Skip to content

Generative docs#8

Open
Knerio wants to merge 15 commits intomainfrom
generate-docs
Open

Generative docs#8
Knerio wants to merge 15 commits intomainfrom
generate-docs

Conversation

@Knerio
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@Knerio Knerio commented Mar 29, 2026

No description provided.

@Knerio Knerio self-assigned this Mar 29, 2026
@Knerio Knerio changed the base branch from main to refactor-stuff March 29, 2026 19:48
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

github-actions bot commented Mar 29, 2026 •
edited
Loading

GitLab Pipeline Action

General information

Link to pipeline: https://gitlab.com/code0-tech/development/centaurus/-/pipelines/2426724815

Status: Passed
Duration: 1 minutes

Job summaries

docs:preview

Documentation preview available at https://code0-tech.gitlab.io/-/development/telescopium/-/jobs/13766484853/artifacts/out/index.html

@Knerio Knerio marked this pull request as draft March 29, 2026 19:56
@Knerio Knerio requested a review from nicosammito March 29, 2026 19:56
@Knerio Knerio force-pushed the generate-docs branch 2 times, most recently from 7b7052c to 1fcc7b1 Compare March 29, 2026 20:03
@Knerio Knerio force-pushed the generate-docs branch 2 times, most recently from 7f66100 to d3eef0f Compare March 30, 2026 20:50
@nicosammito nicosammito removed their request for review April 1, 2026 17:34
Base automatically changed from refactor-stuff to main April 2, 2026 09:51
@Knerio Knerio marked this pull request as ready for review April 2, 2026 18:34
@Knerio Knerio requested review from nicosammito April 2, 2026 18:34
@nicosammito nicosammito changed the title WIP: Generative docs Generative docs Apr 2, 2026
nicosammito
nicosammito requested changes Apr 4, 2026
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@nicosammito nicosammito left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Generally everything is fine, but we are missing docs for data types.

Every data type has this message on top: No documentation provided for this type.

And also the parameters for a FunctionDefinition should use the AutoTypeTable component.

@Knerio
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Knerio commented Apr 4, 2026

You are right, everything is missing docs, but i want to focus on implementing functionality and the structure not, the content of the documentation, thats an issue for later.
And the function shouldnt use the AutoTypeTable because stuff like

| Parameter | Name | Type | Required | Description |

Isnt possible with that, what should i change with the parameter, i think its perfectly fine, because they also link on complex data types

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@nicosammito nicosammito Awaiting requested review from nicosammito

Requested changes must be addressed to merge this pull request.

Assignees

@Knerio Knerio

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@Knerio @nicosammito