Skip to content

Mcp rename prefix from task_ to plan_#88

Merged
neoneye merged 2 commits intomainfrom
mcp-rename-task-prefix2
Feb 26, 2026
Merged

Mcp rename prefix from task_ to plan_#88
neoneye merged 2 commits intomainfrom
mcp-rename-task-prefix2

Conversation

@neoneye
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@neoneye neoneye commented Feb 26, 2026

No description provided.

neoneye and others added 2 commits February 26, 2026 13:50
All public MCP tool names are renamed:
  task_create     → plan_create
  task_status     → plan_status
  task_stop       → plan_stop
  task_retry      → plan_retry
  task_list       → plan_list
  task_file_info  → plan_file_info (cloud)
  task_download   → plan_download  (local)

The task_id UUID field name is intentionally unchanged.

Changes:
- mcp_cloud/tool_models.py: rename 18 Python classes (Task* → Plan*)
  with backward-compat aliases
- mcp_cloud/app.py: schema constants, ToolDefinition names, handler
  functions, TOOL_HANDLERS dict, server instructions
- mcp_cloud/http_server.py: imports, FastMCP wrapper functions,
  handler_map keys, payload.tool check
- mcp_local/planexe_mcp_local.py: schema constants, ToolDefinition
  names, handler functions, _call_remote_tool() calls, TOOL_HANDLERS,
  server instructions
- Test files: updated imports and string literal assertions (5 files)
- Docs: updated all tool name references (13 files)
- Proposal 73 status: Draft → Implemented

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <[email protected]>
@neoneye neoneye merged commit c3acf06 into main Feb 26, 2026
3 checks passed
@neoneye neoneye deleted the mcp-rename-task-prefix2 branch February 26, 2026 15:59
neoneye added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 9, 2026
Rule-based validation that audits distilled assumptions for common
failure modes: missing quantification, implausibly wide ranges (>100x
span ratio), and low-confidence claims without evidence references.
Runs as a pipeline task after DistillAssumptionsTask with no LLM calls.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <[email protected]>
neoneye added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 11, 2026
Mark #86, #62, #114-I4 as implemented. Note open PRs for #58,
#88, #94, #59. Update phase sequence with status indicators and
next priorities (114-I1, 114-I2).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant