-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
Expose 'User' property on ExecCreateCmd (#707) #708
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ public void afterMethod(ITestResult result) { | |
| public void execCreateTest() { | ||
| String containerName = "generated_" + new SecureRandom().nextInt(); | ||
|
|
||
| CreateContainerResponse container = dockerClient.createContainerCmd("busybox").withCmd("top") | ||
| CreateContainerResponse container = dockerClient.createContainerCmd("busybox").withUser("root").withCmd("top") | ||
|
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Add
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Please make separate test, root will be used by default afair.
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. found, depends on when param was added.
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Fair enough. I guess my thinking was that setting the user, even though it's the default, would show that it works as expected without having to create a new test for this one option.
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. ok, let's keep |
||
| .withName(containerName).exec(); | ||
|
|
||
| LOG.info("Created container {}", container.toString()); | ||
|
|
||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -1,24 +1,22 @@ | ||
| package com.github.dockerjava.core.command; | ||
|
|
||
| import static org.hamcrest.MatcherAssert.assertThat; | ||
| import static org.hamcrest.Matchers.isEmptyString; | ||
| import static org.hamcrest.Matchers.not; | ||
|
|
||
| import com.github.dockerjava.api.command.CreateContainerResponse; | ||
| import com.github.dockerjava.api.command.ExecCreateCmdResponse; | ||
| import com.github.dockerjava.api.exception.NotFoundException; | ||
| import com.github.dockerjava.client.AbstractDockerClientTest; | ||
| import java.io.InputStream; | ||
| import java.lang.reflect.Method; | ||
| import java.security.SecureRandom; | ||
|
|
||
| import static org.hamcrest.MatcherAssert.assertThat; | ||
| import static org.hamcrest.Matchers.isEmptyString; | ||
| import static org.hamcrest.Matchers.not; | ||
| import org.testng.ITestResult; | ||
| import org.testng.annotations.AfterMethod; | ||
| import org.testng.annotations.AfterTest; | ||
| import org.testng.annotations.BeforeMethod; | ||
| import org.testng.annotations.BeforeTest; | ||
| import org.testng.annotations.Test; | ||
|
|
||
| import com.github.dockerjava.api.command.CreateContainerResponse; | ||
| import com.github.dockerjava.api.command.ExecCreateCmdResponse; | ||
| import com.github.dockerjava.client.AbstractDockerClientTest; | ||
|
|
||
| @Test(groups = "integration") | ||
| public class ExecStartCmdImplTest extends AbstractDockerClientTest { | ||
| @BeforeTest | ||
|
|
@@ -53,7 +51,7 @@ public void execStart() throws Exception { | |
| dockerClient.startContainerCmd(container.getId()).exec(); | ||
|
|
||
| ExecCreateCmdResponse execCreateCmdResponse = dockerClient.execCreateCmd(container.getId()) | ||
| .withAttachStdout(true).withCmd("touch", "/execStartTest.log").exec(); | ||
| .withAttachStdout(true).withCmd("touch", "/execStartTest.log").withUser("root").exec(); | ||
|
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Added |
||
| dockerClient.execStartCmd(execCreateCmdResponse.getId()).exec( | ||
| new ExecStartResultCallback(System.out, System.err)).awaitCompletion(); | ||
|
|
||
|
|
@@ -92,4 +90,23 @@ public void execStartAttached() throws Exception { | |
| assertNotNull(responseAsString); | ||
| assertTrue(responseAsString.length() > 0); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @Test(groups = "ignoreInCircleCi", expectedExceptions = NotFoundException.class) | ||
|
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. where
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Not clear because last line in test is
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Things are not exactly clear here I admit and now I'm scratching my head wondering why I did things this way. Let me clean this up a bit along with the other minor changes.
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Ok so it's the below line that throws the NFE. My thinking was to remove everything below this line and keep the
|
||
| public void execStartWithNonExistentUser() throws Exception { | ||
|
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Test to show that using a non-existent name fails. |
||
| String containerName = "generated_" + new SecureRandom().nextInt(); | ||
|
|
||
| CreateContainerResponse container = dockerClient.createContainerCmd("busybox").withCmd("sleep", "9999") | ||
| .withName(containerName).exec(); | ||
| LOG.info("Created container {}", container.toString()); | ||
| assertThat(container.getId(), not(isEmptyString())); | ||
|
|
||
| dockerClient.startContainerCmd(container.getId()).exec(); | ||
|
|
||
| ExecCreateCmdResponse execCreateCmdResponse = dockerClient.execCreateCmd(container.getId()) | ||
| .withAttachStdout(true).withCmd("touch", "/execStartTest.log").withUser("NonExistentUser").exec(); | ||
| dockerClient.execStartCmd(execCreateCmdResponse.getId()).withDetach(false).withTty(true) | ||
| .exec(new ExecStartResultCallback(System.out, System.err)).awaitCompletion(); | ||
|
|
||
| dockerClient.copyArchiveFromContainerCmd(container.getId(), "/execStartTest.log").exec(); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Since what api version it appeared? existed all the time?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Merged for docker 1.7.0 which is analogous to api version 1.19.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could you put
@since?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Will do.