Skip to content

ping: document differences from iputils-ping#3511

Merged
orangecms merged 1 commit intou-root:mainfrom
nebojsaj1726:ping/document-differences-from-iputils-ping
Feb 18, 2026
Merged

ping: document differences from iputils-ping#3511
orangecms merged 1 commit intou-root:mainfrom
nebojsaj1726:ping/document-differences-from-iputils-ping

Conversation

@nebojsaj1726
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Related to #3361, as discussed in #3510

Summary

  • Add description to package comment documenting how this implementation differs from iputils-ping

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov bot commented Feb 18, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 61.74%. Comparing base (89cbc04) to head (c3da035).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##           main    #3511       +/-   ##
=========================================
+ Coverage      0   61.74%   +61.74%     
=========================================
  Files         0      644      +644     
  Lines         0    43749    +43749     
=========================================
+ Hits          0    27014    +27014     
- Misses        0    16735    +16735     
Flag Coverage Δ
.-amd64 90.90% <ø> (?)
cmds/...-amd64 51.15% <ø> (?)
integration/generic-tests/...-amd64 30.91% <ø> (?)
integration/generic-tests/...-arm 33.01% <ø> (?)
integration/generic-tests/...-arm64 30.14% <ø> (?)
integration/gotests/...-amd64 61.74% <ø> (?)
integration/gotests/...-arm 62.23% <ø> (?)
integration/gotests/...-arm64 62.34% <ø> (?)
pkg/...-amd64 60.40% <ø> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Components Coverage Δ
everything 67.06% <ø> (∅)
cmds/exp 34.14% <ø> (∅)
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@orangecms orangecms merged commit acfa06b into u-root:main Feb 18, 2026
38 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants