedeker JA, Bennett L, Bhayani SA, Gardner WS, Procknow JD, et al. Effects of increased arterial stiffness on atherosclerotic plaque amounts. J Biomech Eng. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4039175.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Jaminon A, Reesink K, Kroon A, Schurgers L. The role of vascular smooth muscle cells in arterial remodeling: Focus on calcification-related processes. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(22):5694.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Vlachopoulos C, Aznaouridis K, Stefanadis C. Prediction of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality with arterial stiffness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55(13):1318–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Horvath S, Pirazzini C, Bacalini MG, Gentilini D, Di Blasio AM, Delledonne M, et al. Decreased epigenetic age of PBMCs from Italian semi-supercentenarians and their offspring. Aging. 2015;7(12):1159–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Cheng S, Gupta DK, Claggett B, Sharrett AR, Shah AM, Skali H, et al. Differential influence of distinct components of increased blood pressure on cardiovascular outcomesR3. Hypertension. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.113.01561.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Goel A, Maroules CD, Mitchell GF, Peshock R, Ayers C, McColl R, et al. Ethnic difference in proximal aortic stiffness: an observation from the Dallas heart study. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;10(1):54–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Hjelmborg JB, Iachine I, Skytthe A, Vaupel JW, McGue M, Koskenvuo M, et al. Genetic influence on human lifespan and longevity. Hum Genet. 2006;119(3):312–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Palinski W. Effect of maternal cardiovascular conditions and risk factors on offspring cardiovascular disease. Circulation. 2014;129(20):2066–77. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.001805.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Fleming TP, Watkins AJ, Velazquez MA, Mathers JC, Prentice AM, Stephenson J, et al. Origins of lifetime health around the time of conception: causes and consequences. Lancet. 2018;391(10132):1842–52.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Lee DC, Pate RR, Lavie CJ, Sui X, Church TS, Blair SN. Leisure-time running reduces all-cause and cardiovascular mortality risk. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64(5):472.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Williams B, Mancia G, Spiering W, Rosei EA, Azizi M, Burnier M, et al. 2018 ESC/ESH guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. Eur Heart J. 2018;39(33):3021–104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Laurent S, Boutouyrie P, Lacolley P. Structural and genetic bases of arterial stiffness. Hypertension. 2005;45(6):1050–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Cunha PG, Cotter J, Oliveira P, Vila I, Boutouyrie P, Laurent S, et al. Pulse wave velocity distribution in a cohort study: from arterial stiffness to early vascular aging. J Hypertens. 2015;33(7):1438–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Weber T, Wassertheurer S, O’Rourke MF, Haiden A, Zweiker R, Rammer M, et al. Pulsatile hemodynamics in patients with exertional dyspnea: potentially of value in the diagnostic evaluation of suspected heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61(18):1874–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Webster AC, Nagler EV, Morton RL, Masson P. Chronic kidney disease. Lancet. 2017;389(10075):1238–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Zanoli L, Briet M, Empana JP, Cunha PG, Maki-Petaja KM, Protogerou AD, et al. Vascular consequences of inflammation: a position statement from the ESH Working Group on Vascular Structure and Function and the ARTERY Society. J Hypertens. 2020;38(9):1682–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Mozaffarian D. Dietary and policy priorities for cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and obesity: a comprehensive review. Circulation. 2016;133(2):187–225.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Banks E, Joshy G, Korda RJ, Stavreski B, Soga K, Egger S, et al. Tobacco smoking and risk of 36 cardiovascular disease subtypes: fatal and non-fatal outcomes in a large prospective Australian study. BMC Med. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-019-1351-4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Havakuk O, Rezkalla SH, Kloner RA. The cardiovascular effects of cocaine. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70(1):101–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Bennitt FB, Wozniak S, Causey K, Spearman S, Okereke C, Garcia V, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of household air pollution, 1990–2021: a systematic analysis for the Global burden of disease study 2021. The Lancet. 2025;405(10485):1167–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Savji N, Rockman CB, Skolnick AH, Guo Y, Adelman MA, Riles T, et al. Association between advanced age and vascular disease in different arterial territories: a population database of over 3.6 million subjects. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61(16):1736–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Milan A, Zocaro G, Leone D, Tosello F, Buraioli I, Schiavone D, et al. Current assessment of pulse wave velocity: comprehensive review of validation studies. J Hypertens. 2019;37(8):1547–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Jylhävä J, Pedersen NL, Hägg S. Biological age predictors. EBioMedicine. 2017;21:29–36.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Paiva AMG, Mota-Gomes MA, Brandão AA, Silveira FS, Silveira MS, Okawa RTP, et al. Reference values of office central blood pressure, pulse wave velocity, and augmentation index recorded by means of the Mobil-O-Graph PWA monitor. Hypertens Res. 2020;43(11):1239–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Feitosa AD de M, Barroso WKS, Mion Junior D, Nobre F, Mota-Gomes MA, Jardim PCBV, et al. Diretrizes Brasileiras de Medidas da Pressão Arterial Dentro e Fora do Consultório – 2023. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2024;121(4): e20240113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Markman Filho B, Carlos Sobral Sousa A, Felice Castro Issa A, Ramos Nascimento B, Correa Filho H, Luiz Campos Vieira M, et al. Diretrizes brasileiras de hipertensão arterial-2020 Barroso et al. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2021;116(3):516–658. https://doi.org/10.36660/abc.20201238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Ghiadoni L, Bruno RM, Stea F, Virdis A, Taddei S. Central blood pressure, arterial stiffness, and wave reflection: new targets of treatment in essential hypertension. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2009;11(3):190–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Wilkinson IB, Mohammad NH, Tyrrell S, Hall IR, Webb DJ, Paul VE, et al. Heart rate dependency of pulse pressure amplification and arterial stiffness. Am J Hypertens. 2002;15(1 Pt 1):24–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Mikael L de R, de Paiva AMG, Gomes MM, Sousa ALL, Jardim PCVB, Vitorino PV, De O, et al. Vascular aging and arterial stiffness. ArqBras Cardiol. 2017;109(3):253–8.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Brandão AA, Amodeo C, Alcântara C, Barbosa E, Nobre F, Pinto F, et al. I Posicionamento Luso-Brasileiro de Pressão Arterial Central. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2017;108(2):100–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Townsend RR, Wilkinson IB, Schiffrin EL, Avolio AP, Chirinos JA, Cockcroft JR, et al. Recommendations for improving and standardizing vascular research on arterial stiffness: a scientific statement from the American heart association. Hypertension. 2015;66(3):698–722.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Oliveira AC, Cunha PMGM, de Vitorino PV, O, Souza ALL, Deus GD, Feitosa A, et al. Envelhecimento Vascular e Rigidez Arterial. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2022;119(4):604–15.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Laurent S, Cockcroft J, Van Bortel L, Boutouyrie P, Giannattasio C, Hayoz D, et al. Expert consensus document on arterial stiffness: methodological issues and clinical applications. Eur Heart J. 2006;27(21):2588–605.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. 14-velocidade-onda (1).

  61. Rizzoni D, De Ciuceis C, Porteri E, Paiardi S, Boari GEM, Mortini P, et al. Altered structure of small cerebral arteries in patients with essential hypertension. J Hypertens. 2009;27(4):838–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Ungvari Z, Toth P, Tarantini S, Prodan CI, Sorond F, Merkely B, et al. Hypertension-induced cognitive impairment: from pathophysiology to public health. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2021;17:639.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Coca A, editor. Hypertension and Brain Damage. 2024 Available from: https://link.springer.com/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-64928-8

  64. Avolio A, Kim MO, Adji A, Gangoda S, Avadhanam B, Tan I, et al. Cerebral Haemodynamics: effects of systemic arterial pulsatile function and hypertension. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2018;20(3):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11906-018-0822-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Dhana A, DeCarli CS, Dhana K, Desai P, Evans DA, Rajan KB. Blood pressure variability and cognition in black and white older adults over 18 years of follow-up a population-based cohort study. Neurology. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000210151.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Mitchell GF, Van Buchem MA, Sigurdsson S, Gotal JD, Jonsdottir MK, Kjartansson Ó, et al. Arterial stiffness, pressure and flow pulsatility and brain structure and function: the age gene/environment susceptibility-Reykjavik study. Brain. 2011;134(11):3398–407.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. van Sloten TT, Protogerou AD, Henry RMA, Schram MT, Launer LJ, Stehouwer CDA. Association between arterial stiffness, cerebral small vessel disease and cognitive impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2015;53:121–30.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Amier RP, Marcks N, Hooghiemstra AM, Nijveldt R, van Buchem MA, de Roos A, et al. Hypertensive Exposure Markers by MRI in Relation to Cerebral Small Vessel Disease and Cognitive Impairment. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021;14(1):176–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Henskens LHG, Kroon AA, Van Oostenbrugge RJ, Gronenschild EHBM, Fuss-Lejeune MMJJ, Hofman PAM, et al. Increased aortic pulse wave velocity is associated with silent cerebral small-vessel disease in hypertensive patients. Hypertension. 2008;52(6):1120–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Nichols E, Szoeke CEI, Vollset SE, Abbasi N, Abd-Allah F, Abdela J, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2016. Lancet Neurol. 2019;18(1):88–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Bertola L, Suemoto CK, Aliberti MJR, Gonçalves NG, de Moraes R, Pinho PJ, Castro-Costa E, et al. Prevalence of dementia and cognitive impairment no dementia in a large and diverse nationally representative sample: The ELSI-Brazil study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2023;78(6):1060–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. McKhann GM, Knopman DS, Chertkow H, Hyman BT, Jack CR, Kawas CH, et al. The diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease: recommendations from the national institute on aging-Alzheimer’s association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2011;7(3):263–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Jessen F, Amariglio RE, Van Boxtel M, Breteler M, Ceccaldi M, Chételat G, et al. A conceptual framework for research on subjective cognitive decline in preclinical Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2014;10(6):844.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Petersen RC. Clinical practice Mild cognitive impairment. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(23):2227–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Smid J, Studart-Neto A, César-Freitas KG, Dourado MCN, Kochhann R, Barbosa BJAP, et al. Declínio cognitivo subjetivo, comprometimento cognitivo leve e demência - diagnóstico sindrômico: recomendações do Departamento Científico de Neurologia Cognitiva e do Envelhecimento da Academia Brasileira de Neurologia. Dement Neuropsychol. 2022;16(3):1–24.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Ou YN, Tan CC, Shen XN, Xu W, Hou XH, Dong Q, et al. Blood pressure and risks of cognitive impairment and dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 209 prospective studies. Hypertension. 2020;76(1):217–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Laurent S, Agabiti-Rosei C, Bruno RM, Rizzoni D. Microcirculation and Macrocirculation in Hypertension: a dangerous cross-link? Hypertension. 2022;79(3):479–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Rabkin SW, Jarvie G. Comparison of vascular stiffness in vascular dementia, Alzheimer dementia and cognitive impairment. Blood Press. 2011;20(5):274–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Chirinos JA, Segers P, Hughes T, Townsend R. Large-artery stiffness in health and disease: jacc state-of-the-art review. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;74(9):1237–63.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  80. Mirra SS, Gearing M. Brain infarction and the clinical expression of Alzheimer disease. JAMA. 1997;278(2):113.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Santisteban MM, Iadecola C. Hypertension, dietary salt and cognitive impairment. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2018;38(12):2112–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. Baggeroer CE, Cambronero FE, Savan NA, Jefferson AL, Santisteban MM. Basic Mechanisms of Brain Injury and Cognitive Decline in Hypertension Hypertension. Amsterdam: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2024. p. 34–44.

    Google Scholar 

  83. Joyce OC, McHugh C, Mockler D, Wilson F, Kelly ÁM. Midlife hypertension is a risk factor for some, but not all, domains of cognitive decline in later life: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Hypertens. 2024;42(2):205–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Iadecola C, Gottesman RF. Neurovascular and cognitive dysfunction in hypertension. Circ Res. 2019;124(7):1025–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  85. Iadecola C, Yaffe K, Biller J, Bratzke LC, Faraci FM, Gorelick PB, et al. Impact of Hypertension on Cognitive Function: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Hypertension. 2016;68(6):e67-94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Debette S, Schilling S, Duperron MG, Larsson SC, Markus HS. Clinical Significance of magnetic resonance imaging markers of vascular brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Neurol. 2019;76(1):81–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Jack CR, Bennett DA, Blennow K, Carrillo MC, Dunn B, Haeberlein SB, et al. NIA-AA research framework: toward a biological definition of Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer’s Dementia. 2018;14(4):535–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2018.02.018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Steiner LA, Czosnyka M, Piechnik SK, Smielewski P, Chatfield D, Menon DK, et al. Continuous monitoring of cerebrovascular pressure reactivity allows determination of optimal cerebral perfusion pressure in patients with traumatic brain injury. Crit Care Med. 2002;30(4):733–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Hughes TM, Wagenknecht LE, Craft S, Mintz A, Heiss G, Palta P, et al. Arterial stiffness and dementia pathology: Atherosclerosis risk in communities (ARIC)-PET Study. Neurology. 2018;90(14): e1248.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  90. Ter Minassian A, Dubé L, Guilleux AM, Wehrmann N, Ursino M, Beydon L. Changes in intracranial pressure and cerebral autoregulation in patients with severe traumatic brain injury. Crit Care Med. 2002;30(7):1616–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Czosnyka M, Smielewski P, Piechnik S, Steiner LA, Pickard JD. Cerebral autoregulation following head injury. J Neurosurg. 2001;95(5):756–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Gao Y, Li D, Lin J, Thomas AM, Miao J, Chen D, et al. Cerebral small vessel disease: pathological mechanisms and potential therapeutic targets. Front Aging Neurosci. 2022. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2022.961661.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  93. Hasan-Olive MM, Hansson HA, Enger R, Nagelhus EA, Eide PK. Blood-brain barrier dysfunction in idiopathic intracranial hypertension. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2019;78(9):808–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Ocamoto GN, Russo TL, Mendes Zambetta R, Frigieri G, Hayashi CY, Brasil S, et al. Intracranial compliance concepts and assessment: a scoping review. Front Neurol. 2021. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.756112.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  95. Patel S, Maria-Rios J, Parikh A, Okorie ON. Diagnosis and management of elevated intracranial pressure in the emergency department. Int J Emerg Med. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12245-023-00540-x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  96. Vilela GHF, Cabella B, Mascarenhas S, Czosnyka M, Smielewski P, Dias C, et al. Validation of a new minimally invasive intracranial pressure monitoring method by direct comparison with an invasive technique. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2016;122:97–100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Robba C, Santori G, Czosnyka M, Corradi F, Bragazzi N, Padayachy L, et al. Optic nerve sheath diameter measured sonographically as non-invasive estimator of intracranial pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2018;44(8):1284–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Ocamoto GN, dasilva LN, da Silva Rocha Tomaz C, Hisatugu MT, Frigieri G, Cardim D, et al. Characterization of intracranial compliance in healthy subjects using a noninvasive method results from a multicenter prospective observational study. J Clin Monit Comput. 2024;38(6):1249–61.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  99. Czosnyka M, Czosnyka Z. Origin of intracranial pressure pulse waveform. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2020;162(8):1815–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-020-04424-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Liu W, Chen Z, Ortega D, Liu X, Huang X, Wang L, et al. Arterial elasticity, endothelial function and intracranial vascular health: A multimodal MRI study. J Cereb Blood Flow Metabol. 2021;41(6):1390–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. Jefferson AL, Cambronero FE, Liu D, Moore EE, Neal JE, Terry JG, et al. Higher aortic stiffness is related to lower cerebral blood flow and preserved cerebrovascular reactivity in older adults. Circulation. 2018;138(18):1951–62.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  102. Tarumi T, Shah F, Tanaka H, Haley AP. Association between central elastic artery stiffness and cerebral perfusion in deep subcortical gray and white matter. Am J Hypertens. 2011;24(10):1108–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Da Costa MM, Lima LM, Costa TO, Alves ACR, Correia MC, Vitorino PVO, et al. Intracranial pressure waveform and hypertension. J Hypertens. 2023;41(Suppl 3): e58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  104. Fernandes MV, Rosso Melo M, Mowry FE, Lucera GM, Lauar MR, Frigieri G, et al. Intracranial pressure during the development of renovascular hypertension. Hypertension. 2021;77(4):1311–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. Inuzuka S, Correia MC, Martins Da Costa M, Oliveira Costa T, De Oliveria Valverde, Vitorino P, De Toledo Vulcano, Piza P, et al. Original article non-invasive central blood pressure and intracranial waveform assessment in hypertensive patients a cross-sectional study. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2025;122(5):20240778. https://doi.org/10.36660/abc.20240778i.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  106. Palta P, Sharrett AR, Wei J, Meyer ML, Kucharska-Newton A, Power MC, et al. Central arterial stiffness is associated with structural brain damage and poorer cognitive performance: The ARIC study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.118.011045.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  107. Fico BG, Miller KB, Rivera-Rivera LA, Corkery AT, Pearson AG, Eisenmann NA, et al. The impact of aging on the association between aortic stiffness and cerebral pulsatility index. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022;9:9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  108. Sultan SR. The association of arterial pulse wave velocity with internal carotid artery blood flow in healthy subjects: a pilot study. Artery Res. 2024;30(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44200-024-00053-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  109. Zhou Y, Shang X, Tang W, Ni J. Estimated pulse wave velocity is associated with intracranial arterial stenosis: a secondary analysis based on a Korean population. Human Brain. 2023. https://doi.org/10.37819/hb.3.1777.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the support of the funding agencies: Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq).

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MCC, ARB, ARCC, and ROO wrote and participated in the design of the article. MHJL wrote the article. SI, ACO, MTAP, PVTP, and GF revised the article. WKSB designed, conceived, and revised the article.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mikaelle Costa Correia.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

GF declares that he is co-founder and scientific director of brain4care. The other authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

Not applicable

Consent for Publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

GF declares that he is co-founder and scientific director of brain4care. The other authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Correia, M.C., de Jesus Lima, M.H., Bitencourt, A.R. et al. Intracranial Pressure and Vascular Aging: A Narrative Review on its Role in Monitoring Cognitive Decline. Artery Res 31, 17 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44200-025-00085-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44200-025-00085-9

Keywords