User talk:Jeffrey34555
Index
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III. |
You can change
[edit]U can Change Governors, Lieutenant Governors, Administrators , Deputy Chief Minister, Leader of Opposition, Speaker & Chairman of Legislature like Chief Minister articles. @Jeffrey34555 லடாக்மாநிலம் (talk) 17:37, 27 May 2025 (UTC)
- Not sure what you're referring to. If you can bring up some articles, that'll be great. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 04:31, 28 May 2025 (UTC)
- Check List of current Indian governors, List of current Indian lieutenant governors and administrators, List of current Indian deputy chief ministers, List of current Indian opposition leaders,Category:Lists of legislative speakers in India லடாக்மாநிலம் (talk) 06:23, 28 May 2025 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, those were not discussed in an RM, so I can't move those. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 14:29, 28 May 2025 (UTC)
- Check List of current Indian governors, List of current Indian lieutenant governors and administrators, List of current Indian deputy chief ministers, List of current Indian opposition leaders,Category:Lists of legislative speakers in India லடாக்மாநிலம் (talk) 06:23, 28 May 2025 (UTC)
Why was Heinkel He 57 moved?
[edit]This was previously contested at WP:RM/TR and nobody except the nominator voted in support of the move at the RM. Please revert the move, ngrams are clear that the form "He" is more common. — Amakuru (talk) 20:57, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
- I'll revert the move, but please remember that I will close any move as WP:RMNOMIN if there hasn't been any discussion on it for 2 weeks. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 21:08, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks for the revert. But on a point of order, why would you "close any move" in such a fashion? Per WP:RMCIDC, your job as a closer is to assess the discussion and weigh it accordingly. "Consensus is determined not just by considering the preferences of the participants in a given discussion, but also by evaluating their arguments, assigning due weight accordingly, and giving due consideration to the relevant consensus of the Wikipedia community in general as reflected in applicable policy, guidelines and naming conventions". If there is no support for the move and the proposed title doesn't meet WP:AT, then it should be closed as "not moved" or "no consensus". In this case, I had clearly challenged the move at WP:RMTR, and the proposed title doesn't meet WP:COMMONNAME at all. Anyway, thanks again for reopening and wishing you a good weekend. — Amakuru (talk) 21:13, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
- Sorry, I didn't see that you challenged the move at WP:RMTR, and there was no indication on the RM that it was a contested technical move. I had absolutely zero idea that anyone even knew about the move but me and the proposer, and so closed it as "moved". Jeffrey34555 (talk) 21:19, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
- No worries, that's the problem with RM/TR I suppose, there's no link between discussions there and subsequent RMs, unless someone specifically clicks the "discuss" button from that page. Cheers — Amakuru (talk) 21:21, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
- Sorry, I didn't see that you challenged the move at WP:RMTR, and there was no indication on the RM that it was a contested technical move. I had absolutely zero idea that anyone even knew about the move but me and the proposer, and so closed it as "moved". Jeffrey34555 (talk) 21:19, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks for the revert. But on a point of order, why would you "close any move" in such a fashion? Per WP:RMCIDC, your job as a closer is to assess the discussion and weigh it accordingly. "Consensus is determined not just by considering the preferences of the participants in a given discussion, but also by evaluating their arguments, assigning due weight accordingly, and giving due consideration to the relevant consensus of the Wikipedia community in general as reflected in applicable policy, guidelines and naming conventions". If there is no support for the move and the proposed title doesn't meet WP:AT, then it should be closed as "not moved" or "no consensus". In this case, I had clearly challenged the move at WP:RMTR, and the proposed title doesn't meet WP:COMMONNAME at all. Anyway, thanks again for reopening and wishing you a good weekend. — Amakuru (talk) 21:13, 30 May 2025 (UTC)