ci: ensure that all workflows define permissions of the GITHUB_TOKEN#990
ci: ensure that all workflows define permissions of the GITHUB_TOKEN#990
Conversation
This is a missing good practice in some existing workflows, highlighted by CodeQL workflow runs.
tbouffard
added
the
chore
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@tbouffard has exceeded the limit for the number of commits that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 4 minutes and 41 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
WalkthroughTwo GitHub Actions workflows ( Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Fix all issues with AI agents
In @.github/workflows/build.yml:
- Around line 36-37: Align the YAML indentation for the permissions block: under
the existing permissions key, adjust the contents key (the line with contents:
read) so it uses the same indentation level as the permissions child keys used
elsewhere (six spaces relative to the file start) instead of the extra spaces;
update the permissions -> contents alignment to be consistent with the
repository's YAML style.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
.github/workflows/build.yml.github/workflows/generate-website.yml
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (1)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: tbouffard
Repo: maxGraph/maxGraph PR: 849
File: packages/html/stories/DragSource.stories.js:98-101
Timestamp: 2025-06-13T07:48:10.300Z
Learning: User tbouffard prefers answers in English; avoid switching to other languages in future replies.
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (4)
- GitHub Check: build (macos-14)
- GitHub Check: build (windows-2022)
- GitHub Check: build (ubuntu-24.04)
- GitHub Check: build
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/generate-website.yml (1)
46-47: LGTM! Good security practice.The explicit
contents: readpermission appropriately restricts the build job to read-only access, following the principle of least privilege. This is sufficient for all operations in this job (checkout, build, and artifact upload).
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
|
1 participant
This is a missing good practice in some existing workflows, highlighted by CodeQL workflow runs.
Summary by CodeRabbit
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.