Fix README Markdownlint Validation Failures - #145
Conversation
To match other DSC modules
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## dev #145 +/- ##
===================================
Coverage 83% 83%
===================================
Files 19 19
Lines 2760 2760
Branches 4 4
===================================
Hits 2303 2303
Misses 453 453
Partials 4 4 |
Mike Hendrickson (mhendric)
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hi X-Guardian, sorry for taking so long to get to this one. Everything looks good, except the change entry in README now needs to be moved back into the 'Unreleased' section. Can you handle that when you get a chance? Thanks.
Reviewable status: 0 of 1 files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on Simon Heather (@X-Guardian))
README.md, line 610 at r2 (raw file):
* Fix README markdownlint validation failures
Can you move this entry into the Unreleased section?
Simon Heather (X-Guardian)
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Reviewable status: 0 of 1 files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on Mike Hendrickson (@mhendric))
README.md, line 610 at r2 (raw file):
Previously, mhendric (Mike Hendrickson) wrote…
* Fix README markdownlint validation failuresCan you move this entry into the Unreleased section?
Done.
Mike Hendrickson (mhendric)
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Reviewed 1 of 1 files at r3.
Reviewable status:complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved
Mike Hendrickson (mhendric)
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Reviewable status:
complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved
Pull Request (PR) description
This PR fixes the following markdownlint validation failures IN README.md that are reported in the current AppVeyor tests:
To fix
MD041, the build/code coverage information has been moved into a separateBranchessection to match the format of other DSC repository README layouts.This Pull Request (PR) fixes the following issues
None
Task list
Entry should say what was changed, and how that affects users (if applicable).
and comment-based help.
This change is